Você está na página 1de 8

19574 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices

VI. Award Administration Information expiration of the award. This one-page Please read the complete Federal
report will be transmitted to OMB, and Register announcement before sending
VI.1a. Award Notices
be made available to the public via inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
Final awards cannot be made until OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
funds have been appropriated by part of ECA’s Federal Funding staff may not discuss this competition
Congress, allocated and committed Accountability and Transparency Act with applicants until the proposal
through internal Bureau procedures. (FFATA) reporting requirements. review process has been completed.
Successful applicants will receive an (3.) Quarterly program and financial
Assistance Award Document (AAD) reports that include information on the VIII. Other Information
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The progress made on the program plan and Notice: The terms and conditions
AAD and the original grant proposal program results to date. published in this RFGP are binding and may
with subsequent modifications (if Cooperating organizations will be not be modified by any Bureau
applicable) shall be the only binding required to provide reports analyzing representative. Explanatory information
authorizing document between the their evaluation findings to the Bureau provided by the Bureau that contradicts
recipient and the U.S. Government. The in their regular program reports. Please published language will not be binding.
AAD will be signed by an authorized refer to IV. Application and Submission Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an
Grants Officer, and mailed to the Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program award commitment on the part of the
recipient’s responsible officer identified Monitoring and Evaluation information. Government. The Bureau reserves the right to
All data collected, including survey reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets
in the application. in accordance with the needs of the program
Unsuccessful applicants will receive responses and contact information, must and the availability of funds. Awards made
notification of the results of the be maintained for a minimum of three will be subject to periodic reporting and
application review from the ECA years and provided to the Bureau upon evaluation requirements per section VI.3
program office coordinating this request. above.
competition. All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer Dated: April 3, 2008.
VI.2. Administrative and National listed in the final assistance award C. Miller Crouch,
Policy Requirements document. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary,Bureau
Terms and Conditions for the VI.4. Program Data Requirements
of Educational and Cultural
Administration of ECA agreements Affairs,Department of State.
include the following: Organizations awarded grants will be [FR Doc. E8–7630 Filed 4–9–08; 8:45 am]
Office of Management and Budget required to maintain specific data on BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for program participants and activities in an
Nonprofit Organizations.’’ electronically accessible database format
Office of Management and Budget that can be shared with the Bureau as DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following: [Public Notice 6171]
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles (1) Name, address, contact
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
for State, Local and Indian information and biographic sketch of all
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Governments’’. persons who travel internationally on
Proposals: Youth Exchange and Study
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised), funds provided by the grant or who
(YES) Program
Uniform Administrative Requirements benefit from the grant funding but do
for Grants and Agreements with not travel. Announcement Type: New Grant.
Institutions of Higher Education, (2) Itineraries of international and Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit domestic travel, providing dates of PE/C/PY–08–27.
Organizations. travel and cities in which any exchange
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform experiences take place. Final schedules Number: 00.000
Administrative Requirements for for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer Key Dates: September 1, 2008–
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
at least three work days prior to the September 30, 2011.
Governments.
official opening of the activity. Application Deadline: May 29, 2008.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
Executive Summary: The Office of
States, Local Government, and Non- VII. Agency Contacts Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
profit Organizations.
For questions about this Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
Please reference the following Web announcement, contact: Daniel Neher or announces an open competition for
sites for additional information: Catharine Cashner, Youth Programs grants to support exchanges and
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. Division, Office of Citizen Exchanges, relationship building between high
http://exchanges.state.gov/education/ Bureau of Educational and Cultural school students from countries with
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI. Affairs, ECA/PE/C/PY–08–39, U.S. significant Muslim populations and
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th people of the United States. Public and
VI.3. Reporting Requirements private non-profit organizations meeting
Street, SW., Room 568, Washington, DC
You must provide ECA with a hard 20547, Telephone (202) 453–8173 the provisions described in Internal
copy original plus two copies of the (Daniel) or (202) 453–8152 (Catharine), Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
following reports: Fax (202) 203–7529, E-mail: 501(c)(3) and public institutions may
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

(1.) A final program and financial neherde@state.gov or submit proposals to recruit and select
report no more than 90 days after the cashnerce@state.gov. students and to carry out projects for an
expiration of the award; All correspondence with the Bureau academic year or semester of study in
(2.) A concise, one-page final program concerning this RFGP should reference the United States, incorporating themes
report summarizing program outcomes the above title and number ECA/PE/C/ promoting civil society, leadership, and
no more than 90 days after the PY–08–39. mutual understanding.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:04 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices 19575

I. Funding Opportunity Description out since the program began with grants the month of August 2009 and remain
awarded in FY 2002 to bring students to for 10 or 11 months until their departure
Authority
the U.S. in the fall of 2003. The first during the period of mid-May to early
Overall grant making authority for competition for the YES program was July 2010. August post-arrival and June
this program is contained in the Mutual conducted in 2002 and grants awarded pre-departure orientations for students
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act were subsequently renewed in FY 2003 in Washington, DC at the beginning and
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as and FY 2004. The second competition end of the program are encouraged. If
amended, also known as the Fulbright- for grants to assist ECA in expanding the such orientations in Washington, DC are
Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to reach of the program was conducted in proposed, applicants must coordinate
enable the Government of the United FY 2005, and the grants awarded were travel and activity dates with ECA to
States to increase mutual understanding subsequently renewed in FY 2006 and allow opportunity for students to meet
between the people of the United States FY 2007. In this third competition, ECA with Department of State officials and
and the people of other countries * * *; encourages applicants to apply as it possibly with other groups of YES
to strengthen the ties which unite us continues expansion of the program students. For countries where the
with other nations by demonstrating the both in the number of students and the standard of English instruction does not
educational and cultural interests, number of countries participating. The provide an adequate qualified applicant
developments, and achievements of the YES program has grown incrementally pool, selected students requiring
people of the United States and other each year from approximately 165 additional language instruction may
nations * * * and thus to assist in the students from 11 countries in 2003–04 arrive earlier if additional preparation in
development of friendly, sympathetic to 850 students from over 30 countries the U.S. is necessary; alternatively,
and peaceful relations between the anticipated in 2008–09. applicants may propose in-country or
United States and the other countries of Through this open competition ECA third-country language preparation and
the world.’’ The funding authority for seeks to provide awards to fund orientation prior to the students’ arrival
the program above is provided through approximately 1,000 students from an in the U.S. During the exchange period,
legislation. expanded list of countries to participate students will participate in activities
in the program during the 2009–2010 designed to teach them about American
Purpose academic year. Applicants that have not community life and values, citizen
The Youth Exchange and Study (YES) participated in the YES program participation in a democracy, respect for
program is designed to foster a global previously are encouraged to view the diversity, and U.S. culture. Participants
community of shared interests and program’s Web site at: http:// will have opportunities to give
values developed through better mutual exchanges.state.gov/education/citizens/ presentations on their countries and
understanding via first-hand students/programs/yes.htm and to cultures in community forums.
participation of high school students, contact the Youth Division Program Therefore, students must be prepared
preferably aged 15–17, from countries Office representatives listed in this beforehand on how to present
with significant Muslim populations in solicitation. information on their home countries.
academic year or semester exchanges to ECA will accept proposals for either
Scope of Program, Timeline, and multiple-country or single-country
the United States. The program seeks to Applicant Infrastructure
select students with leadership programs. Applicants proposing
potential, to develop their leadership Funding for the YES program will multiple-country programs should
skills while in the U.S., and to support support academic year-long exchanges include in their appendices additional
them in alumni activities after they (between August 2009 and June 2010) country specific information about
return home. with students enrolled in accredited staffing, recruitment strategies, and
The overarching goals of the program U.S. schools and living with host details that may be unique to each
are to: families. Proposals for single semester country.
1. Promote better understanding by exchanges (fall 2009 or spring 2010) ECA will accept proposals from
youth from selected countries about may be proposed only for partner individual organizations with adequate
American society, people, institutions, countries where the academic year is infrastructure in both the U.S. and the
values and culture; not compatible with the U.S. academic partner country(ies) to conduct all
2. Foster lasting personal ties; calendar. aspects of the program, or from
3. Engage the exchange participants in It is anticipated that awards will be organizations that have formed
activities that advance mutual concluded in September 2008, with consortia with qualified organizations or
understanding, respect for diversity, marketing, recruitment, selection of representatives to implement specified
leadership skills, and understanding of students and exchange program tasks to complete the project. In the
civil society during their exchange in planning taking place throughout the latter case, the applicant must have a
the U.S.; 2008–2009 period. Grantees will be significant role in implementing either
4. Enhance Americans’ understanding required to incur expenses beginning the U.S. or overseas component of the
of the foreign students’ countries and before September 30, 2008. programs and meet all eligibility criteria
cultures; Given current U.S. visa processing discussed in this solicitation.
5. Increase the capacity of timelines in some countries, students Applicants may propose value-added
organizations in participating countries must be selected early enough to allow programming for students as long as it
to engage youth in activities that up to six months between the visa directly supports YES program
enhance mutual understanding, respect interview date and the date of departure objectives, themes, and goals, including
for diversity, leadership skills, and for students to obtain visas in time for full time school enrollment and
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

understanding of civil society through an August 2009 arrival. Grantees must enhancement activities related to the
alumni activities. work with the U.S. Embassy in each YES program mission. Examples could
country to ensure timely processing of include special workshops or student
Grant Funding History U.S. visas for all participants. projects focused on issues particularly
This initiative is intended to build on Most student participants will arrive relevant in the students’ home country
a solid foundation of exchanges carried in their U.S. host communities during or region.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
19576 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices

Applicants may not propose names Kuwait (18) host families, support of students
other than ‘‘Youth Exchange and Study’’ Lebanon (50) throughout the year, and follow-on
(YES) for their program, so that all Malaysia (40) alumni activities for returning students.
student participants and alumni will Mali (10) The responsibilities of grantees are
identify themselves first and foremost Morocco (25) described in further detail in the
with the YES program. All materials Nigeria (30) accompanying Program Objectives,
produced for grant activities should bear Oman (15) Goals, and Implementation (POGI)
the YES logo, acknowledge the Pakistan (70) document.
Department of State as the funding Philippines (40) • To recruit, select, and place high
source and reflect the State Qatar (7) school students from countries with
Department’s objectives for the program. Saudi Arabia (20) significant Muslim populations in
An exception to this requirement can Senegal (10) qualified, screened, and well-motivated
only be made upon agreement from ECA Tanzania (30) and financially-able host families.
and the U.S. Embassy in the respective Thailand (20) • To provide extensive orientation of
countries. Tunisia (20) students to the program prior to their
The YES program is for all students Turkey (40) coming to the U.S. English language
from countries with significant Muslim West Bank (15) training may also be provided to
populations. It is not, however, limited Yemen (35) encourage diversity in the selection pool
to Muslim students. It is ECA’s In addition to the these countries and as needed, to meet projected
expectation that the participants from currently involved in the YES program, recruitment levels.
each country will collectively reflect the ECA is requesting proposals to • To provide post-arrival, mid-year,
religious, ethnic, socio-economic, and implement the YES program in the and pre-departure orientations to
geographic diversity of their country, to following new countries, with students students to address program rules and
the extent possible. In order to support to participate for the first time in 2009– goals and to provide support to students
cross-cultural communication and 10. Again, an approximate target while in the U.S.
understanding, ECA encourages number of students is indicated for each • To place students in schools that
applicants to request funding for country. are accredited by the departments of
specially-skilled consultants. These education in the respective state.
Albania (15) • To expose program participants to
consultants will provide training for Bosnia and Herzegovina (15)
grantee staff and volunteers to develop American culture and civil society
Bulgaria (7)
printed and online resource materials through homestay experiences and
Burkina Faso (5)
that support the unique cultural needs enhancement activities that will enable
Cote d’Ivoire (5)
of their YES students, and offers them to attain a broad view of the
Gambia (10)
services such as an on-call resource for society and culture of the U.S.
Guinea (5) • To expose YES program
staff, volunteers, host and natural Guyana (5)
families, and to provide students with participants to opportunities for
Kosovo (7) volunteerism and community service
support. Macedonia (15)
that respond to the needs of the host
Eligible Countries Maldives (2)
community.
Mauritania (5) • To prepare YES program
The partner countries for this program Mozambique (5)
have been selected based on several participants to share their culture,
Niger (5) lifestyle, and traditions with U.S.
factors: (1) Foreign policy Sierra Leone (5)
considerations, (2) a favorable climate citizens throughout their stay and
Suriname (5) during special international events that
for exchange, and (3) anticipated Togo (5)
recruitment and placement capacity for highlight exchanges such as
Uganda (10) International Education Week and
students from the listed country. The
The Bureau reserves the right to Global Youth Service Day.
first list includes the countries that are
currently participating in the YES
amend this list at any time as conditions • To provide YES students with
change. Should an applicant have leadership training and opportunities
program. An approximate target number
questions in regards to countries on this that will foster skills they can take back
of students is indicated for each country
list or an interest in proposing an with them and use in their home
based on the experience of previous
exchange with additional countries not countries.
years and/or anticipated capacities for
successful recruitment and placement.
on this list, please contact the Bureau. • To provide activities that will
(See Section IV.1 for contact increase and enhance students’
Proposals should be for at least the
information.) understanding of the importance of
targeted number:
Only one organization will be tolerance and respect for the views,
Afghanistan (50) awarded a grant to implement the beliefs, and practices of others in a
Bahrain (10) program in each country.
Bangladesh (40) diverse society.
Brunei (10) • To develop alumni databases and
General Responsibilities
Egypt (50) create alumni programs giving
Ethiopia (10) The grantee organization will be opportunities for returning students to
Gaza (10) responsible for all aspects of the YES incorporate their knowledge and skills
Ghana (25) Program’s implementation, including into service in their home countries.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

India (45) marketing, recruitment, and selection of Through participation in the YES
Indonesia (100) students, procurement of U.S. visas and program, students should:
Iraq (20) transit visas as required, transportation 1. Acquire an understanding of
Israel (Arab Communities) (20) to and from the U.S., host family and important elements of a civil society.
Jordan (30) school placement of students, This includes concepts such as
Kenya (20) orientations of students, natural and volunteerism, the idea that American

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices 19577

citizens can and do act at the grassroots orientation in the spring of 2010 as well provided (consulting and enhancement
level to deal with societal problems, and as on-going support throughout the year activities), and in-country factors that
an awareness of and respect for the rule for the students with disabilities. These may impact costs.
of law. orientations are in addition to general Pending successful implementation of
2. Develop an appreciation for orientations required to be conducted by this program and the availability of
American culture, an understanding of the recipients of this grant who will also funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
the diversity of American society and be expected to assist in accommodating ECA’s intent to renew this grant for two
increased respect for diversity, and for the timing of these special additional fiscal years, before openly
appreciation for others with differing orientations. competing it again.
views, beliefs and practices. 6. All exchange participants must
3. Interact with Americans and III. Eligibility Information
travel on J–1 visas using DS–2019s
generate enduring ties. issued by the ECA program office under III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
4. Teach Americans about the cultures its program designation. may be submitted by public and private
of their home countries. 7. Applicants should reflect an non-profit organizations meeting the
5. Gain leadership capacity that will understanding of the related youth work provisions described in Internal
enable them to initiate and support of various international agencies in the Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
activities in their home countries that proposed country(ies), such as the U.S. 501(c)(3).
focus on development and community Agency for International Development, III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
service in their role as YES alumni. World Bank, non-governmental There is no minimum or maximum
organizations (NGOs) working with percentage required for this
Further Considerations
youth, and development foundations as competition. However, the Bureau
1. There is no minimum or maximum a way to enhance alumni programming encourages applicants to provide
number of students that may be selected and provide participants with resources maximum levels of cost sharing and
and placed by one organization; and support when they return home. funding in support of its programs.
however cost effectiveness will be a 8. Projects should promote youth When cost sharing is offered, it is
review criterion in all applications. It is awareness of and involvement in civic understood and agreed that the
anticipated that approximately 5–7 and democratic processes, including applicant must provide the amount of
grants will be awarded for the YES respect for diversity, accountability of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
program. Placements may be in any government, human rights, and and later included in an approved grant
region in the U.S. Strong preference will inclusiveness of women, people with agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
be given to organizations that choose to disabilities, and minorities. Proposals form of allowable direct or indirect
place participants in clusters of at least may include small grants to encourage costs. For accountability, you must
three ECA funded academic year alumni to utilize what they have learned maintain written records to support all
students to facilitate program while on the exchange upon their return costs which are claimed as your
enhancement activities. Applicants to their home countries to promote civic contribution, as well as costs to be paid
must demonstrate that training of local education projects and community by the Federal government. Such
staff ensures their competence in development and community service records are subject to audit. The basis
providing culture and YES-specific initiatives. for determining the value of cash and
orientation programs, appropriate 9. Proposals must contain letters of in-kind contributions must be in
enhancement activities, and quality commitment from any foreign or accordance with OMB Circular A–110
supervision and counseling of students domestic partners to be involved in the (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
from participating countries. Please program, and these letters should be and Matching. In the event you do not
refer to the Solicitation Package for tailored to the activities being proposed. provide the minimum amount of cost
details on essential program elements, Please refer to the Solicitation sharing as stipulated in the approved
permissible costs, and criteria used to Package for further information, budget, ECA’s contribution will be
select students. especially the Project Objectives, Goals reduced in like proportion.
2. ECA anticipates grants beginning and Implementation (POGI) and the III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
no later than September 2008. Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI). (a.) Grants awarded to eligible
3. Administration of the YES program organizations with less than four years
must be in compliance with reporting II. Award Information of experience in conducting
and withholding regulations for federal, Type of Award: Grant Agreement. international exchange programs will be
state, and local taxes as applicable. Fiscal Year Funds: 2008. limited to $60,000. Since the minimum
4. Applicants should submit the Approximate Total Funding: award is set at $150,000, proposals from
health and accident insurance plans $18,700,000. organizations with less than four years
they intend to use for students on this Approximate Number of Awards: 5–7. of experience in conducting
program. Insurance can be provided Approximate Average Award: international exchange programs are
through ECA’s Accident and Sickness $4,500,000. ineligible to apply under this
Program for Exchanges (ASPE) policy, Floor of Award Range: $150,000. competition.
however, if use of a grantee’s private Ceiling of Award Range: $9,000,000. (b.) Technical Eligibility: All
plan is proposed, the insurance Anticipated Award Date: proposals must comply with the
coverage must be of equal or greater Approximately September 1, 2008. following, or they may be declared
value. Anticipated Project Completion Date: technically ineligible and given no
5. All grantees are required to make September 30, 2011. further consideration in the review
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

an effort to recruit and include students Additional Information: The process:


with disabilities in the exchange. The anticipated per participant cost is • Proposed programs must include
ECA Program Office intends to award a expected to be between $16,000 and full-time U.S. high school enrollment
grant to a separate organization to $19,000 within each grant depending on for a semester or full academic year;
provide a special arrival orientation (in the number of countries, number of • Proposed programs may not involve
August 2009) and a pre-departure students per country, special programs multiple year exchanges or exchanges to

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
19578 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices

take place other than within the dates of agreement from the U.S. Government. assistance necessary to enable the
August 2009 and June 2010; This number is a nine-digit Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
• Proposals must identify essential identification number, which uniquely part 62 et. seq.
partners and include letters of identifies business entities. Obtaining a The Bureau of Educational and
commitment from partners critical to DUNS number is easy and free of Cultural Affairs places great emphasis
the implementation of the program. charge. To obtain a DUNS number, on the secure and proper administration
access http:// of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
IV. Application and Submission
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1– and adherence by grantee program
Information
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your organizations and program participants
Note: Please read the complete DUNS number is included in the to all regulations governing the J visa
announcement before sending inquiries or appropriate box of the SF–424 which is program status. Therefore, proposals
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP part of the formal application package. should explicitly state in writing that the
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not IV.3b. All proposals must contain an applicant is prepared to assist the
discuss this competition with applicants executive summary, proposal narrative Bureau in meeting all requirements
until the proposal review process has been and budget. Please refer to the governing the administration of
completed. Solicitation Package. It contains the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth
IV.1. Contact Information to Request mandatory Proposal Submission in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization
an Application Package: Please contact Instructions (PSI) document and the has experience as a designated
Matt O’Rourke at ECA/PE/C/PY, U.S. Project Objectives, Goals and Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th Implementation (POGI) document for applicant should discuss their record of
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, additional formatting and technical compliance with 22 CFR 62 et seq.,
telephone: 202–453–8170 or requirements. including the oversight of their
ORourkeMM@state.gov to request a IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status Responsible Officers and Alternate
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the with the IRS at the time of application. Responsible Officers, screening and
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/ Please note: Effective March 14, 2008, all selection of program participants,
C/PY–08–27 located at the top of this applicants for ECA federal assistance awards provision of pre-arrival information and
announcement when making your must include with their application, a copy orientation to participants, monitoring
request. of page 5, Part V-A, ‘‘Current Officers, of participants, proper maintenance and
Alternatively, an electronic Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees’’ of security of forms, record-keeping,
application package may be obtained their most recent Internal Revenue Service reporting and other requirements.
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f (IRS) Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
Exempt From Income Tax.’’
for further information. ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
The Solicitation Package contains the If your organization is a private 2019 forms to participants in this
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI) nonprofit which has not received a grant program.
document which consists of required or cooperative agreement from ECA in A copy of the complete regulations
application forms, and standard the past three years, or if your governing the administration of
guidelines for proposal preparation. It organization received nonprofit status Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
also contains the Project Objectives, from the IRS within the past four years, available at http://exchanges.state.gov
Goals and Implementation (POGI) you must submit the necessary or from: United States Department of
document, which provides specific documentation to verify nonprofit status State, SA–44, Office of Exchange
information, award criteria and budget as directed in the PSI document. Failure Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/
instructions tailored to this competition. to do so will cause your proposal to be ECD, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
For other inquiries and declared technically ineligible. Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
correspondence please contact Kevin IV.3d. Please take into consideration (202) 203–5029, Fax: (202) 453–8640.
Baker, Program Officer, tel.: 202–453– the following information when IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
8153 or email: BakerKM1@state.gov and preparing your proposal narrative: Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
refer to Funding Opportunity Number IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
ECA/PE/C/PY–08–27 that is also located Governing the J Visa programs must maintain a non-political
at the top of this announcement. The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the character and should be balanced and
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Bureau of Educational and Cultural representative of the diversity of
Package Via Internet: The entire Affairs is the official program sponsor of American political, social, and cultural
Solicitation Package may be the exchange program covered by this life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau in the broadest sense and encompass
at http://exchanges.state.gov/education/ will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the differences including, but not limited to
rfgps/menu.htm or from the Grants.gov program under the terms of 22 CFR part ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
Web site at http://www.grants.gov. 62, which covers the administration of geographic location, socio-economic
Please read all information before the Exchange Visitor Program (J-visa status, and disabilities. Applicants are
downloading. program). Under the terms of 22 CFR strongly encouraged to adhere to the
IV.3. Content and Form of part 62, organizations receiving grants advancement of this principle both in
Submission: Applicants must follow all under this RFGP will be third parties program administration and in program
instructions in the Solicitation Package. ‘‘cooperating with or assisting the content. Please refer to the review
The application should be submitted sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
per the instructions under IV.3f. program.’’ The actions of grantee section for specific suggestions on
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of program organizations shall be incorporating diversity into your
Submission’’ section below. ‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
and Bradstreet Data Universal part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects educational and cultural exchange in
Numbering System (DUNS) number to that any organization receiving a grant countries whose people do not fully
apply for a grant or cooperative under this competition will render all enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices 19579

Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to We encourage you to assess the both administrative and program
provide opportunities for participation following four levels of outcomes, as budgets. Applicants may provide
in such programs to human rights and they relate to the program goals set out separate sub-budgets for each program
democracy leaders of such countries.’’ in the RFGP (listed here in increasing component, phase, location, or activity
Public Law 106–113 requires that the order of importance): to provide clarification.
governments of the countries described 1. Participant satisfaction with the IV.3e.2. Required and allowable costs
above do not have inappropriate program and exchange experience. are provided in the accompanying
influence in the selection process. 2. Participant learning, such as POGI. Please refer to the Solicitation
Proposals should reflect advancement of increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, Package for complete budget guidelines
these goals in their program contents, to and changed understanding and and formatting instructions.
the full extent deemed feasible. attitude. Learning includes both IV.3.f. Application Deadline and
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and substantive (subject-specific) learning Methods of Submission: Application
Evaluation: Proposals must include a and mutual understanding. Deadline Date: May 29, 2008.
plan to monitor and evaluate the 3. Participant behavior, concrete Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
project’s success, both as the activities actions to apply knowledge in work or 08–27.
unfold and at the end of the program. community; greater participation and Methods of Submission—Applications
The Bureau recommends that your responsibility in civic organizations; may be submitted in one of two ways:
proposal include a draft survey interpretation and explanation of (1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
questionnaire or other technique plus a experiences and new knowledge gained; recognized overnight delivery service
description of a methodology to use to continued contacts between (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
link outcomes to original project participants, community members, and Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
objectives. The Bureau expects that the others. Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
grantee will track participants or 4. Institutional changes, such as (2.) Electronically through http://
partners and be able to respond to key increased collaboration and www.grants.gov.
evaluation questions, including partnerships, policy reforms, new Along with the Project Title, all
satisfaction with the program, learning programming, and organizational applicants must enter the above
as a result of the program, changes in improvements. Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
behavior as a result of the program, and Please note: Consideration should be given 424 contained in the mandatory
effects of the program on institutions to the appropriate timing of data collection Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
(institutions in which participants work for each level of outcome. For example, of the solicitation document.
satisfaction is usually captured as a short- IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
or partner institutions). The evaluation term outcome, whereas behavior and
plan should include indicators that institutional changes are normally
Applications:
measure gains in mutual understanding considered longer-term outcomes. Applications must be shipped no later
as well as substantive knowledge. than the above deadline. Delivery
Overall, the quality of your services used by applicants must have
Successful monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation plan will be
depend heavily on setting clear goals in-place, centralized shipping
judged on how well it (1) specifies identification and tracking systems that
and outcomes at the outset of a program. intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
Your evaluation plan should include a may be accessed via the Internet and
descriptions of how each outcome will delivery people who are identifiable by
description of your project’s objectives, be measured; (3) identifies when
your anticipated project outcomes, and commonly recognized uniforms and
particular outcomes will be measured; delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
how and when you intend to measure and (4) provides a clear description of
these outcomes (performance or before the above deadline but
the data collection strategies for each received at ECA more than seven days
indicators). The more that outcomes are outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, after the deadline will be ineligible for
focus groups). (Please note that further consideration under this
attainable, results-oriented, and placed evaluation plans that deal only with the
in a reasonable time frame), the easier competition.
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will Proposals shipped after the
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You be deemed less competitive under the
should also show how your project established deadlines are ineligible for
present evaluation criteria.) consideration under this competition.
objectives link to the goals of the Grantees will be required to provide
program described in this RFGP. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
reports analyzing their evaluation
Your monitoring and evaluation plan application. It is each applicant’s
findings to the Bureau in their regular
should clearly distinguish between responsibility to ensure that each
program reports. All data collected,
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs package is marked with a legible
including survey responses and contact
are products and services delivered, tracking number and to monitor/confirm
information, must be maintained for a
often stated as an amount. Output delivery to ECA via the Internet.
minimum of three years and provided to
information is important to show the Delivery of proposal packages may not
the Bureau upon request.
scope or size of project activities, but it be made via local courier service or in
Describe your plans for sustainability,
cannot substitute for information about person for this competition. Faxed
overall program management, staffing,
progress towards outcomes or the documents will not be accepted at any
coordination with ECA and PAS or any
results achieved. Examples of outputs time. Only proposals submitted as
other requirements etc.
include the number of people trained or IV.3e. Please take the following stated above will be considered.
the number of seminars conducted. information into consideration when Important note: When preparing your
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Outcomes, in contrast, represent preparing your budget: submission please make sure to include one
specific results a project is intended to IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
achieve and is usually measured as an comprehensive budget for the entire place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
extent of change. Findings on outputs program. Awards may not exceed EX/PM’’.
and outcomes should both be reported, $9,000,000. There must be a summary The original and seven (7) copies of
but the focus should be on outcomes. budget as well as breakdowns reflecting the application should be sent to: U.S.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
19580 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices

Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of Grants.gov in their entirety. ECA bears exchange and after the participants
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.: no responsibility for data errors return home. Proposals should provide
ECA/PE/C/PY–08–27, Program resulting from transmission or a plan for continued contact with
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, conversion processes. alumni to ensure that they are tracked
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of over time, utilized and/or organized as
20547. Applications: Executive Order 12372 alumni, and provided opportunities to
Applicants submitting hard-copy does not apply to this program. reinforce the knowledge and skills they
applications must also submit the acquired on the exchange and share
‘‘Executive Summary’’, ‘‘Proposal V. Application Review Information them with others.
Narrative’’, ‘‘Budget’’ and ‘‘Budget V.1. Review Process 3. Support of Diversity: Proposals
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal should demonstrate substantive support
The Bureau will review all proposals
electronically. ECA will provide these of the Bureau’s policy on diversity in all
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
files to the respective Public Affairs program aspects including participants
Section at each U.S. embassy for their be deemed ineligible if they do not fully (exchange students and hosts), sending
review. adhere to the guidelines stated herein and hosting communities, as well as
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic and in the Solicitation Package. All content of orientation and program
Applications: eligible proposals will be reviewed by activities. Proposals should articulate a
Applicants have the option of the program office, as well as to the diversity plan, not just a statement of
submitting proposals electronically appropriate Public Affairs Section compliance.
through Grants.gov (http:// overseas. Eligible proposals will be 4. Institutional Record/Capacity:
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation subject to compliance with Federal and Proposed personnel and institutional
packages are available at Grants.gov in Bureau regulations and guidelines and resources should be adequate and
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system. Please forwarded to Bureau grant panels for appropriate to achieve the program’s
follow the instructions available in the advisory review. Proposals may also be goals. Proposals for infrastructure
‘Get Started’ portion of the site (http:// reviewed by the Office of the Legal building should convincingly describe
www.grants.gov/GetStarted). Several of Adviser or by other Department the need and the plan to address that
the steps in the Grants.gov registration elements. Final funding decisions are at need in specific terms (e.g., staffing,
process could take several weeks. the discretion of the Department of staff training, equipping and
Therefore, applicants should check with State’s Assistant Secretary for maintaining an office). The plan should
appropriate staff within their Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final demonstrate a thorough understanding
organizations immediately after technical authority for assistance of local requirements for establishing
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or awards grants resides with the Bureau’s and registering an NGO, if necessary.
determine their registration status with Grants Officer. Proposals should demonstrate an
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount Review Criteria institutional record of successful
of time it can take to upload an exchange programs, including
application will vary depending on a Technically eligible applications will responsible fiscal management and full
variety of factors including the size of be competitively reviewed according to compliance with all reporting
the application and the speed of your the criteria stated below. These criteria requirements for past ECA grants as
internet connection. Therefore, we are not rank ordered and all carry equal determined by ECA Grant Staff. ECA
strongly recommend that you not wait weight in the proposal evaluation: will consider the past performance of
until the application deadline to begin 1. Quality of the program idea and prior recipients and the demonstrated
the submission process through planning: Proposals should exhibit potential of new applicants.
Grants.gov. Direct all questions originality, substance, precision, and 5. Project Evaluation: The proposal
regarding Grants.gov registration and relevance to the Bureau’s mission and narrative must demonstrate how the
submission to: Grants.gov Customer the purposes outlined in the applicant plans to assess the program’s
Support, Contact Center Phone: 800– solicitation. Detailed agenda and success in achieving program objectives
518–4726. Business Hours: Monday– relevant work plan should demonstrate and efficient operations, and what
Friday, 7 a.m.–9 p.m. EST. E-mail: the ability to ensure that the proposed instruments will be employed to
support@grants.gov. project accomplishes the stated evaluate the program. Applicants may
Applicants have until midnight (12 objectives in the desired time frame. describe any experience conducting
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the Proposals should demonstrate how results-oriented evaluations. Successful
closing date to ensure that their entire students will be recruited, selected, applicants will demonstrate clear
application has been uploaded to the monitored, trained and prepared for program goals and objectives as well as
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions their role as YES alumni. The level of strategies for monitoring student and
to the above deadline. Applications creativity, resources, and effectiveness alumni progress. Grantees are also
uploaded to the site after midnight of will be primary factors for review. expected to submit quarterly reports
the application deadline date will be Proposals should be clearly and that include student and alumni
automatically rejected by the Grants.gov accurately written, with sufficient, activities and progress.
system, and will be technically relevant detail. The Narrative should 6. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-Sharing:
ineligible. address all of the items in the Statement The overhead and administrative
Applicants will receive a of Work and Guidelines described components of the proposal, including
confirmation e-mail from Grants.gov above. salaries and honoraria, should be kept
upon the successful submission of an 2. Multiplier effect/Follow-on as low as possible. All other items
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

application. ECA will not notify you activities: Proposed programs should should be necessary and appropriate.
upon receipt of electronic applications. strengthen long-term mutual Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
It is the responsibility of all understanding, including maximum through institutional direct funding
applicants submitting proposals via the sharing of information and contributions, as well as other private
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that establishment of long-term institutional sector support. Preference will be given
proposals have been received by and individual ties both during the to organizations whose proposals

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Notices 19581

demonstrate a quality, cost-effective Hospitals, and other Nonprofit deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
program. Organizations. not discuss this competition with
7. Value to U.S.-Partner Country OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform applicants until the proposal review
Relations: Proposals should indicate Administrative Requirements for process has been completed.
how the program is of value to U.S. and Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
VIII. Other Information
partner countries’ interests, and receive Governments.
positive assessments by the U.S. OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of Notice
Department of State’s geographic area States, Local Government, and Non-
The terms and conditions published
desks and overseas officers of program profit Organizations.
in this RFGP are binding and may not
need, potential impact, and significance Please reference the following Web
be modified by any Bureau
in the partner countries. sites for additional information: http://
representative. Explanatory information
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
VI. Award Administration Information provided by the Bureau that contradicts
http://exchanges.state.gov/education/
published language will not be binding.
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You Issuance of the RFGP does not
cannot be made until funds have been constitute an award commitment on the
appropriated by Congress, allocated and must provide ECA with one hard copy
original plus one copy of the following part of the Government. The Bureau
committed through internal Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
procedures. Successful applicants will reports:
Mandatory: increase proposal budgets in accordance
receive an Assistance Award Document with the needs of the program and the
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office. 1. Monthly school and housing
placement reports of the students availability of funds. Awards made will
The AAD and the original grant be subject to periodic reporting and
proposal with subsequent modifications should be provided in the Excel
spreadsheet format provided by ECA. evaluation requirements per section VI.3
(if applicable) shall be the only binding above.
authorizing document between the 2. A final program and financial
recipient and the U.S. Government. The report no more than 90 days after the Dated: April 3, 2008.
AAD will be signed by an authorized expiration of the award; C. Miller Crouch,
Grants Officer, and mailed to the 3. A concise, one-page final program Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
recipient’s responsible officer identified report summarizing program outcomes of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
in the application. no more than 90 days after the Department of State.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive expiration of the award. This one-page [FR Doc. E8–7631 Filed 4–9–08; 8:45 am]
notification of the results of the report will be transmitted to OMB, and BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
application review from the ECA be made available to the public via
program office coordinating this OMB’s USAspending.gov website—as
competition. part of ECA’s Federal Funding DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
All awards made under this Accountability and Transparency Act
competition must be executed according (FFATA) reporting requirements. Federal Highway Administration
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies Grantees will be required to provide
regarding assistance to the Palestinian reports analyzing their evaluation Environmental Impact Statement: Salt
Authority, and to the West Bank and findings to the Bureau in their regular Lake and Davis Counties, UT
Gaza. Organizations submitting program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission AGENCY: Federal Highway
proposals for this competition must Administration (FHWA), DOT.
consult with relevant Public Affairs Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information. ACTION: Notice of Termination.
Offices before entering into any formal
arrangements or agreements with All data collected, including survey
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
Palestinian organizations or institutions. responses and contact information, must
notice to advise the public that the effort
be maintained for a minimum of three
Note: To assure that planning for the to prepare an Environmental Impact
years and provided to the Bureau upon
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority Statement (EIS) for transportation
request.
complies with requirements, please contact All reports must be sent to the ECA improvements in the I–15 North
Kevin Baker, Program Officer, telephone
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer Corridor from downtown Salt Lake City
(202) 453–8153 or BakerKM1@state.gov for to Kaysville will be terminated.
additional information. listed in the final assistance award
document. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
VI.2. Administrative and National project was initiated in 1997 and was a
Policy Requirements: Terms and VII. Agency Contacts companion project to the Legacy
Conditions for the Administration of For questions about this Parkway EIS. Portions of the I–15 North
ECA agreements include the following: announcement, contact: Kevin Baker, Corridor and the Legacy Parkway
Office of Management and Budget Program Officer, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room project study areas overlapped and
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for 220, Ref. Nr. ECA/PE/C/PY–08–27, U.S. results of environmental studies
Nonprofit Organizations.’’ Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th performed for the I–15 North Corridor
Office of Management and Budget Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, tel. project were utilized in the Legacy
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for 202–453–8153 or e-mail: Parkway EIS. Due to litigation on the
Educational Institutions.’’ BakerKM1@state.gov. Legacy Parkway project, the I–15 North
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles All correspondence with the Bureau Corridor Project was placed on hold.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

for State, Local and Indian concerning this RFGP should reference There were no federal funds used for the
Governments’’. the program title and the corresponding I–15 North Corridor EIS project. There
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised), Reference number. are no immediate plans for substantial
Uniform Administrative Requirements Please read the complete improvements in the I–15 North
for Grants and Agreements with announcement before sending inquiries Corridor; therefore the EIS for the North
Institutions of Higher Education, or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP Corridor Project will be terminated.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Apr 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM 10APN1

Você também pode gostar