Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2011-Version 2b
DVB-T deployed
DVB-T adopted
DVB-T2 adopted
ISDB-T deployed
ISDB-T adopted
CTTB, CMMB (China)
ATSC, T-DMB (Korea)
ATSC, ATSC M/H
This landscape may seem, at first glance, as a nightmare for chipset and
device manufacturers who must invest significant amounts of money
to develop devices for each standard with a relatively limited market
opportunity. However a comparative analysis of the DTT standards
structures shows that there is more convergence than it would appear
to be at first. Despite this so-called fragmented Broadcast World, it is
possible to find strong commonalities between the various standards
thus allowing manufacturers to implement all these standards into a
single programmable chip with minimum overhead costs as what has
been previously done with modulators chipsets.
Most of the DTT standards use the same frequency band, and the
RF + Filters + A/D
Demodulation / Equalization
(VSP)
M-QAM : 2 to 256
SC; COFDM
FFT : 0.25k to 32k
Diversity
Channel Decoding
(Distributed CPUs + HW blocks)
Inner FEC: Turbo Codes, LDPC, Treillis,..
Outer FEC : RS, BCH,..
De-Interleavers
Interfaces
+ Control
+ CAS
In order to facilitate the comparison between all the DTT standards, the set of configurable parameters (M-QAM, FFT size, Guard Interval,
Inner and Outer codes rates, bandwidth) are listed in columns in the next two pages, together with the bit rate calculation formulas. In
addition, the last column shows that some standards offer the possibility of In-band Mobile TV applications thanks to availability of subchannels or Multi-Pipes.
In practice, the last table synthesizes the performances of the most used DTT configuration in the World and a final graph compares their
spectrum efficiency versus the carrier-to-noise signal C/N required.
Standards
DVB-T
ISDB-T nSEG
n = [1,2,.,13]
CMMB
4k; 8MHz
CMMB
1k; 2MHz
FFT
2k
8k
2k
4k
8k
Inner FEC
6.75
BW
X
(1 + GI ) 8
GI= {1/32;1/16;1/8;1/4}
8n
BW
X
21(1 + GI )
6
BW= {6,8}
Gi =
420
.
1
=
3780
9
CTTB (DTMB)
PN595
or
GI =
595
17
=
3780
108
CTTB (DTMB)
PN945
C= 3780
(4k)
GI =
945
1
=
3780
4
7.488
.
BW
8
BW
8
(1 + GI )
7.488
.
(1 + GI )
DVB-T2 Lite
ATSC
Single
Carrier
10.6762774 X
LDPC
Single
Carrier
Radio/TV
Standards
FFT
DVB-SHA
DAB
DAB+
TDMB
0,25k
0,5k
1k
2k
BCH = 1
8n
188
BW
CR
log 2 (M )
21(1 + GI ) 6
204
Yes
13 SEG
M= {2, 4, 16}
log2(M)
SEG parameters :
(M; CR; I, NSEG)
M= {2, 4, 16}
log2(M)
log2(M)
(Nbch Kbch)
log2(M)
Nldpc LDPC
Idem
DVB-T2
2/3
187/207
Yes
40 slots
PLP parameters :
(M; CR; I, Nslots)
SEG = Segment
SC = Single Carriers
Du = Data User Rate
No
Du_Max=
32.5 Mbit/s
Du_Max=
32.5 Mbit/s
Na
BW
Note :
Does not include the P1 and P2 overhead (~ -0.3%)
See 6.3 of DVB Bluebook A133 ( Implementation
Guideline for DVB-T2)
Na
BW
log2(M)
Yes
PLP parameters :
(M; CR; I, bit rate)
FFT & PP
can be different in
DVB-T2 and DVB-T2 Lite
frames
19.289506
No
M= 8
Log2(M)= 3
Inner FEC
{ 1/5; 2/9; 1/4; 2/7; 1/3 ;
2/5 ;1/2; 2/3 }
BW[MHz]=
{1.7; 5; 8}
1.7 for 1k only
BW
1.712
CR
CR_Viterbi :
log2(M)
RS
FEC Padding
Ncu 188
816 189
Tc
Ncu
2/7
798
1/4; 1/2
816
others
810
1
Yes
Data_rate (Mbit/s)
log2(M)= 3
1.152 X
SCCC
6.75
1k
2k
4k
8k
BW
6
(1 + GI )
No
Acronyms
BW= 6 MHz
ATSC-MH
/CMM
7.488
.
BW
LDPC log 2 (M )
u
1 GI 8
BW[MHz]=
{1.7; 5; 6;
7; 8}
6.75
188
BW
CR
log 2 (M )
(1 + GI ) 8
204
M= {2, 4, 16}
LDPC + BCH
Na
BW
X
8
112 FFT (1 + GI )
2k
4k
8k
16k
240
{1/2; 3/4}
BW= 2MHz
C=1
(Single
carrier)
LDPC
1.092096
CTTB (DTMB)
PN420
DVB-T2
Viterbi (CR)
BW= 8MHz
Du_1k= Du_ 4k / 5
1k
2k
4k
8k
16k
32k
188
204
{1/2; 3/4}
39 x 0.13824 + 0.06912
Data_rate (Mbit/s)
log2(M)
Reed-Solomon
M-QAM
188
204
Viterbi (CR)
5.46048
1k
4k
Outer FEC
Outer FEC
M-QAM
log2(M)
6.75
(1 + GI )
BW
Ncu 188
TC
log 2 (M )
8
816 189
No
M= {4;16}
RS
log2(M)= 2
M= 4
D - QPSK
2304
p CR RS 1000 p
p = 8 for Long_A
p = 32 for Long_B
. = integer part
Yes
Sub-channels
parameters:
(CR, bit rate)
In the following table the previous formulas are used to calculate the bit rate of most used DTT configurations used in the World. Some
specified/measured values of C/N (Gaussian and TU6@10Hz Doppler) are also given in the last columns.
FEC
Standards
DVB-T
ISDB-T
Layer A
NSEG=1
Layer B
NSEG=12
Layer A
NSEG=1
Layer B
NSEG=12
Du [Mb/s]
Spectral
efficiency
(bit/s/Hz)
Country
GI
inner
outer
8k
1/4
2/3
188/204
16-QAM
13.27
1.66
8k
1/8
3/4
188/204
64-QAM
24.88
17.27
8k
1/8
2/3
188/204
QPSK
0.416
1/8
3/4
188/204
64-QAM
16.85
1/8
2/3
188/204
QPSK
0.441
1/16
3/4
188/204
64-QAM
17.84
1/2
192/240
QPSK
16-QAM
4k
CTTB
BW
[MHz]
FFT
8k
CMMB
Modul.
TU6_10Hz
Germany
11.8
22.5
3.11
France
18.9
2.88
Japon
5.5
19.4
18.28
3.05
Brazil
4.37
0.55
Shangha
1.6
9.7
21.66
2.71
Beijing
12.8
20.6
19.4
4k
1/9
PN595
SC
17/108
0.8
16-QAM
20.79
2.6
Shangha
13.1
PN945
4k
1/4
0.6
16-QAM
14.44
1.8
Shangha
10.4
1/128
2/3
BCH
ATSC
SC
32k ext
25.1
5.5
PN420
DVB-T2
0.8
C/N [dB]
Gaussian
8-VSB
19.29
3.22
US
15
256-QAM
40.21
5.03
UK
17.8
25.1
DVB-T2 Lite
+ DVB-T2
Mobile
Fix (HD)
8k
1/32
4/9
BCH
QPSK
1.02
32k ext
1/128
2/3
BCH
256-QAM
33.36
DVB-T2 Lite
+ DVB-T2
Mobile
Fix (HD)
8k
1/32
4/9
BCH
16-QAM
2.04
32k ext
1/128
2/3
BCH
256-QAM
33.36
DVB-SH
Satelite
2k
1/4
QPSK
3.36
0.67
Trials
6.5
DAB+
Radio
2k
RS
D-QPSK
1.71
1.12
0.65
Germany
6.4
10.7
1/2
1/2
34.38
35.40
0.75
5.03
1.5
5.03
4.30
0.7
UK trials
17.8
5.5
4.43
17.8
Currently deployed bit rates and Gaussian (C/N) by standard in some countries
In the next figure the spectral efficiency of DTT standards configurations analysed in the previous table are plotted versus their required
Gaussian C/N and compared to the theoretical Shannon limit.
7
6
DVB-T2
UK
5
4
DVB-T
64QAM 3/4
ATSC
CTTB 4k 0.8
DVB-T2 Lite
16QAM
DVB-SH
ISDB-T
1 SEG
CMMB
ISDB-T
12 SEG
CTTB SC 0.8
CTTB 4k 0.6
DAB
10
12
14
16
18
20
(C/N) Gaussian
______ [dB]
It has to be noted that the chosen configurations are the most used, but they are not necessarily optimal in terms of spectral efficiency. Also,
it appears clearly on this graph that the new DVB-T2 is the standard which has the best performance with respect to the spectral efficiency
criteria.
Conclusion
This paper shows similarities between the world DTT standards,
allowing the design of a programmable multistandard chipset that
can cover all standards with minimum overhead.
For manufacturers, the fragmented Broadcast world is no longer a
challenge, but an opportunity. In the very near future, one might think
of a car that can drive anywhere and be capable of receiving all Radio
and TV standards wherever it is driving, one might dream of a Tablet
www.dibcom.com