Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The period between the death of one king, and the election of a new king, was called the interregnum,[10] durMain articles: Senate of the Roman Kingdom and ing which time the Interrex nominated a candidate to
replace the king.[12] After the senate gave its initial apConstitution of the Roman Kingdom
1
Since the 3rd century the senate also played a pivotal role
in cases of emergency. It could call for the appointment
of a dictator (a right resting with each consul with or withMain articles: Constitution of the Roman Republic and out the senates involvement). However, after 202, the ofSenate of the Roman Republic
ce of dictator fell out of use (and was revived only two
When the Republic began, the Senate functioned as an more times) and was replaced with the senatus consultum
ultimum (ultimate decree of the senate), a senatorial decree which authorised the consuls to employ any means
necessary to solve the crisis.[18]
While senate meetings could take place either inside
or outside of the formal boundary of the city (the
pomerium), no meeting could take place more than a mile
outside of it.[19] The senate operated while under various
religious restrictions. For example, before any meeting
could begin, a sacrice to the gods was made, and a search
for divine omens (the auspices) was taken.[20]
3
usually a physical division of the house,[19] with senators The rst emperor, Augustus, reduced the size of the senvoting by taking a place on either side of the chamber.
ate from 900 members to 600, even though there were
Senate membership was controlled by the Censors. only about 100 to 200 active senators at one time. After
By the time of Gaius Marius, ownership of prop- this point, the size of the senate was never again draserty worth at least one million sesterces was required tically altered. Under the empire, as was the case durfor membership.[15] The ethical requirements of sena- ing the late republic, one could become a senator by benancial duties),
tors were signicant. In contrast to members of the ing elected quaestor (a magistrate with[25]
In addition to
but
only
if
one
was
of
senatorial
rank.
Equestrian order, senators could not engage in banking
quaestors, elected ocials holding a range of senior poor any form of public contract. They could not own
senatorial rank by virtue of
a ship that was large enough to participate in foreign sitions were routinely granted
the oces that they held.[26]
[19]
commerce, they could not leave Italy without permission from the senate and they were not paid a salary. If an individual was not of senatorial rank, there were
Election to magisterial oce resulted in automatic sen- two ways for him to become a senator. Under the rst
ate membership.[24]
method, the emperor granted that individual the authority
to stand for election to the quaestorship,[25] while under
the second method, the emperor appointed that individual to the senate by issuing a decree.[27] Under the em3 Senate of the Roman Empire
pire, the power that the emperor held over the senate was
absolute.[28]
Main articles: Constitution of the Roman Empire,
Senate of the Roman Empire and Constitution of the During senate meetings, the emperor sat between the
two consuls,[29] and usually acted as the presiding ocer.
Late Roman Empire
Senators of the early empire could ask extraneous questions or request that a certain action be taken by the senAfter the fall of the Roman Republic, the constitutional
ate. Higher ranking senators spoke before those of lower
balance of power shifted from the Roman senate to the
rank, although the emperor could speak at any time.[29]
Roman emperor. Though retaining its legal position as
under the republic, in practice, however, the actual au- Besides the emperor, consuls and praetors could also prethority of the imperial senate was negligible, as the em- side over the senate. Since no senator could stand for
peror held the true power in the state. As such, mem- election to a magisterial oce without the emperors apbership in the senate became sought after by individuals proval, senators usually did not vote against bills that had
seeking prestige and social standing, rather than actual been presented by the emperor. If a senator disapproved
of a bill, he usually showed his disapproval by not attendauthority.
ing the senate meeting on the day that the bill was to be
During the reigns of the rst emperors, legislative, judivoted on.[30]
cial, and electoral powers were all transferred from the
Roman assemblies to the senate. However, since the em- While the Roman assemblies continued to meet after the
peror held control over the senate, the senate acted as a founding of the empire, their powers were all transferred
vehicle through which he exercised his autocratic powers. to the senate, and so senatorial decrees (senatus consulta)
acquired the full force of law.[28] The legislative powers
of the imperial senate were principally of a nancial and
an administrative nature, although the senate did retain a
range of powers over the provinces.[28]
During the early Roman Empire, all judicial powers that
had been held by the Roman assemblies were also transferred to the senate. For example, the senate now held
jurisdiction over criminal trials. In these cases, a consul
presided, the senators constituted the jury, and the verdict
was handed down in the form of a decree (senatus consultum),[28][31] and, while a verdict could not be appealed,
the emperor could pardon a convicted individual through
a veto. The emperor Tiberius transferred all electoral
powers from the assemblies to the senate,[31] and, while
theoretically the senate elected new magistrates, the approval of the emperor was always needed before an election could be nalized.
The Curia Julia in the Roman Forum, the seat of the imperial
Senate.
4
retical consent of the senate, thus depriving the senate of
its status as the ultimate depository of supreme power.
Diocletians reforms also ended whatever illusion had remained that the senate had independent legislative, judicial, or electoral powers. The senate did, however, retain
its legislative powers over public games in Rome, and over
the senatorial order.
It is not clearly known when the Roman senate disappeared in the West, but it is known from the Gregorian
register that the senate acclaimed new statues of Emperor
Phocas and Empress Leontia in 603.[35] The institution is
assumed to have vanished by 630 when the Curia Julia
The senate also retained the power to try treason cases, was transformed into a church by Pope Honorius I.
and to elect some magistrates, but only with the permission of the emperor. In the nal years of the empire, the
senate would sometimes try to appoint their own emperor, 4.2 Medieval era
such as in the case of Eugenius, who was later defeated by
forces loyal to Theodosius I. The senate remained the last In later medieval times, the title senator was still in ocstronghold of the traditional Roman religion in the face of casional use, but it had become a meaningless adjunct tithe spreading Christianity, and several times attempted to tle of nobility and no longer implied membership in an
facilitate the return of the Altar of Victory (rst removed organized governing body.
by Constantius II) to the senatorial curia.
In 1144, the Commune of Rome attempted to establish a
government modeled on the old Roman republic in opposition to the temporal power of the higher nobles and the
pope. This included setting up a senate along the lines of
4 Post-Imperial Senate in Rome
the ancient one. The revolutionaries divided Rome into
fourteen regions, each electing four senators for a total of
After the fall of the western Roman Empire, the sen56 (though one source, often repeated, gives a total of
ate continued to function under the barbarian chieftain
50). These senators, the rst real senators since the 7th
Odoacer, and then under Ostrogothic rule. The authority
century, elected as their leader, Giordano Pierleoni, son
of the senate rose considerably under barbarian leaders,
of the Roman consul Pier Leoni, with the title patrician,
who sought to protect the institution. This period was
because consul was also a deprecated noble styling.
characterized by the rise of prominent Roman senatorial
families, such as the Anicii, while the senates leader, the This renovated form of government was constantly emprinceps senatus, often served as the right hand of the battled. By the end of the 12th century, it had undergone
barbarian leader. It is known that the senate successfully a radical transformation, with the reduction of the numinstalled Laurentius as pope in 498, despite the fact that ber of senators to a single one - Summus Senator - being
both King Theodoric and Emperor Anastasius supported thereafter the title of the head of the civil government of
Rome. (For example, in modern terms, this is compathe other candidate, Symmachus.
rable to the reduction of a board of commissioners to a
The peaceful coexistence of senatorial and barbarian rule
single commissioner, such as the political head of the pocontinued until the Ostrogothic leader Theodahad found
lice department of New York City.) Between 1191 and
himself at war with Emperor Justinian I and took the sen1193, this was a certain Benedetto called Carus homo or
ators as hostages. Several senators were executed in 552
carissimo.
as revenge for the death of the Ostrogothic king, Totila.
After Rome was recaptured by the imperial (Byzantine)
army, the senate was restored, but the institution (like
classical Rome itself) had been mortally weakened by 5 Senate of the Eastern Roman
the long war. Many senators had been killed and many
Empire
of those who had ed to the east chose to remain there,
thanks to favorable legislation passed by Emperor JusMain article: Byzantine Senate
tinian, who, however, abolished virtually all senatorial ofces in Italy. The importance of the Roman senate thus
The senate continued to exist in Constantinople, howdeclined rapidly.[32]
ever. In the second half of the 10th century a new ofce, prodrus (Greek: ), was created as head
4.1 Relationships with Constantinople
of the senate by Emperor Nicephorus Phocas. Up to the
mid-11th century, only eunuchs could become prodrus,
In 578 and again in 580, the senate sent envoys to Con- but later this restriction was lifted and several prodri
stantinople. They delivered 3000 pounds (believed to could be appointed, of which the senior prodrus, or probe around 960 kg) of gold as a gift to the new em- toprodrus (Greek: ), served as the head
peror, Tiberius II Constantinus, along with a plea for help of the senate. There were two types of meetings pracagainst the Lombards, who had invaded Italy ten years tised: silentium, in which only magistrates currently in
earlier. Pope Gregory I, in a sermon from 593, lamented oce participated and conventus, in which all syncletics
5
(Greek: , senators) could participate. The
senate in Constantinople existed at least until the beginning of the 13th century, its last known act being the election of Nicolas Canabus as emperor in 1204 during the
Fourth Crusade.[36]
7 Further reading
Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches Into the History of the
Roman Constitution. William Pickering. 1853.
See also
Acta Senatus
Aedile
Byzantine Senate
Centuria
Curia
comitia curiata
Gerousia
SPQR
Cursus honorum
Interrex
Pontifex Maximus
Princeps senatus
Promagistrate
Roman consul
Roman Dictator
Roman Empire
Roman Kingdom
Roman Law
Roman Republic
Andrew Lintott, The Constitution of the Roman Republic (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
Holkeskamp, Karl-Joachim, Senatus populusque
Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik - Dimensionen und Deutungen (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner
Verlag, 2004).
Krieckhaus, Andreas, Senatorische Familien und
ihre patriae (1./2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.) (Hamburg:
Verlag Dr. Kovac, 2006) (Studien zur Geschichtesforschung des Altertums, 14).
Werner Eck, Monument und Inschrift. Gesammelte
Aufstze zur senatorischen Reprsentation in der
Kaiserzeit (Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter, 2010).
Roman censor
Plebeian Council
Praetor
Quaestor
8 NOTES
Livy, Ab urbe condita
Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press (ISBN 0-19926108-3).
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works
of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on
the Commonwealth; and his Treatise on the Laws.
Translated from the original, with Dissertations and
Notes in Two Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq.
London: Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1.
8 Notes
[1] Abbott, 3
[2] Abbott, 1
[3] Abbott, 12
[4] Abbott, 6
[5] Abbott, 16
[6] Byrd, 42
[7] Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:8
Schnurer, Gustov (1956). Church And Culture In [14] Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.41
The Middle Ages 350-814. Kessinger Publishing
[15] McCullough, 1026
(ISBN 9-781425-423223).
[16] Byrd, 44
7.2
[20] Lintott, 72
[21] Lintott, 75
[23] Lintott, 83
[24] Byrd, 36
[26] Metz, David. Daily Life of the Ancient Romans. pp. 59 &
60. ISBN 978-0-87220-957-2.
[19] Byrd, 34
[22] Lintott, 78
Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Re- [29] Abbott, 383
public. U.S. Government Printing Oce, Senate [30] Abbott, 384
Document 103-23.
Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics,
ISBN 0-543-92749-0.
Hooke, Nathaniel; The Roman History, from the
Building of Rome to the Ruin of the Commonwealth,
F. Rivington (Rome). Original in New York Public
Library
9.1
Text
9.2
Images
9.3
Content license