Você está na página 1de 33

7/7/15

Return on Investment
Michael R. Roberts
William H. Lawrence Professor of Finance
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Last Time
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Decision making
Free cash flow
Forecast drivers
Forecasting free cash flow
Sensitivity analysis
Decision criteria
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

This Time
Return on investment
IRR versus NPV

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

IRR

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

RECALL

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

The internal rate of return of an asset is the


one discount rate such that the NPV of the
assets free cash flows equals zero.

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

The internal rate of return of an asset is the


one discount rate such that the NPV of the
assets free cash flows equals zero.
NPV =

CF1
CF2
CF3
CFT
+
=0
2 +
3 + ... +
(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR )
(1+ IRR )T

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

The IRR Decision Rule says accept all


projects whose IRR > R, reject all projects
whose IRR < R where R is the hurdle rate

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Rates of return are popular measures used


for making decisions

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Profitability index
Accounting rate of return
Discounted payback
Payback
Net present value
Internal rate of return
0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Graham and Harvey, 2001, The theory and pracEce of corporate


nance: Evidence from the eld, Journal of Financial Economics
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Profitability Index
Accounting Rate of Return
Discounted Payback Period
Payback Period
Net Present Value
Internal Rate of Return
0

2
4
6
8
Mean Number of Responses

10

What do Private Equity Firms Say they Do? (Paul Gompers, Steve
Kaplan, and Vladimir Mukharlyamov)
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

IRR V NPV

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Lesson: The IRR rule leads to the


same decisions accept or reject as
the NPV rule if all negative cash flows
precede all positive cash flows

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Examples of CF sequences where IRR


and NPV rules will coincide:
-, +, +, +, +
-, -, -, +, +, +, +, +, +
-, -, -, -, - , +
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Examples of CF sequences where IRR


and NPV rules may not coincide:
-, +, -, +, -, +
+, +, +, +, +, +, -, -, -, -, +, +, +, +, Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Can we compare projects using IRR?

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Comparing Projects

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Wharton wants to upgrade IT system


and overhaul network infrastructure

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

7/7/15

Wharton wants to upgrade IT system


and overhaul network infrastructure
Puts out request for proposals (RFP)

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

10

7/7/15

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million
If Whartons cost of capital is 12%,
what is your assessment of this bid?

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million
Cash flows first:

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

11

7/7/15

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million

0 = 100 +

60

60

60

(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR )2 (1+ IRR )3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million

IRR > R and CFs signs proper


Looks good!
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

12

7/7/15

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million

NPV = 100 +

60

60

60

(1+ 0.12 ) (1+ 0.12 )2 (1+ 0.12 )3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1 from Cisco


Generate $60 million in cost savings
over three years for up front cost of
$100 million

NVP > 0 Looks good!


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

13

7/7/15

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years
Cash flows first:

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

14

7/7/15

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years
Cash flows first:

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years
Cash flows first:

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

15

7/7/15

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years

0 = 20 +

25
25
25
+
2 +
(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR )3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years

Bid #1a IRR (112%) > Bid #1 IRR (36%)


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

16

7/7/15

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years

NPV = 20 +

25
25
25
+
2 +
(1+ 0.12 ) (1+ 0.12 ) (1+ 0.12 )3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Bid #1a from Cisco


Same cost savings ($60 mil over three
years) but costs spread over time: $20
mil today, $35 mil over three years

Bid #1 NPV ($44.11) > Bid #1a NPV ($40.05)


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

17

7/7/15

What is going on?

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

NPV Bid #1 is better

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

18

7/7/15

NPV Bid #1 is better

IRR Bid #1a is better


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

A closer look

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

19

7/7/15

A closer look

Bid 1a incorporates a loan from Cisco

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

A closer look

Bid 1a incorporates a loan from Cisco


What is the interest rate?
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

20

7/7/15

A closer look

80 =

35
35
35
+
R = 15%
2 +
(1+ R ) (1+ R ) (1+ R )3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

A closer look

0 = 80 +

35

35

35

(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR )2 (1+ IRR )3

IRR = 15%

Note: This is also the IRR of the loan


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

21

7/7/15

A closer look

80 =

35
35
35
+
YTM = 15%
2 +
(1+YTM ) (1+YTM ) (1+YTM )3

Note: This is also the Yield-to-Maturity


of the loan

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

A closer look

80 =

35

35

35

(1+YTM ) (1+YTM )2 (1+YTM )3

YTM = 15%

Is this high or low?


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

22

7/7/15

A closer look

80 =

35
35
35
+
YTM = 15%
2 +
(1+YTM ) (1+YTM ) (1+YTM )3

Loan interest rate (15%) > Cost of Capital (12%)


Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Lesson: IRR increased because initial


investment fell more than future cash flows.

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

23

7/7/15

Lesson: IRR increased because initial


investment fell more than future cash flows.
(Intuition: Small payoffs on a smaller
investment can generate very large returns
because of division by small numbers.)
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Lesson: NPV fell because Cisco is lending


you money at an interest rate that is greater
than your cost of capital.

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

24

7/7/15

Lesson: IRR can mislead when deciding


among projects.

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Lesson: NPV will not mislead in


comparisons. The larger the NPV, the
greater the value

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

25

7/7/15

ADDITIONAL BIDS

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

26

7/7/15

How would you rank the bids according


to the IRR and the NPV criterion?

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

27

7/7/15

IRR: #3 > #2 > #1


NPV: #1 > #2 > #3

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

100

12% Cost of Capital

80
60
NPV

40
20
0
0%
-20

Huawei
10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Juniper

-40

Cisco

-60
Discount Rate

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

28

7/7/15

Intuition:
Huawei has small upfront cost IRR
Juniper has front-loaded CFs IRR

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Lesson: IRR does not address differences


in scale.

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

29

7/7/15

Lesson: IRR does not address differences


in scale.
Would you rather earn 100% on a $1
investment or 10% on a $1,000,000
investment?
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Intuition:
Junipers bid is like Ciscos with an
embedded loan

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

30

7/7/15

Intuition:
Junipers bid is like Ciscos with an
embedded loanwith a 23% interest rate!

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Summary

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

31

7/7/15

Lessons
The internal rate of return of an asset is
the one discount rate such that the NPV
of the assets free cash flows equals
zero.
NPV =

CF1
CF2
CF3
CFT
+
=0
2 +
3 + ... +
(1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR ) (1+ IRR )
(1+ IRR )T

The IRR Decision Rule says accept all


projects whose IRR > R, reject all
projects whose IRR < R where R is the
hurdle rate
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Lessons
IRR Rule can mislead decision making
when cash flow signs are anything other
than all negatives before all positives
IRR Rule can mislead decision making
when comparing projects even when
cash flow signs are proper.
IRR does not account for differences in
scale
Copyright Michael R. Roberts

32

7/7/15

Lessons
IRR should be used in conjunction
with NPV analysis

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

Coming up next
Fixed Income Securities
Institutional environment
Valuation
Risk analysis

Copyright Michael R. Roberts

33

Você também pode gostar