65700 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
225 / Friday, November 23, 2007 / Notices
Dated at Washington, DC, November 19,
2007.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs
Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E7–22859 Filed 11–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–02–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Sunshine Act Notice
AGENCY: United States Commission on
Civil Rights.
ACTION: Notice of meeting and briefing.
DATE AND TIME: Monday, December 3,
2007; 9 a.m. Meeting. 10 a.m. Briefing.
PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights,
624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540,
Washington, DC 20425.
Meeting Agenda
I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of October 12,
Meeting.
III. Program Planning.
• Racial Preferences and the
California Department of
Transportation.
IV. Adjourn Meeting.
Briefing Agenda
Topic: Minorities in Special Education.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers’ Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and
Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.
CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION: Robert Lerner, Press and
Communications, (202) 376–8582.
Dated: November 20, 2007.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07–5833 Filed 11–20–07; 3:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1531]
Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 214
Lenoir County, NC
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Whereas, the North Carolina Global
TransPark Authority, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 214, submitted an
application to the Board for authority to
expand the zone to include an
additional site in Rocky Mount, North
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Nov 21, 2007 Jkt 214001
Carolina, adjacent to the Durham
Customs and Border Protection port of
entry (FTZ Docket 16–2007; filed 4/19/
07);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (72 FR 21219, 4/30/07) and the
application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to expand FTZ 214 is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
November 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-
Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–5775 Filed 11–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–485–803]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate From Romania: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 7, 2007, the
United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) affirmed the final remand
results made by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) pursuant to
the CIT’s remand of the final results of
antidumping duty administrative review
of the antidumping order on certain cut-
to-length carbon steel plate from
Romania. See Mittal Steel Galati S.A.,
Formerly Known as Ispat Sidex S.A. v.
United States, Slip Op. 07–110 (CIT)
(July 18, 2007) (Mittal Steel). This case
arises out of the Department’s final
results in the administrative review
covering the period August 1, 2002,
through July 31, 2003. See Certain Cut-
to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from
Romania: Final Results and Final
PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 70 FR 12651
(March 15, 2005), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum
(Final Results). The judgment in this
case was not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Results.
DATES: Effective Date: November 23,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Dena Crossland, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3362, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Mittal
Steel, the CIT remanded the underlying
Final Results to the Department to re-
examine its use of Filipino data to value
limestone as well as the decision to
value scrap as an input. The Department
issued a draft redetermination on
remand to interested parties for
comment on September 21, 2007. No
parties commented on the draft
redetermination.
On October 1, 2007, the Department
issued to the CIT its final remand
results. In the final remand results, the
Department provided an offset for scrap
generated and re-used in the production
process by Mittal Steel Galati S.A.,
formerly known as Ispat Sidex (Mittal),
and reconsidered its valuation of the
limestone input used to manufacture
cut-to-length carbon steel plate for this
proceeding. Thus, the Department
recalculated the antidumping duty rate
applicable to Mittal. On November 7,
2007, the CIT sustained the
Department’s final remand results. The
recalculated margin for these final
remand results is 7.29 percent.
In its decision in Timken Co., v.
United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (Timken), the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(CAFC) held that, pursuant to section
516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the Department
must publish a notice of a court
decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with
a Department determination, and must
suspend liquidation of entries pending
a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
decision in this case on November 7,
2007, constitutes a decision of the court
that is not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Results. This notice
is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, the Department will
continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending the
expiration of the period of appeal or, if
23NON1