Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
h i g h l i g h t s
New construction material from construction and demolition debris.
Lime production waste was used as binder material.
Uniaxial resistance strength on the 3 day was 4.0 MPa, on the 60th day 15.3 MPa.
Established by XRD, SEM and EDS methods ceramics production.
Utilization of industrial wastes has high economical and environment efciency.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 15 July 2014
Received in revised form 9 January 2015
Accepted 10 January 2015
Available online 23 January 2015
Keywords:
Construction/demolition debris
Lime production waste
Recycling
Environmental degradation
Composites
Mechanical properties
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
Solgel processes
a b s t r a c t
It was developed a construction material from construction and demolition debris (CDD) and lime production waste (LPW). Beyond it is a viable solution for the utilization of the large amount of lime output
residues generated, having in mind that was also found nothing similar in the world literature. There
were studies on the parameters of chemical and mineralogy compositions of initial components and nal
product, axial resistance strength, water resistance and water absorption. The LPW was characterized by
a high excess of CaCO3. The medium compression resistance of the samples, cured in air conditions during
3 days is 4.0 MPa, on the 60th day arrived to 13.4 MPa and to 17.1 MPa on the 365th day. The XRD and
SEM studies explain the growth of the samples resistance by the transformation of the initial mineral
mixture into carbonates of calcium, carbonates of magnesium, between other carbonates, which led to
the growth of amorphous and crystalline new formations. The main advantage expected from these
materials is the environmental conservation they afford, represented by the use of CDD and LPW.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The construction industry is one of the oldest known industries,
and since the early days of mankind, construction was performed
by hand, creating a large amount of mineral debris as a byproduct.
Since then, among construction waste, a large amount of modern
construction and demolition debris (CDD) has appeared. These
materials include aggregates, such as bricks, concrete, plaster,
ceramics, glass, asphalt, tiles, gypsum wallboard, wood, metals,
208
3. Calculations
The water resistance coefcient (CWR) was determined from the
axial resistance strength of the TSs on the 28th and 90th day,
which were saturated after a total immersion in water for 24 h
(RSAT), and the strength of the dry TSs (RD) following the standard
in [24], was calculated using the following equation:
C WR RSAT =RD
C WA MSAT M D =M D 100
where MSAT = the mass of the test specimen saturated after total
immersion in water for 24 h. MD = the mass of the test specimen.
Table 1
Substantial compositions of TSs under study.
N
1
2
3
4
5
Compositions, wt.%
CDD
LPW
90
85
80
75
70
10
15
20
25
30
209
Elements
The particle size distribution of the CDD was obtained by sieving the material; the average result of the two samples of both
materials show (Table 2) that only 7.23% of the particle diameters
were greater than 0.6 mm. The primary part of the CDD (76.45%)
contains particle diameters of less than 0.6 mm, and only 15.91%
of the particle diameters were less than 0.149 mm. According to
the Brazilian classication [25], such sand is categorized as small
sand.
The chemical compositions of the raw materials (Table 3) determined by XRF analysis showed that most of the CDD contained
SiO2 (67.02%), CaO (11.54%), Al2O3 (6.30%), Fe2O3 (3.85%) and
MgO (1.37%). The rather high value of calcinations loss (7.57%) is
explained by the presence of carbonates, sulfur and hydrated minerals in the concrete and plaster.
The LPW contained 73.59% of CaO and MgO with an extremely
high (24.07%) calcinations loss (CL). The CO2 recalculation of 9.02%,
which was measured by a calcimeter, compared with that of calcite
(CaCO3) shows the presence of extremely large amounts (20.50%)
of under-red material, which is much greater (12%) than that permitted by the Brazilian standards [26]. This is the reason why this
product cannot be sold as construction material and must be classied as industrial lime production waste (LPW). The CaCO3 values
can be higher and depend of the roast duration and temperature
and the storage length and its conditions. Typically, LPW is used
for acid soil neutralization or sent to industrial waste dumps.
Interpreting the CDD diffractograms patterns (Fig. 1) shows that
the primary components of CDD are quartz SiO2, calcite CaCO3 and
albite ((Na, Ca)(Si, Al)4O8).
The main components of the LPW under study (Fig. 2) are the
following minerals: quicklime CaO, periclase MgO, portlandite
Ca(OH)2, dolomite CaMg(CO3)2, magnesite MgCO3 and quartz SiO2.
Table 2
Granulometric composition of CDD.
Sieve (mm) versus the content of fractions (%)
0.6
7.23
0.42
15.55
CaO
MgO
SiO2
Fe2O3
Al2O3
K2O
SO3
Na2O
P2O5
C.L.
CO2
CaCO3
CDD
LPW
11.54
1.37
67.02
3.85
6.30
0.67
0.58
0.29
0.11
7.57
0.13
0.33
48.4148.41
25.18
1.89
0.23
0.19
0
0
0
0
24.07
9.02
20.50
Sieve (mm)
Content (%)
Components, wt.%
0.297
31.78
0.149
29.12
0.075
9.71
<0.075
6.20
Total
99.73
210
Fig. 3. Changes in the axial resistance strength during hydration of TSs from CDD and LPW.
Table 4
Water resistance of developed materials at the 28th and 90th days.
N
Compositions, wt.%
Statistic parameters
CDD
LPW
90
10
85
15
80
20
75
25
70
30
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
90
RD
RSAT
CW
RD
RSAT
CW
3.5
0.3
7.4
0.4
8.1
0.7
8.7
0.6
9.3
0.5
2.6
0.2
5.8
0.4
6.6
0.4
7.3
0.6
8.3
0.4
0.75
0.03
0.78
0.05
0.82
0.05
0.84
0.07
0.89
0.05
4.3
0.3
8.9
0.6
12.4
0.7
12.3
0.8
14.4
0.7
3.3
0.2
7.0
0.5
10.3
0.6
10.7
0.5
13.0
0.5
0.77
0.05
0.81
0.06
0.83
0.04
0.87
0.03
0.90
0.02
Compositions
(w.%)
CDD
LPW
90
10
85
15
80
20
75
25
70
30
Statistic parameters
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
Average
Deviations
90
7.14
0.56
7.45
0.52
7.86
0.50
8.02
0.46
8.43
0.42
6.32
0.49
7.11
0.73
7.38
0.48
7.58
0.42
7.91
0.35
211
212
x 50
20 m
B x 3.000
5 m
C x 1,000
10 m
2+
+1
4+
+3
Area 1
Area 2
D x 1,000
10 m
E x 1,000
10 m
F x 2,000
10 m
Fig. 5. SEM imagines of initial components (A CDD and B LPW) and TSs of composition 5 at different ages of hydration (C 3 days, D 60 days, E 180 days, and F
365 days). In F are shown also the areas and points of EDS analyses (Table 6).
Table 6
Micro-chemical analyses results of crystal-like new formations and surface areas by EDS method.
Spectrum
Area 1
Area 2
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Compositions, wt.%
C
Mg
Si
Ca
Na
Fe
Al
Total
34.68
25.34
15.56
12.81
49.87
31.08
7.08
15.38
2.88
9.64
7.24
0.39
23.42
21.65
7.52
35.29
9.83
11.18
0.42
0.21
9.38
11.82
5.03
0.97
31.99
26.75
44.28
28.76
23.03
40.70
1.20
3.14
0.35
2.18
1.21
1.69
5.17
0.38
14.51
8.98
12.07
0.95
2.82
1.17
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Fig. 6. LAMMA laser micro-mass analysis of new formations of composition 5 at the 365-th curing day.
formations found by the XRD method (Fig. 4) have smaller dimensions and could be more visible with larger magnications.
The dates in Table 6 also demonstrate a great heterogeneity, not
only of different points but also of different areas of new formations (areas 1 and 2).
The results of Laser micro-mass analysis using a LAMMA1000 (Fig. 6) are similar to the results of the EDS analysis. All
the isotopes spectra obtained for chemical compositions of the
nearest points of new formations for the TS of composition 5 on
the 365th day show dissimilar combinations and quantities of isotopes (intensity of LAMMA peaks).
5. Conclusions
(1) This work provides experimental conrmation of the possibility of obtaining new construction material using different
compositions of CDD and LPW as raw materials.
(2) All of the different material compositions were shown to
possess sufcient axial compressive strength, which is compatible with the criteria of Brazilian standards. However, the
best mechanical property was obtained with the composition containing 30% LPW and 70% CDD waste. The medium
compression resistance of the samples, which were cured
in air conditions for 3 days, was 4.0 MPa; on the 60th day
and 180th day, the compression resistance was 13.4 MPa
and to 15.3 MPa, respectively.
(3) The XRD and SEM analyses indicated that the hydration of
the initial compositions led to the complete transformation
of lime (CaO) and portlandite (Ca(OH)2) into different sol
gel and crystalline forms of carbonate, such as calcite
(CaCO3) and dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2). The synthesis of these
new formations may explain the increasing mechanical
strength of the sample mixtures of CDD and LPW.
(4) A calculation of the economical efciency was not among
the research objectives. Nevertheless, the use of industrial
wastes as free-of-charge raw materials would undoubtedly
reduce the price of civil construction.
(5) The most important result of these research ndings may be
the benets they represent for the environment in view of
the aforementioned vast volume of CDD and LPW wastes
and the real possibility of substantially reducing their existing waste dumps and environment pollution.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Environmental Technology Laboratory
(LTA), the Laboratory of Biomass Energy, the Laboratory of Mineralogical Analysis (LAMIR) of the Federal University of Paran
UFPR, and lial of BOSCH in Curitiba, Brazil for the SEM and EDS
analysis conducted in this research work.
References
[1] CDRA Construction & Demolition Recycling Association. http://www.
cdrecycling.org/.
[2] Rodrigues F, Carvalho MT, Evangelista L, Brito J. Physicalchemical and
mineralogical characterization of ne aggregates from construction and
demolition waste recycling plants. J Clean Prod 2013;52:43845. http://dx.
doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.
[3] Poon CS, Ann TW Yu, Ng LH. On-site sorting of construction and demolition
waste in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 2001;32(2):15772. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00052-0.
213
[4] Tolaymat TTT, Leo K, Jambeck J. Heavy metals in recovered nes from
construction and demolition debris recycling facilities in Florida. Sci Tot
Environ 2004;332(13):111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.
[5] Jang YC, Townsend T. Sulfate leaching from recovered construction and
demolition debris nes. Adv Environ Res 2001;5(I3):20317. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00056-3.
[6] Engelsen CJ, Sloot HA, Wibetoe G, Petkovic G, Stoltenberg-Hansson E, Lund W.
Release of major elements from recycled concrete aggregates and geochemical
modeling. Cem Concr Res 2009;39(5):44659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
cemconres.2009.02.001.
[7] Bennert T, Papp WJ, Maher A, Gucunski N. Utilization of construction and
demolition debris under trafc-type loading in base. J Transport Res Board
2000;1714:339.
[8] Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Bo MW, Sivakugan N. Geotechnical characteristics
of recycled crushed brick blends for pavement sub-base applications. Can
Geotech J 2012;49(7):796811.
[9] Acchar W, Silva JE, Melo-Castanho SRH, Segades AM. Properties of clay-based
ceramics added with construction and demolition waste. In: EPD congress
138th annual meeting & exhibition, TMS 2009, San Francisco, USA; 2009. p.
90710.
[10] Dondi M, Marsigli M, Fabbri B. Recycling of industrial and urban wastes in
brick production: a review (Part 2). Tile Brick Int 1997;13(4):3029.
[11] John VM, Agopyan V. Reciclagem de resduos na construo. Departamento de
Engenharia de Construo Civil, Escola Politcnica da USP (PCC USP); 2001.
[12] Mymrin VA. Industrial and municipal wastes utilization as economical and
environment efcient raw materials; 2012. Available at: http://paginapessoal.
utfpr.edu.br/mymrinev.
[13] Bianchini G, Marochino E, Tassinari R, Vaccaro C. Recycling of construction and
demolition waste materials: a chemical-mineralogical appraisal. Waste
Manage 2005;25:14959.
[14] Bhatty JI, Gajda J. Alternative materials. World Cem 2004;35(12):418.
[15] Mymrin V, Correa SM. New construction material from concrete production
and demolition wastes and lime production waste. Constr Build Mater
2007;21:57882.
[16] Hansen TC. Recycled concrete aggregate and y ash produce concrete without
strength cement. Cem Concr Res 1990;20(3):3556.
[17] Al-Sayed MH, Madany IM, Al-Khaja WA, Darwish AA. Properties of asphaltic
paving mixes containing hydrated lime waste. Waste Manage Res
2004;10:18394.
[18] Do HS, Muna PH, Keun RS. A study on engineering characteristics of asphalt
concrete using ller with recycled waste lime. Waste Manage 2007;28:1919.
[19] Arce R, Galn B, Coz A, Andrs A, Viguri JR. Stabilization/solidication of an
alkyd paint waste by carbonation of waste-lime based formulations. J Hazard
Mater 2009;177:42836.
[20] Al-Khaja WA, Madany IM, Al-Sayed MH, Darwish AA. The mechanical and
drying shrinkage properties of cement mortars containing carbide lime waste.
Resour Conserv Recycl 2003;6:17990.
[21] Bulewicz EM, Jurysa C, Kandefer S. Flue gas desulphurization using lime waste,
studies in environmental. Stud Environ Sci 2008;23:58995.
[22] Kumar S. A perspective study on y ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks
for low cost housing development. Constr Build Mater 2002;16(8):51925.
[23] Marinkovic S, Kostic-Pulek A. Examination of the system y ash-lime-calcined
gypsum-water. J Phys Chem Solids 2007;68:11215.
[24] GOST
9479-84.
Natural
stone
blocks
for
facing
products
manufacture. Moscow: Technical Standard, Ministry of Building Materials
Industry; 1985.
[25] NBR 8492. Soil-cement brick dimensional analysis, compressive strength
determination and water absorption test method. Rio de Janeiro; 2012.
[26] NBR 6453. Quick lime for civil construction requirements to quick lime of
civil construction requirements; 2003 (in Portuguese).
[27] NBR 7170. Ceramic solid brick for masonry specication. Rio de Janeiro;
1983. p. 4.
[28] Mymrin VA, Ponte HA, Ponte MJJJ. Structure formation of slag-soil construction
materials. Mater Struct 2005;38(275):10713.
[29] Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM. Estrutura, propriedades e materiais. So Paulo: PINI;
1994.