Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Moritz Jaeger
Center for Adaptive
Security Research
and Applications
(CASRA)
Zurich
Switzerland
Rebekka Schibli
Center for Adaptive
Research and
Applications
(CASRA)
Zurich
Switzerland
Adrian Schwaninger
Center for Adaptive
Security Research
and Applications
(CASRA)
Zurich
Switzerland
I.
INTRODUCTION
The category other includes threat items like electric shock devices,
chemicals, etc.
and after training a computer based test was used before and
after Computer Based Training (CBT). Furthermore, the test
design of the study not only allowed measuring the training
and transfer effect but as well the influence of the bag
complexity level on the detection performance of all types of
IEDs used. Last, improvement in the detection for screeners
who trained most and screeners who trained least was
evaluated.
II.
STUDY 1
In the first study the two types conventional IEDs and inert
IEDs were compared before and after CBT using a computer
based X-ray screening test.
A. Methods
1) Participants and Procedure: The sample consisted of
420 airport security screeners working at one European
airport. All screeners had already several years of computer
based training with the training system X-Ray Tutor (XRT)
including conventional IEDs only. To measure the training
effect in X-ray image interpretation, all screeners conducted
an X-ray test before and after a 4 months period of recurrent
computer-based training with a special IED version of XRT.
During the training period, screeners trained on average 5.64
hours per week (SD = 5.02).
To avoid test repetition as the reason for performance
increase, two tests were developed and screeners randomly
distributed into two groups: group 1 started with test A and
finished with test B whereas group 2 conducted the tests in
the reversed order. The data of both groups are combined for
the analysis.
2) Material:
a)
X-ray screening test: The two X-ray image
interpretation tests (test A and test B) were developed to
measure how well airport security screeners are able to detect
IEDs in X-ray images of passenger bags. The two parallel
tests consisted of 192 X-ray images of passenger bags using
images of Smiths-Heimann Hi-Scan 6040i machines.
Whereas half of the bags where harmless bags (no threat
item included), the other half of the bags contained an IED
that had been virtually inserted into the bag by aviation
security experts.
The tests were integrated into the training system XRT and
took about 1-2 sessions of 20 minutes to complete. Images
were shown for a maximum of 15 seconds on the screen. The
task was to visually inspect the images and judge whether a
bag was OK (contains no IED) or NOT OK (contains an IED).
X-ray image interpretation competency was measured by the
Hit Rate (% of threat images correctly identified), the False
Alarm Rate (% of harmless bags falsely identified as a threat),
Figure 1. Detection performance A for each IED type before and after
training. The bars represent standard deviations. Please note that due
to security reasons detection performance values are not specified.
TABLE I
RELIABILITIES
1A
1B
2A
2B
Cronbach Alpha
.845
.825
.880
.873
Guttman
split-half
.865
.867
.903
.864
N = 420
III. STUDY 2
B. Results
Once more the psychophysical
measure A was used for analysis.
detection
performance
1) Reliability:
Cronbach Alpha and split-half reliability coefficients are listed
in table 2, again separately for both test versions. All reliability
coefficients show reliable measurements with
Cronbach Alpha coefficients >.805 and split-half coefficients
>.803.
TABLE II
RELIABLITIES
N = 433
Cronbach Alpha
Guttman
split-half
1A
1B
2A
2B
.817
.805
.811
.825
Figure 5: Detection Performance A for each IED type before and after
training, n = 433. All three types showed significant effects (p < .005).
.806
.817
.803
.848
The ANCOVA with the two within-participant factors IED type
and measurement plus the covariate training hours gave the
following results: there were significant main effects of IED
2
type = .36, F(2,862) = 246.90, p < .001 and measurement
2
= .05, F(1.431) = 23.56, p < .001 and a significant
2
interaction of IED type and measurement =.04, F(2,862) =
16.46, p < .001. These results are also illustrated in Figure 5,
which visualizes that the influence of training is different for
unconventional IEDs than for the other two IED types.
Because inert IEDs had now been trained for several months,
the detection performance of this IED type was much higher
compared to the detection performance of unconventional
IEDs. It was also much higher in comparison to the detection
performance of this type revealed in the first study.
V.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
VI. REFERENCES
[1]
VII. VITA
Dr. Diana Hardmeier is the General Manager of CASRA since
2009. Prior to that she worked nearly three years at Zurich
State Police Airport Division and was responsible for the
development, deployment and supervision of quality control
measures for airport security control. This allowed her
combining both the operational and the theoretical
perspectives which she acquired at the University of Zurich.
During her employment at the University of Zurich, Dr.
Hardmeier was project manager of testing and certification
projects in Switzerland, Belgium and Germany. She received
her doctoral degree in 2008.
Moritz Jger is in his master studies in the Psychological
Department of the University of Zurich. He has practical
experience in aviation security x-ray screening and in the field
of computer-based training and testing of x-ray screeners.
Rebekka Schibli graduated from Zurich University in 2009
with a Bachelor of Natural Science degree. She works for
CASRA since 2010.
Prof. Dr. Adrian Schwaninger lectures at the University of
Zurich since 1999 and at the University of Applied Sciences
Northwestern Switzerland since 2008. He is the head of the
Center for Adaptive Security Research and Applications
(www.casra.ch) in Zurich and the head of the Institute
Humans in complex Systems (MikS) at the School of Applied
Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern
Switzerland (www.fhnw.ch/miks). His areas of expertise are
aviation security, human factors, scientifically based software
development, applied cognitive psychology, and humanmachine interaction. Prof. Schwaninger is a member of the
ECAC Training Task Force, the ECAC Technical Task Force,
the ICAO Working Group on Training, and he leads the ECAC
Technical Task Force TIP Study Group. Prof. Schwaninger is
recognized as a leading authority of aviation security. He has
more than 70 publications and more than 150 invited
presentations. In 1999 he received the Young Researcher
Award in Psychology. In 2003 he received the ASI
International Award of Excellence in Aviation Security:
Enhancement of Human Factors.