Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I, 145-151
TECHNICAL NOTE
LABORATORY TESTING
INTRODUCTION
100
>'
~
~
80
80
"
D
40
Q.
20
0~063
0125
025
05
Diameter: mm
145
146
,--------------,-12
5
-8
eliminated using
10
(I)
is the thickness of
1 O~#'''--5t----:';!;Oc-----''1~5...L..'-~2;!;O,JO
I
(1:%
=:
5,----------_--,
-8
FRICTION ANGLES
and
I D = O 38.
To check
the
,---------------,-12
5
-8
~3
o
IGS
o IGM
.6.
Non-Iubricaled
ll".~:'--'-----':---"";----:':-'O
o
5
10
15
20
[1:%
147
dcg~~es
I deg~~'es
"'.. I ","
-""-'
1
dewees
10
"'"
1-15
IGS
419
34-8
133
IMG
401
357
140
Non-lubric:ued
418
l7-7
126
10 = 038
34-4
IGS
34-4
(3)
D=R/K
00
K = lan' (45
deforms with further change of volume. At the end
of the test, at an axial strain of 17%, this critical
state is not yet fully reached but softening and
dilation are clearly damping out. At 17% vertical
strain the IGS and Th-1G data yield friction angles
of 34.80 and 35.7 0 respectively. It is possible that a
0
critical state angle of almost 34-4 would have
been reached on further straining. This angle is
obtained from the loose sand data in Fig. 3, and is
assumed here to be the critical state angle of
friction.
0
Having obtained a peak friction angle of 40-42
for the dense sand and a maximum friction angle
of 34-40 for the loose sand, it is interesting to
compare these triaxial angles to friction angles
measured in plane strain tests by Hammad (1991).
The laner data are listed in Table 2 for various
values of the confining stress.
Taking data for a cell pressure of 300 kN/m 2 as
was also done in tria"{ial testing, a peak friction
angle of 45-47 is found for the dense sand and a
maximum friction angle of 32,5-34,5 for the loose
sand. A significant difference is thus found for the
dense sand, as other studies, whereas there is very
linle difference for the loose sand at the critical
state. (This finding is confirmed below by data for
other sands.) Hence it seems that a unique critical
state angle cv exists independently of strain
conditions.
+ r/2)
(4)
-E,fEIA = DA = RA/K
(Sa)
= D. = R./K
(5b)
-E3/EI.
Table 2. Aooles of friction and dilatanc\' of Hostun sand in the biaxial test (Ji:lmmad , 1991)
2
3: kN/m
",,,.
P . degrces
"'~s:
degrees
<pps, degrees
P
10 095
IjIPs.
P degrees
/0 '" 0'37
100
467-475
14'5-147
35'5
00
200
464-470
141-142
32,5-345
00
400
4;1-453
114-121
330-333
-1,3
148
----------
6
/
/
/
/
,,"
",,"
//<1"='9.)
3
2
/
/
/
oL
~/
_ _L-_ _L-..!-_L-_-----1
0'5
=-2E:/t,
15
or in short
D=R/K
(7a)
D = -21: 3 /1:,
(7b)
ANGLE OF DILATANCY
sm
/
/
Kev (ev
=34'4)
"
/
" ,,"J(
""
')1
(Q =29)
II
/
/
/
/
/
// /
<-
o,L----,d-_
_+
o
0'5
1
__-.-'15,-__--!2
D= -'id~
ps
1 +)
= --.--.EI - E)
(8)
149
_ D _
I - sin rp
DA - B - .
I + SIn rp
(10)
sin", =
tv/E.I
(II)
2 - iv/E.I
rp
Slllrp=
tPr
tPr
sin tP ps - sin
=
I - sin tP ps sin
(13)
</>~
'" 51.
(14)
tP; -
tP~v
::::: 3/R
( 15)
srrain~
and
(12)
for triaxial
index
10
= 10{Q -InUrn) -
(16)
(17)
150
Cornforth (1964)
,,
"
o
,,
,,
Equation (17)
..
30 "---_ _.,..
~
,,
-,':-
40
tis p: degrees
___:'
(18)
This suppons the idea of a unique angle of
dilatancy, as this angle was related to the above
rate of dilation. Combining equations (II) and (18)
gives
03[.
2 + 03[.
[.
67
+ [.
(17.
smllJ=
(19)
CONCLUSIONS
From the results prcsented, the following conclusions can be drawn concerning the angles of
friction and dilatancy of sand.
By using concepts of superposition it is possible
to relate the angle of dilatancy to triaxial strain
conditions. This yields an extended definition for
the angle of dilatancy which applies to triaxial
testing conditions as well as plane strain condi-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are indebted to Dr 1. Desrues and
Dr E. Flavigny of the Instirut de Mecanique de
Grenoble for discussion on the triaxial testing
tcchnique, and for their biaxial testing data on
Hosrun sand.
NOTATION
D diameter
e void ratio
Em membrane thickness
H height
10 dilatancy index
I R rel:ltive dil:ltancy index
K internal friction coefficient
R stress ratio (ol/oJ)
to membrane thickness
!::J.r bedding error
EJ
radial strain
p density
00
b:lck-pressure
a, axial stress
OJ
radial stress
1'". critical state friction angle
1'p peak friction angle
V'p angle of dilatancy
REFERENCES
Barden, L. & Khayatt, A. 1. (1966). Incremental strain
rate ratios and strength of sand in the tria;~ial test.
Georeclmiqlle 16. 338-357.
Bohon. M. O. (1986). The strength and dilatancy of
sands. Georeclmiqlle 36, No. I, 65-78.
Cornforth, D. H. (1964). Some experiments on the
influence of strain conditions on the strength of
sand. Georedlfliquf! 16, 193.
Oesrues, J. (1984). La localisation de fa defom/Q(;on
dUllS fes muter;Ollx grcwlIfu;res. OSc thesis, Institut de
Mecanique de Grenoble.
Oesrues, J.. ColliatOangus, J. L. & Foray, P. (1988).
Triaxial testing of granular soil under elevated cell
pressure. In Advanced tr;u..ial resting of soil ami
151