Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Next Wednesday, the entire school will participate in a protocol to fine-tune our plans to help
produce high quality student work.
People will have the opportunity to receive feedback on tasks that are intended to lead to high
quality work. Each grade level team will have one teacher present a high quality task or product in
process. To make this work, there are a few things were asking all teachers to do by next
Monday.
You will need to:
Decide with your grade level team what work will be presented and who will present
Ensure that your team has completed the Tuning Protocol Sign-Up google doc by Friday,
March 13th
Support your team with providing materials for the protocol by Monday, March 16th
3 samples of the work (if applicable, documentation of different stages in the process)
Description of work/task (including learning targets or objectives)
Rubrics/assessment tools
Any other supportive documentation that will give context to the work
Thora, Leensa, or your ILT rep will follow up with you prior to next Wednesday. Feel free to reach
out with an questions before then.
We look forward to the work ahead!
Leensa & Thora
5 minutes to present
Room 202
Andre
Christina
Erika
Room 202
Bre
Dominique
Omar
Room 205
Claudia
Lisa
Kristen
Room 205
Jeny
Mary
John
Room 205
Lauren
Ariel
Tim
Room 206
Morgan
Adriana
Molley
Room 206
Joel
Michelle
Alyssa
Room 206
Betty
Jessica
Room 208
Monique
Chris
Britt
th
March18
PD:modifiedTuningProtocolfeedbackonHQW(inprocess)
Round1
Presenters
Music
th
(
4grade)
NicoleC.
Math
Weaving
Printmaking
StoryProblems
Experience
(PK)
Anna
(PK)
Daizy
NonFiction
BiographyBook
st
(1grade)
JessieC.
Round2
Presenters
WritingSamples
(Kindergarten)
Olivia
LabReports
(2grade)
Erin
(3grade)
JessieP.
th
(4
grade)
Stephanie
Facilitators
Amy
Leensa
Emmanuel
Heidi
Walkway
RugArea
LibraryEntrance
(bystairs)
Yudelkys
Margo
Mike
Karla
Renee
Megan
Elizabeth
Athena
Mr.A
Jayme
Jamie
Ellen
KatieS.
KatieK.
Cerissa
Sandra
Ellen
Martin
NicoleS.
Yen
Rachel
Library
Location
Participants
CornerofCircle
area(byscreen)
Carlos
Natalie
Cynthia
MichelleFay
Fabiola
Melissa
Annette
nd
Books
rd
Project
WHOLEGROUPLOWERSCHOOL
2:30Presenters(15minutes)Leensa
Presentershave1minutetogiveabriefdescriptionoftheworkinprocess,including
LTs
or
objectives
and
context
:
Wherearestudentsintheprocess?
Whatpriorlearningexperienceshavetheyalreadyhad?
Whatlearningexperiencesarecomingnext?
Workdisplayedmayinclude:
lessonorunitplans
mentortextsorexemplars
anchorcharts
checklists,rubricsand/orotherassessmenttools
Processmaybeshownthrough:
Onesampleofworkfrommultiplestudents
Multipledraftsofonestudentswork
Aseriesofsamplesinabodyofworkbyonestudent
2:45
GalleryWalk(15minutes)Leensa
Besuretostartbylookingattheworkofyourgrouppresenter(showgroups)
Wowfactors(writtenonastickyandpostednexttowork)
whatdoyouseethatsexciting?
whatdoyouseethatyouwanttotry?
3:00Transitiontosmallgroups(5minutes)Leensa
Review(modified)protocol
Instructionsfortransition
SMALLGROUPS
3:05 Protocol:2presenters(45totalminutes20minuteseach)
PresenterssharesfocusingquestionasrelatestoAttributesofHighQualityWork(12)
Participantslistensilentduringthistime
ClarifyingQuestions(5)
Purpose:
Thistimeisallottedto
supportparticipants
withgainingabetterunderstandingof
thecontextoftheworktheywillexamine.Clarifyingquestionsaremattersoffact.
Facilitatorsneedtobealertduringthistime.Redirectanyjudging/probingquestionsfor
warmandcoolfeedback
(whenthepurposeisto
supportpresenters
)
Examineworkallaresilent(5)
Participantstakenotesonfeedbacktheymightgivearoundfocusedquestion
Presenterscanviewpostitsfromgallerywalk
WarmandCoolFeedback(5)
Facilitatorwritesallfeedbackforpresenter.
Presenterlistenssilently(withoutresponding)
Reflectionfrompresenterspeakstocommentsofhis/herchoice(3)
The
purpose
ofthisreflectionistofocusonthepresenterslearning.Thisisnotatimeto
explain,defend,orclarifyworkfortheparticipants.Norisitatimetodebrieftheprotocol.
Thiswillhappenduringthewholegroupdebrief
Presenter
reflectsaloud(possibleprompts):
3:55
Nowisthetimeforthepresentertotakeinwhathe/shehasheardandsharewhatitsmaking
youthinkaboutthestudentworkbrought?Ifpresentersneedsmoreprompting(choose
Howcanyouapplythefeedback?
Whatdoyouwanttotry?
Synthesizewhatyouveheardandhowyouremakingsenseofit?
Howhasthefeedbackbroadened/narrowed/shifted/pushedyourthinking?
Participants
listensilently
WholeGroupDebrief(20minutes)Leensa
Debriefprotocol:Sharehow(5)
WhatpartofthisprotocolhelpedtofacilitateyourdeepenedunderstandingofHQW?
Howcouldtheprotocolbeimprovedtobettersupportyourneeds
Debrieflearning:ThinkPairShare(15)
WhatattributeofHQWwillyoufocusonandwhy?Howmightyougetthere?
TuningProtocolTeacherFeedback
ElizabethOpportunitytoseework,maybenotevenaprotocol
MartinLikeningittolookingatadocumentationboardseeingtheprocess
Jaymeitshelpfultomakeconnectionsacrossclassroomsandgrades
Sandrakeepingfeedbackfocusedonpresentersfeedbackwaspowerful
KaitelookingatHQWandnotjustanexpeditionproduct,appreciatedseeingeverydaywork
Erinappreciatedseeingamathtask,tolookatthenuancesgointoproblemsolving,reallythereisan
entirerange,reinforcestheimportanceofspendinganentireworkperiodunpackingoneproblem
Stephanieverypurposefulgroupingsfeedbackfromothergradelevelsanddisciplines
Emmanuelwantstoecho,speakingtomultipleperspectives
HeidiGivingfeedbackonsomeoneelsesworkthatIcoulduse
Sandraverycourageousthesearereallygreatconversationsthatcanbeeasierdoneinyourteam,but
openingituptoothers
MikereallyenjoyednumerouswaystoexploreattributesofHQWdifferentlens
Martinprotocolscanfeelartificial,butappreciateswhenfacilitatorsaremoreflexible
AmyauthenticitycameupinbothsharingsandrealizeitsnotsomethingIthinkaboutenough
Rachelletsyoubackoffstudentworkinawayyoumaynot
Amycouldhaveusedasectionforprobingquestionsbeforelookingatwork
Athenamydesiretoenterintoaconversationtalkingfreely,conversationalway
Victoriaperhapshavepresentersfocusoneachattribute