Você está na página 1de 3

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules 51209

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST (DARS), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense
Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In SERVICES Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062.
addition to filing comments with the • Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense
1. The authority citation for part 73 Acquisition Regulations System, Crystal
FCC, interested parties should serve
continues to read as follows: Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street,
counsel for the designated petitioner as
follows: Mark N. Lipp, Esq., Scott Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. Arlington, VA 22202–3402.
Woodworth, Esq., Wiley, Rein & Comments received generally will be
§ 73.202 [Amended] posted without change to http://
Fielding LLP, 1776 K Street, NW.,
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM www.regulations.gov, including any
Washington, DC 20006. Allotments under Nebraska, is amended personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: by adding Humboldt, Channel 272C3. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau (202) Federal Communications Commission. Michael Benavides, (703) 602–1302.
418–7072. John A. Karousos, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media A. Background
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Bureau.
[FR Doc. E7–17446 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
This proposed rule implements
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. Section 819 of the National Defense
07–176, adopted August 15, 2007, and BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006
released August 17, 2007. The full text (Pub. L. 109–163). Section 819
of this Commission decision is available authorizes DoD to use an evaluation
for inspection and copying during DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE factor that considers whether an offeror
normal business hours in the FCC intends to perform a contract using
Reference Information Center (Room Defense Acquisition Regulations
employees or individual subcontractors
CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW., System
who are members of the Selected
Washington, DC 20554. The complete Reserve and requires offerors to submit
48 CFR Parts 215 and 252
text of this decision may also be documentation supporting any stated
purchased from the Commission’s copy RIN 0750–AF40 intent to use such employees or
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., subcontractors.
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Defense Federal Acquisition This rule was not subject to Office of
Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378–3160, Regulation Supplement; Evaluation Management and Budget review under
or via the company’s Web site, http:// Factor for Use of Members of the Executive Order 12866, dated
www.bcpiweb.com. This document does Selected Reserve (DFARS Case 2006– September 30, 1993.
D014)
not contain proposed information B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
collection requirements subject to the AGENCY: Defense Acquisition DoD does not expect this proposed
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Regulations System, Department of rule to have a significant economic
Public Law 104–13. In addition, Defense (DoD). impact on a substantial number of small
therefore, it does not contain any ACTION: Proposed rule with request for entities within the meaning of the
proposed information collection burden comments. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer et seq., because use of the evaluation
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
factor is discretionary and is not
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of the Defense Federal Acquisition
expected to affect a significant number
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
of acquisitions. Therefore, DoD has not
3506 (C)(4). implement Section 819 of the National
performed an initial regulatory
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
The Provisions of the Regulatory flexibility analysis. DoD invites
Year 2006. Section 819 authorizes DoD
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to comments from small businesses and
to use an evaluation factor that
this proceeding. Members of the public other interested parties. DoD also will
considers whether an offeror intends to
should note that from the time a Notice consider comments from small entities
perform a contract using employees or
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until concerning the affected DFARS subparts
individual subcontractors who are
the matter is no longer subject to in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such
members of the Selected Reserve.
Commission consideration or court comments should be submitted
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule separately and should cite DFARS Case
review, all ex parte contacts are should be submitted in writing to the
prohibited in Commission proceedings, 2006–D014.
address shown below on or before
such as this one, which involve channel November 5, 2007, to be considered in C. Paperwork Reduction Act
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for the formation of the final rule. This proposed rule contains a new
rules governing permissible ex parte ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, information collection requirement.
contacts. identified by DFARS Case 2006–D014, DoD has submitted the following
For information regarding proper using any of the following methods: proposal to the Office of Management
filing procedures for comments, see 47 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// and Budget (OMB) under the provisions
CFR 1.415 and 1.420. www.regulations.gov. Follow the of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
instructions for submitting comments. U.S.C. Chapter 35). Comments are
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include invited on: (a) Whether the proposed


Radio, Radio broadcasting. DFARS Case 2006–D014 in the subject collection of information is necessary
line of the message. for the proper performance of the
For the reasons discussed in the • Fax: (703) 602–7887. functions of DoD, including whether the
preamble, the Federal Communications • Mail: Defense Acquisition information will have practical utility;
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Michael (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the
part 73 as follows: Benavides, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP burden of the proposed information

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:24 Sep 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1
51210 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules

collection; (c) ways to enhance the List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215 and PART 252—SOLICITATION
quality, utility, and clarity of the 252 PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
information to be collected; and (d) CLAUSES
Government procurement.
ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents, Michele P. Peterson, 3. Sections 252.215–XXXX and
including the use of automated Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
252.215–YYYY are added to read as
collection techniques or other forms of System. follows:
information technology. The following Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 252.215–XXXX Evaluation Factor for
is a summary of the information CFR parts 215 and 252 as follows: Employing or Subcontracting with Members
collection requirement. 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR of the Selected Reserve.
Title: Defense Federal Acquisition parts 215 and 252 continues to read as As prescribed in 215.370–3(a), use the
Regulation Supplement (DFARS); follows: following provision:
Evaluation Factor for Employing or Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Subcontracting with Members of the Evaluation Factor for Employing or
Chapter 1. Subcontracting With Members of the
Armed Forces Selected Reserve.
Selected Reserve (XXX 2007)
Type of Request: New requirement. PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION (a) Definition. Selected Reserve, as
Number of Respondents: 100.
used in this provision, has the meaning
Responses per Respondent: 1. 2. Sections 215.370 through 215.370– given that term in 10 U.S.C. 10143.
Annual Responses: 100. 3 are added to read as follows: Selected Reserve members normally
Average Burden per Response: 1 hour. 215.370 Evaluation factor for employing or
attend regular drills throughout the year
subcontracting with members of the and are the group of Reserves most
Annual Burden Hours: 100.
Selected Reserve. readily available to the President.
Needs and Uses: DoD needs this (b) This solicitation includes an
information to implement Section 819 215.370–1 Definition. evaluation factor that considers the
of the National Defense Authorization Selected Reserve, as used in this offeror’s intended use of employees, or
Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law section, is defined in the provision at individual subcontractors, who are
109–163). Section 819 authorizes DoD to 252.215–XXXX, Evaluation Factor for members of the Selected Reserve.
use an evaluation factor that considers Employing or Subcontracting with (c) If the offeror, in the performance
whether an offeror intends to perform a Members of the Selected Reserve. of any contract resulting from this
contract using employees or individual solicitation, intends to use employees or
subcontractors who are members of the 215.370–2 Evaluation factor. individual subcontractors who are
Selected Reserve, and requires offerers In accordance with Section 819 of the members of the Selected Reserve, the
to submit documentation supporting National Defense Authorization Act for offeror’s proposal shall include
any stated intent to use such employees Fiscal Year 2006 (Pub. L. 109–163), the documentation to support this intent.
or subcontractors. contracting officer may use an Such documentation may include, but is
Affected Public: Businesses or other evaluation factor that considers whether not limited to—
for-profit and not-for-profit institutions. an offeror intends to perform the (1) Existing company documentation,
Frequency: On occasion. contract using employees or individual such as payroll or personnel records,
subcontractors who are members of the indicating the names of the Selected
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
Selected Reserve. See PGI 215.370–2 for Reserve members who are currently
obtain or retain benefits.
guidance on use of this evaluation employed by the company; or
Written comments and factor. (2) A statement that one or more
recommendations on the proposed positions will be set aside to be filled by
information collection should be sent to 215.370–3 Solicitation provision and new hires of Selected Reserve members,
Ms. Hillary Fielden at the Office of contract clause.
along with verifying documentation.
Management and Budget, Desk Officer (a) Use the provision at 252.215–
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive XXXX, Evaluation Factor for Employing (End of provision)
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or Subcontracting with Members of the 252.215–YYYY Use of Employees or
with a copy to the Defense Acquisition Selected Reserve, in solicitations that Individual Subcontractors Who are
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Michael include an evaluation factor considering Members of the Selected Reserve.
Benavides, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP whether an offeror intends to perform As prescribed in 215.370–3(b), use the
(DARS), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense the contract using employees or following clause:
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062. individual subcontractors who are
Comments can be received from 30 to 60 members of the Selected Reserve. Use of Employees or Individual
days after the date of this notice, but (b) Use the clause at 252.215–YYYY, Subcontractors Who Are Members of
comments to OMB will be most useful Use of Employees or Individual the Selected Reserve (XXX 2007)
if received by OMB within 30 days after Subcontractors Who are Members of the (a) Definition. Selected Reserve, as
the date of this notice. Selected Reserve, in solicitations that used in this clause, has the meaning
To request more information on this include the provision at 252.215–XXXX. given that term in 10 U.S.C. 10143.
proposed information collection or to Include the clause in the resultant Selected Reserve members normally
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

obtain a copy of the proposal and contract only if the contractor stated in attend regular drills throughout the year
associated collection instruments, its proposal that it intends to perform and are the group of Reserves most
please write to the Defense Acquisition the contract using employees or readily available to the President.
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Michael individual subcontractors who are (b) If the Contractor stated in its offer
Benavides, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP members of the Selected Reserve, and that it intends to use members of the
(DARS), IMD 3D139, 3062 Defense that statement was used as an Selected Reserve in the performance of
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062. evaluation factor in the award decision. this contract—

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:24 Sep 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 172 / Thursday, September 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules 51211

(1) The Contractor shall use consistent with efficient contract Reserve, as employees or individual
employees, or individual performance; and subcontractors, in the performance of
subcontractors, who are members of the (2) The Government has the right to the contract.
Selected Reserve in the performance of terminate the contract for default if the (End of clause)
the contract to the fullest extent Contractor willfully or intentionally [FR Doc. E7–17424 Filed 9–5–07; 8:45 am]
fails to use members of the Selected BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:24 Sep 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06SEP1.SGM 06SEP1

Você também pode gostar