Você está na página 1de 2

31850 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

110 / Friday, June 8, 2007 / Notices

mails to Brenda_Hudgens- of Decision on this PRMP and FEIS U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of Land
Williams@blm.gov. deferred. Management (BLM) has prepared a
Please direct the follow-up letter to Written comments on the ACECs as Proposed Resource Management Plan
the appropriate address provided below. proposed in the DRMP/DEIS may be (RMP) and Final Environmental Impact
The protest must contain: submitted as follows: Statement (EIS) for the Sierra planning
a. The name, mailing address, 1. The Casper RMP Revision Web site area managed by the Folsom Field
telephone number, and interest of the at http://www.blm.gov/rmp/casper/; the Office.
person filing the protest. web site allows commenters to submit DATES: BLM Planning Regulations (43
b. A statement of the part or parts of ACEC-related comments electronically CFR 1610.5–2) state that any person
the plan and the issue or issues being into the Special Designations topic who participated in the planning
protested. directly onto a comment form posted on process and has an interest which may
c. A copy of all documents addressing the web site. be adversely affected, may protest
the issue(s) the protesting party 2. Written comments may be mailed BLM’s approval or amendment of an
submitted during the planning process or delivered to the BLM at: Casper RMP/ RMP. Protests must be filed within 30
or a statement of the date they were EIS, Bureau of Land Management— days of the date that the Environmental
discussed for the record. Casper Field Office, 2987 Prospector Protection Agency publishes their
d. A concise statement explaining Drive, Casper, WY 82604–2968. Notice of Availability in the Federal
why the protestor believes the State 3. Comments may be sent by facsimile Register. Instructions for filing protests
Director’s decision is wrong. to (307) 261–7587. are described in the front cover of the
All protests must be in writing and The BLM will only accept comments Sierra Proposed RMP and Final EIS and
mailed to one of the following if they are submitted in the methods in the Supplementary Information
addresses: described above. To be given section of this notice.
consideration by the BLM, comment
Regular Mail: Director (210), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
submittals must include the
Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box Sandra McGinnis, (916) 985–4474,
commenter’s name and street address.
66538, Washington, DC 20035. Bureau of Land Management, 63
Whenever possible, please include
Overnight Mail: Director (210), Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630;
reference to either the page or section in
Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L caformp@ca.blm.gov.
the DRMP/EIS to which the ACEC-
Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
related comment applies. To facilitate
D.C. 20036. planning area for the Sierra RMP is the
analysis of comments and information
The Director will promptly render a Folsom Field Office’s area of
submitted, it is encouraged to submit
decision on the protest. The decision management responsibility. The
comments in an electronic format
will be in writing and will be sent to the planning area encompasses portions of
through the Web site.
protesting party by certified mail, return Before including your address, phone 15 California counties: Yuba, Sutter,
receipt requested. The decision of the number, e-mail address, or other Colusa, Nevada, Placer, El Dorado,
Director is the final decision of the personal identifying information in your Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, San
Department of the Interior. comment, you should be aware that Joaquin, Tuolumne, Mariposa,
2. Instructions on Commenting on the your entire comment—including your Sacramento, Stanislaus, and Merced. A
Proposed ACECs personal identifying information—may total of 230,000 acres of public lands
be made publicly available at any time. and 300,000 acres of subsurface mineral
BLM planning regulations at 43 CFR estate are administered by BLM. The
While you can ask us to withhold your
1610.7–2 require the BLM to notify the decisions in the RMP will only apply to
personal identifying information from
public of proposed ACECs in the BLM lands and mineral estate in the
public review, we cannot guarantee that
Federal Register releasing the DRMP/ planning area. The Sierra Proposed RMP
we will be able to do so.
DEIS. While the DRMP/DEIS including and Final EIS have been developed
the ACEC information has been Dated: April 2, 2007. through collaborative planning and
available for public review and Robert A. Bennett, consider four alternatives. Primary
comment, the BLM is providing an State Director. issues include: recreation, wild and
additional 60-day review period to [FR Doc. E7–10886 Filed 6–7–07; 8:45 am] scenic river recommendations, sensitive
ensure the procedural requirements BILLING CODE 4310–22–P natural and cultural resources, livestock
contained in 43 CFR 1610.7–2 are met. grazing, wildland fire risk and fuel
Specifically, these regulations require reduction, energy and mineral
the BLM to specify in a Federal Register DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR development, land ownership
any resource use limitations, which adjustments, and motorized vehicle
would occur if an ACEC is designated. Bureau of Land Management route designations. The Proposed RMP
The BLM can best use your comments includes two wild and scenic river
on only the ACEC information Notice of Availability of Sierra suitability recommendations: South
presented in the DRMP/DEIS and in this Proposed Resource Management Plan Fork American River (8.8 miles—
Notice of Supplemental Information if and Final Environmental Impact recreational) and North Fork and Main
they are received on or before the end Statement, California Mokelumne River (13.7 miles—wild,
of the 60-day comment period following AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, scenic, recreational). The Proposed RMP
publication of this notice. If any Interior. includes eight new Areas of Critical
comments received identify new and ACTION: Notice of availability. Environmental Concern (ACECs): Pine
significant ACEC-related information Hill Preserve (3,236 acres), Cosumnes
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

that has not currently been raised in the SUMMARY: In accordance with the River Preserve (2,035 acres), Spivey
planning process, then a Supplemental National Environmental Policy Act of Pond (54 acres), Deadman’s Flat (796
Proposed Resource Management Plan/ 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and acres), Dutch Flat/Indiana Hill proposed
Final Environmental Impact Statement the Federal Land Policy and Research Natural Area, which is a type
may have to be issued and the Record Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 of ACEC (320 acres), Bagby Serpentine

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:14 Jun 07, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 110 / Friday, June 8, 2007 / Notices 31851

(5,775 acres) and North Fork Cosumnes or a statement of the date they were Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
(1,129 acres). Additionally, the discussed for the record. publishes their Notice of Availability
Proposed RMP would expand three d. A concise statement explaining (NOA) in the Federal Register. Public
existing ACECs: Red Hills, Ione why the protestor believes the State meetings to gather comments on the
Manzanita, and Limestone Salamander Director’s decision is wrong. draft will be held in Montana at the
ACECs. Use of public lands in these All protests must be in writing and following locations during the public
ACECs would vary depending on their mailed to one of the following comment period: Boulder, Bozeman,
individual resources and values but addresses: Butte, Divide, Helena, and Townsend.
would include limitations on motorized Regular Mail: Director (210), Comments on the DRMP/EIS must be
use, mining, and other surface Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box received on or before the end of the
disturbing activities. Copies of the 66538, Washington, DC 20035. comment period at the address listed
Sierra Proposed RMP and Final EIS Overnight Mail: Director (210), below. Public meetings and any other
have been sent to affected Federal, state, Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L public involvement activities will be
and local government agencies and to Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington, announced at least 15 days in advance
interested parties. Copies are available DC 20036. through public notices, media news
for public inspection on the internet at Before including your address, phone releases, newsletter mailings, and on the
http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/folsom/ number, email address, or other Butte RMP Web site at http://
nepa2.2.html. The document is also personal identifying information in your www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/fo/
available at some local libraries, BLM’s comment, you should be aware that butte_field_office.html.
Folsom Field Office (63 Natoma Street, your entire comment—including your ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
Folsom, CA 95630) and upon request by personal identifying information—may by any of the following methods below.
emailing or calling BLM (see contact be made publicly available at any time. Your name and mailing address must be
information, above). Comments on the While you can ask us in your comment submitted as part of your comments.
Sierra Draft RMP/EIS received from the to withhold your personal identifying • E-mail: MT_Butte_RMP@blm.gov.
public and internal BLM review were information from public review, we • Fax: (406) 533–7660
incorporated into the proposed RMP. cannot guarantee that we will be able to • Mail or hand-deliver to: Butte RMP
Public comments resulted in do so. Team, BLM Butte Field Office, 106
corrections, clarifying text, and the The Director will promptly render a North Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701.
proposal to establish a 1,129 acre ACEC decision on any protests. The decision FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
along the North Fork Cosumnes River. will be in writing and will be sent to the La Marr, Project Manager, BLM, (406)
The public has 60 days from this notice protesting party by certified mail, return 533–7645.
to comment on this ACEC proposal. A receipt requested. The decision of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Butte
final decision on the RMP will not be Director is the final decision of the Field Office RMP planning area is
issued until after this 60 day comment Department of the Interior. located in southwestern Montana in
period and until all protests are Dated: March 13, 2007. Beaverhead, Broadwater, Deerlodge,
resolved. William S. Haigh, Gallatin, Jefferson, Lewis and Clark,
Instructions for filing a protest with Field Manager. Park, and Silver Bow Counties. The
the Director of the BLM regarding the [FR Doc. E7–11140 Filed 6–7–07; 8:45 am] planning area contains approximately
Proposed RMP and Final EIS are BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
302,000 acres of public surface estate
described in 43 CFR 1610.5–2. A protest and approximately 678,000 acres of
may only raise issues that were federal mineral estate administered by
submitted for the record during the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the Butte Field Office. The DRMP/EIS
planning process. Emailed and faxed focuses on the principles of multiple
protests will not be accepted as valid Bureau of Land Management use and sustained yield as prescribed by
protests unless the protesting party also Section 202 of the FLPMA.
[MT–070–1610-DP–030E]
provides the original letter by regular or The public involvement and
overnight mail postmarked by the close Notice of Availability of the Draft collaboration process included
of the protest period. Under these Resource Management Plan and invitations to Federal agencies and
conditions, BLM will consider the Environmental Impact Statement for tribal and local governments to become
emailed or faxed protest as an advance the Butte Field Office, Montana cooperating agencies. None of the
copy and it will receive full Federal agencies or governments have
consideration. If you wish to provide AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, participated as cooperating agencies.
BLM with such advance notification, Interior. Public scoping included six public
please direct faxed protests to the ACTION: Notice of Availability. meetings in communities throughout
attention of the BLM protest coordinator the planning area (January 2004), six
at (202) 452–5112, and e-mails to SUMMARY: In accordance with the additional public meetings specifically
Brenda_Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov. National Environmental Policy Act of focused on site-specific travel planning
Please direct the follow-up letter to 1969 (NEPA), and under the authority of issues (November/December 2004), two
the appropriate address provided below. the Federal Land Policy and additional public meetings to scope the
The protest must contain: Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), a Proposed Planning Scenario (a
a. The name, mailing address, Draft Resource Management Plan and preliminary draft proposal of
telephone number, and interest of the Environmental Impact Statement management) in June 2005, ten briefings
person filing the protest. (DRMP/EIS) has been prepared for to specific organizations/county
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

b. A statement of the part(s) of the public lands and resources administered governments on the Proposed Planning
plan and the issue(s) being protested. by the Bureau of Land Management Scenario (June/July 2005), and release of
c. A copy of all documents addressing (BLM) Butte Field Office in Montana. reports on Wild and Scenic River (WSR)
the issue(s) that the protesting party DATES: The 90-day public comment and Area of Critical Environmental
submitted during the planning process period will begin the date the Concern (ACEC) findings. Community-

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:14 Jun 07, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1

Você também pode gostar