Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Key Words
Chlorhexidine, hypochlorite, parachloroaniline, TOFSIMS, tubules
icrobial infections are the most common cause of an endodontic disease (1). To
critically reduce bacterial loads, endodontic treatment regimens combine mechanical instrumentation with chemicals, namely irrigation and medication (2, 3).
The most commonly used irrigation solution is sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). It is
antimicrobial and an effective tissue-dissolving agent (46). It is used at a
concentration varying between 0.5% and 6% (4). One disadvantage of NaOCl is its ineffectiveness in removing the smear layer (7). Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) has also
been suggested as a possible irrigation solution in endodontic treatment (4, 6). It
exhibits antimicrobial activity in addition to substantivity (4, 6, 8). The
concentrations used vary from 0.12% to 2% (4, 6). Its mode of action is a cationic
binding, which causes bacterial cell membrane disruption (9). As a disadvantage,
CHX is ineffective in removing the smear layer and possesses no tissue-dissolving ability
(10). EDTA is a chelating agent that dissolves inorganic components of the dentin but
not the organic components (4, 6, 7). Concentration used is normally 17% (4).
Although its main function is to remove smear layer, dentin erosion can occur with prolonged exposures of 10 minutes (4, 11). QMiX is a novel irrigation compound
containing EDTA, CHX, and a nonspecified detergent (12). It is antimicrobial and
has been shown to remove smear layer. The detergents function is to decrease surface
tension and increase surface wettability (12, 13).
In vitro studies showed that NaOCl and CHX can diffuse into dentinal tubules
(DTs) to a depth of 300 mm (14, 15). Interestingly, the effect of QMiX on bacteria
in 2 studies was reported to extend deeper into the tubules than CHX and similar to
NaOCl, up to 500 mm (16, 17). In endodontics, irrigation solutions are used in
succession, and it is crucial to discern that irrigation solutions used in succession
can react with each other. This is especially evident when NaOCl is mixed with CHX.
This interaction breaks down CHX, produces a brown precipitate containing parachloroaniline (PCA) (1820), and can occlude DTs (21). The amount of PCA is directly
proportional to the concentration of NaOCl used (18). A reaction also occurs when
QMiX is mixed with NaOCl, resulting in a visually detectable color change but without
precipitate formation (pilot study).
Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) is a method used in
surface chemistry that has been successfully adapted to analyze mineralized tissue
such as dentin (22). It consists of ion gun pulsing high-energy ions into the target
surface. This bombardment causes collision cascades, disrupting atoms in the top
1 or 2 monolayers, causing an ejection and emissions of secondary ions from the surface. The charged ion mass is determined by the flight time from the surface to the
detector (23). Mass spectra with multiple peaks that arise as a result of molecular
From the *Discipline of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto; and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Address requests for reprints to Dr Bettina R. Basrani, Co-Director MSc Endodontic Program, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Room
348C, Toronto, ON, M5G 1G6 Canada. E-mail address: Bettina.basrani@dentistry.utoronto.ca
0099-2399/$ - see front matter
Copyright 2014 American Association of Endodontists.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.017
2036
Kolosowski et al.
Basic ResearchTechnology
fragmentations can then be analyzed or compared with SIMS library to
obtain parent molecular information. When subjected to TOF-SIMS
analysis, NaOCl/CHX precipitate yields peaks at 127, 153, 170, and
195 u, PCA yields a specific 127-u peak, and CHX yields a parent molecule peak at 505 u (18).
The penetration of the precipitate and PCA into DTs has not been
determined. If PCA is formed inside DTs, this may act as a reservoir of
PCA even if attempts are made to eliminate its formation in the main root
canal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the formation of
precipitate and PCA on the surface and in the tubules of dentin irrigated
with NaOCl and subsequent irrigation with EDTA, NaOCl and CHX, or
saline and QMiX by using qualitative TOF-SIMS analysis.
Results
Precipitate Formation
A brown precipitate was visually observed on the cross-sectional
surfaces of all group 1 samples immediately after CHX immersion. No
color change or precipitate was visualized on the cross-sectional surface of group 2 samples after immersion in QMiX.
Preparation of Samples
The study was approved by the universitys Health Sciences
Research Ethics Board. Two-millimeter-thick horizontal slices of
mid-root dentin were obtained from 4 extracted non-carious human
upper molars that had been previously stored in methyl alcohol by using
a diamond-coated saw (Leica EM TXP Target Sectioning System; Leica
Microsystems GmbH, Vienna, Austria). The slices were split vertically
to create 12 dentin blocks. Blocks were embedded in low viscosity
epoxy resin (Epo-Thin; Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL) and allowed to set
for 24 hours. The resin covering the root canal aspect of the embedded
block was then carefully removed with a diamond blade (Leica EM UC6/
FC6 Ultra-cryomicrotome; Leica Microsystems GmbH) to expose dentin,
with the DTs oriented approximately perpendicular to the exposed
surface.
Treatment of Samples
Blocks were randomly divided into 2 groups. For group 1 (CHX),
6 blocks were immersed in 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite;
Lavo Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada) for 3 minutes, followed immediately
by 5 mL 17% EDTA (Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) for 1 minute,
fresh 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl for 2 minutes, and a final immersion in 5 mL
2% CHX (chlorhexidine digluconate BP; Medisca, Montreal, QC, Canada) for 1 minute. For group 2 (QMiX), 6 blocks were immersed in
5 mL 2.5% NaOCl for 3 minutes, followed immediately by immersion
in 5 mL sterile saline (Aqualite; Hospira, Montreal, QC, Canada) (per
manufacturers recommendation) and then 5 mL QMiX (Dentsply Tulsa
Dental, Tulsa, OK) for 1 minute. Samples were dried on a bench top
overnight.
Discussion
Up until the time this article was written, there had been no published studies of TOF-SIMS analysis of human dentin subjected to new
irrigation modalities. In addition, no published articles explored the
presence or absence of PCA inside DTs or on dentin surface without first
removing the precipitate for testing (24, 25).
QMiX is a novel root canal irrigant formulated to remove
smear layer and enhance root canal disinfection (12, 13). It is
recommended that it be used as the final irrigant after irrigation with
NaOCl and saline (26). Its composition is proprietary, but the manufacturer has disclosed that it contains EDTA, CHX, and a surface-active
detergent (12). In view of the previous reports highlighting the interaction between CHX and NaOCl (1820, 24, 25, 27) and the formation of
PCA with its known toxicity (2830), this study set out to examine
whether a potential for such precipitation existed when QMiX
inadvertently came in contact with NaOCl during clinical use.
TOF-SIMS is mostly used as a qualitative study tool with fragmentation pattern peaks or fingerprinting analysis. TOF-SIMS technique
was chosen for this study because of the advantages of great surface
sensitivity, which can measure composition of 12 monolayers. It
2037
Basic ResearchTechnology
Figure 1. Selected TOF-SIMS mass spectra of dentin surfaces with high mass resolution: (A) positive ion of group 1 (CHX), (B) negative ion of group 1 (CHX), (C)
positive ion of group 2 (QMiX), and (D) negative ion of group 2 (QMiX). Marked are the positions of peaks assignable to CHX+ at 505 u (right inset); breakdown
products of CHX at 153, 170, and 195 u, including PCA+ at 127 u, Cl at 35 and 37 u, PO2 at 63 u, and PO3 at 79 u. Note relative abundance of PCA+ in group 1,
absence of PO2 and PO3 in group 1, absence of PCA+ in group 2, and abundance of Cl in groups 1 and 2.
exhibits good spatial and mass resolutions and provides chemical mapping of the samples with analysis of the images. However, TOF-SIMS
is sensitive to contamination and demonstrates difficulty in data
quantification. This latter disadvantage implies that the intensities of
individual peaks of the ions cannot be compared among different
samples (23, 27).
Figure 2. High-spatial-resolution (BA) TOF-SIMS images of ion distribution on dentin surface: (A) positive ion of group 1 (CHX), (B) negative ion of group 1
(CHX), (C) positive ion of group 2 (QMiX), and (D) negative ion of group 2 (QMiX). Total shows raw image; ClC6H4NH2+ shows distribution of PCA. Note
irregular precipitate, containing PCA, on surface of group 1 and smooth appearance with patent DTs in group 2. mc, maximum ion count in 1 pixel.
2038
Kolosowski et al.
Basic ResearchTechnology
Figure 3. High-spatial-resolution (BA) TOF-SIMS images of ion distribution in longitudinal sections of dentin: (A) positive ion of group 1 (CHX), (B) negative ion
of group 1 (CHX), (C) positive ion of group 2 (QMiX), and (D) negative ion of group 2 (QMiX). Pulp space is on topmost and dentin bottom-most in each image.
Total shows raw image; ClC6H4 H2N+ + ClC6H4CH2N2+ show distribution of PCA and CHX breakdown products, and Cl + 37Cl show distribution of chlorine.
Note irregular precipitate on surface (green arrows), the extension of PCA and CHX breakdown products, in addition to chlorine, into DTs in G1 (yellow arrows),
and lack thereof in group 2. mc, maximum ion count in 1 pixel.
2039
Basic ResearchTechnology
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study, PCA containing precipitate was
formed on the surface and in the tubules of dentin irrigated with NaOCl
followed by CHX. No precipitate or PCA was detected in the tubules of
dentin irrigated with NaOCl followed by saline and QMiX.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Surface Interface Ontario for its assistance
in the conduct of these experiments and also Drs Torneck and
Friedman for their feedback on the manuscript.
This study was supported by a grant from Canadian Academy
of Endodontics Endowment Fund and Endo Tech.
The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.
References
1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental
pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1965;20:3409.
2. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, Wesselink PR. Effects of instrumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone lesions. Int Endod J 2002;35:1321.
3. Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria
using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod
2000;26:7515.
4. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am
2010;54:291312.
5. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium
hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:
30712.
6. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:38998.
7. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root
canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987;13:14757.
8. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation
with chlorhexidine. J Endod 1997;23:22931.
9. Davies A. The mode of action of chlorhexidine. J Periodontal Res Suppl 1973;12:
6875.
10. Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M. Soft tissue dissolution capacity of currently used
and potential endodontic irrigants. J Endod 2004;30:7857.
11. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod
2002;28:179.
12. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, et al. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a
novel irrigant, QMiX. Int Endod J 2012;45:36371.
13. Eliot C, Hatton JF, Stewart GP, et al. The effect of the irrigant QMix on removal of
canal wall smear layer: an ex vivo study. Odontology 2014;102:23240.
14. Kuga MC, Gouveia-Jorge E, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. Penetration into dentin of
sodium hypochlorite associated with acid solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:e1559.
15. Zou L, Shen Y, Li W, Haapasalo M. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentin.
J Endod 2010;36:7936.
2040
Kolosowski et al.
16. Ma J, Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. A new noninvasive model to study the effectiveness of dentin disinfection by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Endod
2011;37:13805.
17. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of smear layer against disinfection
protocols on Enterococcus faecalis-infected dentin. J Endod 2013;39:
1395400.
18. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, et al. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and
chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 2007;33:9669.
19. Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, et al. Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its
derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine
by using gas chromatography. J Endod 2010;36:3124.
20. Basrani BR, Manek S, Fillery E. Using diazotization to characterize the effect
of heat or sodium hypochlorite on 2.0% chlorhexidine. J Endod 2009;35:
12969.
21. Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium
hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod
2008;34:1815.
22. Gotliv BA, Robach JS, Veis A. The composition and structure of bovine peritubular
dentin: mapping by time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy. J Struct Biol
2006;156:32033.
23. Sodhi RN. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS): versatility in
chemical and imaging surface analysis. Analyst 2004;129:4837.
24. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S. Evaluation and prevention of the precipitate formed
on interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010;36:
11547.
25. Mortenson D, Sadilek M, Flake NM, et al. The effect of using an alternative
irrigant between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine to prevent the formation of para-chloroaniline within the root canal system. Int Endod J 2012;45:
87882.
26. Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialities. QMiX 2 in 1 Irrigating Solution: Directions
for Use. Johnson City, TN: Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialities; 2012.
27. Sodhi R, Manek S, Fillery E, Basrani B. Tof-SIMS studies on chlorhexidine and its
reaction products with sodium hypochlorite to ascertain decomposition products.
Surf Interface Anal 2011;43:5914.
28. Chhabra RS, Huff JE, Haseman JK, et al. Carcinogenicity of p-chloroaniline in rats
and mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1991;29:11924.
29. van der Vorst MM, Tamminga P, Wijburg FA, Schutgens RB. Severe methaemoglobinaemia due to para-chloraniline intoxication in premature neonates. Eur J Pediatr
1990;150:73.
30. Lueken A, Juhl-Strauss U, Krieger G, Witte I. Synergistic DNA damage by oxidative
stress (induced by H2O2) and nongenotoxic environmental chemicals in human
fibroblasts. Toxicol Lett 2004;147:3543.
31. Prado M, Santos Junior HM, Rezende CM, et al. Interactions between irrigants
commonly used in endodontic practice: a chemical analysis. J Endod 2013;39:
50510.
32. Thomas JE, Sem DS. An in vitro spectroscopic analysis to determine whether parachloroaniline is produced from mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine.
J Endod 2010;36:3157.
33. Nowicki JB, Sem DS. An in vitro spectroscopic analysis to determine the chemical
composition of the precipitate formed by mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2011;37:9838.
34. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effectiveness of endodontic disinfecting solutions
against young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod
2012;38:13769.