Você está na página 1de 4

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 30971

Drug labeler FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: affect small governments. Therefore, no
Firm name and address code Margaret P. Grafeld, Director, Office of actions are deemed necessary under the
Information Programs and Services, U.S. provisions of the Unfounded Mandates
* * * * * Department of State, SA–2, 515 22nd Reform Act of 1995.
St., NW., Washington, DC 20522–6001. Small Business Regulatory
(2) * * * Tel: 202–261–8300; FAX: 202–261– Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
8590. rule is not a major rule as defined by
Drug labeler
code Firm name and address
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The section 804 of the Small Business
Department’s proposed rule was Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996.
* * * * * published as Public Notice 5658 at 72 This rule will not result in an annual
000402 ....... Watson Laboratories, Inc., 311 FR 59–62 on January 3, 2007, with a 90- effect on the economy of $100 million
Bonnie Circle, Corona, CA or more; a major increase in costs or
92880.
day public comment period. The
Department received one non- prices; or significant adverse effects on
* * * * * competition, employment, investment,
substantive comment discussed under
Analysis of Comments. Since the last productivity, innovation, or on the
Dated: May 24, 2007. ability of United States-based
comprehensive revision of the
Bernadette Dunham, Department’s national security companies to compete with foreign
Deputy Director, Center for Veterinary information regulations, a new based companies in domestic and
Medicine. governing executive order, E.O. 12958, import markets.
[FR Doc. E7–10771 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] has been issued and modified several Executive Order 12866. The
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S times, most substantially by E.O. 13292 Department does not consider this rule
of March 25, 2003. In addition, the to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
Information Security Oversight Office under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
DEPARTMENT OF STATE has issued a new classified national section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and
security information directive Review. In addition, the Department is
22 CFR Part 9 containing interpretive guidance. Both exempt from Executive Order 12866
the order and the directive effected except to the extent that it is
[Public Notice 5822] promulgating regulations in conjunction
significant changes in the procedures for
RIN 1400–AB91 classifying and declassifying national with a domestic agency that are
security information. The final significant regulatory actions. The
National Security Information regulations of the Department take Department has nevertheless reviewed
Regulations account of these changes and reflect the regulation to ensure its consistency
changes in the Department’s procedures with the regulatory philosophy and
AGENCY: State Department.
designed to implement them. principles set forth in that Executive
ACTION: Final rule. Order.
Analysis of Comments: The proposed
SUMMARY: This rule makes final the rule was published for comments on Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Department’s proposed rule published January 3, 2007. The comment period Reform. The Department has reviewed
on January 3, 2007. The rule revises the closed April 3, 2007. The one public this regulation in light of sections 3(a)
Department’s regulations governing the comment received by the Department and 3(b) (2) of Executive Order 12988 to
classification and declassification of related to the language in Sec. 9.2 eliminate ambiguity, minimize
national security information that is pertaining to the objective of the litigation, establish clear legal
under the control of the Department in classification program. The comment standards, and reduce burden.
order to reflect changes in the suggested the inclusion in Sec. 9.2 of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132.
provisions of a new executive order on additional language from the preamble This regulation will not have substantial
national security information and of E.O. 12958. The Department direct effects on the States, on the
consequent changes in the Department’s concluded that such additional relationship between the national
procedures since the last revision of the elaboration of program objective was government and the States, or on the
Department’s regulations on this duplicative of the order and distribution of power and
subject. The Department received one unnecessary. responsibilities among the various
non-substantive comment and proposes levels of government. Therefore, in
Regulatory Findings accordance with section 6 of Executive
no changes to the proposed rule. The
proposed rule is therefore adopted as Administrative Procedure Act. The Order 13132, it is determined that this
final. Department is publishing this regulation rule does not have sufficient federalism
as a final rule, after it was published as implications to require consultations or
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is a proposed rule on January 3, 2007. warrant the preparation of a federalism
effective June 5, 2007. Regulatory Flexibility Act. The summary impact statement. The
ADDRESSES: Persons having questions Department, in accordance with the regulations implementing Executive
with respect to these regulations should Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Order 12372 regarding
address such questions to: Margaret P. 605(b)), has reviewed this rule and, by intergovernmental consultation on
Grafeld, Director, Office of Information approving it, certifies that this rule will Federal programs and activities do not
Programs and Services, U.S. Department not have significant economic impact on apply to this regulation.
of State, SA–2, 515 22nd St., NW., a substantial number of small entities. National Environmental Policy Act.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES

Washington, DC 20522–6001. Tel: 202– Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995. This The Department has analyzed this
261–8300; FAX: 202–261–8590. Persons rule will not result in the expenditure regulation for the purpose of the
with access to the Internet may also by State, local, and tribal governments, National Environmental Policy Act of
view this notice by going to the in the aggregate, or by the private sector, 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) and has
regulations.gov Web site at http:// of $100 million or more in any year, and determined that it will not have any
www.regulations. gov/index.cfm. it will not significantly or uniquely effect on the quality of the environment.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 Jun 04, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1
30972 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations

Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule Department’s senior agency official is information must be balanced against
does not impose any new reporting or the Under Secretary of State for the need to protect national security
record-keeping requirements subject to Management. The senior agency official information.
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. is assisted in carrying out the provisions (3) In no case shall information be
Chapter 35. of the Executive Order and the classified in order to conceal violations
Department’s information security of law, inefficiency, or administrative
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 9 program by the Assistant Secretary for error, or to prevent embarrassment to a
Original classification, Original Diplomatic Security, the Assistant person, organization, or agency, to
classification authorities, Derivative Secretary for Administration, and the restrain competition, or to prevent or
classification, Classification challenges, Deputy Assistant Secretary for delay the release of information that
Declassification and downgrading, Information Sharing Services. does not require protection in the
Mandatory declassification review, interest of the national security.
Systematic declassification review, § 9.4 Original classification. (4) A reference to classified
Safeguarding. (a) Definition. Original classification documents that does not directly or
■ For the reasons set forth in the
is the initial determination that certain indirectly disclose classified
preamble, Title 22, Part 9 of the Code of information requires protection against information may not be classified or
Federal Regulations is revised to read as unauthorized disclosure in the interest used as a basis for classification.
of national security (i.e., national (5) Only information owned by,
follows:
defense or foreign relations of the produced by or for, or under the control
PART 9—SECURITY INFORMATION United States), together with a of the U.S. Government may be
REGULATIONS designation of the level of classification. classified.
(b) Classification levels. (1) Top Secret (6) The unauthorized disclosure of
Sec. shall be applied to information the foreign government information is
9.1 Basis. unauthorized disclosure of which presumed to cause damage to national
9.2 Objective. reasonably could be expected to cause
9.3 Senior agency official.
security.
exceptionally grave damage to the (d) Duration of classification. (1)
9.4 Original classification. national security that the original
9.5 Original classification authority. Information shall be classified for as
9.6 Derivative classification.
classification authority is able to long as is required by national security
9.7 Identification and marking. identify or describe. considerations, subject to the limitations
9.8 Classification challenges. (2) Secret shall be applied to set forth in section 1.5 of the Executive
9.9 Declassification and downgrading. information the unauthorized disclosure Order. When it can be determined, a
9.10 Mandatory declassification review. of which reasonably could be expected specific date or event for
9.11 Systematic declassification review. to cause serious damage to the national declassification in less than 10 years
9.12 Access to classified information by security that the original classification shall be set by the original classification
historical researchers and certain former authority is able to identify or describe.
government personnel.
authority at the time the information is
(3) Confidential shall be applied to originally classified. If a specific date or
9.13 Safeguarding. information the unauthorized disclosure event for declassification cannot be
Authority: E.O. 12958 (60 FR 19825, April of which reasonably could be expected
determined, information shall be
20, 1995) as amended; Information Security to cause damage to the national security
Oversight Office Directive No. 1, 32 CFR
marked for declassification 10 years
that the original classification authority
2001 (68 FR 55168, Sept. 22, 2003). from the date of the original decision,
is able to identify or describe.
(c) Classification requirements and unless the original classification
§ 9.1 Basis.
limitations. (1) Information may not be authority determines that the sensitivity
These regulations, taken together with considered for classification unless it of the information requires that it shall
the Information Security Oversight concerns: be marked for declassification for up to
Office Directive No. 1 dated September (i) Military plans, weapons systems, 25 years.
22, 2003, and Volume 5 of the or operations; (2) An original classification authority
Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual, (ii) Foreign government information; may extend the duration of
provide the basis for the security (iii) Intelligence activities (including classification, change the level of
classification program of the U.S. special activities), intelligence sources classification, or reclassify specific
Department of State (‘‘the Department’’) or methods, or cryptology; information only when the standards
implementing Executive Order 12958, (iv) Foreign relations or foreign and procedures for classifying
‘‘Classified National Security activities of the United States, including information under the Executive Order
Information’’, as amended (‘‘the confidential sources; are met.
Executive Order’’). (v) Scientific, technological, or (3) Information marked for an
economic matters relating to the indefinite duration of classification
§ 9.2 Objective. national security; which includes under predecessor orders, such as
The objective of the Department’s defense against transnational terrorism; ‘‘Originating Agency’s Determination
classification program is to ensure that (vi) United States Government Required’’ (OADR) or containing no
national security information is programs for safeguarding nuclear declassification instructions shall be
protected from unauthorized disclosure, materials or facilities; subject to the declassification provisions
but only to the extent and for such a (vii) Vulnerabilities or capabilities of of Part 3 of the Order, including the
period as is necessary. systems, installations, infrastructures, provisions of section 3.3 regarding
projects, plans, or protection services automatic declassification of records
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES

§ 9.3 Senior agency official. relating to the national security, which older than 25 years.
The Executive Order requires that includes defense against transnational
each agency that originates or handles terrorism; or § 9.5 Original classification authority.
classified information designate a senior (viii) Weapons of mass destruction. (a) Authority for original classification
agency official to direct and administer (2) In classifying information, the of information as Top Secret may be
its information security program. The public’s interest in access to government exercised by the Secretary and those

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 Jun 04, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 30973

officials delegated this authority in Department guidance in 12 Foreign § 9.9 Declassification and downgrading.
writing by the Secretary. Such authority Affairs Manual (FAM). (a) Declassification processes.
has been delegated to the Deputy (b) Foreign government information Declassification of classified
Secretary, the Under Secretaries, shall retain its original classification information may occur:
Assistant Secretaries and other markings or be marked and classified at (1) After review of material in
Executive Level IV officials and their a U.S. classification level that provides response to a Freedom of Information
deputies; Chiefs of Mission, Charge a degree of protection at least equivalent Act (FOIA) request, mandatory
d’Affaires, and Principal Officers at to that required by the entity that declassification review request,
autonomous posts abroad; and to other furnished the information. Foreign discovery request, subpoena,
officers within the Department as set government information retaining its classification challenge, or other
forth in Department Notice dated May original classification markings need not information access or declassification
26, 2000. be assigned a U.S. classification marking request;
(b) Authority for original provided the responsible agency (2) After review as part of the
classification of information as Secret or determines that the foreign government Department’s systematic declassification
Confidential may be exercised only by markings are adequate to meet the review program;
the Secretary, the Senior Agency purposes served by U.S. classification (3) As a result of the elapse of the time
Official, and those officials delegated markings. or the occurrence of the event specified
this authority in writing by the (c) Information assigned a level of at the time of classification;
Secretary or the Senior Agency Official. classification under predecessor (4) By operation of the automatic
Such authority has been delegated to executive orders shall be considered as declassification provisions of section 3.3
Office Directors and Division Chiefs in classified at that level of classification. of the Executive Order with respect to
the Department, Section Heads in material more than 25 years old.
§ 9.8 Classification challenges. (b) Downgrading. When material
Embassies and Consulates abroad, and (a) Challenges. Holders of information classified at the Top Secret level is
other officers within the Department as pertaining to the Department of State reviewed for declassification and it is
set forth in Department Notice dated who believe that its classification status determined that classification continues
May 26, 2000. In the absence of the is improper are expected and to be warranted, a determination shall
Secret or Confidential classification encouraged to challenge the be made whether downgrading to a
authority, the person designated to act classification status of the information. lower level of classification is
for that official may exercise that Holders of information making appropriate. If downgrading is
authority. challenges to the classification status of determined to be warranted, the
§ 9.6 Derivative classification. information shall not be subject to classification level of the material shall
(a) Definition. Derivative classification retribution for such action. Informal, be changed to the appropriate lower
is the incorporating, paraphrasing, usually oral, challenges are encouraged. level.
restating or generating in new form Formal challenges to classification (c) Authority to downgrade and
information that is already classified actions shall be in writing to an original declassify. (1) Classified information
and the marking of the new material classification authority (OCA) with may be downgraded or declassified by
consistent with the classification of the jurisdiction over the information and a the official who originally classified the
source material. Duplication or copy of the challenge shall be sent to the information if that official is still serving
reproduction of existing classified Office of Information Programs and in the same position, by a successor in
information is not derivative Services (IPS) of the Department of that capacity, by a supervisory official of
classification. State, SA–2, 515 22nd St. NW., either, or by any other official
(b) Responsibility. Information Washington, DC 20522–6001. The specifically designated by the Secretary
classified derivatively from other Department (either the OCA or IPS) or the senior agency official.
classified information shall be classified shall provide an initial response in (2) The Department shall maintain a
and marked in accordance with writing within 60 days. record of Department officials
instructions from an authorized (b) Appeal procedures and time specifically designated as
classifier or in accordance with an limits. A negative response may be declassification and downgrading
authorized classification guide and shall appealed to the Department’s Appeals authorities.
comply with the standards set forth in Review Panel (ARP) and should be sent (d) Declassification in the public
sections 2.1–2.2 of the Executive Order to: Chairman, Appeals Review Panel, c/ interest. Although information that
and the ISOO implementing directives o Information and Privacy Coordinator/ continues to meet the classification
in 32 CFR 2001.22. Appeals Officer, at the IPS address criteria of the Executive Order or a
(c) Department of State Classification given above. The appeal shall include a predecessor order normally requires
Guide. The Department of State copy of the original challenge, the continued protection, in some
Classification Guide (DSCG) is the response, and any additional exceptional cases the need to protect
primary authority for the classification information the appellant believes information may be outweighed by the
of information in documents created by would assist the ARP in reaching its public interest in disclosure of the
Department of State personnel. The decision. The ARP shall respond within information. When such a question
Guide is classified ‘‘Confidential’’ and is 90 days of receipt of the appeal. A arises, it shall be referred to the
found on the Department of State’s negative decision by the ARP may be Secretary or the Senior Agency Official
classified Web site. appealed to the Interagency Security for decision on whether, as an exercise
Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) of discretion, the information should be
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES

§ 9.7 Identification and marking. referenced in section 5.3 of Executive declassified and disclosed. This
(a) Classified information shall be Order 12958. If the Department fails to provision does not amplify or modify
marked pursuant to the standards set respond to a formal challenge within the substantive criteria or procedures for
forth in section 1.6 of the Executive 120 days or if the ARP fails to respond classification or create any substantive
Order; ISOO implementing directives in to an appeal within 90 days, the or procedural right subject to judicial
32 CFR 2001, Subpart B; and internal challenge may be sent to the ISCAP. review.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 Jun 04, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1
30974 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations

(e) Public dissemination of DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY instead of being disabled, Employee C is
declassified information. receiving a hardship distribution. * * *
Declassification of information is not Internal Revenue Service * * * * *
authorization for its public disclosure. ■ Par. 3. Section 1.402A–2 is amended
Previously classified information that is 26 CFR Part 1 by revising paragraph (2) of A–2.(a) to
declassified may be subject to [TD 9324] read as follows:
withholding from public disclosure
RIN 1545–BF04 § 1.402A–2 Reporting and recordkeeping
under the FOIA, the Privacy Act, and requirements with respect to designated
various statutory confidentiality Designated Roth Accounts Under Roth accounts.
provisions. Section 402A; Correction * * * * *
§ 9.10 Mandatory declassification review. AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), A–2. * * *
Treasury. (a) * * *
All requests to the Department by a (2) If the distribution is not a direct
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
member of the public, a government rollover to a designated Roth account
employee, or an agency to declassify SUMMARY: This document contains under another plan, the plan
and release information shall result in a corrections to final regulations (TD administrator or responsible party must
prompt declassification review of the 9324) that were published in the provide to the employee, upon request,
information in accordance with Federal Register on Monday, April 30, the same information described in
procedures set forth in 22 CFR 171.20– 2007 (72 FR 21103) providing guidance paragraph (a)(1) of this A–2, except the
25. Mandatory declassification review concerning the taxation of distributions statement need not indicate the first
requests should be directed to the from designated Roth accounts under year of the 5-taxable-year period
Information and Privacy Coordinator, qualified cash or deferred arrangments described in A–1 of this section.
U.S. Department of State, SA–2, 515 under section 401(k). * * * * *
22nd St., NW., Washington, DC 20522– DATES: The correction is effective June
LaNita Van Dyke,
6001. 5, 2007.
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
§ 9.11 Systematic declassification review. Lisa Mojiri-Azad or William D. Gibbs at Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
The Information and Privacy 202–622–6060, or Cathy A. Vohs, 202– [FR Doc. E7–10802 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am]
Coordinator shall be responsible for 622–6090 (not toll-free numbers). BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
conducting a program for systematic SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
declassification review of historically Background
valuable records that were exempted DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
from the automatic declassification The final regulations that are the
subject of this correction are under Internal Revenue Service
provisions of section 3.3 of the
sections 401(k), 402(g), 402A, and 408A
Executive Order. The Information and
of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 CFR Part 301
Privacy Coordinator shall prioritize
such review on the basis of researcher Need for Correction [TD 9327]
interest and the likelihood of As published, final regulations (TD RIN 1545–BC92
declassification upon review. 9324) contain errors that may prove to
be misleading and are in need of Disclosure of Returns and Return
§ 9.12 Access to classified information by
clarification. Information in Connection With Written
historical researchers and certain former
Contracts or Agreements for the
government personnel. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Acquisition of Property or Services for
For Department procedures regarding Income taxes, Reporting and Tax Administration Purposes
the access to classified information by recordkeeping requirements.
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
historical researchers and certain former Correction of Publication Treasury.
government personnel, see Sec. 171.24
■ Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is ACTION: Final regulations.
of this Title.
corrected by making the following
SUMMARY: This document contains final
§ 9.13 Safeguarding. correcting amendments:
regulations relating to the disclosure of
Specific controls on the use, PART 1—INCOME TAXES returns and return information pursuant
processing, storage, reproduction, and to section 6103(n) of the Internal
transmittal of classified information ■ Paragraph 1. The authority citation Revenue Code (Code). The final
within the Department to provide for part 1 continues to read in part as regulations describe the circumstances
protection for such information and to follows: under which officers or employees of
prevent access by unauthorized persons Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * the Treasury Department, a State tax
are contained in Volume 12 of the agency, the Social Security
■ Par. 2. Section 1.402A–1 is amended
Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual. Administration, or the Department of
by revising the first sentence of Justice, may disclose returns and return
Dated: May 25, 2007. Example. of A–8.(b) to read as follows: information to obtain property or
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES

Lee Lohman, services for tax administration purposes,


§ 1.402A–1 Designated Roth Accounts.
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of
* * * * * pursuant to a written contract or
State. agreement. The final regulations also set
A–8. * * *
[FR Doc. E7–10778 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am] (b) * * * forth safeguard requirements that are
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P Example. The facts are the same as in the designed to protect the confidentiality
Example in A–7 of this section, except that of returns and return information in the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 Jun 04, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1

Você também pode gostar