25788 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Notices
(56,898 hours for recordkeeping on an
average of 0.33 hours per record and
8,720 hours for reporting on an average
of 40 hours per licensee).
7. Abstract: NRC Form 4 is used to
record the summary of an individual’s
cumulative occupational radiation dose
up to and including the current year to
ensure that the dose does not exceed
regulatory limits.
NRC Form 5 is used to record and
report the results of individual
monitoring for occupational radiation
exposure during a one-year (calendar
year) period to ensure regulatory
compliance with annual radiation dose
limits.
Submit, by July 6, 2007, comments
that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/index.html. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the
information collection requirements
may be directed to the NRC Clearance
Officer, Margaret A. Janney (T–5 F52),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, by
telephone at 301–415–7245, or by
Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of April, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Margaret A. Janney,
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E7–8675 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:36 May 04, 2007 Jkt 211001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–247]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Notice of Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (the licensee) to
withdraw its July 10, 2006, application
for proposed amendment to Facility
Operating License No. DPR–26 for
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit
No. 2, located in Westchester County,
New York.
The proposed amendment would
have revised the Technical
Specifications pertaining to spent fuel
cask loading operations.
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on August 29, 2006
(71 FR 51227). However, by letter dated
April 11, 2007, the licensee withdrew
the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated July 10, 2006, and the
licensee’s letter dated April 11, 2007,
which withdrew the application for
license amendment. Documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, Public
File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the internet
at the NRC Web site, http://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR Reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day
of May 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John P. Boska,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch I–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–8658 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030–29302; License No. 29–
27857–01; EA–06–286]
In the Matter of TRC Engineers, Inc.,
Mount Laurel, NJ; Order Imposing Civil
Monetary Penalty
I
TRC Engineers, Inc., formerly SITE-
Blauvelt Engineering, Inc., formerly Site
Engineers, Inc., is the holder of a
byproduct materials License No. 29–
27857–01 issued by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) on July 11, 1986. The
license was renewed on December 26,
2001 (Amendment 7) and expires on
December 31, 2011. The license
authorizes the Licensee to possess and
use certain byproduct materials in
accordance with the conditions
specified therein.
II
An inspection of the Licensee’s
activities was completed on December
5, 2006 at the licensee’s facility, as well
as at a temporary job site in Monroe,
Pennsylvania. The results of this
inspection indicated that the Licensee
had not conducted its activities in full
compliance with NRC requirements. A
written Notice of Violation and
Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty
(Notice) was served upon the Licensee
by letter dated January 30, 2007. The
Notice states the nature of the violation,
the provision of the NRC’s requirements
that the Licensee violated, and the
amount of the civil penalty proposed for
the violation. The Licensee responded
to the Notice in a letter dated February
28, 2007. In its response, the Licensee
disputed the violation and requested
rescission of the civil penalty.
III
After consideration of the Licensee’s
response and the statements of fact,
explanation, and argument for
mitigation contained therein, the NRC
staff has determined, the violation
occurred as stated in the Notice and that
the penalty proposed for the violation
designated in the Notice should be
imposed.
IV
In view of the foregoing and pursuant
to Section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (Act), 42 U.S.C.
2282, and 10 CFR 2.205, it is hereby
ordered that:
The Licensee pay a civil penalty in the
amount of $ 3,250 within 30 days of the date
of this Order, in accordance with NUREG/
07MYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Notices
BR–0254. In addition, at the time payment is
made, the licensee shall submit a statement
indicating when and by what method
payment was made, to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–2738.
V scheduled to be held on May 16–17,
The Licensee may request a hearing
within 30 days of the date of this Order.
Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to request a hearing. A request
for extension of time must be made in
writing to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, and include a statement of good
cause for the extension. A request for a
hearing should be clearly marked as a
‘‘Request for an Enforcement Hearing’’
and shall be submitted to the Secretary,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications
Staff, Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Copies also shall be sent to the Director,
Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, to the Assistant
General Counsel for Materials Litigation
and Enforcement at the same address,
and to the Regional Administrator, NRC
Region I, 475 Allendale Rd., King of
Prussia, PA 19406. If a hearing is
requested, the Commission will issue an
Order designating the time and place of
the hearing. If the Licensee fails to
request a hearing within 30 days of the
date of this Order, or if written approval
of an extension of time in which to
request a hearing has not been granted,
the provisions of this Order shall be
effective without further proceedings. If
payment has not been made by that
time, the matter may be referred to the
Attorney General, for collection.
In the event the Licensee requests a
hearing as provided above, the issues to
be considered at such hearing shall be:
(a) Whether the Licensee was in
violation of the Commission’s
requirements as set forth in the Notice
referenced in Section II above, and
(b) Whether, on the basis of such
violation, this Order should be
sustained.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 30th day of April 2007.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–8672 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:36 May 04, 2007 Jkt 211001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Nuclear
Waste; Revised
The 179th Advisory Committee on
Nuclear Waste (ACNW) meeting
2007, Room T–2B3, Two White Flint
North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland has been revised as noted
below. Notice of this meeting was
previously published in the Federal
Register on Thursday, April 26, 2007
(72 FR 20889).
The discussion of the item on Yucca
Mountain Preclosure Repository Design:
NRC Staff Review Readiness and Views
on the Issues, scheduled between 1 p.m.
and 4 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16,
2007, is now scheduled between 1 p.m.
and 3:30 p.m.
The discussion of the topic on NCRP
Study on Radiation Exposure of U.S.
Population, scheduled between 4 p.m.—
6 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 has
been canceled. A discussion of ACNW
Letter Reports will now take place
between 3:45 p.m. and 5:30 p.m on
Wednesday, May 16, 2007. All the other
items remain the same as previously
published in the Federal Register on
Thursday, April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20889).
For further information, contact Mr.
Antonio L. Dias, (Telephone 301–415–
6805), between 6:45 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
ET.
Dated: May 1, 2007.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–8676 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[EA–07–086]
In the Matter of Certain Fuel Cycle
Licensees and All Other Persons Who
Seek or Obtain Authorized Unescorted
Access to Radioactive Material or
Other Property Described Herein;
Order Imposing Fingerprinting and
Criminal History Records Check
Requirements for Unescorted Access
to Certain Radioactive Material or
Other Property (Effective Immediately)
I developed to comply with that Order,
The Licensees identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses
issued in accordance with the Atomic
Energy Act (AEA) of 1954, as amended,
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), authorizing them to
possess radioactive materials. On
PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
25789
August 8, 2005, the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 (EPAct) was enacted. Section
652 of the EPAct, amended Section 149
of the AEA to require fingerprinting and
a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
identification and criminal history
records check of any individual who is
permitted unescorted access to
radioactive material or other property
subject to regulation by the
Commission, and which the
Commission determines to be of such
significance to the public health and
safety or the common defense and
security as to warrant fingerprinting and
background checks. Though a
rulemaking to implement the
fingerprinting provisions of the EPAct is
currently underway, the NRC has
decided to implement this particular
requirement by Order, in part, prior to
the completion of the rulemaking
because a deliberate malevolent act by
an individual with unescorted access to
radioactive material or other property
has a potential to result in significant
adverse impacts to the public health and
safety or the common defense and
security.
Those exempted from fingerprinting
requirements under 10 CFR 73.61 [72
FR 4945 (February 2, 2007)] are also
exempt from the fingerprinting
requirements under this Order. In
addition, individuals who have had a
favorably-decided U.S. Government
criminal history records check within
the last five (5) years, or individuals
who have an active federal security
clearance (provided in either case that
they make available the appropriate
documentation), have satisfied the
EPAct fingerprinting requirement and
need not be fingerprinted again. Also,
individuals who have been
fingerprinted and granted access to SGI
by the reviewing official under the
previous fingerprinting order, ‘‘Order
Imposing Fingerprinting and Criminal
History Check Requirements for Access
to Safeguards Information,’’ do not need
to be fingerprinted again.
Subsequent to the terrorist events of
September 11, 2001, the NRC issued
security Orders requiring certain entities
to implement Additional Security
Measures (ASMs) or Interim
Compensatory Measures (ICMs) for
certain radioactive material. The
requirements imposed by these Orders
and the measures licensees have
were designated by the NRC as
Safeguards Information (SGI) and were
not released to the public. These Orders
included a local criminal history
records check to determine
trustworthiness and reliability of
individuals seeking unescorted access to
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1