Você está na página 1de 1

23806 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An EIS ACTION: Notice of intent. to boat wake erosion; and (4)
will be prepared in accordance with Formulating shoreline ecosystem
NEPA to address any environmental or SUMMARY: In accordance with the restoration and public property and
socioeconomic impacts associated with National Environmental Policy Act infrastructure storm/flood damage
the real property exchange. The EIS will (NEPA), the Baltimore District, U.S. reduction projects for implementation
examine a wide range of resource areas, Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), will by USACE, DNR, and other agencies or
including, but not limited to, land use, conduct a review of the 1990 organizations. Engineering feasibility,
air quality, traffic, noise, biological Chesapeake Bay Shoreline Erosion economic costs and benefits, and
resources, cultural resources, Study to investigate shoreline erosion environmental impacts will be
socioeconomics, utilities, hazardous and and related sediment management considered in formulating projects.
toxic substances, and cumulative measures which could be undertaken to Additionally, the study partners, in
environmental effects. Air quality and protect the water and land resources of conjunction with Md. Dept. of the
traffic effects are believed at this time to the Chesapeake Bay watershed and Environment (MDE), initiated
be the areas with greatest potential for achieve the water quality conditions preparation of an updated shoreline
impact. necessary to protect the Bay’s living erosion control handbook for waterfront
resources. USACE will prepare a Draft property owners.
All reasonable alternatives, including Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Study products will comprise
a No Action Alternative (as required by and integrated feasibility report components of a shoreline management
NEPA), will be developed and analyzed documenting study findings and plan master plan DNR and MDE are
in the EIS. The range of alternatives will formulation. developing for the state of Maryland.
include several redevelopment
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The master plan would address issuance
scenarios. During the scoping process,
Questions about the proposed DEIS with of stabilization permits for shoreline
other alternatives may be developed for
integrated feasibility report can be property owners, shoreline habitat
consideration. The EIS will analyze
addressed to Mr. Kevin Luebke, U.S. restoration and conservation, and
each alternative’s impact on the natural
Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: coastal flood and erosion hazard
and cultural environments at the West reduction. The USACE EIS and
Los Angeles facility and the CENAB–PL–P, 10 South Howard Street,
P.O. Box 1715, Baltimore, MD 21203– integrated feasibility report will provide
surrounding area. Mitigation measures an overview of the master plan and
will also be considered in the EIS. 1715, telephone 410–962–6141; e-mail
address: Kevin.Luebke@usace.army.mil; include environmental compliance
Tribal, federal, state and local documentation for specific projects
or Mr. Christopher Spaur, same address,
agencies, and the public are invited to USACE may pursue. Projects to be
telephone 410–962–6134; e-mail
participate in the scoping process for pursued independently by others would
address:
the preparation of the EIS. The scoping require separate environmental
Christopher.C.Spaur@usace.army.mil.
process will help identify additional compliance efforts to be undertaken by
possible alternatives, potential SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USACE is other agencies and organization.
environmental impacts, and key issues conducting this review in partnership The study will be conducted in
of concern to be analyzed in the EIS. with the Maryland Department of compliance with Sections 401 and 404
Scoping meetings will be held in Natural Resources (DNR). The 1990 of the Clean Water Act, Section 7 of the
convenient locations near the West Los study evaluated erosive conditions Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air
Angeles facility. Notification of the along the Chesapeake Bay shoreline Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
times and locations for the scoping where publicly owned property and/or Coordination Act, Section 106 of the
meetings will be published in local infrastructure were threatened. The National Historic Preservation Act,
newspapers. To ensure scoping 1990 study also investigated sources of Prime and Unique Farmlands, the
comments are fully considered in the sediment from shoreline that contribute Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
draft EIS, comments and suggestions to shoaling of public navigation Conservation and Management Act, and
should be received within the 30-day channels. the National Pollutant Discharge
scoping period. Several efforts have been completed Elimination System Act. All appropriate
to date in the review. Conditions of the documentation (i.e., coordination letters
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Maryland shoreline have been and public and agency comments) will
Addison D. Davis, IV, inventoried by the Virginia Institute of
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
be obtained and included as part of the
Marine Science and summary data and EIS. As part of the EIS process,
(Environment, Safety and Occupational maps are now available on the
Health). recommendations of projects will be
worldwide Web at http:// based on an evaluation of the probable
[FR Doc. 07–2135 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] ccrm.vims.edu/gisdatabases.html. Wave
BILLING CODE 3710–07–M
impact of the proposed activity on the
energy has been modeled regionally for public interest. The decision will reflect
the study area shoreline by USACE. The the national concern for the protection
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service prepared and utilization of important resources.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE a planning aid report identifying The benefit, which may reasonably be
Department of the Army; Corps of shoreline-dependent animal and plant expected to accrue from the proposal,
Engineers species and important habitats. Efforts will be balanced against its reasonably
currently underway include: (1) foreseeable detriments.
Intent To Prepare a Draft Conducting a statistical analysis of It is expected that public release of
Environmental Impact Statement With historic shoreline change rates, modeled the DEIS and integrated feasibility
shoreline wave energy, and current
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES

an Integrated Feasibility Report for the report will occur in Summer 2009.
Chesapeake Bay Shoreline Erosion shoreline to correlate relationships
between these variables; (2) Forecasting Brenda S. Bowen,
Study, MD
shoreline areas likely to be vulnerable to Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
AGENCY:Department of the Army, U.S. future erosion; (3) Characterizing tidal [FR Doc. 07–2114 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am]
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. tributary shoreline segments vulnerable BILLING CODE 3710–41–M

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:32 Apr 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1

Você também pode gostar