Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
com/
Marketing Education
Incorporating Transformative Consumer Research Into the Consumer Behavior Course Experience
Ed Petkus, Jr
Journal of Marketing Education 2010 32: 292 originally published online 28 July 2010
DOI: 10.1177/0273475310377784
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://jmd.sagepub.com/content/32/3/292
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Journal of Marketing Education can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://jmd.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://jmd.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://jmd.sagepub.com/content/32/3/292.refs.html
Article
Ed Petkus Jr.1
Abstract
In contrast to understanding consumer behavior for the benefit of business organizations, transformative consumer research
(TCR) seeks to understand consumer behavior for the benefit of consumers themselves. Following Maris (2008) call for the
incorporation of TCR in doctoral programs in marketing, this article outlines the relevance of TCR to the undergraduate
consumer behavior course experience and develops topical and structural recommendations for implementation. Empirical
evidence indicates positive student perceptions of TCR-based course projects in terms of complementing traditional projects,
personal relevance, awareness of social responsibility issues, and marketing applications.
Keywords
transformative consumer research, experiential learning, consumer behavior, social responsibility
Mrs. ___ understands enough about nutrition to know that
her children eat far too many processed foods and far too few
fruits and vegetables. She reads anything she can find about
healthy eating and often talks to her friends about it. She understands nutritional labels and is skilled at evaluating alternatives in the context of food shopping. She is seriously motivated
to buy healthy food, and despite her relatively low income,
she is willing to pay more for it.
But Mrs. ___ lives in what is known as a food desert.
She has no car, and the only stores to which she has access
via walking or affordable public transportation are convenience stores (which, of course, not only sell mostly processed food but sell it at a higher price). There is one store
that she could walk to that sells some whole foods, but it
involves crossing under a bridge where some dangerous people hang out (her friend was attacked there 6 months ago). So
despite a consumer decision-making process that results in a
strong intention to buy healthy food, Mrs. ___ is in a situation that forces her to make choices that are less than favorable to her and her familys well-being.
This scenario describes a consumer behavior context that
is significantly different from the contexts typically addressed
in a more traditional, managerially focused consumer behavior
curriculum. These situations and ones like them raise important implications for consumer researchersconsiderations
involving not only why and how people make (and are sometimes forced to make) the choices they do but what the impact
of those choices is on their well-being. The question is, Is
there a place for such considerations in the consumer behavior
What Is Transformative
Consumer Research?
Transformative consumer research (TCR) refers most simply to consumer research whose mission is to improve peoples welfare. A formal definition is found on the TCR link
from the Association for Consumer Research (2010) website: (TCR) is a movement within our association that seeks
to encourage, support, and publicize research that benefits
consumer welfare and quality of life for all beings affected
by consumption across the world. The scope of TCR includes
both micro- and macro-level consumer considerations. In
setting the broad context for increased attention to TCR considerations, Mick (2008, p. 377) remarks, These are . . . the
times in which the ideology and practice of consumption
have multiplied across the earth to levels of complexity, subtlety, and influence that were unimaginable just a few
decades ago.
In short, TCR addresses the avoidance of negative consumer outcomes and the realization of positive consumer
1
Corresponding Author:
Ed Petkus Jr., Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, NJ 07430, USA
Email: epetkus@ramapo.edu
293
Petkus
outcomes. General TCR topic areas include vulnerable populations (e.g., the poor, illiterate, elderly, etc.), negative consumer behaviors (e.g., smoking, poor nutritional habits,
high-risk behaviors, etc.), and positive consumer behaviors
(e.g., environmentally responsible behavior, volunteer work,
organ donation, etc.) (Mari, 2008; Mick, 2006). TCR represents a countervailing approach to the traditional managerial
perspective in consumer behavior; in contrast to understanding consumer behavior for the benefit of business organizations, TCR involves understanding consumer behavior for
the benefit of consumers themselves.
Although Mick (2006) can be credited with developing
the TCR concept, Mari (2008) must be credited with introducing the TCR theme to marketing education. However,
Maris (2008) discussion is entirely limited to doctoral-level
marketing education. This article seeks to extend the Mari
(2008) discussion to undergraduate marketing education.
This article will argue that undergraduate marketing education, specifically the Consumer Behavior course, represents
an effective context for the implementation of TCR.
These articles are cited here because they are among the
classics in the fieldgroundbreaking in terms of TCR
theme (and methodology in some cases). Much more recent
scholarship has carried on in this tradition. In 2007, the first
Transformative Consumer Research Conference was held
at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth University; the
second TCR conference was held in summer 2009 at Villanova University. General themes for the conference sessions
included the following:
Poverty
Materialism
Developing Markets
Sustainable Consumption
Empowering Consumers to Live Healthier Lives
Food and Health
At-Risk Groups
Social Justice
Immigration, Culture, Ethnicity
294
Table 1. Consumer Behavior Topics, TCR Dimensions, and Related Learning Experiences
Consumer Behavior Topic
Sensory systems/
multisensory perception
Consumer socialization
and learning
Motivation
Materialism/conspicuous
consumption
Self-concept/self-esteem
Consumer decision-making
model
Consumer attitudes
Personality/lifestyle
Reference group/social
influence
Consumer social
responsibility
Cultural influences
Global issues
Implementation of TCR
Perspective in the Consumer
Behavior Course Experience
Topical Relevance
The first step in implementation is to match basic consumer
behavior course topics with the TCR body of knowledge.
Table 1 outlines selected potential correspondences among
295
Petkus
sabotage or defacement of marketing activities such as cigarette billboards). Other textbook treatments of specific TCRrelated topics include consumer misbehavior (Babin &
Harris, 2008) and consumer advocacy and public policy issues
related to consumer behavior (Lindquist & Sirgy, 2008). In
addition, most consumer behavior textbooks include treatments of broader contextually relevant issues such as marketing ethics and social responsibility.
Learning Experiences
If one accepts that TCR dimensions and topics are relevant
to the consumer behavior course curriculum, the next step is
to develop specific learning experiences for implementation.
These learning experiences generally fall into two categories: in-class experiences and homework/project work. Table 1
offers examples of potential learning experiences for each of
the consumer behavior topics and TCR dimensions. These
examples are intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive; indeed,
any type of learning experience or assignment could potentially be applied to any of the topics, based on instructor interest, preference, and course structure.
Also, it is very important to emphasize that the overall
degree of TCR implementation is very flexible: It could range
from creating an entire course that is TCR themed to occasionally introducing TCR dimensions on an a la carte basis.
Indeed, innovative teaching methods may be applied to the
TCR context; for example, Stern (2008) discusses a course
innovation in which students undertook a discovery walk
in which they directly observed the consumption contexts of
minority consumers. Again, instructor preference, school or
college or department mission, and student interest are some
factors than can help determine the degree of TCR integration in the course. The following sections will offer some
illustrative examples of (a) in-class learning experiences and
(b) student projects from my own experience in fall 2008 and
spring 2009 (the semesters in which, inspired by Mari (2008),
I integrated TCR formally into the curriculum). For context:
I teach at a medium-sized public liberal arts college in the
northeast United States; the School of Business is the largest
of the five schools at the college; we have roughly 225 marketing majors.
In-class learning experiences. In-class TCR-related experiences include (a) discussions of TCR themes and dimension
and (b) the completion of in-class experiential exercises. In
my experience, in-class discussions of TCR topics have been
vibrant, with generally broad participation. In the interest of
full disclosure, an advantage in my classes is that the students were primed to understand TCR topics because their
final project, to be discussed later, was TCR themed, so they
were familiar with the TCR perspective starting with the
first-day discussion of the syllabus. In general, student familiarity with the specific topics, as well as students overall
level of involvement with social issues, would likely be factors in the level of participation in class discussion and the
depth and breadth of student input in those discussions.
In my own classes, I emphasized the congruence of
TCR themes with the liberal arts mission of our college (our
school of business mission also incorporates integration of
business education and the liberal arts). However, any marketing educator seeking to enhance the degree of relevance
of TCR dimensions can call on (a) current events and/or
(b) students own life experiences. For example, the semesters in which I implemented TCR dimensions happened to
coincide with the economic recession of 2008-2009, which
opened up many chances for discussion of how economic
difficulties relate to consumer behavior in terms of motivation,
attitude formation, and consumer decision-making dynamics. In addition, a number of my students were able to share
stories that related to TCR themes. In one notably affecting
example, a students father had recently died from obesityrelated conditions; the student was forthcoming with many
details about his fathers consumption choices (in terms of
food, exercise, and other lifestyle factors), which provided
rich fodder for discussion (and inspired that students group
project topic for the course).
In-class exercises represent an even higher level of TCR
application than does a general discussion. Several times
during the two semesters, I dedicated the last 20 to 30 minutes of class to having the students form small groups and
apply the days material to a minicase that is TCR themed.
For example, the class was asked to devise a draft of a
community outreach strategy that would help children learn
how to understand the basics of nutritional labeling for the
foods they eat. The goal of this exercise was to have students
apply concepts involving consumer socialization and consumer learning. The outcomes of this exercise involved multifaceted appeals drawing on cultural, social, and educational
factors in consumer socialization and consumer learning (as
well as a complementary application of integrated marketing
communication basics). Another example of an in-class TCR
exercise had students rewriting and redesigning advertisements for beauty products. The goal of this exercise was to
apply chapter material dealing with body image, self-esteem,
and sex roles in order to redesign the ads so that they told
the truth. The main TCR-related outcome of this exercise
was that it helped the students understand the links between
marketing/advertising strategies and consumers psychological well-being; however, the in-class time was perhaps too
limited for the students to fully execute their ideas (something to consider for any in-class exercise or assignment).
Student projects/out-of-class assignments. Although in-class
experiences serve to reinforce course material and demonstrate its application in the TCR context, homework assignments and research projects provide an opportunity for
even deeper immersion in and exploration of TCR themes.
296
Consumer well-being
(diet/fitness)
Consumer well-being
(addictive/harmful
behaviors)
Economic/
technological
issues
297
Petkus
Please describe how you feel about doing a project with this
type of objective. Please include as much detail as possible in
your response. Forty-four out of the 60 students responded,
and they were nearly evenly split between the two semesters
(21 from fall 2008 and 23 from spring 2009); given that the
two courses were in the same academic year, there is no reason to expect that there would be any significant differences
between the two groups.
The valence of the responses was overwhelmingly positive, which was not surprising because, as the projects
unfolded during the semesters, there was a generally positive
feeling about the TCR orientation (likewise the comments
in the course evaluations). Beyond that confirmation, I was
interested in the students feelings regarding the learning
outcomes that they had realized in completing the project.
A content analysis of the responses identified four main
themes. First, many students noted the favorable contrast that
the TCR project provided with respect to more traditional
marketing/business-oriented projects. A second theme was
personal relevancestudents commented that they could
relate personally to the TCR topics and that this enhanced
their learning of the concepts. Third, students reported that
the TCR project helped increase their awareness of consumer
well-being issues and social responsibility factors in marketing. Finally, several responses discussed the practical marketing applications that emerged from the project (which is
encouraging in terms of the overall objectives of the consumer behavior course). It is also important to note that two
students commented that they would have liked to either
have had a choice between doing a traditional project or completed a project that somehow combined the traditional with
the TCR approach (indeed, this speaks to the flexible nature
of the degree of TCR implementationcommunication with
students as to the amount of choice that they would like to
see). None of the student comments were critical or disdainful of the project (though I acknowledge that there is no way
to account for potential nonresponse bias). Table 3 offers
some verbatim examples of the students responses for each
of these four thematic categories.
Final Reflections
The total body of consumer research literature is indeed vast,
and no instructor can hope to cover all of it in a semester-long
consumer behavior course experience. Adding a TCR perspective to ones course thus might require that something
else be foregone. However, merely exposing students to the
potential for such consumer research, and to the consumer
well-being issues that are raised, should result in some of the
learning outcomes discussed in the previous section. Moreover, TCR topical coverage would not be limited to the
consumer behavior course; any course that covers consumer
behavior topics and/or social responsibility topics could
Personal relevance
Awareness of
social/social
responsibility
issues
Marketing
applications
potentially find opportunities for implementation. It is important to emphasize here that the TCR implementation described
herein is intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive. Over
time, given some level of increased TCR implementation, we
298
should look for future scholarship to expand on the considerations introduced herein. Also, it is important to reiterate that
this is not a call for a complete, radical overhaul of the consumer behavior curriculum; TCR can serve as a balance to the
predominant managerial focus, but not necessarily a replacement. Again, ultimately, the degree to which TCR is incorporated into the consumer behavior curriculum will likely be
driven primarily by the individual instructors level of interest in the perspective.
Such considerations open the door to a new and broader
question: Should a TCR perspective be part of a larger social
responsibility focus in the overall marketing curriculum?
Most marketing curricula have embraced marketing ethics
across most, if not all, courses. Marketing curricula are
increasingly embracing sustainability issues. Is TCR the next
step in the evolution (enlightenment?) of the marketing curriculum? The student responses to the TCR project experience seem to indicate that this may be the case (see Table 3).
Examples of student responses include conducting the
research forces you to become aware of issues you may not
otherwise think about . . . it encompasses ethics, law, as well
as social sciences; presented an opportunity to look outside of the box beyond the actual product and address the
ways in which in affect the consumers life; and will better
our ability to work in a socially responsible capacity. Although
more research would need to be done in this area, the logical
extension from TCR themes to social responsibility considerations does not appear to be too far a stretch.
Of course, Mrs.___ does not care what we call it. She just
wants to get some healthy food for her kids.
Appendix
Example Outline for TCR Final Course Project
MKTG 310 Consumer Behavior
General Outline for the Final Project
Transformative Consumer Research: Analysis of Consumer
Experience, with Recommendations to Increase Consumer Well-Being
Introduction
1. Description of the Phenomenon/Experience of
Interest
2. Brief Historical Perspective
Part 1: Individual and Decision-Making Perspective
1. Perception/Multi-Sensory Issues
2. Motivation & Values Analysis
3. Self, Personality, Lifestyle, and Attitudinal
Factors
4. Decision-Making Dynamics
Appendix (continued)
Part 2: Sociocultural Perspective
1. Sociodemographic Factors
2. Cultural Influences
3. Global/Multicultural Factors
Part 3: Recommendations to Organizations and Consumers
Please recall that the overarching theme of the project is
transformative consumer research, with a mission of enhancing the well-being of people/society. Some topical areas that
you might address include
Economic efficiency
Health/nutrition/fitness
Environmental/social responsibility
Consumer education (children/youth)
Consumer safety
Psychological and social well-being
Vulnerable groups (poor, elderly, illiterate, etc.)
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research and/or
authorship of this article.
References
Arnould, E. J. (1989). Toward a broadened theory of preference formation and the diffusion of innovations: Cases from Zinder province, Niger Republic. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 239-267.
Association for Consumer Research. (2010). Transformative consumer research resources: Retrieved from http://www.acrweb
site.org/fop/index.asp?itemID=325
Babin, B. J., & Harris, E. (2008). CB. Boston, MA: Southwestern.
Bazerman, M. H. (2001). Consumer research for consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 499-504.
Deighton, J., & Grayson, K. (1995). Marketing and seduction:
Building exchange relationships by managing social consensus.
Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 660-676.
Hill, R. P. (1991). Homeless women, special possessions, and the
meaning of home: An ethnographic case study. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 303-321.
Hirschmann, E. C. (1992). The consciousness of addiction: Toward
a general theory of compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 155-179.
Lindquist, J., & Sirgy, M. J. (2008). Shopper, buyer, and consumer
behavior: Theory, marketing applications, and public policy.
Florence, KY: Atomic Dog/Cengage.
299
Petkus
Mari, C. (2008). Doctoral education and transformative consumer
research. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 5-11.
Mehta, R., & Belk, R. W. (1991). Artifacts, identity, and transition:
Favorite possessions of Indians and Indian immigrants to the
United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 398-411.
Mick, D. G. (2006). ACR presidential address: Meaning and mattering through transformative consumer research. Advances in
Consumer Research, 33, 2-5.
Mick, D. G. (2008). Introduction: The moment and place for a
special Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer
Research, 35, 377-379.
Penaloza, L. (1994). Atravesando Fronteras/Border crossings:
A critical ethnographic study of the consumer acculturation of
Mexican immigrants. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 32-53.
Petkus, E., Jr. (2007). Enhancing the relevance and value of marketing curriculum outcomes to a liberal arts education. Journal
of Marketing Education, 29, 39-51.
Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Selfpresentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer
Research, 30, 385-404.
Singhapakdi, A. (2004). Important factors underlying ethical intentions of students: Implication for marketing education. Journal
of Marketing Education, 26, 261-271.