Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
and contradict the verbal message. It shows how nonverbal gives strong effects
and meaning to the verbal communication.
In education, nonverbal communication also plays an important role. Kellogg
and Lawson (1993) found that 82% of communication technique used by teachers
in the classroom is nonverbal. Galloway (1966) also concluded in his research that
the meaning inherent in nonverbal expressions are used by the students to check
on the fidelity of communicative act and by interpreting and inferring from
nonverbal expression, student may attempt to obtain the full import of the a
teachers perceptions and motivations. Okon also (2011) took a study to examine
the issue of nonverbal communication in the context of mitigating and managing
conflict between students and teachers. He found that by understanding these
nonverbal cues, teacher can solve the problem better when conflict arises with a
student in the classroom.
In language teaching, nonverbal education also has a big contribution. Negi
(2009) found that teachers nonverbal behaviors play a highly important and
essential role on learners motivation in language classroom. It is also in line with
the result of Krugers research (2009) that there is a positive relationship between
the use of gestures in EFL class and students listening comprehension. In 2012,
Karimi et al also found that nonverbal communication has a big impact on Iranian
young EFL learners attitude and understanding of lexical items. Oladipupo
(2014) suggested on his research that nonverbal communication will improve the
academic achievements of language learners as well as making the task of
impacting knowledge an easy one for the teacher also. It is supported by
Pennycook (1985) that the balance combination between verbal and nonverbal
communication must be considered to make students easier to understand
language acquisition.
There are various kinds of nonverbal communication. Some scholars also
have different versions in dividing it. Negi (2009) stated that Various forms of
NVC that are used in language classroom include: kinesics, facial expressions,
oculecies, haptics, proxemics, paralanguage, chronemics, physical appearance,
olfactics, environmental factors, and so on. While Malandro et al in Hong-li
(2011) divided nonverbal communication into: (1) body types, shapes and size, (2)
clothing personal artifacts, (3) body movements and gestures, (4) facial expression
and eye behavior, (5) environment, (6) personal space, territory, and crowding, (7)
voice characteristics and qualities, (8) taste and smell, and (9) culture and time.
The previous study related to nonverbal in education mainly focused on the
kinesic aspect and the general term of nonverbal itself which is sometimes limited
on the body language or facial expression.
In this study, the researcher will focus on the contribution of paralanguage or
called as vocalic by Masterson (1996) and Boy (2000) or paraverbal features by
Key (1975) in English language teaching. The term of paralanguage was first
used by Trager (1958) which means a combination between linguistic and
psychological material collected on the kinds and categories of voice modification
which could be applied in the different context. Allen (2000) defines it as auditory
behavior including pitch, volume, silence, laughter, sighs, and cough.
This study will be brought into the analysis of the use of paralanguage
features by the teachers in English language teaching. Besides that, the study also
will see the students perception toward these features.
Thus, the researcher formulates these research questions:
1. What is the perception of teachers toward primary quality features of
paralanguage in the classroom?
2. How do teachers apply the primary quality features of paralanguage in the
classroom?
3. How are students responses toward teachers primary quality features of
paralanguage in the classroom?
C. Objectives of the Study
Based on the background and the problem statement above, the aims of this
study are:
1. To analyze the perception of teachers toward the use of primary quality
features of paralanguage in the classroom.
2. To find out the way teachers apply the primary quality features of
paralanguage in the classroom.
3. To find out the students responses toward teachers primary quality features in
the classroom.
D. Significance of the Study
The result of this study is expected to further be used mainly for language
teaching. Nonverbal communication, especially paralanguage plays an important
role in Language teaching.
This study is likely to promote the awareness of teacher about the importance
of the features of paralanguage in their teaching process and as a reflection after
seeing the students perception towards the use of paralanguage features.
E. Scope of the Study
According to Surakhman (1975, cited in Setiawan 2006), the scope of the
study is important to simplify and solve the problem for the researcher, such as
time, dexterity, cost, energy that emerge from the researcher planning.
Based on that, this study will be focused on the primary qualities features of
paralanguage which can be modified like laudness, tempo, pitch quality,
intonation, syllabic length, and rhythm, used by teacher in English classroom. The
subjects are English teachers in Watansoppeng, center of Soppeng Regency, South
Sulawesi.
Primary qualities of paralanguage is actually more than what researcher
mention above. There are also timbre and resonance. But under the consideration
that timbre and resonance are permanent qualities that cannot be modified, the
researcher exclude them from this research.