Você está na página 1de 3

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules 67077

Applicability or assembly to detect damage, failure, or hydraulic lines. This proposed AD


(c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model irregularity. Available lighting is normally results from a fuel leak found in the left
ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 STD, –100 SE, –100 supplemented with a direct source of good MLG bay. We are proposing this AD to
SU, –200 LR, –200 STD, and –200 SU lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. detect and correct inadequate clearance
airplanes, and Model ERJ 190–100 STD, –100 Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
between fuel and hydraulic lines in the
LR, and –100 IGW airplanes; certificated in MLG bay, which could lead to chafing
any category. cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’ of a fuel line and fuel leakage. A fuel
Unsafe Condition leak near hot brakes could result in a
(d) This AD results from reports of Alternative Methods of Compliance fire in the MLG bay.
erroneous air speed indications caused by (AMOCs)
DATES: We must receive comments on
blockage of the pitot sensors due to freezing (h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, this proposed AD by December 20,
of accumulated moisture in the air data smart ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve 2006.
probes (ADSP) pneumatic passages. We are AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
issuing this AD to prevent an erroneous air accordance with the procedures found in 14 ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
speed indication, which could reduce CFR 39.19. addresses to submit comments on this
flightcrew ability to control the airplane. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in proposed AD.
Compliance
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to • DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://
which the AMOC applies, notify the dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
(e) You are responsible for having the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
actions required by this AD performed within
for sending your comments
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
the compliance times specified, unless the electronically.
Office.
actions have already been done. • Government-wide rulemaking Web
Related Information site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
Inspect To Determine Part Number (P/N) of and follow the instructions for sending
ADSPs (i) Brazilian airworthiness directives 2006–
05–05, effective June 14, 2006, and 2006–05– your comments electronically.
(f) Within 600 flight hours after the 08, effective June 19, 2006, also address the • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
effective date of this AD, inspect to subject of this AD. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
determine the part number of the ADSPs. For Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
any Rosemount Aerospace ADSP having P/N Issued in Renton, Washington, on
2015G2H2H–4( ), 2015G2H2H–5( ), November 8, 2006. room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
2015G2H2H–6( ), or 2015G2H2H–7 ( ), do Kalene C. Yanamura, • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
the applicable actions required by this AD. Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
For any ADSP having any other part number, Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
no further action is required by this AD. [FR Doc. E6–19532 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
Note 1: The parentheses used in the DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
identified ADSP model part numbers through Friday, except Federal holidays.
indicate the presence or absence of an Contact Fokker Services B.V.,
additional letter(s), which varies with the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231,
basic ADSP model designation. The letter(s) 2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep, the
defines minor changes that do not affect Netherlands, for service information
Federal Aviation Administration
interchangeability or eligibility of the ADSP. identified in this proposed AD.
Therefore, this AD still applies regardless of
the presence or absence of these letters on the 14 CFR Part 39 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
ADSP model designation. Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26355; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–198–AD]
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Detailed Inspection, Moisture Removal, and Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Related Investigative/Corrective Actions RIN 2120–AA64 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
(g) Within 600 flight hours after the 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137;
effective date of this AD, perform a detailed Airworthiness Directives; Fokker fax (425) 227–1149.
inspection for blockage of the pitot drain Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
holes of the ADSP, remove accumulated Airplanes
moisture from the pneumatic passages of the Comments Invited
ADSP, and, before further flight, do all AGENCY: Federal Aviation
related investigative actions and applicable Administration (FAA), Department of We invite you to submit any relevant
corrective actions. Perform all required Transportation (DOT). written data, views, or arguments
actions in accordance with the ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking regarding this proposed AD. Send your
Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER (NPRM). comments to an address listed in the
Service Bulletin 170–34–0007, dated April ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
28, 2005 (for Model ERJ 170 airplanes), or SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a number ‘‘FAA–2006–26355; Directorate
EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190–34–0003, new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Identifier 2006–NM–198–AD’’ at the
dated December 2, 2005 (for Model ERJ 190 Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 beginning of your comments. We
airplanes), as applicable. Repeat all required airplanes. This proposed AD would specifically invite comments on the
actions thereafter at intervals not to exceed
600 flight hours.
require a one-time inspection of the fuel overall regulatory, economic,
lines located in the left and right main environmental, and energy aspects of
Note 2: EMBRAER Service Bulletins 170–
34–0007 and 190–34–0003 refer to
landing gear (MLG) bays to determine the proposed AD. We will consider all
Rosemount Aerospace Service Bulletin the clearance between the fuel and comments received by the closing date
2015G2H2H–34–04, Revision 1, dated April hydraulic lines. If necessary, this and may amend the proposed AD in
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS

6, 2005, as an additional source of service proposed AD would also require an light of those comments.
information for accomplishing the required inspection of fuel lines for chafing, We will post all comments we
actions. replacement of a chafed fuel line with receive, without change, to http://
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a a new fuel line, and the repositioning of dms.dot.gov, including any personal
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive existing clamps and installation of information you provide. We will also
examination of a specific item, installation, additional clamps between the fuel and post a report summarizing each

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Nov 17, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1
67078 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules

substantive verbal contact with FAA (2) to reposition the existing clamps and ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
personnel concerning this proposed AD. install additional clamps to obtain a section, Congress charges the FAA with
Using the search function of that Web minimum clearance of 3 mm between promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
site, anyone can find and read the the fuel and hydraulic lines, as air commerce by prescribing regulations
comments in any of our dockets, necessary. Accomplishing the actions for practices, methods, and procedures
including the name of the individual specified in the service information is the Administrator finds necessary for
who sent the comment (or signed the intended to adequately address the safety in air commerce. This regulation
comment on behalf of an association, unsafe condition. The CAA–NL is within the scope of that authority
business, labor union, etc.). You may mandated the service information and because it addresses an unsafe condition
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act issued Dutch airworthiness directive that is likely to exist or develop on
Statement in the Federal Register NL–2005–010 R1, dated September 7, products identified in this rulemaking
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 2005, to ensure the continued action.
19477–78), or you may visit http:// airworthiness of these airplanes in the
dms.dot.gov. Regulatory Findings
Netherlands.
Examining the Docket We have determined that this
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
proposed AD would not have federalism
You may examine the AD docket on of the Proposed AD
implications under Executive Order
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in These airplane models are 13132. This proposed AD would not
person at the Docket Management manufactured in the Netherlands and have a substantial direct effect on the
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 are type certificated for operation in the States, on the relationship between the
p.m., Monday through Friday, except United States under the provisions of national Government and the States, or
Federal holidays. The Docket section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation on the distribution of power and
Management Facility office (telephone Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the responsibilities among the various
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza applicable bilateral airworthiness levels of government.
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral For the reasons discussed above, I
street address stated in the ADDRESSES airworthiness agreement, the CAA–NL certify that the proposed regulation:
section. Comments will be available in has kept the FAA informed of the
the AD docket shortly after the Docket 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
situation described above. We have action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
Management System receives them. examined the CAA–NL’s findings, 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
Discussion evaluated all pertinent information, and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
determined that we need to issue an AD (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
The Civil Aviation Authority—The for airplanes of this type design that are
Netherlands (CAA–NL), which is the 3. Will not have a significant
certificated for operation in the United
airworthiness authority for the economic impact, positive or negative,
States.
Netherlands, notified us that an unsafe Therefore, we are proposing this AD, on a substantial number of small entities
condition may exist on all Fokker Model which would require accomplishing the under the criteria of the Regulatory
F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. The actions specified in the service Flexibility Act.
CAA–NL advises that a fuel leak was information described previously. We prepared a regulatory evaluation
found in the left main landing gear of the estimated costs to comply with
(MLG) bay, on a Fokker Model F.28 Clarification of Inspection Terminology this proposed AD and placed it in the
Mark 0100 airplane. Investigation The ‘‘inspection’’ specified in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
revealed that inadequate clearance Fokker service bulletin is referred to as for a location to examine the regulatory
between the fuel and hydraulic lines in a ‘‘general visual inspection’’ in this evaluation.
the MLG bay led to chafing of the fuel proposed AD. We have included the List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
line and consequent fuel leakage. A fuel definition for a general visual inspection
leak near hot brakes, if not corrected, in a note in the proposed AD. Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
could result in a fire in the MLG bay. safety, Safety.
Costs of Compliance
Relevant Service Information The Proposed Amendment
This proposed AD would affect about
Fokker Services B.V. has issued 9 airplanes of U.S. registry. The Accordingly, under the authority
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– proposed inspection would take about 1 delegated to me by the Administrator,
041, dated July 20, 2005. The service work hour per airplane, at an average the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
bulletin describes procedures for a one- labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based 39 as follows:
time inspection of the fuel lines located on these figures, the estimated cost of
in the left and right MLG bays to the proposed AD for U.S. operators is PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
determine the clearance between the $720, or $80 per airplane. DIRECTIVES
fuel and hydraulic lines. If the clearance
is less than 3 mm (millimeters), the Authority for This Rulemaking 1. The authority citation for part 39
service bulletin specifies inspecting the Title 49 of the United States Code continues to read as follows:
fuel line for chafing and doing specifies the FAA’s authority to issue Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
corrective actions as necessary. If no rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
chafing is found, the corrective action is § 39.13 [Amended]
section 106, describes the authority of
to reposition the existing clamps and the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 2. The Federal Aviation
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS

install additional clamps to obtain a Aviation Programs, describes in more Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
minimum clearance of 3 mm between detail the scope of the Agency’s by adding the following new
the fuel and hydraulic lines, as authority. airworthiness directive (AD):
necessary. If chafing is found, the We are issuing this rulemaking under Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA–
corrective actions are (1) To replace the the authority described in subtitle VII, 2006–26355; Directorate Identifier 2006–
chafed fuel line with a new fuel line and part A, subpart III, section 44701, NM–198–AD.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Nov 17, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules 67079

Comments Due Date (2) Reposition the existing clamps and partial retractions of the NLG. We are
(a) The FAA must receive comments on install additional clamps to obtain a proposing this AD to prevent internal
this AD action by December 20, 2006. minimum clearance of 3 mm between the leakage of the selector valve, which,
fuel and hydraulic lines, as applicable, in under certain conditions, could result in
Affected ADs accordance with Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker
an uncommanded retraction of the NLG
(b) None.
Service Bulletin SBF100–28–041, dated July with consequent damage to the airplane
Applicability 20, 2005. and possible serious injury to ground
(c) This AD applies to all Fokker Model personnel.
F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes, Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs) DATES: We must receive comments on
certificated in any category.
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, this proposed AD by December 20,
Unsafe Condition ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 2006.
(d) This AD results from a fuel leak found FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
in the left main landing gear (MLG) bay. We for this AD, if requested in accordance with addresses to submit comments on this
are issuing this AD to detect and correct the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
inadequate clearance between fuel and
proposed AD.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in • DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://
hydraulic lines in the MLG bay, which could accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
lead to chafing of a fuel line and fuel leakage. which the AMOC applies, notify the
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
A fuel leak near hot brakes could result in appropriate principal inspector in the FAA for sending your comments
a fire in the MLG bay. Flight Standards Certificate Holding District electronically.
Office. • Government-wide rulemaking Web
Compliance
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
(e) You are responsible for having the Related Information and follow the instructions for sending
actions required by this AD performed within (i) Dutch airworthiness directive NL–2005–
the compliance times specified, unless the
your comments electronically.
actions have already been done.
010 R1, dated September 7, 2005, also • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
addresses the subject of this AD. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Inspections for Clearance and Chafing Issued in Renton, Washington, on Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
(f) Within 6 months after the effective date November 8, 2006. Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
of this AD, do a general visual inspection of Kalene C. Yanamura, • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
the fuel lines located in the left and right
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
MLG bays to determine the clearance the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
between the fuel and hydraulic lines, in
[FR Doc. E6–19538 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am] 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
accordance with Part 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
Service Bulletin SBF100–28–041, dated July through Friday, except Federal holidays.
20, 2005. If the clearance of a fuel line is 3 Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
mm (millimeters) or more, no further action DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087,
is required by this AD for that fuel line only. Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec
If the clearance of a fuel line is less than 3 Federal Aviation Administration H3C 3G9, Canada, for service
mm, before further flight, do a general visual information identified in this proposed
inspection of the fuel line for chafing in
14 CFR Part 39 AD.
accordance with Part 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service [Docket No. FAA–2006–26353; Directorate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
bulletin. Identifier 2006–NM–189–AD] Daniel Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer,
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE–
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual RIN 2120–AA64 172, FAA, New York Aircraft
examination of an interior or exterior area, Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
installation, or assembly to detect obvious Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, New York
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600), CL–
11590; telephone (516) 228–7305; fax
inspection is made from within touching 600–2A12 (CL–601), CL–600–2B16 (CL–
(516) 794–5531.
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror 601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604)
may be necessary to ensure visual access to Airplanes SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Comments Invited
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as Administration (FAA), Department of We invite you to submit any relevant
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or Transportation (DOT). written data, views, or arguments
droplight and may require removal or regarding this proposed AD. Send your
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
opening of access panels or doors. Stands, comments to an address listed in the
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain (NPRM).
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
proximity to the area being checked.’’
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a number ‘‘FAA–2006–26353; Directorate
Corrective Actions new airworthiness directive (AD) for Identifier 2006–NM–189–AD’’ at the
(g) If the fuel line is found chafed during certain Bombardier Model CL–600– beginning of your comments. We
the inspection for chafing specified in 1A11 (CL–600) airplanes, CL–600–2A12 specifically invite comments on the
paragraph (f) of this AD, before further flight (CL–601) airplanes, and CL–600–2B16 overall regulatory, economic,
after that inspection, do the actions in (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604) environmental, and energy aspects of
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD. If the airplanes. This proposed AD would the proposed AD. We will consider all
fuel line is not found chafed, within 6 require inspecting to identify the part comments received by the closing date
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS

months after the inspection for chafing, do number and serial number of the and may amend the proposed AD in
the actions in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Replace the chafed fuel line with a new
selector valves of the nose landing gear light of those comments.
fuel line in accordance with Part 1 of the (NLG) and the nose gear door; and doing We will post all comments we
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker related investigative and corrective receive, without change, to http://
Service Bulletin SBF100–28–041, dated July actions if necessary. This proposed AD dms.dot.gov, including any personal
20, 2005. results from reports of uncommanded information you provide. We will also

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Nov 17, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1

Você também pode gostar