Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CITY OF PAGADIAN
PEOPLES LAW ENFORCEMENT BOARD
asdff,
Complainant,
-versus-
-for-
PO1 anini
GRAVE MISCONDUCT
Respondent.
x------------------------------------------x
the
ISSUE/S
Whether or not the act of entering the room of Mrs. Amomomo,
without proper authority, while in the in performance of respondents
official functions as Police Officer constitute Grave Misconduct;
Whether or not the same act was committed in respondents
official capacity as public officer;
ARGUMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS
As to the first issue, respondent herein is liable for grave
misconduct. As enunciated in Civil Service Commission vs. Ledesma
G.R. No. 154521, September 30 2015:
Misconduct
established
and
is
transgression
definite
rule
of
of
some
action,
more
any
of
the
additional
elements
of
established
rules,
which
must
be
houses,
papers,
and
effects
against
and
her
witnesses,
PO3
Soon
and
Spo1
Sayson,
Respondent was on duty before and during the illegal search incident.
And when she went to the building co-own by the complainant and
Mrs. Amomomo she was acting in her public function as police officer.
In fact, she was in her uniform when she conducted the illegal search
on the premises.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully
prayed before this Honorable Board that judgment be rendered in
favor of the complainant and find the respondent Guilty for Grave
Misconduct.
Pagadian City, Philippines.
7 September 2015
lack
of
material
time
and
manpower,
the
foregoing
Copy Furnished:
ATTY. Abcd