Você está na página 1de 3

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 61687

will not institute a second comment compliance prior to final payment. This Supplement Parts 1819 and 1852 to
period on this action. requirement is being established to require that all research and
DATES: The direct final rule published at facilitate the Government’s ability to development contracts awarded under
71 FR 51489 on August 30, 2006 is hold contractors accountable for the SBIR and STTR Programs include
withdrawn as of October 19, 2006. compliance with Federal statute, the clause at 1852.219–85, Conditions
regulation, and requirements associated for Final Payment—SBIR and STTR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
with the SBIR and STTR programs. In Contracts. This clause provides
Steven Rosenthal, Environmental
addition, the final rule corrects the direction to the contractor regarding
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
following in the proposed rule: Revises completion and submission of a
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
the section numbering of the recertification requirement prior to and
Environmental Protection Agency,
prescription identified in NFS 1832.12 as a condition of final payment. In
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
of the proposed rule from NFS addition, the rule requires use of the
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)886–6052,
1832.1200 to NFS 1819.7302(f); revises clauses at 1852.219–80, Limitation on
Rosenthal.steven@epa.gov.
the numbering of the clause from NFS Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program,
List of Subjects 1852.232–83 in the proposed rule to 1852.219–81, Limitation on
NFS 1852.219–85 in the final rule; Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program,
40 CFR Part 52 and 1852.219–82, Limitation on
makes minor revisions to conform
Environmental protection, Air clause titles with those in the clause Subcontracting—STTR Program, in the
pollution control, Incorporation by prescriptions; revises the respective SBIR and STTR contracts to
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Supplementary Information, Paragraph delineate the subcontracting limitations
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, and Volatile B. Regulatory Flexibility Act to expand necessary for contract performance. The
organic compounds. the justification that the rule does not rule also requires the use of clauses at
have a significant economic impact on 1852.219–83, Limitation of the Principal
40 CFR Part 81
small entities; and makes other minor Investigator—SBIR Program, and
Air pollution control, Environmental editorial corrections. 1852.219–84, Limitation of the Principal
protection, National parks, Wilderness DATES: Effective Date: October 19, 2006. Investigator—STTR Program,
areas. respectively, to describe the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: October 6, 2006. employment requirements of the
Marilyn J. Seppi, NASA, Office of
Gary Gulezian, principal investigator.
Procurement, Contract Management This is not a significant regulatory
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. Division, (202) 358–0447, e-mail: action and, therefore, was not subject to
Marilyn.Seppi-1@nasa.gov. review under Section 6(b) of Executive
PART 40—[AMENDED] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
■ Accordingly, the amendments to 40 A. Background Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
CFR 52.777 and 81.315 published in the rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
NASA published a proposed rule in 804.
Federal Register on August 30, 2006 (71 the Federal Register on September 30,
FR 51489) on pages 51489–51500 is 2005 (70 FR 57240–57242). The public B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
withdrawn as of October 19, 2006. comment period ended on November NASA certifies that this rule will not
[FR Doc. E6–17432 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am] 29, 2005. One public comment was have a significant economic impact on
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P received. The comment stated that the a substantial number of small entities
proposed rule constituted an undue within the meaning of the Regulatory
burden and would have a significant Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND (adverse) impact on small businesses. because the recertification prior to final
SPACE ADMINISTRATION The respondent also objected to long- payment to awardees is merely an
standing SBIR/STTR program updated statement by the contractor
48 CFR Parts 1819 and 1852 requirements relating to limitations on provided in the representations and
subcontracting. NASA’s Response: certifications submitted with the
RIN 2700–AD17 Regarding the issue of additional proposal in accordance with the Small
burden, NASA believes that it is in the Business Administration’s SBIR
Small Business Innovation Research
Government’s best interest to implement Program Directive. The information
(SBIR) and Small Business Technology
the proposed rule requiring SBIR/STTR included in the contractor’s statement
Transfer (STTR) Contractor
contractors to recertify their compliance addresses subcontracting limitations
Recertification of Program Compliance
with Program requirements prior to final and contracting officer consent
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and payment to hold contractors requirements which are part of a
Space Administration. accountable for Program compliance contractor’s normal contract
ACTION: Final rule. and to enable the pursuit of criminal administration responsibilities in
and civil cases when noncompliance monitoring compliance with contract
SUMMARY: This rule adopts the proposed constitutes a fraud against the and program requirements. Accordingly,
rule published in the Federal Register Government. NASA believes that the the recertification is not considered to
on September 30, 2005 as final with additional burden resulting from the have a significant impact.
minor, non-substantive editorial recertification statement requirement is
changes. The final rule amends the minimal. The respondent’s comment C. Paperwork Reduction Act
NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to objecting to current SBIR/STTR program The Paperwork Reduction Act applies
PWALKER on PRODPC60 with RULES

include a requirement for NASA’s Small requirements relating to limitations on because the changes to the NFS impose
Business Innovation Research (SBIR) subcontracting is noted; however, these recordkeeping or information
and the Small Business Technology are existing program requirements that collections, or collection of information
Transfer (STTR) program contractors to apply regardless of this rule. Therefore, from offerors or contractors. The Office
complete a recertification of program this final rule amends NASA FAR of Management and Budget under 44

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:58 Oct 18, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM 19OCR1
61688 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

U.S.C. 3501, et seq., has approved this participating in the SBIR/STTR PART 1852—SOLICITATION
as a new collection under OMB Control Programs (SBIR/STTR agencies) are PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
Number 2700–0124. obligated to follow the guidance CLAUSES
provided by the SBA Policy Directive.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR 1819 and
NASA is required to ensure its policies, ■ 3. Add sections 1852.219–80,
1852
regulations, and guidance on the SBIR/ 1852.219–81, 1852.219–82, 1852.219–
Government procurement. STTR Programs are consistent with 83, 1852.219–84, and 1852.219–85 to
Tom Luedtke, SBA’s Policy Directive. Contracting read as follows:
officers are required to insert the
Assistant Administrator for Procurement. 1852.219–80 Limitation on
applicable clauses identified in
■ Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1819 and Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program.
1819.7302 in all SBIR and STTR
1852 are amended as follows: contracts. As prescribed in 1819.7302(a), insert
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR the following clause:
parts 1819 and 1852 continues to read 1819.7302 NASA contract clauses.
Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I
as follows: (a) Contracting officers shall insert the Program(Oct 2006)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(1). clause at 1852.219–80, Limitation on The Contractor shall perform a minimum
Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program, of two-thirds of the research and/or
PART 1819—SMALL BUSINESS in all Phase I contracts awarded under analytical effort (total contract price less
PROGRAMS the Small Business Innovation Research profit) conducted under this contract. Any
(SBIR) Program established pursuant to deviation from this requirement must be
■ 2. Add Subpart 1819.73 to read as approved in advance and in writing by the
Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business
follows: Contracting Officer.
Innovation Development Act of 1982).
Subpart 1819.73—Small Business (b) Contracting officers shall insert the
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small (End of clause)
clause at 1852.219–81, Limitation on
Business Technology Transfer (STTR) 1852.219–81 Limitation on
Programs 1819.7301 Scope of subpart. Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program,
in all Phase II contracts awarded under Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program.
Sec.
the Small Business Innovation Research As prescribed in 1819.7302(b), insert
1819.7301 Scope of subpart.
1819.7302 NASA contract clauses. (SBIR) Program established pursuant to the following clause:
Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase
Subpart 1819.73—Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). II Program (Oct 2006)
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small (c) Contracting officers shall insert the The Contractor shall perform a minimum
Business Technology Transfer (STTR) clause at 1852.219–82, Limitation on of one-half of the research and/or analytical
Programs Subcontracting—STTR Program, in all effort (total contract price less profit)
contracts awarded under the Small conducted under this contract. Any deviation
1819.7301 Scope of subpart. from this requirement must be approved in
Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
The Small Business Innovation Program established pursuant to Public advance and in writing by the Contracting
Research (SBIR) and Small Business Law 97–219 (the Small Business Officer. Since the selection of R&D
Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs Innovation Development Act of 1982). contractors is substantially based on the best
were established and issued under the scientific and technological sources, it is
(d) Contracting officers shall insert the important that the Contractor not subcontract
authority of the Small Business Act
clause at 1852.219–83, Limitation of the technical or scientific work without the
codified at 15 U.S.C. 631, as amended,
Principal Investigator—SBIR Program, Contracting Officer’s advance approval.
and the Small Business Innovation
in all contracts awarded under the
Development Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97– (End of clause)
Small Business Innovation Research
219), codified with amendments at 15
(SBIR) Program established pursuant to 1852.219–82 Limitation on
U.S.C. 638. The Small Business Act
Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Subcontracting—STTR Program.
requires that the Small Business
Innovation Development Act of 1982).
Administration (SBA) issue SBIR and As prescribed in 1819.7302(c), insert
STTR Program Policy Directives for the (e) Contracting officers shall insert the the following clause:
general conduct of the SBIR/STTR clause at 1852.219–84, Limitation of the
Principal Investigator—STTR Program, Limitation on Subcontracting—STTR
Programs within the Federal Program(Oct 2006)
Government. The statutory purpose of in all contracts awarded under the
Small Business Technology Transfer The Contractor shall perform a minimum
the SBIR Program is to strengthen the
(STTR) Program established pursuant to of 40 percent of the work under this contract
role of innovative small business (total contract price including cost sharing if
concerns (SBCs) in federally-funded Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business
any, less profit if any). A minimum of 30
research or research and development Innovation Development Act of 1982). percent of the work under this contract shall
(R/R&D). Specific program purposes are (f) Contracting officers shall insert the be performed by the research institution.
to: Stimulate technological innovation; clause at 1852.219–85, Conditions for Since the selection of R&D contractors is
use small business to meet Federal Final Payment—SBIR and STTR substantially based on the best scientific and
R/R&D needs; foster and encourage Contracts, in all contracts awarded technological sources, it is important that the
participation by socially and under the Small Business Technology Contractor not subcontract technical or
scientific work without the Contracting
economically disadvantaged SBCs, and Transfer (STTR) Program and in all
Officer’s advance approval.
by SBCs that are 51-percent owned and Phase I and Phase II contracts awarded
controlled by women, in technological under the Small Business Technology (End of clause)
PWALKER on PRODPC60 with RULES

innovation; and increase private sector Transfer (STTR) Small Business


commercialization of innovations Innovation Research (SBIR) Program 1852.219–83 Limitation of the Principal
derived from Federal R/R&D, thereby established pursuant to Public Law 97– Investigator—SBIR Program.
increasing competition, productivity 219 (the Small Business Innovation As prescribed in 1819.7302(d), insert
and economic growth. Federal agencies Development Act of 1982). the following clause:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:58 Oct 18, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM 19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 61689

Limitation of the Principal Investigator— employer of the PI, shall exercise primary the Contracting Officer on (insert date of
SBIR Program(Oct 2006) management direction and control over the approval or modification number.);
The primary employment of the principal PI and be overall responsible for the PI’s 5. For STTR contracts: The subcontracting
investigator (PI) shall be with the small performance under this contract. Deviations limitation set forth in this contract was not
business concern (SBC)/Contractor during from these requirements must be approved in exceeded;
the conduct of this contract. Primary advance and in writing by the Contracting 6. For SBIR contracts: The primary
employment means that more than one-half Officer and are not subject to a change in the employment of the principal investigator (PI)
of the principal investigator’s time is spent in firm-fixed price of the contract. The PI for identified in this SBIR contract was with the
the employ of the SBC/Contractor. This this contract is (insert name). Contractor, except as approved in writing by
precludes full-time employment with another the Contracting Officer on (insert date of
organization. Deviations from these (End of Clause) approval or modification number); and
requirements must be approved in advance 7. For STTR contracts: The primary
1852.219–85 Conditions for Final employment of the principal investigator (PI)
and in writing by the Contracting Officer and Payment—SBIR and STTR Contracts.
are not subject to a change in the firm-fixed identified in this STTR contract was the SBC/
price of the contract. The PI for this contract As prescribed in 1819.7302(f), insert Contractor or the research institution (RI).
is (insert name). the following clause: The PI identified in the STTR contract was
considered key in the performance of this
(End of Clause) Conditions for Final Payment—SBIR AND contract. The SBC/Contractor, whether or not
STTR Contracts(Oct 2006) the employer of the PI, did exercise primary
1852.219–84 Limitation of the Principal As a condition for final payment under this management direction and control over the
Investigator—STTR Program. contract, the Contractor shall provide the PI and was overall responsible for the PI’s
As prescribed in 1819.7302(e), insert following certifications as part of its final performance under this contract. Any
the following clause: payment invoice request: substitutions of this individual were
During performance of this contract— approved in writing by the Contracting
Limitation of the Principal Investigator— 1. Essentially equivalent work performed Officer on (insert date of approval or
STTR Program (Oct 2006) under this contract has not been proposed for modification number).
(a) The primary employment of the funding to another Federal agency; I understand that the willful provision of
principal investigator (PI) identified in 2. No other Federal funding award has false information or concealing a material
paragraph (b) of this clause is with the small been received for essentially equivalent work fact in this representation is a criminal
business concern (SBC)/Contractor or the performed under this contract; offense under Title 18 USC, Section 1001,
research institution (RI). Primary 3. Deliverable items submitted under this False Statements, as well as Title 18 U.S.C.,
employment means that more than one-half contract have not been submitted as Section 287, False Claims.
of the principal investigator’s time is spent in deliverable items under another Federal
the employ of the SBC/Contractor or RI. funding award; (End of Clause)
(b) The PI is considered to be key 4. For SBIR contracts: The subcontracting
personnel in the performance of this contract. limitation set forth in this contract was not [FR Doc. E6–17043 Filed 10–18–06; 8:45 am]
The SBC/Contractor, whether or not the exceeded except as approved in writing by BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
PWALKER on PRODPC60 with RULES

VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:58 Oct 18, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM 19OCR1

Você também pode gostar