Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Warning System (HTWAS) Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on An electronic copy of this notice may
August 17, 2006. be downloaded from the Office of the
AGENCY:Federal Aviation Francisco Estrada, C., Federal Register’s home page at http://
Administration (FAA), DOT. RTCA Advisory Committee. www.archives.gov and the Government
Notice of RTCA Special
ACTION: [FR Doc. 06–7203 Filed 8–25–06; 8:45 am] Printing Office’s Web site at http://
Committee 212, Helicopter Terrain BILLING CODE 4910–13–M www.access.gpo.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:57 Aug 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM 28AUN1
50968 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 166 / Monday, August 28, 2006 / Notices
Congestion on America’s Transportation Network State Department of Transportation to include evidence of prior consultation
includes a number of initiatives designed to reduce the FHWA’s Office of Freight and/or partnership with affected
transportation congestion. The transcript of these Management and Operations, via the Metropolitan Planning Organizations
remarks is available at the following URL: http://
dot.gov/minetasp051606.htm. FHWA Division Office in the State in (MPOs), local governments, community
2 A copy of this document is available for which the application was submitted. groups, private providers of commercial
inspection in the docket for this notice. Awarded projects will be administered motor vehicle parking, and motorist and
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:09 Aug 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM 28AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 166 / Monday, August 28, 2006 / Notices 50969
trucking organizations. Also, include a corridor or area to be addressed (20 Freight Management and Operations,
listing of all public and private partners, percent). and will be scored as described in the
and the role each will play in the Examples used to demonstrate severe scoring criteria.
execution of the project. Commitment/ shortage may include: 7. If the FHWA determines that the
consultation examples may include: • Average Daily Truck Traffic (ADTT)
project is technically or financially
Memorandums of Agreement, in proposal area.
• Average daily shortfall of truck unfeasible, FHWA will notify the
Memorandums of Understanding,
parking in proposal area. applicant, in writing.
contracts, meeting minutes, letters of
support/commitment, and • Ratio of ADTT to average daily 8. The FHWA reserves the right to
documentation in a metropolitan shortfall of truck parking in proposal partially fund or request modification of
transportation improvement program area. projects.
(TIP) or statewide transportation • Proximity to NHS. 9. All information described in the
improvement program (STIP). 2. The extent to which the proposed
submitter’s mandatory proposal
5. A detailed quantification of eligible solution resolves the described shortage
elements must be quantifiable and
project costs by activity, an (35 percent).
Examples should include: sourced.
identification of all funding sources that
will supplement the grant and be • Number of truck parking spaces per 10. Submitter must describe a
necessary to fully fund the project, and day that will be used as a result of the measurement plan to determine whether
the anticipated dates on which the proposed solution. or not the project will achieve its
additional funds are to be made • The effect on highway safety, traffic intended results. The measurement plan
available. Public and private sources of congestion, and/or air quality. must continue for three years beyond
funds (non-Federal commitment) will be 3. Cost effectiveness of proposal (25 the date of the project. After a three-year
considered by the FHWA as an in-kind percent). period, a final report quantifying the
match contributing to the project. State Examples should include: results of the project must be submitted
matching funds will be required for • How many truck parking spaces to the FHWA.
projects eligible under 23 U.S.C. 120 will be used per day per dollar
expended? 11. The proposed projects should not
U.S.C. (b). compete with local businesses or
• Total cost of project, including all
6. Applicants should provide a commercial enterprises.
non-Federal funds that will be
timeline that includes work to be
contributed to the project. V. Selection Process
completed and anticipated funding
4. Scope of proposal (20 percent).
cycles. Gantt charts are preferred. Examples should include:
7. Environmental process: Please The grant applications will be ranked
• Evidence of a wide range of input by final score. The FHWA will select
include a timeline for complying with from affected parties, including State
the National Environmental Policy Act applications based on those rankings,
and local governments, community subject to the availability of funds.
(NEPA) process, if applicable. groups, private providers of commercial
8. Include a project map that consists motor vehicle parking, and motorist and VI. Award Administration Information
of a schematic illustration depicting the trucking organizations.
project and connecting transportation A. Award Notices
• Whether the principles outlined in
infrastructure. the proposal can be applied to other The FHWA recognizes that each
9. Measurement Plan. Submitter must locations/projects and possibly serve as funded project is unique, and therefore
describe a measurement plan to a model for other locations. may attach conditions to different
determine whether or not the project
achieved its intended results. The B. Review Standards projects’ award documents. The FHWA
measurement plan must continue for will send an award letter with a grant
1. All applications for grants must be
three years beyond the completion date submitted to the FHWA Division Office agreement that contains all the terms
of the project. After the three-year by the State DOT by the date specified and conditions for the grant. These
period, a final report quantifying the in this notice. successful applicants must execute and
results of the project must be submitted 2. State DOTs should ensure that the return the grant agreement,
to the FHWA. project proposal is compatible with or accompanied by any additional items
10. Proposals should not exceed 20 documented on their planning required by the grant agreement.
pages in length. documents (TIP and STIP). They should B. Performance Reporting and
also validate, to the extent the can, any Measurement
IV. Applicant Review Information
analytic data.
Grant applications that contain the 3. Each application will be reviewed Failure to provide the measurement
mandatory elements will be scored for conformance with the provisions in plan will be considered during the past-
competitively according to the this notice. performance element of future grant
soundness of their methodology and 4. Applications lacking any of the applications.
subject to the criteria listed below. Sub- mandatory elements or arriving after the
factors listed under each factor are of deadline for submission will not be Authority: Pub. L. 109–59; Aug. 10, 2005.
equal importance unless otherwise considered. To assure full Issued on: August 23, 2006.
noted. consideration, proposals should not Frederick G. Wright, Jr.,
exceed 20 pages in length.
A. Scoring Criteria Federal Highway Executive Director.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:09 Aug 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM 28AUN1