Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
C
ou
rt
1 / 60
Tapadia RR/B.
Applicants
Vs
1. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust
and Anr.
.. Respondents
ig
h
ba
y
CORAM :
RESERVED ON:
PRONOUNCED ON :
R.G.KETKAR,J.
14/08/2015
11/09/2015
ORDER:
om
1.
leave
to
delete
respondent
no.2
is
granted.
2 / 60
rt
2.
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
ig
h
Application-Exhibit-19 filed by respondent no.1 for grant of adinterim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with
Sections 151 and 9-A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for
ba
y
om
Court.
4.
3 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
plaintiff claims that the suit properties are waqf properties and
belong to it.
C
ou
5.
thereof,
defendants
no.1
to
appeared
On
ig
h
on
ba
y
om
the
plaint.
Defendants
no.1
to
resisted
the
Mr. Khan submitted that for the first time in this revision
4 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
section 83(4) of the Waqf Act, 1995 (for short, 'Principal Act') is
ig
h
ba
y
7.
om
lays down that a High Court may, on its own motion or on the
application of the Board or any person aggrieved, call for and
5 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
cannot agitate this ground for the first time in the revision
ig
h
om
ba
y
(1)
Full Bench decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court in
the case of Muslim Minority Front, represented by its
Secretary, Sri Mohd. Abdul Muqueet (Khusroo) Vs. The
Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its
Secretary, Minority Welfare Department, 1996 (2) A.L.T. 30.
(2)
P. Ramrao Vs High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 2000 (1)
A.L.T. 210 = 2000(1) A.L.D. 298.
(3)
Mirza Khusru Ali Baig Vs. The Andhra Pradesh State
Wakf Board, Writ Petition No.582 of 2014, decided on
28.1.2014 (Coram C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.)
(4)
Umar Jusab Munjavar Vs Mohammed Abdul Karim,
Spl. Civil Application No.6868 of 2014, decided by learned
Single Judge of Gujarat High Court (Coram: Smt. Abhilasha
Kumari, J.) on 17.6.2014;
(5)
N.V.Ali
6 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
(6)
K.K.Kunhi Mohammed Vs. State of Kerala, Writ
Petition (C) No. 5305 of 2014 (R), decided on 15.7.2014,
MANU/KE/0872/2014.
9.
Court, Kerala High Court have uniformly taken a view that so long
member Tribunal
ig
h
a single
the contention
ba
y
83( 1) of the Principal Act laid down that the State Government
om
under the Act and define the local limits and jurisdiction under
the Act of each of such Tribunals.
11.
7 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
section 83(4) lays down that every Tribunal shall consist of (a) one person, who shall be a member of the State
Judicial Service holding a rank, not below of a District,
ba
y
om
jurisprudence, Member;
and the appointment of every such person shall be made
either by name or by designation.
13.
On and from
8 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
Section 83(1) of the Act. The plaintiff instituted the waqf suit
after amendment to Section 83(4). He submitted that when the
words of the statute are plain and unambiguous, one cannot
resort to a purposive interpretation.
ig
h
14.
lie in any civil Court, revenue Court and any other authority in
respect of any dispute, question or other matter relating to any
waqf, waqf property or other matter which is required by
or
ba
y
om
CRA/395/2015
(1)
Rajasthan SRTC Vs Bal Mukund Bairwa, (2009) 4
SCC 299 and in particular paragraphs 12 to 14;
C
ou
(2)
Afcons
Infrastructure Ltd Vs Cherian Varkey
Construction Co. (P) Ltd, (2010) 8 SCC 24 and in
particular paragraph 21;
rt
9 / 60
(3)
Bhagat Ram Vs Union of India, AIR 1988 SC 740
and in particular paragraphs 17 and 9 thereof.
15.
ig
h
ba
y
om
the Court has to consider whether (i) the plaintiff has made out a
prima facie case, (ii) balance of convenience lies in its favour
and (iii) irreparable injury will be caused to the plaintiff in case
10 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
relied upon the decision in the case of Shiv Shakti Co-op. Housing
Society Vs. Swaraj
C
ou
He submitted that the Principal Act came into force with effect
Maharashtra
ig
h
from 1.1.1996.
(a)
Settlement
Commissioner
and
Konkan,
Nashik,
Nagpur,
Amravati
and
Aurangabad
ba
y
om
though the Act came into force, the enforcement of the Act was
on
subsequent
date.
It
was
impossible
for
the
State
11 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
submitted
that
on
30.10.2000
the
State
under
18.
section 83(1) of the Principal Act. Though the Principal Act came
ba
y
into force with effect from 1.1.1996, the Tribunal was constituted
by issuing Notification on 30.10.2000 and on 6.11.2000, the
Government of Maharashtra, with the concurrence of the Hon'ble
om
Chief
Justice
of
the
Bombay
High
Court,
appointed
Shri
6.11.2000.
In view of
In
12 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab Vs. Harnek Singh, A.I.R
2002 Supreme Court 1074.
C
ou
19.
ig
h
ba
y
20.
om
13 / 60
CRA/395/2015
In short, he
rt
submitted that coming into force of the Act is one thing and
C
ou
Act came into force with effect from 1.11.2013, the scheme of
the Act itself contemplates that in stage-wise the Act will be
ig
h
ba
y
relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of M.P.Wakf
Board Vs. Subhan Shah, (2006) 10 Supreme Court Cases 696 and
om
is
not
constituted,
single
member
Tribunal
has
14 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
determined by
ig
h
ba
y
om
expressly barred.
Tribunal is deemed to have been a Civil Court and has the same
15 / 60
rt
of C.P.C.
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
ig
h
ba
y
it can be safely said that the above lands were part of Inam and
Inam Takka and the same may belong to the plaintiff. There is a
serious and substantial question of fact and law for determination
om
16 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
on the suit properties if, after the trial, it is found that the suit
Accordingly, power of
C
ou
to rehabilitate the
ig
h
flat owners, then the complications will arise and the plaintiff will
be required to file suits against different persons for recovery of
possession
ba
y
om
The
on
the
suit
properties
till
determination
of
17 / 60
rt
25.
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
ig
h
creating third party interest, from changing the nature of the suit
properties as also from handing over possession of flats
constructed over the suit properties. The plaintiff claims that the
ba
y
1.11.2013.
26.
om
Principal Act received the assent of the President and has been
brought into effect in the State of Maharashtra on and from
1.1.1996.
27.
Perusal of the
18 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
widespread feeling that the Act has not proved effective enough
in improving the administration of auqaf.
C
ou
28.
Economic
and
Educational
Status
of
the
Muslim
ig
h
ba
y
presented its Third Report on 4th March, 2008 and Ninth Report on
23rd October, 2008 to the Rajya Sabha. The recommendations of
the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Waqf were considered by
om
the Central Waqf Council. The various issues and the need for
amendments to the Act were
also
considered in consultation
with other stakeholders such as the All India Muslim Personal Law
Board, representatives of the State Governments and the
Chairmen and the Chief Executive Officers of State Waqf Boards.
29.
were:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Absence
of
statutory
obligation
CRA/395/2015
to
ensure
flow
rt
19 / 60
of
C
ou
constituting the
ig
h
ba
y
om
the Bill, Section 83 of the Principal Act was substituted by subsection (4) and sub-section (4-A). By clause 41, Section 85 of the
Principal Act was amended. For the words Civil Court, the words
Civil Court, revenue Court and any other authority were
substituted. By clause 49, Section 109 of the Principal Act was
amended. In sub-section (2) after clause (xxii), clause (xxiia) was
added. By clause 44 of the Amendment Act, for sub-section (1)
of Section 83, the following sub-section was substituted, namely:-
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
20 / 60
32.
Reports
presented
by
the
Joint
ig
h
and
Parliamentary
ba
y
of the Principal Act, the member was appointed from one source
only, namely, judiciary. Under section 83(4) of the Amendment
Act, now members are appointed from difference sources,
om
namely:
(3)Member
having
knowledge
of
Muslim
law
and
jurisprudence.
33.
21 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Tribunal has his own role to play drawing from his experience and
knowledge and it is the interaction with all three members that
34.
C
ou
ig
h
juxtaposition as under.
Principal Act
S. 83.
Amendment Act
S. 83
(1) The State government shall,
by notification in the Official
Gazette, constitute
as many
Tribunals as it may think fit, for
the
determination
of
any
dispute,
question
or
other
matter relating to a waqf or a
waqf property, eviction of a
tenant or determination of rights
and obligations of the lessor and
the lessee of such property,
under the Act and define the
local limits and jurisdiction under
the Act of each of such Tribunals.
om
ba
y
(4)
Every Tribunal shall
consist of one person, who
shall be a member of the
State Judicial Service holding
a rank, not below that of a
District, Sessions or Civil
Judge,
Class-I,
and
the
appointment of every such
person may be made either
by name or by designation.
(4)
Every Tribunal shall consist
of (a) one person, who shall be a
member of the State Judicial
Service holding a rank, not
below of a District, Sessions or
Civil Judge, Class-I, who shall be
the Chairman;
(b) one person, who shall be an
officer from the State Civil
Services equivalent in rank to
that of the Additional District
Magistrate, member;
22 / 60
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
(c)
one
person
having
knowledge of Muslim law and
jurisprudence,
Member;
and the appointment of every
such person shall be made
either
by
name
or
by
designation.
Perusal of Section 83(1) of the Principal Act shows that the
Tribunal
constituted
by
the
State
government
by
issuing
ig
h
ba
y
om
35.
23 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
ba
y
Section 112 of the Act provides for repeal and savings and
om
reads thus :
112. Repeal and savings. (1) The Waqf Act, 1954 (29 of
1954) and the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 1984 (69 of 1984)
are hereby repealed.
CRA/395/2015
37.
C
ou
rt
24 / 60
ig
h
ba
y
om
reads thus:
113. Power to remove difficulties. (1) If any difficulty
arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
25 / 60
ig
h
ba
y
om
CRA/395/2015
40.
C
ou
rt
26 / 60
om
ba
y
ig
h
41.
various
27 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Welfare (Waqf-I)
C
ou
ig
h
however, anything done or any action taken under the said Acts.
The Principal Act came into force in the State of Andhra Pradesh
with effect from 1.1.1996. Aggrieved by the decision of the
ba
y
learned Single Judge, Writ Appeals were filed. The same were
decided on 17.1.1996, that is to say, after coming into force of
the Principal Act on 1.1.1996. It appears that the parties before
om
the Division Bench did not bring to the notice of the court that
the Waqf Act, 1954 was replaced by Waqf Act of 1995 which
28 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
ba
y
om
In
29 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Act is issued?
43.
C
ou
Under Section 1(3) of the Wakf Act, 1995 is the beginning of the
enforcement of the Act in the State. Establishment of the Board
of Wakf under such name as may be specified in the notification
ig
h
ba
y
om
come into force and the State Government has made its
intentions clear by issuing the notification Under Section 13
thereof that the Wakf Board shall be one as envisaged under it
and it alone shall be regularizing the administration of the
properties and other religious affairs attendant to the wakf, the
30 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Full Bench observed that it has no reason to think that the State
Government is not serious and it shall not proceed to complete
C
ou
the composition of the Board under Section 14(1) of the Act and
no sooner the composition is complete, appoint the members by
issuing necessary notification under Section 14(9) of the Act.
45.
ig
h
ba
y
om
the Board are appointed, the Board appointed under the Waqf
Act,1954 shall survive the notification under section 1(3) of the
Act and the notification under section 13 of the Waqf Act, 1995
but shall cease and all members of the Board appointed under
Section 11 of the Waqf Act, 1954 shall vacate their office the
moment notification under section 14(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 is
issued. They can hold the office,thus, pursuant to the judgment
in Writ Appeal No.401 of 1995 and batch until the composition of
the Board under the Waqf Act, 1995 is completed, but not a day
31 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
office in the Board. The Full Bench issued the direction to State
ig
h
respect, is in tune with Section 12 of the Waqf Act, 1954 that laid
down that the members of Board shall hold office for five years
ba
y
om
32 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
the civil courts, when once the waqf Tribunal is constituted. The
High Court of Andhra Pradesh directed all the civil Courts in the
ig
h
In
ba
y
om
CRA/395/2015
om
ba
y
ig
h
C
ou
rt
33 / 60
CRA/395/2015
ig
h
C
ou
rt
34 / 60
I will deal with this judgment a little later. Suffice it to say, at this
stage, that the controversy raised therein is similar to the
ba
y
om
35 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
Bench opined that the Division Bench in P. Rama Rao (supra) has
laid down the correct law and that it requires no reconsideration.
C
ou
ig
h
om
ba
y
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
36 / 60
ig
h
ba
y
Division Bench of
om
37 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
try the disputes under section 83(1) even after Amendment Act
ig
h
observed thus:
om
ba
y
8.
We now proceed to notice as to what is happening as
of now, as regards the Wakf Tribunals. In 2012, a question
arose as to whether an officer who is put in charge of a
Tribunal by the High Court or who is covered by general
transfer orders issued by the High Court and posted to man
the Tribunal has to be further energised by a notification of
the State Government to act, function and discharge the
functions of the Tribunal. The situation was one of stalemate
owing to the delay in issuing government notifications. The
constitutional and statutory situation therefore became focal
issues and it was held that government notifications were
not necessary in such situations. It was therefore declared
by this Court that following general transfers and other
transfer orders of judicial officers of the subordinate
judiciary from time to time, the person manning any Wakf
Tribunal, on transfer, will hand over charge as may be
ordered by the High Court in its proceedings on the
administrative side and such handing over charge is
sufficient to clothe the person put in charge of the Tribunal
to discharge all functions and powers of the Tribunal in
terms of the provisions of the Act. See Abdulla Shahul
Hameed v. State of Kerala [2012 (3) KLT 324].
CRA/395/2015
om
ba
y
ig
h
C
ou
rt
38 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
39 / 60
C
ou
ig
h
50.
ba
y
though its constitution was legal and valid at the relevant point of
time. In other words, the learned Single Judge held that the order
passed by the single member Tribunal cannot be faulted on that
om
ground.
51.
40 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
In
ig
h
ba
y
om
52
1897 and in particular clause (e) thereof. Section 6(e) lays down
that where this Act or any Central Act or Regulation made after
the commencement of this Act, repeals any enactment hereto
made or hereafter made, unless different intention appears,
repeal shall not affect any investigation, legal proceedings or
remedy in respect of any right, obligation, liability, penalty,
forfeiture, punishment aforesaid and any such investigation,
41 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
earlier in that case, the suit was instituted in the year 2006, that
is to say, prior to coming into force the Amendment Act in the
State of Gujarat. In the State of Gujarat the Amendment act
ig
h
ba
y
53.
has jurisdiction to entertain and try the dispute and whether the
jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in view of Section 85. In
om
my opinion,
Tribunal under the amended Section 83(4) of the Act, the Civil
Court's jurisdiction is not excluded for the following reasons.
54.
42 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
plaintiff in the year 1952-53. The defendants raised plea that the
civil court had no jurisdiction to decide the suit until the question
whether they were
ba
y
Officers.
55.
om
provided
thus:
43 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
that provision.
56.
C
ou
Revenue Officers
(1)
Deputy Commissioners and
Section
(2)
4(2) and (4)
8(1), (2) and (3);
9(3), (4) and (6);
10(2),(3),(5)
and (6); 11(1)
and(2); 14;19(1),
(2) and (3),
15(1) and (5)
Sub-Divisional Officers.
ig
h
TABLE
ba
y
Deputy Commissioners.
om
57.
Amended Sections 16-A and 16-B read thus:16-A. (1) Whenever any question as is referred to in section
16 arises before a Civil Court in any suit or proceeding, the
Court shall, unless such question has already been
determined by a Revenue Officer, refer the question to the
Revenue Officer for decision and shall stay the suit or
proceeding so far as it relates to the decision of such
question.
(2) The Civil Court shall accept the decision of the Revenue
Officer on the question and decide the suit or proceeding
before it accordingly.
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
44 / 60
58.
ig
h
under the Berar Land Revenue Code. The Full Bench held that
the argument that the words under that provision mean the
Land Revenue Code, is devoid of any merit. The definition
ba
y
om
45 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
the Civil Court can refer question, sub-section (1) of section 16-A
cannot be given effect to. The Full Bench observed that
legislature could not possibly have intended that a person should
ba
y
om
46 / 60
rt
60.
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
following decisions:
ig
h
ba
y
om
discharge the functions of Revenue Officer under subsection (1) of section 16 was not advanced before the Full
Bench. Consequently, the Full Bench did not consider the
question which fell for consideration int his case.;
47 / 60
CRA/395/2015
61.
C
ou
7.
rt
shall
(subject
to
the
provisions
herein
contained)
have
ig
h
ba
y
om
48 / 60
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
ig
h
ba
y
State Government
om
49 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
64.
ba
y
om
Mr. Muchhala
50 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
65.
om
ba
y
ig
h
CRA/395/2015
om
ba
y
ig
h
C
ou
rt
51 / 60
24. It is then true that, "When the words of a law extend not
to an inconvenience rarely happening, but do to those which
often happen, it is good reason not to strain the words
further than they reach, by saying it is casus omissus, and
that the law intended quae frequentius accidunt." "But," on
the other hand," it is no reason, when the words of a law do
enough extend to an inconvenience seldom happening, that
they should not extend to it as well as if it happened more
frequently, because it happens but seldom" (See Fenton v.
Hampton (1858)11 Moo P.C. 347). A casus omissus ought not
to be created by interpretation, save in some case of strong
necessity. Where, however, a casus omissus does really
occur, either through the inadvertence of the legislature, or
on the principle quod semel aut bis exist it proetereunt
legislatores, the rule is that the particular case, this left
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
52 / 60
66.
also the decision of the Full Bench in the case of Raje Vyankatrao
ig
h
67.
ba
y
om
possible to accept the submission of Mr. Khan that till such time
the Tribunal is constituted in terms of the amended Section
I have
53 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
am, therefore, of the opinion that the reliance placed by Mr. Khan
ig
h
Single Judge of Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the Tribunal
constituted under the parent Act has to be permitted to deal with
the disputes till the Waqf Tribunal is reconstituted under the
ba
y
om
54 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
bars the jurisdiction of the civil Court. This would give rise to
serious repercussions and have a cascading effect. A situation
C
ou
ig
h
ba
y
70.
om
I respectfully
55 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
ig
h
therefore, cannot agitate this ground for the first time in this
revision application. Even this Court, in exercise of powers under
section 83(9) cannot go into this question. I do not find any merit
ba
y
om
72.
56 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
correctness of the impugned order, I have dealt with this only for
73.
C
ou
ig
h
ba
y
of revisional jurisdiction.
74.
the
Amendment
Act
with
effect
from
1.11.2013.
The
om
of the
1.11.2013
Plaint
is
liable
to
be
returned
along
with
57 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
on
the
ground
that
it
is
without
jurisdiction
and
ig
h
ba
y
75.
om
58 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
C
ou
made herein.
ig
h
ba
y
om
State
so
59 / 60
CRA/395/2015
rt
amended.
7. Notwithstanding
setting
aside
the
C
ou
impugned
order,
ig
h
ba
y
om
(R.G.Ketkar, J.)
CRA/395/2015
C
ou
rt
60 / 60
11/09/2015
ig
h
1.
Whether Reporters of Local
papers may be allowed to see the
judgement ?
ba
y
om
5.
Whether it is to be circulated to
the Civil Judges?
6. Whether the case involves an
important question of law and
whether a copy of the judgment
should
be
sent
to
Nagpur,
Aurangabad & Goa Offices?