Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Environmental Biotechnology and Renewable Energies R&D Group, Dept. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centro de Investigacin y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto
Politcnico Nacional, P.O. Box 14-740, Mxico D.F. 07000, Mexico
Central Analtica, Dept. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centro de Investigacin y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politcnico Nacional, Mxico D.F., Mexico
c
ESIQIE del IPN, Divisin de Ciencias Bsicas, Campus Zacatenco, Mxico D.F., Mexico
b
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 27 September 2009
Received in revised form
16 November 2010
Accepted 18 January 2011
Available online 12 February 2011
In the rst batch solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with intermittent venting
(SSAHF-IV) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), a cumulative production of
16.6 mmol H2/reactor was obtained. Releases of hydrogen partial pressure rst by intermittent venting
and afterward by ushing headspace of reactors with inert gas N2 allowed for further hydrogen
production in a second to fourth incubation cycle, with no new inoculum nor substrate nor inhibitor
added. After the fourth cycle, no more H2 could be harvested. Interestingly, accumulated hydrogen in 4
cycles was 100% higher than that produced in the rst cycle alone. At the end of incubation, partial
pressure of H2 was near zero whereas high concentrations of organic acids and solvents remained in the
spent solids. So, since approximate mass balances indicated that there was still a moderate amount of
biodegradable matter in the spent solids we hypothesized that the organic metabolites imposed some
kind of inhibition on further fermentation of digestates. Spent solids were washed to eliminate organic
metabolites and they were used in a second SSAHF-IV. Two more cycles of H2 production were obtained,
with a cumulative production of ca. 2.4 mmol H2/mini-reactor. As a conclusion, washing of spent solids of
a previous SSAHF-IV allowed for an increase of hydrogen production by 15% in a second run of SSAHF-IV,
leading to the validation of our hypothesis.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Biohydrogen
Organic fraction of municipal solid wastes
Re-fermentation
Solid substrate
Spent solids
Washing
1. Introduction
In the last 10 years, interest on biohydrogen has resurrected,
particularly the research on dark fermentation of solid wastes
(Kovcs et al., 2006; Muoz-Pez et al., 2008a). Hydrogen can be
considered the best energy alternative because it can be produced
by biological means, it has the highest energy density, it is versatile
since can be used both as a primary or secondary energy source,
and it is environmentally-friendly since water is the main
combustion product and no aggressive pollutants are generated
(Mizuno et al., 2002).
In bioydrogen production by dark fermentation of organic
wastes, several microbial groups that consume H2 coexist with the
S356
extent the type and distribution of fermentation products. In biohydrogen fermentation, the pH strongly inuences the active
bacteria, affecting among others the overall H2 production, the
specic rate of H2 generation, and type and concentration of
organic acids and solvents (Li et al., 2007).
Another important aspect in biohydrogen fermentation is the
possible inhibition of further hydrogen production by accumulation
of nal products. The accumulation of dissolved H2 in the liquid
phase (associated to high partial pressures of hydrogen in the gas
phase) could inhibit hydrogen production (Logan et al., 2002;
Sparling et al., 1997; Valdez-Vazquez et al., 2005) and along with
low pH it may promote the shift to solventogenic fermentation.
Bioreactor headspace release by venting and eventual ushing
with inert gas seems to alleviate such an inhibition (Mizuno et al.,
2000; Valdez-Vazquez et al., 2006a).
There is little information on inhibition of the biohydrogenogenesis by accumulation of organic acids and other organic
metabolites. It is known that undissociated (or unionized) forms of
organic acids are more inhibitory to fermentative bacteria than the
anionic forms. It seems that unionized organic acids may uncouple
the growth of microorganisms (Booth, 1985; Wang and Wang,
1984). It is likely that hydrogen production cessation in batch
solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with
intermittent venting and headspace ushing (SSAHF-IV) of organic
fraction of municipal solid wastes (OFMSW) at the end could also
be due to accumulation of organic acids and other organic metabolites (Valdez-Vazquez et al., 2005; van Ginkel and Logan, 2005).
Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate the
hydrogenogenic second fermentation of washed spent solids originated in a rst SSAHF-IV. Washing of spent solids was performed
between batch fermentations in order to eliminate the presence of
organic metabolites.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental design and bioreactors
2.1.1. First SSAHF-IV of organic fraction of municipal solid wastes
The process chosen was the so-called mesophilic (35 C), batch,
solid substrate anaerobic hydrogen fermentation with intermittent
venting and headspace ushing (SSAHF-IV) according to procedures reported by Valdez-Vazquez et al. (2005).
2.1.1.1. Inocula. Mini-reactors were seeded with digestates from
methanogenic solid substrate anaerobic digesters degrading
a mixture of organic solid wastes. Those digesters were operated at
21 days mass retention time in mesophilic conditions.
2.1.1.2. Substrate. The substrate was a model organic fraction of
municipal solid waste (OFMSW) conformed by a mixture of 40% of
paper and 60% food waste. It was prepared with paper and food
wastes from CINVESTAVs cafeteria. The mixture was vacuum-dried
overnight, milled and stored at 58 C until its use. The substrate
moisture content was adjusted to 25% total solids with a buffer
containing 31.6 g NaHCO3 and 63.3 g K2HPO4 per liter; buffer and
substrate were sterilized in order to control the studied microbial
consortium producers of H2. The main characteristics of the feedstock supplied to the mini-reactors are shown in Table 1.
2.1.1.3. Mini-reactors and experimental procedure. Wide mouth
glass bottles of 250 mL volume which were tightly stoppered using
rubber stoppers and metallic harnesses were used as mini-reactors.
First, in an anerobic glove chamber, 20 g of inocula y 80 g of
substrate were added to mini-reactors and blended with the
inocula. Background controls with only 20 g of inoculum and
Table 1
Characterization of substrates in both solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic
fermentation with intermittent venting and headspace ushing.
Parameter
TSb(%)
VSc(%)
TKN (%)d
Cellulose (%)d
Lignin (%)d
Phosphorus (mg/kg)
PH
SSAHF-IVa
1
24.54
14.90
1.93
26.2
19.4
17.3
7.34
0.13
0.85
0.80
1.5
1.1
1.1
0.15
19.62 0.03
8.91 0.02
NDe
18.7 0.8
16.9 1.2
13.7 0.3
7.0 0.20
a
Notes: batch solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with
intermittent venting and ushing of reactor headspace.
b
Total solids.
c
Volatile solids.
d
% of total solids.
e
Not determined.
S357
Fig. 1. Time course of H2 production in batch mini-reactors: (a) rst batch fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid wastes; (b) second batch fermentation of
washed, spent solids from the rst fermentation. Vertical arrows indicate ushing of
bioreactor headspace with N2.
Acetone
Ethanol
Acetate
Propionate
Butyrate
Acetone
SSAHF-IV
1st fermentation
2nd fermentation
36
528
2406
1056
4874
36
5
47
26
12
101
5
5 0.6
<DLb
32 4
14 0.2
49 3
5 0.6
a
Notes: batch solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with
intermittent venting and ushing of reactor headspace.
b
Detection level.
S358
Table 3
Hydrogen production in the rst and second solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentations with intermittent venting and headspace ushing.
SSAHF-IVa
1st fermentation
Cycle 1
7.89 1.21
a
b
2nd fermentation
Cycle 2
5.39 0.61
Cycle 3
2.28 0.10
Cycle 4
1.06 0.22
PH cumb
16.62
Cycle 1
0.28 0.07
Cycle 2
2.1 0.22
PH cumb
2.38
Notes: batch solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with intermittent venting of reactor headspace.
Cumulative H2 production (mmolH2/mini-reactor).
4. Conclusion
Washing and re-fermentation of spent solids from a rst batch
solid substrate hydrogenogenic fermentation allowed for the
additional generation of biohydrogen, i.e., 14.3% of the biohydrogen
obtained in the rst fermentation. It seems that washing of solids
prevented the inhibition to further H2 production caused by accumulation of organic acids and other metabolites.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank CINVESTAV del IPN and IMCYTDF for
partial support to this research, CONACYT for a graduate scholarship to KMM-P, and COFAA for a fellowship to NR-S. The excellent
help of Mr. Javier Pareja and Mr. Rafael Hernndez-Vera from the
EBRE Group, CINVESTAV del IPN, is gratefully acknowledged. The
authors wish to express their gratitude to the Editor, Guest Editors,
and Referees, for their kind assistance and valuable comments and
suggestions that helped to improve our manuscript.
References
Acevedo-Bentez, J.A., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., 2008. Hydrogen from recalcitrant
leachates by photoheterotrophic fermentation. In: Sass, Bruce M. (Ed.), Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compoundsd2008. Proceedings of the
Sixth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant
Compounds (Monterey, CA; May 2008). Battelle, Columbus, OH, ISBN 1-57477163-9 Book in CD-ROM. www.battelle.org/chlorcon-PaperG-012.
Booth, I.R., 1985. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 49,
359e378.
Brock, T.D., Madigan, M.T., 1991. Biology of Microorganisms, sixth ed. Prentice-Hall.
Inc, Englewood Cliffs.NJ. Sections 17.2 and 19.9.
Ezeji, T.C., Qureshi, N., Blaschek, H.P., 2004. Acetone butanol ethanol (ABE)
production from concentrated substrate: reduction in substrate inhibition by
fed-batch technique and product inhibition by gas stripping. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 63 (6), 653e658.
Fukuzaki, S., Nishio, N., Shobayashi, M., Nagai, S., 1990. Inhibition of fermentation of
propionate to methane by hydrogen, acetate, and propionate. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 56, 719e723.
Gottschalk, G., 1986. Bacterial Metabolism, second ed.. Springer, New York.
Gottwald, M., Gottschalk, G., 1985. The internal pH of Clostridium acetobutylicum
and its effects on the shift from acid to solvent formation. Arch. Microbiol. 143,
42e46.
Jones, D.T., Woods, D.R., 1986. Acetoneebutanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol.
Rev. 48, 484e524.
Kovcs, K.L., Martia, G., Rkhelya, R., 2006. A novel approach for biohydrogen
production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31, 1460e1468.
Lay, J.J., Lee, Y.J., Noike, T., 1999. Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from
organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Res. 33, 2579e2586.
Li, Y.F., Ren, N.Q., Chen, Y., Zheng, G.X., 2007. Ecological mechanism of fermentative
hydrogen production by bacteria. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (6), 755e760.
Logan, B.E., Oh, S.E., Kim, I.S., Ginkel, S.V., 2002. Biological hydrogen production
measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36,
2530e2535.
Mizuno, O., Dinsdale, R., Hawkes, F.R., Hawkes, D.L., Noike, T., 2000. Enhancement of
hydrogen production from glucose by nitrogen gas sparging. Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 31, 1460e1468.
Mizuno, O., Dinsdale, R., Hawkes, F.R., Hawkes, D.L., Noike, T., 2002. Enhancement of
hydrogen production from glucose by nitrogen gas sparcing. Bioresour. Technol.
73, 59e65.
Muoz-Pez, K.M., Garca-Mena, J., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., 2008a. Biological production of hydrogen: a review. In: Proceedings of the IWA 5th International
Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Wastes and Energy Crops. Hammamet, Tunisia, 25e28 May 2008.
S359
Valdez-Vazquez, I., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., 2009. Hydrogen production by fermentative consortia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 13 (5), 1000e1013.
Valdez-Vazquez, I., Sparling, R., Risbey, D., Rinderknecht-Seijas, N., PoggiVaraldo, H.M., 2005. Hydrogen generation via anaerobic fermentation of paper
mill wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (17), 1907e1913.
Valdez-Vazquez, I., Ros-Leal, E., Muoz, K., Carmona, A., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M.,
2006a. Effect of inhibition treatment, type of inocula and incubation temperature on batch hydrogen production from organic solid wastes. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 95 (3), 342e349.
Van Ginkel, S., Logan, B., 2005. Inhibition of biohydrogen production by undissociated acetic and butyric acids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 9351e9356.
Wang, G., Wang, D.I.C., 1984. Elucidation of growth inhibition and acetic acid production by Clostridium thermoaceticum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 294e298.
Wang, Y., Zhao, Q.-B., Mu, Y., Yu, H.-Q., Harada, H., Li, Y.-Y., 2008. Biohydrogen
production with mixed anaerobic cultures in the presence of high-concentration acetate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 1164e1171.
Zoetemeyer, R.J., Matthijsen, A.J.C.M., Cohen, A., Boelhouwer, C., 1982. Product
inhibition in the acid forming stage of the anaerobic digestion process. Water
Res. 16 (5), 633e639.
Notation
A/B: ratio acetic acid-to-butyric acid, both in COD-equivalent concentrations
BES: bromo-ethanesulphonate
OFMSW: organic fraction of municipal solid wastes
PH cum: cumulative hydrogen production
SSAHF-IV: solid substrate anaerobic hydrogenogenic fermentation with intermittent
venting and headspace ushing
TK: total Kjeldahl nitrogen