Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CHAPTER
1. 1 Introduction
1.2 Background
1.3 Definition
1.4 Philosophy or Technique
1.5 Main Area
1|Page
Just In Time
Introduction
Just-In-time
management
or
philosophy
JIT,
is
aimed
at
(JIT) enforces
Continuous
2|Page
Just In Time
The JIT system consists of defining the production flow and setting up the
production floor such that the flow of materials as they get manufactured through the
line is smooth and unimpeded, thereby reducing material waiting time.
This requires that the capacities of the various workstations that the materials
pass through are very evenly matched and balanced, such that bottlenecks in the
production line are eliminated. This set-up ensures that the materials will undergo
manufacturing without queuing or stoppage.
Another important aspect of JIT is the use of a 'pull' system to move
inventories through the production line. Under such a system, the requirements of the
next station are what modulate the production of a particular station. It is therefore
necessary under JIT to define a process by which the pulling of lots from one station
to the next is facilitated.
JIT is most applicable to operations or production flows that do not change,
i.e., those that are simply repeated over and over again. An example of this would be
an automobile assembly line, wherein every car undergoes the same production
process as the one before it.
Some semiconductor companies have likewise practiced JIT successfully.
Still, there are some semiconductor companies that dont practice JIT for the simple
reason that their operations are too complex for JIT application. On the other hand,
thats precisely the challenge of JIT creation of a production set-up that is simple
enough to allow JIT.
Inventory stocks allow production process to continue even when some
problem occurs. In a way, inventory stocks act like a buffers to hide any problem that
may occur. But, with JIT, there are no buffers to hide problems and thus, occurrence
of problem can shut down the entire production process. Thus, JIT philosophy helps
organization to prominently expose problems and thus, bring a clear focus on removal
of it at source, by eliminating the cause, rather than effects, of problem.
With JIT, it is believed that the root causes of most problems are due to faulty
production process design. Hence, with JIT, nothing is taken for granted, everything is
subject to analysis.
3|Page
Just In Time
1.2
Background
JIT finds its origin in Japan, where it has
4|Page
Just In Time
defect free process. Thus began the search for the system that could bring about a
turnaround.
The original concepts for the present day JIT philosophy is derived from the
car plant developed by Henry Ford in the early part of the century.
The ideas probably originated even earlier than this. Although many elements
of JIT manufacturing were present in Ford's assembly line in the 1930s, JIT as a
manufacturing process was not refined until the 1970's by Toyota Motors. Springing
from Japan's post World War II goal of full employment through industrialization,
Japanese manufacturers imported technology to avo0id heavy R & D expenditures
and focused on improving the production process. Their aim was to increase product
quality and reliability. Taiichi Ohno established Toyota as leaders in quality and
delivery time through the implementation of JIT. This position was gained due to a
commitment to two philosophies: elimination of waste and respect for people.
The Japanese developed what we today understand as Just-in-time, through
intensive government supported work, and intended to improve their then inferior
industries. Their programmes began by learning existing techniques from experts such
as Deming and Juran, American quality specialists.
The characteristics of Japan, restrained spaces, no natural energy sources or
mineral wealth put them under pressure and appear to have banished complacency.
Total Quality Manufacturing experts, Deming and Juran, are responsible for
pushing North American manufacturers to adopt JIT philosophies. JIT gained world
prominence as North American manufacturers modified JIT principles to fit into their
top down planning and manufacturing systems approach.
5|Page
Just In Time
1.3
Definition
JIT has gained considerable interest because it allows a company to produce
high quality products with reduced waste and with increased levels of productivity.
Just-in-time (JIT) is defined by T.C.E Cheng
A philosophy of manufacturing based on planned elimination of all waste and on
continuous improvement of productivity. It also has been described as an approach
with the objective of producing the right part in the right place at the right time
David Hutchins (1995) defined Just in Time as
The term used to indicate that a process is capable of instant response to demand
without the need for any overstocking either in expectation of the demand being
forthcoming or as a result of inefficiency in the process.
Taiichi Onho (1986) defined Just in Time as
Just in Time (JIT) is a manufacturing philosophy which leads to producing the
necessary units, in the necessary quantities at the necessary time with the required
quality."
Schonberger describes the JIT system as to
"produce and deliver finished goods just in time to be sold, sub-assemblies just in
time to be assembled into finished goods, and purchased materials just in time
to be transformed into fabricated parts".
Monden describes JIT as
"A production system to produce the kind of units needed, at the time needed and in
the quantities needed".
Just In Time
1.4
Philosophy or Technique
Just in Time are a philosophy and not the technique for elimination of wastes.
The JIT strategy is to have "the right product at the right place at the right time."The
Just-in-time philosophy that emerged, is a management logic based on simplicity and
continuous improvement. It may be applied to any process where it will aim to make
improvements through elimination of excess, waste and unevenness.
The Just-in-Time concept comprises methods and techniques that aim to
increase the potential for short times to delivery. Production system in which both the
movement of goods during production and deliveries from suppliers are carefully
timed so that at each step of the process the next (usually small) batch arrives for
processing just as the proceeding batch is completed
The "Just in time" (JIT.) inventory concept, also called Kanban, asserts that
just enough inventories, arriving just in time to replace that which was just used, is all
the inventory that is necessary at any given time. Excessive inventory unnecessarily
ties up money, adds warehousing costs, increases risk of damage and risks
obsolescence, and most of all, can possibly obscure opportunities for operational
improvements.
Storing inventory is still the basics of warehousing, but in todays business it
constitutes only part of the total. A modern thought on warehousing is that large
inventories are really not as necessary as once believed. To some companies storing
large quantities of inventory is detrimental to business because it ties up capital and
can also disguise poor management practices. The JIT philosophy emphasizes flow
flexibility and developing supply chains to reduce all excess and waste
1.5
Main Area
Often this ter m J IT is us ed w ith JIT interch angeab l y . It is tha t mu c h
inter connected with lean manufacturing; in fact JIT is the backbone of the lean
manufacturing. Actually the concept grew first with the Toyota system was the JIT.
Then it developed to the lean manufacturing.
7|Page
Just In Time
JIT is one key way to get read of most of the wastes which we have already
discussed in the early chapters. JIT concepts are based on the pull demand model.
Everything is done when they are actually needed. JIT has three main areas.
Case Study
The Japanese by no means confine the JIT concept to in-plant production.
Purchased inventories are considered as evil as in-plant inventories.
8|Page
Just In Time
The Japanese tend to buy in small lots from the same few suppliers year after
year. Suppliers develop a competency that is particularly attuned to the delivery and
quality needs of the buying firm. Confidence in the supplier reduces buffer
inventories which are sometimes used up in only a few hours. Delivery frequency
from the supplier may be more than once a day. And over time, some suppliers
achieve quality levels high enough for all receiving inspections to be bypassed and for
the parts to go right to the production line rather than to a receiving dock.
Under JIT, suppliers also benefit, especially from long-term contracts and
stable relationships with the buying plant. By making parts steadily rather than in
batches, the supplier realizes inventory, quality, and scrap improvements. Defects are
identified early, and there are fewer defectives to throw out or rework. Further
inventory benefits may be gained if the supplier also initiates JIT buying from its own
suppliers.
A less obvious but potentially great benefit to the supplier is less need for
large, expensive equipment and steadier utilization of existing equipment since the
supplier may produce in the same steady daily amounts as are called for in the JIT
purchase agreement.
The benefits of JIT buying are greatest in the case of materials used every day.
For materials whose usage rates are irregular, one can go only so far toward frequent
deliveries in small amounts. But still the point is to try to go as far as possible.
In Japan it is common for a JIT purchase agreement to involve very little paper
work. The purchase order (PO) or contract may specify an overall quantity to be
delivered during a period of several months in accordance with a long-term
production schedule provided by the buying plant.
Some Japanese original equipment manufacturer (OEM) companies use
kanban instead of a production schedule to trigger deliveries. The kanban are released
from the using work center on the shop floor of the OEM Company. Deliveries are
thus matched with the work centers rate of usage and hence are closer to being justin-time than would be the case if they were based on a production schedule. The
9|Page
Just In Time
kanban may serve as the invoice when returned with the parts to the OEM plant. The
quantity of cards is totaled. The total is payable perhaps once a month.
Another notable feature of the Japanese system of industrial buying is
simplicity of the product specifications. The Japanese way, is to rely more on
performance specifications and less on design specifications. The idea is to let a
supplier innovate. After all, the supplier is the expert. Why not rely on the suppliers
expertise?
It is common practice for U.S suppliers to ship somewhat more or less than the
quantity called for in the purchase agreement. The Japanese buyer expects and gets an
exact quantity or very closes to it. The Japanese commonly use packages or containers
with a standard number of divided spaces or an exact cube. This makes it easy to
count out the right number.
American buyers take shipping costs and the whole freight handling system to
be a given, which tends to force large-lot buying. JIT buying, like JIT production,
considers any such obstacles to cutting lot sizes as a challenge rather than as a given.
The freight system may be attacked in various ways, and distances to suppliers must
become an important consideration in selecting them. These issues are examined
further in the next sections.
The typical U.S way of dealing with inbound freight is to leave it to the
supplier and the transportation industry. But the transportation systems, primary
concern is with optimal utilization of drivers, storage space, and trailer or rail-car
cubes. One way is to try to deal with clusters of vendors rather than widely scattered
ones, so that freight may be consolidated daily in economical full trailer loads or
carloads. Vendor clusters also afford increased use of contract shipping or companyowned trucks and use of trailers as portable warehouses. These measures improve
control over freight scheduling and make it possible to avoid the uncertainties of
dealing with break-bulk warehouses.
As deliveries become frequent, full truck loads may not be possible. Unit-load
economics may be overcome by cutting the transportation distance between supplier
and buyer plants. Proximity also means that there are numerous coordination benefits.
10 | P a g e
Just In Time
Toyota, Nissan, Honda, and many other companies that seem not to be
vertically integrated actually exercise extensive control over their suppliers.
Sometimes the supplier plants are partially owned by the buying firm. But even when
that is not the case, control is exercised. Buyer representatives constantly visit the
supplier plants and come to know the suppliers capabilities and weaknesses, perhaps
even better than a U.S assembly plant typically knows its own subsidiary fabrication
plants. On the other hand, Japanese companies that are highly vertically integrated in
an ownership sense are often internally organized into small units, so that over control
does not stifle local initiative and pride.
A rule of thumb in the U.S purchasing trade is to have at least two suppliers
for a given purchased part. Japanese companies, by contrast, hope to evolve to buying
a given part from just one supplier but a good one, and preferably one that does little
business with other buyer companies. The Japanese buying firm wants to be the
dominant reason for the suppliers existence. A supplier selling, say, 60 percent of its
output to a single buying company will go to great lengths to be responsive.
Building up and staying with a base of dedicated, high-quality suppliers seems
resourceful, as compared with the musical-chairs pattern practiced in the U S.
Frequent rebidding is supposed to search out the best current price. But that opens the
door to those who quote low to get the contract and then fail to perform satisfactorily.
Also in awarding a contract to a new lower bidder, the previous supplier is taken off
his learning curve and a supplier who may have to go through a debugging period that
the first supplier already experienced. Of course, the purchasing department is
supposed to thoroughly check out a potential new suppliers capabilities before
awarding a contract. But such investigation is time-consuming and subject to error as
compared with the administrative simplicity of sticking with the old supplier.
Rebidding also fails to generate supplier loyalty, which can mean panic when a
supplier is unable to fill orders fast enough and must decide which buyer to favor
Just In Time
value without having stocks in between workstations. This created the backbone of
lean manufacturing.
Every workstation is linked to the other with a customer supplier relationship.
Top of the line requirement is pulled by subsequent workstation by means of a kanban
or a pull signal. So the manufacturing is carried out only on demand, when they
required and only to the required quantity. Everything happens in a synchronized
manner to make sure the seamless integration of processes. Every workstation is a
supplier to the next workstation of the manufacturing process. And every workstation
is a customer to the workstation before that.
Just in time manufacturing make sure optimized cycle times. It also reduces
the stock holding costs. Reduction of work in progress is another important impact
JIT brings to the manufacturing process. This leads to improved quality of
manufacturing, reduced costs and cycle times. Obviously this will give the
competitive edge to any manufacturer in open markets.
Case Study
Just-in-time production is a simple concept. It is not about automation. It
requires little use of computers. In some industries, JIT can provide for tighter
controls on inventory than are attainable through U.S computer-based approaches.
Furthermore, JIT leads to significantly higher quality and productivity. JIT provides
visibility for results so that worker responsibility and commitment are improved.
Applications and benefits of JIT/TQC may be extended from the factory itself forward
into distribution and backward into the supplier end of the business.
The JIT idea is simple. Produce and deliver finished goods just in time to be
sold, subassemblies just in time to be assembled into finished goods, fabricated parts
just in time to go into subassemblies, and purchased materials just in time to be
transformed into fabricated parts. All materials must be in the processing stage, never
at rest collecting carrying charges. This hand-to-mouth mode of operation, approaches
piece-by-piece production.
The system becomes very transparent. If a worker makes only one of a given
part and passes it to the next worker immediately, the first worker will hear about it if
12 | P a g e
Just In Time
soon the part does not fit at one of the next work stations. Thus, defects are discovered
quickly. The causes of defects can be nipped in the bud. Production of large lots high
in defects is avoided. Due to reduced scrap and more good parts, the time and money
spent on rework drops. So does the cost of wasted materials.
Under JIT, if a part doesnt fit at the new work station, the worker who made
the bad part will probably not find it hard to guess what he did wrong. In short, the
workers awareness of defect causation is heightened. So, the worker is strongly
motivated to improve.
Large lot sizes lead to carelessness on the part of the worker, the workers peer
group, and perhaps the labor union and management as well. They may feel, with
some justification, that a certain percentage of bad parts in a large lot cause little
harm; in a large lot there may be plenty of good items for every bad one. Just toss the
defectives aside and keep on assembling. With small JIT lot sizes, by contrast, a few
defectives parts pinch hard. The need to avoid errors is apparent, which heightens the
sense of responsibility.
Western observers have marveled at how Japanese workers come to one
anothers aid to resolve problems. We might expect such behavior in a JIT plant. It is
natural for each affected worker to want to come to the aid of the worker whose drive
belt breaks, whose machine is jammed, or who is having any of a large variety of
other common problems.
The Japanese no longer accept the buffer principle. They seem to have
understood the essence of the buffer inventory principle: The more irregularity, the
more buffer stock. Instead of adding buffer stocks at the points of irregularity,
Japanese production managers deliberately expose the work force to the
consequences. The response is that workers and foreman rally to root out the causes of
irregularity. They know that otherwise there may be work stoppages.
The Japanese principle of exposing the workers to the consequences of
production irregularities is not applied passively. In the Toyota Kanban system, for
example, each time that workers succeed in correcting the causes of recent irregularity
the managers remove still more buffer stock. The workers are never allowed to settle
13 | P a g e
Just In Time
into a comfortable pattern. The pattern becomes one of continually perfecting the
production process.
A happy incidental benefit of JIT is faster market response, better forecasting,
and less administration. Less idle inventory in the system cuts overall lead time from
raw materials purchasing to shipping of finished goods. Marketing can thereby
promise deliveries faster, can effect a change in the product mix or quantity faster, and
can forecast demand better since the time horizon is shorter. In as much as JIT
systems tend to be run by workers and foremen, the administrative budget for data
processing, accounting, inspection, materials, production planning and control and so
forth is less. With fire-fighting responsibilities clearly recognized and accepted by line
workers, the executives can sit back and focus on strategy.
14 | P a g e
Just In Time
1.6
Element
People Involvement
Plants
System
People Involvement:
S
P
ly
s
a
t
n
production. This is not only reducing
the time and effort in implementation t
e
of JIT, but also minimizes the chance
m
of creating implementation problem. The attempt to maximize people's involvement
agreement from people involved in
may carry through the introduction of quality circle and total involvement concept.
Manufacturers can gain support from 4 sources.
1. Stockholders and owners of the company should maintain a good long-term
relationship among them.
2. Labour organization - all labours should be well informed about the goals of
JIT, this is crucial in gaining support from the them.
3. Management support - support from all level of management. The ideas of
continuous improvement should spread all over the factory, managers and all
shop floor labour.
4. Government support - government can show their support by extending tax
and other financial help. This can enhance the motivation, and also help in
financing the implementation of JIT
Just In Time
3. Kanban - a Japanese term for card or tag. Special inventory and process
information are written on the card. This helps tying and linking the process
more efficiently.
4. Self inspection - it is carried out by the workers at catch mistakes
immediately.
5. Continuous improvement - this concept should be adopted by every member
in the organization in order to carry out JIT. This is the most important concept
of JIT. This can allow an organization to improve its productivity, service,
operation and even customer satisfaction in an on-going basis.
System:
This refers to the technology and process that combines the different processes
and activities together. Two major types are Material Requirement Planning and
Manufacturing
Resource
Planning.MRP
is
computer
based
bottom-up
manufacturing approach. This involves two plans, production plan and master
production schedule. Production plan involves the management and planning of
resources through the available capacity. Master production schedule involves what
products to be produced in what time.
1.7
Phrase
Just In Time
It means giving up old concept of managing and adopting JIT way of thinking.
There are 10 principles for improvement:
1.
2.
3.
4.
acceptable.
5. Correct mistakes immediately.
6. Do not spend money on improvement.
7. Use your brain to solve problem.
8. Repeat to ask yourself 5 times before any decision.
9. Gather information from several people, more is better!
10. Remember that improvement has no limits.
The idea of giving up old concept was especially for the large lot production,
the lot production was felt that "having fewer changeover was better", but it was no
longer true. Whereas JIT is a one-piece flow manufacturing. To compare the two,
Hirano had this idea: Lot production: "Unneeded goods...In unneeded quantities...At
unneeded time..."JIT: "Needed goods...In needed quantities...At needed times..." The
main point here is to have an awareness of the need of throwing out old system and
adopting a new one.
Just In Time
18 | P a g e
Just In Time
Daily Quantity Required = Monthly Quantity Needed / Working Days per month
Cycle Time = Working Hours per day / Daily Quantity Required Work sequence
Standard stock-on-hand
Use operation charts
19 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
Research Methodology
SYNOPSIS
2. 1 Primary Data
2.2 Secondary Data
20 | P a g e
Just In Time
Research Methodology
Research methodology is a careful investigation for inquiring in a systematic
method and finding solution of a problem. It comprises the defining and redefining of
problem formulating hypothesis, collection and evaluating data, making detection and
reaching conclusion.
2.1
Primary Data
Primary data is one which is collected first time and original in nature. This
Observation
Personal interview
Telephone
Questionnaire
2.2
Secondary Data
The data which is already collected by someone else. I.e. collected through
21 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
22 | P a g e
Just In Time
Just In Time
First of all each department should establish its goals and a specific
problem to attack. Then a team should be chosen by each department and
establish team leaders. The teams should focus on the reduction of costs and
the elimination of wastes. Data must then be collected on the teams problems.
This data should be plotted in order to find excess waste or costs. Once this is
done, measurement should be plotted in order to find excess waste or costs.
Once this is done, measurement should be made. Manipulation of this data
should show at least some apparent problems in the current system. Further
analysis should help in the implementation of JIT by showing problem areas.
In addition, the data the data could be used to show the effects of
implementing JIT into the company.
3.2
24 | P a g e
Just In Time
5. Preventive maintenance:
Use machine and worker idle time to maintain equipment and prevent
breakdowns
3.3
Just In Time
3.4
3.5
Repetitive production.
Standard products.
Short set-up times.
Demands discipline.
Sloppy work, no late delivery.
Bad management.
Stable demand, level production.
Cooperation and trust between people
Factor Debilitation
Listed below are few of the factors that can debilitate JIT:
2. Shortcoming of Suppliers:
These include factors such as unpredictable quality, erratic deliver
schedules, varying quantity dispatches, machine breakdowns and quality
related losses etc
Just In Time
Power is among the basic necessity for any plant operation. Unreliable
power supply is quite a common phenomenon is a country like India. Very few
places in the country get uninterrupted power supply throughout the day. This
halts production and delivery dates
cannot be met by the supplier.
in
the
JIT
system.
3.6
Just In Time
lines only produce or deliver desired components when they receive a card and an
empty container. Kanban is a production system, which draws many of its elements
from two primary sources, industrial re-engineering, and work force. Industrial
reengineering along with Kanban consists of Elements such as:
1. Modular/cell production. Products-oriented layout of processes and machine
layout.
2. U-shaped production / processing lines.
3. Total Preventive Maintenance
4. Mass production of mixed models
Advantages of Kanban Process:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
satisfaction.
6. It provides flexible manufacturing systems and computer aided manufacturing.
Benefits of GT
28 | P a g e
Just In Time
E.g. Bottling industries sometimes spend more than 20% of their planned
production time on changeovers. These setup and changeover times can be reduced
significantly when the changeover SMED system is applied.
4. JIDOKA (Automation)
JIDOKA is the concept of adding an element of human judgment to automated
equipment. So that the equipment can identify unacceptable items and the automated
process becomes more reliable.
29 | P a g e
Just In Time
JIDOKA means not allowing problems to pass from one workstation to the
next. Such that the production of a defective part is detected immediately and machine
responds by stopping and requesting help.
E.g. in Toyota power loom the shuttlecocks would stick and create defects in the
cloth being produced. The Toyota loom incorporated a simple stopper that was
activated by a sticking shuttlecock. The operator could stop machine when the shuttle
would stick.
Objective of JIDOKA
1. Ensuring 100% quality.
2. Preventing equipment breakdowns.
3. Using manpower efficiently.
5. Total
Productive
Maintenance (TPM)
In any factory it is necessary to run
all the equipments on continuous basis to get maximum output. It is found that
generally that does not happen. There is loss if any tool or machine is not in use. Due
to any reason like material not available or the machine is not working. In order to
avoid such losses TPM is implemented. For this purpose following steps should be
taken.
1. All the reason for the loss of equipment should be avoided.
2. Preventive Maintenance program is to be made.
3. Operator should be given training to maintain his equipment when required.
4. Autonomous maintenance by the operator along with the small group activity
is to be done.
30 | P a g e
Just In Time
eliminate.
7. Ten heads are better than one.
31 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
4.1 Benefit
4.2 Drawback
Just In Time
4.1 Benefit
JIT benefits could be grouped into the following categories;
1. Product Cost:
This is greatly reduced of manufacturing cycle time, reduction of
scraps, inventories, space requirement, and material handling and eliminations
of non-value adding operations.
2. Quality:
It has greatly improved due to fast detection and correction of defects,
use of automatic stop devices, higher quality of purchased parts, worker
centred quality control and statistical process control. Total preventive
maintenance and lower inventory levels also help in quality improvements.
3. Design:
Due to fast response to engineering change, alternative designs can be
quickly brought on the shop floor.
4. Productivity:
Order magnitude productivity improvements are obtained due to the
use of flexible workforce, reduced rework, reduced inspection, reduced part
delay and reduced throughout time. Workers acquire multiple skills and
become highly productive.
The other benefits are:
5. Reduced levels of in-process inventories, purchased, and finished goods.
6. Reduced space requirements.
7. Increased product quality and reduced scrap and rework.
8. Reduced lead times.
9. Greater flexibility in changing the production mix.
10. Worker participation in problem solving.
11. Pressure to build good relationships with vendors.
4.2 Drawback
Regardless of the great benefits of JIT, it has its drawbacks.
JIT has the following major drawbacks:
1. Culture Differences:
33 | P a g e
Just In Time
The organizational cultures vary from firm to firm. There are some
cultures that tie to JIT success but it is difficult for an organization to change
its cultures within a short time.
2. Traditional Approach:
The traditional approach in manufacturing is to store up a large amount
of inventory in the means of backing up during bad time. Those companies
rely on safety stocks may have a problem with the use of JIT.
3. Difference in implementation of JIT:
Because JIT was originally established in Japanese, it is somehow
different for implementing in western countries. The benefits may vary.
4. Loss of individual autonomy:
This is mainly due to the shorter cycle times which add pressures and
stress on the workers.
5. Loss of team autonomy:
This is the result of decreasing buffer inventories which lead to a lower
flexibility of the workers to solve problem individually.
6. Loss of method autonomy:
It means the workers must act some way when problems occur, this
does not allow them to have their own method to solve a problem.
7. Varied
JIT success is varied from industry to industry. Some industries are
benefit more from JIT while others do not.
8. Employee commitment:
Employees must commit to JIT, to enhance the quality as their ultimate
goal, and to see JIT as a way to compete rather than method used by managers
to increase their workload.
9. Relationship:
Relationship between management and employees is important .A
mutual trust must be built between management and employees in order to
have effective decision making.
10. Employee commitment:
Employees must commit to JIT, to enhance the quality as their ultimate
goal, and to see JIT as a way to compete rather than method used by managers
to increase their workload.
34 | P a g e
Just In Time
11. Production level JIT works best for medium to high range of production
volume.
12. Employee skill JIT requires workers to be multi-skilled and flexible to change.
13. Compensation should be set on time-based wages. This allows the workers to
concentrate on building what the customers wants.
35 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
5.1 Focus
5.2 Objective
Just In Time
5.1
Focus
Mainly JIT focuses to eliminate the waste or the non-value added. Thus there
1. Transportation:
Each time a product is moved it stands the risk of being damaged, lost,
delayed, etc. as well as being a cost for no added value. Transportation does
not make any transformation to the product that the consumer is supposed to
pay for.
2. Inventory:
Inventory, be it in the form of raw materials, work-in-progress (WIP),
or finished goods, represents a capital outlay that has not yet produced an
income either by the producer or for the consumer. Any of these three items
not being actively processed to add value is waste.
3. Motion:
As compared to Transportation, Motion refers to the producer, worker
or equipment. This has significance to damage, wear and safety. It also
includes the fixed assets and expenses incurred in the production.
4. Waiting:
Whenever goods are not in transport or being processed, they are
waiting. In traditional processes, a large part of an individual product's life is
spent waiting to be worked on.
5. Over-processing:
Over-processing occurs any time more work is done on a piece than
what is required by the customer. This also includes using tools that are more
precise, complex, or expensive than absolutely required.
6. Over-production:
37 | P a g e
Just In Time
7. Defects:
Whenever defects occur, extra costs are incurred reworking the part,
rescheduling production, etc.
5.2
Objective
The prime goal of JIT is the achievement of zero inventories, minimal work in
progress not just within the confine of a single organization, but ultimately throughout
the entire supply chain.
Just In Time
39 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
Just In Time
6.1
the pull one. The push system is so called because the previously planned
manufactured lots 'push' the production
In contrast, in the pull system (from 'pull', or decentralized information) each
process or customer takes the product or the parts from the previous process as and
when they are needed. In this way, a work or service centre only works when the next
process communicates to it the need to do so.
This system uses Kanban in order to function. Kanban is the authorization to
produce or adjust stock, at the same time providing control and information.
It is used to regulate the level of stocks and the speed of production by
lowering or raising either the number or the size of Kanbans. If there is no Kanban,
the system comes to a standstill. It facilitates visual control and reduces bureaucracy.
It establishes a maximum, which is the highest stock possible, and it is calculated on
the basis of the requirements of the situation. The Kanban involves the stock; the
objective is to reduce it to the optimum point possible
This type of management has an effect on the balance of the
production variations and on flexibility. JIT requires the flow of operations to be as
uniform as possible, so that it can be both constant and stable. Mechanisms have to
be used which reduce variations in the short term in order to achieve
synchronization of the production process. The leveling out of the production is based
on manufacturing varieties of products which are then adjusted to the demand, rather
than producing large series. Great flexibility is needed both in the equipment used,
which must have a number of different uses and permit the production of short series
efficiently, and the manpower, which should be able to perform several tasks and have
experience in a variety of operations.
the
pull
system
(from
pull,
41 | P a g e
Just In Time
decentralized
information)
each
The
customers come and take away The customers start the process: as they
their orders, but the warehouse sends take away the goods the warehouse
the orders according to the planning sends new orders to the plant. If the
of materials
Materials planning establishes the stocks The work positions do not hold stock;
for each work position, and each one they depend on each other to continue
works independently of the others
An increase in demand from the customers The customer activates the process. If the
produces a drop in stocks. It might lead to a demands increases, the whole process speeds
shortfall situation
The suppliers and the warehouse maintain their The work positions adjust their speed to
normal rhythm
production
of
work,
following
the the
the demand
42 | P a g e
Just In Time
If there is a stoppage in one of the positions A stoppage in one of the work positions
the others continue their work at full speed, means the other positions are not given work,
accumulating stock. The chain continues and so the process is halted and stocks are not
the problem grows
Supply Problem
The Purchasing department puts on pressure The system might be halted while the plant
to solve the problem and grants part of the collaborates with the supplier to solve the
contract to another supplier
problem
One supplier suffers problems and his stock When a problem arises, the supplier informs
piles up. The other increases his supplies to the production chain and production is halted.
avoid running out of stocks
6.2
improves quality
, and in the
Just In Time
production with demand improves the flow of goods and reduces the need
for storage facilities.
2. JITs focus on eliminating waste from the production process lead to
redesign of the workspace to ensure a smooth flow of goods or processes,
eliminating redundant tasks and minimizing transportation of the product
across the workspace.
3. The traditional manufacturing process call for batch manufacturing or
manufacturing of a particular component or model in a lot before moving
on to another batch or lot. JIT makes it possible to manufacture even
single pieces or components without any delays.
4. JITs system of
kanban
Just In Time
delivery.
This
eliminates
all
scope
of
misunderstandings
or
miscommunication.
2. The success of JIT requires reliable suppliers and organizations takes the
initiative to upgrade supplier competencies and establish a long-term
relationship with the supplier to ensure compatibility and standardized
products
3. The exact nature of order and the long-term proactive relationship with
suppliers eliminate the need for inspection of received goods
45 | P a g e
Just In Time
6.3
volume of a relatively high value product. (Its origins are in car manufacturing).
Ideally your company should have short setup times on machines, and a commitment
to quality assurance.
To see if Just in Time might be applicable to some or all of your business,
work through the following steps.
Examine your business model
Could you extract more value from your suppliers by communicating directly
with their systems?
Can you identify the key interfaces between your business and your
suppliers/customers?
Are ordering, delivery or transportation failures costing you time and money?
46 | P a g e
Just In Time
Can you quantify the cost of failure/delay at any given interface between you
and your suppliers/customers?
Have you calculated the cost of managing your supply chain and could you
reduce the cost by automating the processes?
If you answered "Yes" to any of these questions you are ready to look at the
next section below on inventory. If you answered "No" to any of these questions you
should review your processes further.
Minimise inventory
Do you know how much inventory you hold at any one time?
Do you know how much inventory you need to hold at any one time?
Does production proceed at a rate dictated by your customers rather than your
supply chain partners?
Do your supply chain partners know in advance when your demand peaks will
affect their business?
47 | P a g e
Just In Time
If you answered "No" to any of these questions, you should consider using
automated JIT techniques in ordering, supply and production to streamline your
supply chain.
Is the sequence of steps required to take a product from point of sale to point
of delivery a standard one, repeatable at a pre-defined quality level?
Can you trace what you produce (including its constituent parts) back to
source and prove that you meet the appropriate commercial or regulatory
standards?
If you answered "No" to any of these questions, consider how you could
48 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
Case Study
SYNOPSIS
49 | P a g e
Just In Time
Case Study
7.1
along with lean operations and six-sigma are the buzz words being talked most about.
But what exactly is the deal with JIT operations?
First of all, JIT is a form of providing supplies for customers, as the name
suggests, just in time. JIT model involves not even being in possession of the raw
materials needed to fulfill an order until that order is placed and yet being capable of
filling orders in a short period of time.
McDonald's doesn't begin to cook (well, I should probably say reheat and
assemble what may or may not be actual food) its orders until a customer has placed a
specific order.
What used to be the case was McDonald's would pre-cook a batch of
hamburgers and let them sit under heat lamps. They would keep them for as long as
possible and eventually discard what couldn't be sold. The only way to get a fresh
hamburger under the old system was to make a special order. Now, due to more
sophisticated burger-making technology (including a record-breaking bun toaster),
McDonald's is able to make food fast enough to wait until it's been ordered.
What McDonald's do is, provide a customer with their order as fast as possible
while having the finished product sitting in inventory for as short as possible.
What are the benefits for McDonald's?
The major benefits for McDonald's are better food at a lower cost. Lets stop
here for a second to drive home a very important point: Whenever you can implement
something that allows you to raise quality AND lower costs, you should definitely
look into implementing that practice. Unless illegal, immoral, socially irresponsible,
or likely to drive down demand (which is unlikely considering quality is being
50 | P a g e
Just In Time
improved), you are probably going to want to implement this practice. Back to
McDonald's.
McDonald's has found something that allows them to improve quality and
lower costs. Let's take a look at how it does both.
Improved Quality
I think benefits of a better tasting burger should be fairly apparent. Unless of
course you prefer aged burgers, the fresher burger is going to be higher quality if
made fresh just for you.
The less obvious benefit is the higher quality customer service that arises from
the JIT burger assembly. When McDonald's waits for you to order the burger, they do
a few things to improve customer service. First of all, when you place a special order,
it doesn't send McDonald's into a panic that causes huge delays.
Now that McDonald's is in the practice of waiting until you order a burger
until they make it, they don't freak out when they have to make a special order fresh
just for you. This higher quality customer service is subject to McDonald's ability to
actually produce faster. Without this ability, McDonald's ordering costs would be skyhigh because the costs associated with ordering would be the loss of customers tired
of ordering fast food that really isn't fast.
Second, JIT allows McDonald's to adapt to demand a little bit better.
Seemingly, lower inventory levels would cause McDonald's bigger problems in a
higher demand because they wouldn't have their safety stock. However, because they
can produce burgers in a record time, they don't have to worry about their pre-made
burger inventories running out in the middle of an exceptionally busy shift.
Lower Costs
The holding costs for burger parts are fairly high because of their spoilage
costs. Frozen ground chicken that's good today might not be so good in a few
months. Once cooked, the same ground chickens spoilage rate shoots through the
roof. Instead of having a shelf life of months or weeks, the burger needs to be sold
within 15 minutes or so. The holding costs go from roughly 20% per week to 100%
per hour.
51 | P a g e
Just In Time
In other words, under McDonald's old system, they produced at a level that
gave them high inventories so that food would be available fast, which is the main
benefit of fast food. Unfortunately, food that was unsold after a short period of time
was scrapped. Food that was sold was forced to be sold at a higher price in order to
absorb the scrap costs of unsold food. Ultimately this meant higher costs for
McDonald's.
For McDonald's, the benefits of JIT are fairly clear.
Why Economic Order quantity Savings
A large benefit of JIT is that it reduces the total cost of ordering and holding
inventory. Let's quickly recap three firms that have achieved this and how they did so.
McDonald's High holding costs is the nature of the fast food industry. JIT
system allowed it to exploit the savings that were realized by holding fewer
inventories.
High holding costs and low ordering costs are the factors that drive
JIT. Generally, it's the ability to lower ordering costs that make it a feasible
solution. McDonald's is slave to the high holding costs. It was just the nature of their
industry. The solution for them was that while they couldn't lower holding costs, they
could lower ordering costs. McDonald's has very high holding costs in comparison to
their ordering costs. Ultimately, this, coupled with the ability to lower safety stock, is
when JIT is effective. EOQ determines how much you should order and there are two
factors that drive economic order quantities down: low ordering costs and high
holding costs. Depending on the product and the industry, one or both of these
qualities may exist in your operations. If they do, JIT may be right for you. Without
the ability to make ordering costs low as a percentage of holding costs then there is no
need for JIT. In fact, the increased frequency in ordering will result in cost increases.
Safety stock Reductions
The other aspect of JIT is the drastic reduction in safety stock. The two
reasons safety stock exists: variability in demand and variability in lead times from
suppliers (in McDonald's case, the supplier is the internal production process).
52 | P a g e
Just In Time
It is because of this variability that safety stock exists in the first place. What
JIT does is tries to reduce the lead times and variation in lead times in order to help
reduce safety stock. McDonald's accomplished this by creating a system that allowed
a faster burger production (remember, McDonald's lead times are internal) by
standardizing production.
In order to accomplish the tasks of shortening lead times and reducing their
variances, a considerable amount of work needs to be done with suppliers/internal
operations. For some firms this is worth the trouble, for others, it is not.
Conclusively, there are two major parts to JIT inventory operations: lowering
the ratio between ordering costs and holding costs and shortening lead times. What
results is a firm with such high holding costs that ordering very small batches very
frequently is the most profitable solution. This eliminates average inventory above the
safety stock level. Then, if lead times and lead time variability can be decreased,
safety stock can be decreased. The result is inventory coming in as it needs to come
in. In other words, it comes in just in time.
Conclusion
Efficient stock management is essential to any business. It enables the
business to operate in a responsible way. Because McDonald's has taken much of the
hard work out of stock management, Restaurant Managers are able to spend more
time focusing on delivering McDonald's high standards of Quality, Service and
Cleanliness. Customers are happy because they can be sure the item they want is on
the menu that day.
The system also minimizes waste. Efficient use of materials means that
societys resources are being used well with very few waste products. For example,
fewer materials end up as waste in landfill sites. This leads to a reduction in costs.
Due to lower costs, McDonald's can pass the benefits on to customers, providing
better service and lower prices. The reduction of waste provides a win-win situation
for McDonald's, its customers and wider society.
McDonald's avoid running out of stock. As a result, customers can always
receive what they order. The system eliminates inexperience in the ordering. The
system enables a new Restaurant Manager to ensure the order is right first time.
53 | P a g e
Just In Time
Time saved in ordering as the system calculates how much is required. Orders
are based on the current stocks. The Restaurant Manager simply inputs the current
stock levels.
Less waste means food costs are reduced. This cost saving is then passed on in
better value for money for customers. The amount of stock ordered for promotions is
more accurate, being based on past performance. There is a reduction in the need for
emergency deliveries, saving money.
Stock levels are always at optimum level, helping to ensure sales and the
freshest product. Stock can be reduced automatically at the end of a promotion,
avoiding too much stock.
54 | P a g e
Just In Time
7.2
Hell, even I've mentioned Dell on this site. So why all the commotion? Has their low
inventory REALLY helped out that much? In short, yes. This article is primarily going
to discuss how much it helped. This article will not discuss how they achieved such
high inventory turns using a state of the art just in time inventory system.
Reasoning behind need for lower inventory
The first thing that needs to be discussed is why low inventory has such a
great effect on Dell's overall performance. The reason is quite simple: computers
depreciate at a very high rate. Sitting in inventory, a computer loses a ton of value.
As Dell's CEO, Kevin Rollins, put it in an interview with Fast Company:
"The longer you keep it the faster it deteriorates you can literally see the stuff
rot," he says."Because of their short product lifecycles, computer components
depreciate anywhere from a half to a full point a week. Cutting inventory is not just a
nice thing to do. It's a financial imperative."
We're going to assume that the depreciation is a full point per week (1%/week)
and use that to determine how much money high inventory turns can save Dell.
This means that for every 7 days a computer sits in Dell's warehouses, the
computer loses 1% of its value. Ok, now that we know how much Dell loses for each
day, let's take a look at some of Dell's data over the past 10 years that I pulled from
www.themanufacturer.com
What I got from this was the inventory turns. An inventory turn, as this
website successfully describes it, is "cost of goods sold from the income statement
divided by value of inventory from the balance sheet". Typically, this is turned into a
value showing how many days worth of inventory a firm has by dividing inventory
turnover by 365. I divided the inventory turnover by 52 in order to show how many
weeks worth of inventory Dell holds.
55 | P a g e
Just In Time
Year
Inventory Turnover
Week's Inventory
1992
4.79
10.856
1993
5.16
10.078
1994
9.4
5.532
1995
9.8
5.306
1996
24.2
2.149
1997
41.7
1.247
1998
52.40
0.992
1999
52.40
0.992
2000
51.4
1.012
2001
63.50
0.819
Key point to notice here is that Dell was carrying over 10 weeks worth of
inventory in 1993. By 2001, Dell was carrying less than 1 week's worth of inventory.
This essentially means that inventory used to sit around for 11 weeks and now it sits
around for less than 1 week.
So what does this mean for Dell?
Remember, computers lose 1 percent of their value per week. This isn't like
the canned food industry where managers can let their supplies sit around for months
before anyone bats an eye. Computers arent canned goods, and as Kevin Rollins of
Dell put it, computers rot. The longer a computer sits around, the less it is worth.
That said, due to depreciation alone, in 1993 Dell was losing roughly 10% per
computer just by allowing computers to sit around before they were sold. In 2001,
56 | P a g e
Just In Time
Dell was losing less than a percent. Based on holding costs alone, Dell reduced costs
by nearly 9%.
Since 2001, Dell has continued to lower inventory. Looking at their
reports
latest annual
the positive effects lower inventory can have on a firm's overall costs. For more
information regarding lawyers in the Texas area, check out
accident attorney
57 | P a g e
Just In Time
CHAPTER
Conculsion
58 | P a g e
Just In Time
Conclusion
Just-In-Time is a manufacturing philosophy which leads to producing the
required items, at the required quality and in the right quantities at the precise time as
they are required. It is an approach to achieving excellence in elimination of waste.
In this case waste can be thought of as all things that dont add value to the
product. Overproduction, Inventory, defect products, transport and waiting time are
some examples of what can be waste according to JIT. Just-In-Time manufacturing is
a system of enforced problem solving. Managers have the choice between putting a
huge effort in finding and solving causes of production problems, or they can learn to
live with an intolerable level of interruptions in production. As everybody knows, the
situation in which one has to put huge efforts is highly undesirable, and therefore the
system is called enforced. Quality within JIT manufacturing is necessary, because
without a quality program in JIT, the JIT will fail. Here we think about quality at the
source and the Plan, Do, Check, Action with its statistical process control.
Furthermore, techniques are also very important. The JIT technique is a pull
system rather than a pull system, based on not producing things until they are needed.
The well known Kanban card is used as a signal to produce. Moreover, integration
also plays a key role in JIT systems. JIT integration can be found in four points of the
manufacturing firm. The Accounting side, Engineering side, Customer side and
Supplier side. At the accounting side, JIT has concern for WIP, utilization and
overhead allocation and at the engineering side of JIT focuses on simultaneously and
participative design of products and processes.
Just-In-Time has its influence in ordering, scheduling and producing sides of a
manufacturing firm. JIT production contains the well known Kanban System. This
influence in the manufacturing firm is depending on employees, suppliers or
customers. Therefore a large element of training is put toward the JIT to reach certain
goals. One of these goals is mutual trust and teamwork. This is an important factor in
59 | P a g e
Just In Time
the JIT principle. When managers and workers see each other as equal, committed to
the organization and its success, they are more willing to co-operate with each other in
order to find the problems and solve these problems. Moreover, a firm which
empowers its workers gives the workers the authority to solve problems on their own.
When this is done, workers have the authority to stop production and to solve
problems, instead of first waiting for guidance from a supervisor. The objective of
worker empowerment is having workers involved in the problem as it occurs. In all,
JIT is an important operational system for manufacturing and supplying companies to
adopt and implement. Technically, procedurally and managerially it requires attention
to data, information and communication. But if looked at through the eyes of the
corporation that has implemented the JIT system, the positive outcomes that arise
from the use of the system are far greater than those that are not. The JIT system
really is a state of the art idea that is beginning to catch on in a tremendous way all
over the world.
60 | P a g e
Just In Time
Bibliography
Book
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Website
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
http://www.leanmanufacturingconcepts.com
http://www.scribd.com
http://openmultimedia.ie.edu
http://www.vedpuriswar.org
http://www.brighthub.com
http://www.is4profit.com
http://www.bms.co.in
http://just-in-time2005.tripod.com
61 | P a g e