Você está na página 1de 36

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

PERSPECTIVE /OVERVIEW

STORM SEWER DESIGN

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

PERSPECTIVE /OVERVIEW

STORM SEWER DESIGN


Adequate and properly functioning storm water drainage system.
Construction of houses, commercial buildings, parking lots, paved
roads, and streets increases the impervious cover in a watershed
and reduces infiltration.
urbanization changes the spatial pattern of flow in the watershed;
there is an increase in the hydraulic efficiency of flow through
artificial channels, curbing, gutters, and storm drainage and
collection systems.
These increase the volume and velocity of runoff and produce
larger peak flood discharges from urbanized watersheds.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

PERSPECTIVE /OVERVIEW

STORM SEWER DESIGN


The urban drainage system can be considered
as consisting of two major types of elements:
LOCATION ELEMENTS and TRANSFER
ELEMENTS.
LOCATION ELEMENTS: places where the
water stops and undergoes changes as a result
of humanly controlled processes e.g. Water
storage, water treatment, water use, WWTP
TRANSFER ELEMENTS: connect the location
elements e.g. Channels, pipelines, storm
sewers, sanitary sewers, and strrets.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

PERSPECTIVE /OVERVIEW

STORM SEWER DESIGN


Complex urban problems involve distributed systems requiring
analysis of spatial and temporal variations.
Urban watersheds vary in space in that the ground surface slope
and cover, and the soil type, change from place to place in the
watershed.
They vary in time in that hydrologic characteristics change with
the process of urbanization.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

PERSPECTIVE /OVERVIEW

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The design of storm sewer systems involves the determination of DIAMETERS,
SLOPES, and CROWN/INVERT elevation for each pipe in the system.
Selection of a layout/network of pipe locations.
Once a layout has been selected, the RATIONAL METHOD can be used to select
pipe diameters.

Storm drainage design can be divided into two aspects:


RUNOFF PREDICTION
SYSTEM DESIGN
In recent years, rainfall-runoff modeling for urban watersheds has been a
popular activity and a variety of such rainfall-runoff models are now available.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method
Still probably the most widely used method for design of storm sewers
[Pilgrim, 1986; Linsley, 1986].
The idea behind the rational method is that if a rainfall of intensity i begins
instantaneously and continues indefinitely, the rate of runoff will increase until the
time of concentration tc, when all of the watershed is contributing to flow at the
outlet.
The product of rainfall intensity i and watershed area A is the inflow rate for the
system, iA, and the ratio of this rate to the rate of peak discharge Q (which occurs at
time tc) is termed the runoff coefficient C (0<C<1). This is expressed in the rational
formula:
Q=CiA
the duration used for the determination of the design precipitation intensity i is the
time of concentration of the watershed.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method
a composite analysis for various surface characteristics is required for the
drainage area with subareas.
The peak runoff:

Q = i CjAj
Assumption associated with the rational method:
The computed peak rate of runoff at the outlet point is a function of the
average rainfall rate during the time of concentration, that is, the peak
discharge does not result from a more intense storm of shorter duration,
during which only a portion of the watershed is contributing to runoff at the
outlet.
The time of concentration employed is the time for the runoff to become
established and flow from the most remote part of the drainage area to the
inflow point of the sewer being designed.
Rainfall intensity is constant throughout the storm duration

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Runoff Coefficient
The proportion of the total rainfall that will reach the storm drains depends
on the percent imperviousness, slope, and ponding character of the surface.
impervious surfaces, such as asphalt pavements and roofs of buildings, will
produce nearly 100% runoff after the surface has become thoroughly wet,
regardless of the slope.
Field inspection and aerial photographs are useful in estimating the nature of
the surface within the drainage area.
The runoff coefficient is also dependent on the character and condition of
the soil. The infiltration rate decreases as rainfall continues, and is also
influenced by the antecedent moisture condition of the soil.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Runoff Coefficient

for use in the rational method [Chow et al., 1988]

Character of surface

Return Period (years)


5

25

Asphaltic

0.77

0.86

Concrete/roof

0.80

0.88

- Poor condition (grass cover less than 50% of the area)


- Flat (0-2%)
- Steep (over 7%)

0.34
0.43

0.40
0.49

- Good condition (grass cover larger than 75% of the area)


- Flat
- Steep

0.23
0.37

0.29
0.44

Cultivated land
- Flat
- Steep

0.34
0.42

0.40
0.48

Forest/Woodlands
- Flat
- Sttep

0.25
0.39

0.31
0.45

DEVELOPED

Grass area (lawns, parks)

UNDEVELOPED

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rainfall Intensity
The rainfall intensity i is the average rainfall rate (in/hr) for a particular drainage basin.
The intensity is selected on the basis of the design rainfall duration and return period.
The design duration is equal to the time of concentration for the drainage area under
consideration.
The return period is established by design standards.
the time of concentration to any point in a storm drainage system is the sum of the
inlet time to (the time it takes for flow from the remotest point to reach the sewer inlet),
and the flow time tf in the upstream sewers connected to the outer point:

tc = to + tf
tf = Li/Vi
Li is the length of the ith pipe along the flow path, Vi is the flow velocity in the pipe.
inlet time decreases as the slope and imperviousness of the surface increases.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Time of Concentration Summary


[Source Chow et al., 1988]

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Time of Concentration Summary

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Waktu Konsentrasi Travel Time


Calculate the time of concentration of a watershed in which the longest flow path covers
100 feet of pastures at a 5% slope, then enters a 1000-foot-long rectangular channel having
width 2 ft, roughness n = 0.015, and slope 2.5%, and receiving a lateral flow of 0.00926
cfs/ft.
Table Approximate average velocities in ft/s of runoff flow for calculating time of concentration

Description of water course

Slope

Woodlands
Pastures
Cultivated
Pavements
Outlet channel (Natural channel not well-defined)
Distance along channel, l (ft)

l
Calculated velocity (ft/s)
Average velocity , V (ft/s)
Travel time t= l/V (s)

200
200

0-3

4-7

8-11

12-...

0-1.5
0-2.5
0-3.0
0-8.5

1.5-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.0-4.5
8.5-13.5

2.5-3.25
3.5-4.25
4.5-5.5
13.5-17

3.254.255.517-

0-2

2-4

4-7

7-

400
200

4.63

600
200

5.97

800
200

6.86

1000
200

7.56

8.02

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Waktu Konsentrasi
Table Approximate average velocities in ft/s of runoff flow for calculating time of concentration

Description of water course

Slope (%)

Woodlands
Pastures
Cultivated
Pavements
Outlet channel (Natural channel not well-defined)

0-3

4-7

8-11

12-...

0-1.5
0-2.5
0-3.0
0-8.5

1.5-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.0-4.5
8.5-13.5

2.5-3.25
3.5-4.25
4.5-5.5
13.5-17

3.254.255.517-

0-2

2-4

4-7

7-

Average velocity: 3.0 ft/s

Distance along channel, l (ft)

l
Calculated velocity (ft/s)
Average velocity , V (ft/s)
Travel time t= l/V (s)

200
200

400
200

4.63
2,315
86,4

600
200

5.97
5,3
37,7

800
200

6.86
6,415
31,2

1000
200

7.56
7,21
27,7

8.02
7,79
25,7

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Pipe Capacity
Once the design discharge Q entering the sewer pipe has been calculated by the
rational formula, the diameter of pipe D required to carry this discharge is determined.
it is usually assumed that the pipe is flowing full under gravity but is not pressurized, so
the pipe capacity can be calculated by the Manning or Darcy-Weisbach equations for
open-channel flow.

D = (2.16 Qn/So)3/8
where Q in cfs, D in ft.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method Assessment


I

Example A hypothetical drainage basin


comprising seven subcatchments is shown.
Determine the required capacity of the storm
sewer EB draining subarea III for a five-year
return period storm. This subcatchment has
an area of 4 acres, a runoff coefficient of 0.6,
and an inlet time of 10 minutes.

VII

The design precipitation intensity for this


location is given by i = 120 T 0.175/(Td+27),
where i is the intensity in in/hr, T is the return
period, and Td is the duration in minutes.

II
A

III

IV
B

E
VI

C
D

The ground elevations at points E and B are


498.43 and 495.55 ft above mean sea level,
respectively, and the length of pipe EB is 450
ft. Assume Mannings n is 0.015. Calculate
the flow time in the pipe.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method Assessment


I

II
A

III

IV

V
B

E
VI

VII
C
D

i = 120 T 0.175/(Td+27)
= 120 (5) 0.175/(10+27)
= 4.30 in/h
The design discharge:
Q=CiA
= 0.6 x 4.30 x 4
= 10.3 cfs
The slope of the pipe EB is the difference between the
ground elevations at points E and B divided by the length of
the pipe: So = (498.43 495.55)/450 = 0.0064
The required pipe diameter is:
D = (2.16 Qn/So)3/8
D = (2.16 x 10.3 x 0.015/0.0064)3/8
= 1.71 ft
The diameter is rounded up to the next commercially
available pipe size, 1.75 ft or 21 in.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method Assessment


I

II
A

III

IV

V
B

E
VI

VII
C
D

i = 120 T 0.175/(Td+27)
= 120 (5) 0.175/(10+27)
= 4.30 in/h
The design discharge:
Q=CiA
= 0.6 x 4.30 x 4
= 10.3 cfs
The slope of the pipe EB is the difference between the
ground elevations at points E and B divided by the length of
the pipe: So = (498.43 495.55)/450 = 0.0064
The required pipe diameter is:
D = (2.16 Qn/So)3/8
D = (2.16 x 10.3 x 0.015/0.0064)3/8
= 1.71 ft
The diameter is rounded up to the next commercially
available pipe size, 1.75 ft or 21 in.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method Assessment


I

II
A

III

IV

V
B

E
VI

VII
C
D

Sewer pipe

Length , L (ft)

Slope, So

EB
AB
BC
CD

450
550
400
450

0.0064
0.0081
0.0064
0.0064

Determine The diameter for pipes AB, BC,


and CD in the 27-acre drainage basin shown
in the figure. The area, runoff coefficients,
and inlet time for each subcatchment are
shown in Table, and the length and slope for
each pipe are in columns 2 and 3 of Table .
Use the same rainfall intensity equation and
assume the pipes have Mannings n = 0.015.
Catchment

Area, A
(acres)

Runoff
coefficient,
C

Inlet time,
ti (min)

I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII

2
3
4
4
5
4.5
4.5

0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5

5
7
10
10
15
15
15

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Rational Method Assessment


I

II

The same method is used for each pipe, except that now the
time of concentration must include both inlet time and flow
time through upstream sewers. The results obtained for pipe
EB the previous case is shown in table.

A
III

IV

V
B

E
VI

VII
C
D

Sewer
pipe

L (ft)

So

Total
area
drained
(acres)

CA

tc (min)

i (in/hr)

Design
dischar
ge, Q
(cfs)

Comput
ed
sewer
diamet
er (ft)

Pipe
size
used
(ft)

Flow
velocity
Q/A
(ft/s)

Flow
time
L/V
(min)

EB

450

0.0064

2.4

10.0

4.30

10.3

1.71

1.75

4.28

1.75

AB

550

0.0081

3.5

7.0

4.68

16.4

1.94

2.00

5.21

1.76

This pipe drains subcatchments I and II. From Table, A1=2 acres, C1=0.7, and the inlet time is
t1=5min, while AII=3 acres, CII=0.7, and tII=7 min. Hence, the toal area drained by pipe AB is
5 acres and CA=CIAI + CIIAII = 0.7x2 + 0.7x3 = 3.5. The time concentration used is 7 min, the
larger of the two inlet times. The calculations for the required diameter are carried out in
the same way; the results are shown in the second row of the table. The calculated
diameter, 1.94 ft, is rounded up to a commercial size of 2.0 ft (24 in) for pipe AB.

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Intensitas hujan ( in/jam)

IDF Curve Intensity-Duration-Frequency

Periode
Ulang

100 tahun
50
25
10
5

Durasi (menit)

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

IDF Curve Intensity-Duration-Frequency


Determine the design precipitation intensity and depth for a 20-minute duration
storm with a 5-year return period.
Answer:
From the IDF curves, the design intensity for a 5-year, 20-minute storm is
i = 3.5 in/h.
The corresponding precipitation depth is
i = P/Td with Td = 20 min = 0.333 h.
P = i Td = 3.50 x 0.333 = 1.17 in.

Design STORM
Determine the design rainfall depth for a 25-year 30-minute storm in City X.
P 10-min = 0.51 P5-min + 0.49 P15-min
P 30-min = 0.51 P15-min + 0.49 P60-min
For T=2 years, P2,30= 0.51x1.02 + 0.45x1.85 = 1.43 in
For T=100 years, P100,30= 0.51 x 1.86 +0.49x3.80 = 2,81 in
Coefficient a and b are 0.293 and 0.669, respectively (from Table)
P25,30 = aP2,30 + bP100,30
= 0.293 x 1.43 + 0.669x2.81
= 2.30 in

Return period T,
years

5
10
25
50

0.674
0.496
0.293
0.146

0.278
0.449
0.669
0.835

Hydroeconomic Analysis
Use the maps and equations to plot IDF curves for City-O for return periods of 2, 5, 10,
25, 50, and 100 years. Consider rainfall durations ranging from 5 minutes to 1 hour.

0.80
0.85
0.85

0.90

0.90

Design STORM

Use the National Weather Service maps to plot IDF curves for City X, for return period 2, 5, 10,
25, 50, and 100 years. Consider rainfall duration ranging from 5 minutes to 1 hour.

map

Answer:
The six maps presented in the figure show precipitation for 5-, 15-, and 60-minute durations and
2- and 100-year return periods. The six values for this City X are:
P2,5 = 0.48 in P100,5 0.87 in P2,15 1.02 in P100,15 1.86 in P2,60 1.85 in P100,60 3.80 in
The results are shown in the table in terms of precipitation depth, and are converted into intensity
by dividing by duration.
Return period T,
a
b
For example P25,30 = 2.30 in
4.60 in/hr.
years
P 10-min = 0.51 P5-min + 0.49 P15-min
5
0.674
0.278
P 30-min = 0.51 P15-min + 0.49 P60-min
P25,30 = aP2,30 + bP100,30
10
0.496
0.449
25
50

Coefficient a and b are 0.293 and 0.669, respectively (from Table)


Return period
T (year)
2
5
10
25
50
100

0.293
0.146

0.669
0.835

Duration, Td (min)
5

10

15

30

60

0.48
0.57
0.63
0.72
0.80
0.87

0.80
0.94
1.05
1.21
1.33
1.45

1.02
1.20
1.34
1.54
1.70
1.86

1.43
1.74
1.97
2.30
2.56
2.81

1.85
2.30
2.62
3.08
3.44
3.80

Design precipitation
depths (in) at City X for
various Td and T

Design STORM
Return period
T (year)

Design precipitation
depths (in) at City X for
various Td and T

2
5
10
25
50
100

Duration, Td (min)
5

10

15

30

60

0.48
0.57
0.63
0.72
0.80
0.87

0.80
0.94
1.05
1.21
1.33
1.45

1.02
1.20
1.34
1.54
1.70
1.86

1.43
1.74
1.97
2.30
2.56
2.81

1.85
2.30
2.62
3.08
3.44
3.80

11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0

Intensity (in/h)

7.0
6.0
5.0
Return Period (years)
100
50
25
10
5
2

4.0
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0

Duration (min)
1

10

15

30

60

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Dari data hujan yang dihasilkan oleh penakar hujan otomatis di Lokasi X dapat
dilihat besaran intensitas hujan ekstrim seperti tampak pada tabel.
Tahun

10

15

30

45

60

120

360

720

1440

1985

122

138

118

122

87

70

50

20

1986

156

134

124

1987

138

149

129

1988

147

125

160

1989

126

174

154

1990

192

120

132

1991

129

164

149

1992

142

118

134

1993

133

159

140

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Dari data hujan yang dihasilkan oleh penakar hujan otomatis di Lokasi X dapat
dilihat besaran intensitas hujan ekstrim seperti tampak pada tabel.
Tabel Perhitungan Periode Ulang dan Probabilits (untuk durasi 5 menit)
T=(n+1)/m
Tahun

Intensitas Hujan
ekstrim (mm/jam)

Ranking,
m

Periode
ulang, T

Probabilitas, P

1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993

122
156
138
147
126
192
129
142
133

9
2
5
3
8
1
7
4
6

1.11
5
2
3.33
1.25
10
1.43
2.5
1.66

90
20
50
30
80
10
70
40
60

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Tabel Intensitas ekstrim (mm/jam) untuk Periode Ulang 5 dan 10 tahun
X, Durasi
(menit)

Y, Intensitas hujan ekstrim,


periode ulang 5 tahun

Y, ntensitas hujan ekstrim,


periode ulang 10 tahun

5
10
15
30
45
60
120
360
720
1440

156
138
132
104
80
73
40
16
8
5

192
174
160
122
100
80
50
20
12
7

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Tabel Kurva Interpolasi Least Square
X,
Durasi
(menit)

XY

Y2

XY2

logX

logY

LogX.
LogY

(Log
X)2

Y X

Y2X

5
10
15
30
45
60
120
360
720
1440

156
138
132
104
80
73
40
16
8
5

780

24336

121680

0.69

2.19

1.53

0.48

348

54416

38760

85294

187190

18.4

16.6

26.8

39.9

123

350625

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Tiga rumus kurva yang harus dipilih:
- Kurva No. 1: y = a/(x+b) -------- Persamaan Talbot: I = a/(t+b)
a = (xy)(y2) - (xy2)(y)
10 (y2) - (y)(y)

b = (y)(xy) - 10(xy2)
10 (y2) - (y)(y)

a = 1625.86 (10=jumlah tahun)

b = 121.28

- Kurva No. 2: y = a/Xn -------------

Persamaan Sherman: I = a/Xn

log a = (logx)(logx)2 - (logx.logy)(y)


10 (y2) - (logx)(logx)

n = (logy)(logx) - 10(logx logy)


10 (logx)2 - (logx)(logx)

a = - 8.42

n = - 4.55

- Kurva No. 3: y = a/((x) + b) -----

Persamaan Ishiguro: I = a/((t) + b)

a = (yx)(y2) - (y2x)(y)
10 (y2) - (y)(y)

b = (y)(yx) - 10(y2x)
10 (y2) - (y)(y)

a = 746.77

b = 2.732

EnvE

EnvironmentalEngineering
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Kurva Intensitas Hujan


Selisih intensitas dalam angka mutlak positif dinyatakan dalam dy1, dy2, dy3. Nilai
dy terkecil menunjukkan kurva terbaik untuk dipilih.
No.

y1

dy1

y2

dy2

y3

dy3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

5
10
15
30
45
60
120
360
720
1440

156
138
132
140
80
73
40
16
8
5

128.64
123.74
119.20

27.35
14.25
12.79

5.8E-06

156

158.57

2.57

Jumlah

153.9

985235

99.2

Mean

15.39

98523.5

9.92

Yang dipilih adalah Kurva no.3, pada dy3 rata-rata terkecil yaitu 9.92.

Areal RAINFALL

Determine Areal Rainfall:

Arithmetic
Thiessen Polygon
Isohyet

P = P/n
P = 1/A AjPj
P = 1/A AiPi

Flood
Areal RAINFALL

Determine Areal Rainfall:

Thiessen Polygon

Areal RAINFALL

Determine Areal Rainfall:

Isohyet

Design FLOW
Flood Control Reservoir Design

P1=10 mm

Determine Rainfall:

Arithmetic
Thiessen Polygon
Isohyet

P5=50 mm

P2=20 mm

P4=40 mm

P3=30 mm

Você também pode gostar