Você está na página 1de 4

14126 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Proposed Rules

under the criteria of the Regulatory (2) If all corrosion is detected that meets Reporting Requirement
Flexibility Act. the criteria of ‘‘light’’ or ‘‘mild’’ corrosion, (g) Within 30 days of performing the
We prepared a regulatory evaluation repeat the NDT inspections of that inspections required by this AD: Submit a
of the estimated costs to comply with component thereafter at intervals not to report of inspection findings (both positive
this supplemental NPRM and placed it exceed 12 months. and negative) to Gulfstream Aerospace
(3) If any corrosion is detected that meets Corporation; Attention: Technical
in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES the criteria of ‘‘moderate’’ corrosion, repeat
section for a location to examine the Operations—Mail Station D–10, P. O. Box
the NDT inspection of that component 2206, Savannah, Georgia 31402–0080.
regulatory evaluation. thereafter at intervals not to exceed 9 months. Information collection requirements
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (4) If any corrosion is detected that meets contained in this regulation have been
the criteria of ‘‘severe’’ corrosion, before approved by the Office of Management and
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation further flight, replace the component with a Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the
safety, Safety. serviceable component in accordance with Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.
the CB. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB
The Proposed Amendment
Control Number 2120–0056.
Accordingly, pursuant to the Existing Repairs
(b) If any existing repairs are found during Alternative Methods of Compliance
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation the inspections required by paragraph (a) of (h)(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA,
Administration proposes to amend part this AD, before further flight, ensure that the has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
repairs are in accordance with a method AD, if requested in accordance with the
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO,
(14 CFR part 39) as follows: FAA. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Inspections of the Lower Wing Plank which the AMOC applies, notify the
DIRECTIVES (c) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
this AD: Within 9 months after the effective Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
1. The authority citation for part 39 Office.
date of this AD, perform NDT inspections to
continues to read as follows: detect corrosion and cracking of the lower Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9,
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. wing plank splices in accordance with 2006.
Gulfstream GI CB 337B, including Appendix
§ 39.13 [Amended] Kalene C. Yanamura,
A, dated August 17, 2005.
2. Section 39.13 is amended by (1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
adding the following new airworthiness repeat the NDT inspection at intervals not to Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
directive: exceed 18 months. [FR Doc. E6–4050 Filed 3–20–06; 8:45 am]
(2) If any corrosion or cracking is detected, BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Docket
before further flight, perform all applicable
96–NM–143–AD.
investigative actions and corrective actions in
Applicability: All Model G–159 airplanes, accordance with the customer bulletin.
certificated in any category.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless Repair Removal Threshold
accomplished previously.
Federal Aviation Administration
(d) For repairs specified in Appendix A of
To detect and correct corrosion and Gulfstream GI CB 337B, dated August 17,
cracking of the spot-welded skins of the 2005: Within 144 months after the date of the 14 CFR Part 39
lower wing plank splices and certain repair installation, remove the repaired [Docket No. FAA–2006–24173; Directorate
structural assemblies, which could result in component and replace it with a new or Identifier 2005–NM–262–AD]
reduced controllability of the airplane, serviceable component, in accordance with
accomplish the following: Gulfstream GI CB 337B, including Appendix RIN 2120–AA64
Note 1: A note in the Accomplishment A, dated August 17, 2005.
Instructions of the Gulfstream customer Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
bulletin instructs operators to contact Prior Blending in the Riser Areas Model 777 Airplanes
Gulfstream if any difficulty is encountered in (e) If, during the performance of the
accomplishing the customer bulletin. inspections required by paragraph (c) or (f) of AGENCY: Federal Aviation
However, any deviation from the instructions this AD, the inspection reveals that prior Administration (FAA), Department of
provided in the service bulletin must be blending has been performed on the riser Transportation (DOT).
approved as an alternative method of areas: Before further flight, perform an eddy ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
compliance (AMOC) under paragraph (h) of current or fluorescent penetrant inspection, (NPRM).
this AD. as applicable, to evaluate the blending, and
accomplish appropriate corrective actions, in SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
Non-Destructive Testing Inspections of the accordance with Gulfstream GI CB 337B, new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Fuselage, Empennage, and Flight Controls including Appendix A, dated August 17, certain Boeing Model 777 airplanes.
(a) Within 9 months after the effective date 2005. If any blend-out is outside the limits This proposed AD would require a one-
of this AD, perform a non-destructive test specified in the CB, before further flight,
(NDT) to detect corrosion of the skins of the repair in a manner approved by the Manager,
time inspection of the first bonding
elevators, ailerons, rudder and rudder trim Atlanta ACO. jumper aft of the bulkhead fitting to
tab, flaps, aft lower fuselage, and vertical and detect damage or failure and to
For Airplanes With New Lower Wing Planks determine the mechanical integrity of its
horizontal stabilizers; in accordance with
Gulfstream GI Customer Bulletin (CB) No. (f) For airplanes with new lower wing electrical bonding path, and repair if
337B, including Appendix A, dated August planks, as defined by paragraphs (f)(1) and necessary; measuring the bonding
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

17, 2005. The corrosion criteria must be (f)(2) of this AD: Within 144 months after resistance between the fitting for the
determined by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft replacement of the lower wing planks with fuel feed tube and the front spar in the
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Gulfstream new lower wing planks, or within 9 months
Tool ST905–377 is also an acceptable method after the effective date of this AD, whichever
left and right main fuel tanks, and
of determining the corrosion criteria. occurs later, perform all of the actions, repairing the bonding if necessary; and
(1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected, including any other related investigative applying additional sealant to
repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals actions and corrective actions, specified in completely cover the bulkhead fittings
not to exceed 18 months. paragraph (c) of this AD. inside the fuel tanks. This proposed AD

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:06 Mar 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Proposed Rules 14127

results from fuel system reviews dms.dot.gov, including any personal to the rule, we intended to adopt
conducted by the manufacturer. We are information you provide. We will also airworthiness directives to mandate any
proposing this AD to prevent arcing or post a report summarizing each changes found necessary to address
sparking during a lightning strike at the substantive verbal contact with FAA unsafe conditions identified as a result
interface between the bulkhead fittings personnel concerning this proposed AD. of these reviews.
of the engine fuel feed tube and the Using the search function of that Web In evaluating these design reviews, we
front spar inside the fuel tank. This site, anyone can find and read the have established four criteria intended
arcing or sparking could provide a comments in any of our dockets, to define the unsafe conditions
potential ignition source inside the fuel including the name of the individual associated with fuel tank systems that
tank, which, in combination with who sent the comment (or signed the require corrective actions. The
flammable fuel vapors, could result in comment on behalf of an association, percentage of operating time during
fuel tank explosions and consequent business, labor union, etc.). You may which fuel tanks are exposed to
loss of the airplane. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act flammable conditions is one of these
DATES: We must receive comments on Statement in the Federal Register criteria. The other three criteria address
this proposed AD by May 5, 2006. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR the failure types under evaluation:
19477–78), or you may visit http:// Single failures, single failures in
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
dms.dot.gov. combination with another latent
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD. Examining the Docket condition(s), and in-service failure
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to experience. For all four criteria, the
You may examine the AD docket on evaluations included consideration of
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
instructions for sending your comments previous actions taken that may mitigate
person at the Docket Management the need for further action.
electronically. Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
• Government-wide rulemaking Web p.m., Monday through Friday, except
We have determined that the actions
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov identified in this AD are necessary to
Federal holidays. The Docket
and follow the instructions for sending reduce the potential of ignition sources
Management Facility office (telephone
your comments electronically. inside fuel tanks, which, in combination
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
• Mail: Docket Management Facility, level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
with flammable fuel vapors, could result
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 in fuel tank explosions and consequent
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, section. Comments will be available in loss of the airplane.
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. the AD docket shortly after the Docket We have received a report indicating
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. Management System receives them. that, on certain Boeing Model 747
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on airplanes, the sealant at the fitting for
the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Discussion the fuel feed tube at the front spar
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, We have examined the underlying bulkhead may be insufficient to protect
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday safety issues involved in fuel tank against a spark between the bulkhead
through Friday, except Federal holidays. explosions on several large transport fitting and the spar in the event of a
Contact Boeing Commercial airplanes, including the adequacy of lightning strike. In SFAR 88-related
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, existing regulations, the service history testing, the manufacturer determined
Washington 98124–2207, for the service of airplanes subject to those regulations, that a lightning strike can cause a spark
information identified in this proposed and existing maintenance practices for even if the fitting is bonded. This
AD. fuel tank systems. As a result of those condition, if not corrected, could result
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John findings, we issued a regulation titled in a potential ignition source inside the
L. Vann, Aerospace Engineer, ‘‘Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System fuel tank, which, in combination with
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, Seattle Design Review, Flammability Reduction flammable fuel vapors, could result in
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1601 and Maintenance and Inspection fuel tank explosions and consequent
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington Requirements’’ (67 FR 23086, May 7, loss of the airplane.
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6513; 2001). In addition to new airworthiness The affected area on certain Boeing
fax (425) 917–6590. standards for transport airplanes and Model 747 airplanes is similar in design
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: new maintenance requirements, this to that on the affected Boeing Model 777
rule included Special Federal Aviation airplanes. Therefore, all of these models
Comments Invited Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’ may be subject to the same unsafe
We invite you to submit any relevant Amendment 21–78, and subsequent condition.
written data, views, or arguments Amendments 21–82 and 21–83). Relevant Service Information
regarding this proposed AD. Send your Among other actions, SFAR 88
comments to an address listed in the requires certain type design (i.e., type We have reviewed Boeing Special
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket certificate (TC) and supplemental type Attention Service Bulletin 777–28–
number ‘‘FAA–2006–24173; Directorate certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate 0044, Revision 1, dated December 20,
Identifier 2005–NM–262–AD’’ at the that their fuel tank systems can prevent 2005. The service bulletin describes
beginning of your comments. We ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This procedures for:
specifically invite comments on the requirement applies to type design • Doing a general visual inspection of
overall regulatory, economic, holders for large turbine-powered the first bonding jumper aft of the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

environmental, and energy aspects of transport airplanes and for subsequent bulkhead fitting to detect damage or
the proposed AD. We will consider all modifications to those airplanes. It failure and to determine the mechanical
comments received by the closing date requires them to perform design reviews integrity of its electrical bonding path.
and may amend the proposed AD in and to develop design changes and • Measuring the bonding resistance
light of those comments. maintenance procedures if their designs between the fitting for the fuel feed tube
We will post all comments we do not meet the new fuel tank safety and the front spar in the left main fuel
receive, without change, to http:// standards. As explained in the preamble tank, and repairing the bonding if it

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:06 Mar 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1
14128 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Proposed Rules

exceeds certain limits defined in the safety in air commerce. This regulation Applicability
service bulletin. is within the scope of that authority (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 777–
• Applying additional sealant to because it addresses an unsafe condition 200, –300, and –300ER series airplanes,
completely cover the bulkhead fitting that is likely to exist or develop on certificated in any category; as identified in
inside the fuel tank. products identified in this rulemaking Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
Accomplishing the actions specified action. 777–28–0044, Revision 1, dated December
in the service information is intended to 20, 2005.
adequately address the unsafe Regulatory Findings Unsafe Condition
condition. We have determined that this (d) This AD results from fuel system
proposed AD would not have federalism reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
FAA’s Determination and Requirements are issuing this AD to prevent arcing or
of the Proposed AD implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not sparking during a lightning strike at the
We have evaluated all pertinent interface between the bulkhead fittings of the
have a substantial direct effect on the engine fuel feed tube and the front spar
information and identified an unsafe States, on the relationship between the
condition that is likely to exist or inside the fuel tank. This arcing or sparking
national Government and the States, or could provide a potential ignition source
develop on other airplanes of this same on the distribution of power and inside the fuel tank, which, in combination
type design. For this reason, we are responsibilities among the various with flammable fuel vapors, could result in
proposing this AD, which would require levels of government. fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of
accomplishing the actions specified in the airplane.
For the reasons discussed above, I
the service information described Compliance
certify that the proposed regulation:
previously, except as discussed under
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (e) You are responsible for having the
‘‘Difference Between the Proposed AD
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; actions required by this AD performed within
and the Service Bulletin.’’ the compliance times specified, unless the
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the actions have already been done.
Difference Between the Proposed AD DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
and the Service Bulletin (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Inspection and Corrective Actions
Although the service bulletin does not 3. Will not have a significant (f) Within 60 months after the effective
give repair instructions if any damage or economic impact, positive or negative, date of this AD, do the actions in paragraphs
failure is found during the general (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD for the
on a substantial number of small entities
visual inspection, or if the mechanical bulkhead fittings of the engine fuel feed tube
under the criteria of the Regulatory for the left and right main fuel tanks. Do all
integrity of the bonding path is Flexibility Act. actions in accordance with the
compromised, this proposed AD would We prepared a regulatory evaluation Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
require doing the repair according to a of the estimated costs to comply with Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–28–
method approved by the Manager, this proposed AD and placed it in the 0044, Revision 1, dated December 20, 2005.
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section (1) Do a general visual inspection of the
(ACO), FAA. Chapter 28–00–00 of the first bonding jumper aft of the bulkhead
for a location to examine the regulatory fitting to detect damage or failure and to
Boeing 777 Aircraft Maintenance evaluation.
Manual is one approved method. determine the mechanical integrity of its
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 electrical bonding path. If any damage or
Costs of Compliance failure is found during this inspection or if
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation the mechanical integrity of the bonding path
There are about 497 airplanes of the is compromised: Before further flight, repair
affected design in the worldwide fleet. safety, Safety.
according to a method approved by the
This proposed AD would affect about The Proposed Amendment Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
131 airplanes of U.S. registry. The (ACO), FAA. Chapter 28–00–00 of the Boeing
proposed actions would take about 8 Accordingly, under the authority 777 Aircraft Maintenance Manual is one
work hours per airplane, at an average delegated to me by the Administrator, approved method.
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (2) Measure the bonding resistance
on these figures, the estimated cost of 39 as follows: between the fitting for the fuel feed tube and
the front spar in the left main fuel tank. If the
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is bonding resistance exceeds 0.001 ohm:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
$83,840, or $640 per airplane. Before further flight, repair the bonding in
DIRECTIVES
Authority for This Rulemaking accordance with the service bulletin.
1. The authority citation for part 39 (3) Apply additional sealant to completely
Title 49 of the United States Code continues to read as follows: cover the bulkhead fitting inside the fuel
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue tank.
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With
section 106, describes the authority of § 39.13 [Amended] Previous Revision of Service Bulletin
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
2. The Federal Aviation (g) Actions done before the effective date
Aviation Programs, describes in more of this AD in accordance with Boeing Special
detail the scope of the Agency’s Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
Attention Service bulletin 777–28–0044,
authority. by adding the following new
dated February 3, 2005, are acceptable for
We are issuing this rulemaking under airworthiness directive (AD): compliance with the requirements of
the authority described in subtitle VII, Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2006–24173; paragraph (f) of this AD.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

part A, subpart III, section 44701, Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–262–AD.


Alternative Methods of Compliance
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Comments Due Date (AMOCs)
section, Congress charges the FAA with (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in this AD action by May 5, 2006. Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
air commerce by prescribing regulations authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
for practices, methods, and procedures Affected ADs requested in accordance with the procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for (b) None. found in 14 CFR 39.19.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:06 Mar 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2006 / Proposed Rules 14129

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in Washington, DC, area may be delayed. certain non-bank financial institutions.
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to Please submit comments by one method As such, casinos are vulnerable to abuse
which the AMOC applies, notify the only. Any submissions received must by money launderers, terrorist
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA include the agency name and the RIN financiers, and tax evaders.
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
for this rulemaking. All comments In general, state-licensed casinos were
received will be posted without change made subject to the Bank Secrecy Act by
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March to http://www.fincen.gov, including any regulation in 1985.3 The 1985
10, 2006. personal information provided. rulemaking was based on the authority
Kalene C. Yanamura, Comments may be inspected in the of the Secretary of the Treasury to
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Financial Crimes Enforcement Network designate as financial institutions for
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. reading room between 10 a.m. and 4 Bank Secrecy Act purposes: (i)
[FR Doc. E6–4051 Filed 3–20–06; 8:45 am] p.m. in Washington, DC. Persons Businesses that engage in activities that
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P wishing to inspect the comments are ‘‘similar to, related to, or a substitute
submitted must request an appointment for’’ the activities of covered businesses
by telephone at (202) 354–6400 (not a listed in the Bank Secrecy Act and (ii)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY toll-free number). other businesses ‘‘whose cash
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: transactions have a high degree of
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Regulatory Policy and Programs usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory
Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement matters.’’ 4 Congress later explicitly
31 CFR Part 103 Network, (800) 949–2732 (toll-free added casinos and other gaming
RIN 1506–AA84 number) or (202) 354–6400 (not a toll- establishments to the list of financial
free number). institutions regulated pursuant to the
Proposed Amendments to Bank SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bank Secrecy Act.5
Secrecy Act Regulations Regarding Casinos authorized to conduct
I. Background business under the Indian Gaming
Casino Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements A. Statutory and Regulatory Background Regulatory Act became subject to the
Bank Secrecy Act by regulation in
AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement The Director of the Financial Crimes
1996,6 and card clubs became subject to
Network, Department of the Treasury. Enforcement Network is the delegated
the Bank Secrecy Act by regulation in
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act.1
1998.7
The Act authorizes the Director to issue
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend regulations to require all financial B. Casino Currency Transaction
the Bank Secrecy Act regulations institutions defined as such in the Act Reporting Requirements
relating to currency transaction to maintain or file certain reports or Regulations under the Bank Secrecy
reporting by casinos. Specifically, we records that have been determined to Act define a ‘‘transaction in currency’’
are proposing to exclude, as reportable have a high degree of usefulness in as any transaction ‘‘involving the
transactions in currency, jackpots from criminal, tax, or regulatory physical transfer of currency from one
slot machines and video lottery investigations or proceedings, or in the person to another.’’ 8 Casinos must
terminals. We are also proposing to conduct of intelligence or counter- report each transaction in currency
exclude certain transactions between intelligence activities, including involving cash in or cash out of more
casinos and currency dealers or analysis, to protect against international
exchangers and casinos and check terrorism, and to implement anti-money 3 See 50 FR 5065 (February 6, 1985). Casinos
cashers as reportable transactions in laundering programs and compliance whose gross annual gaming revenue did not exceed
currency. Finally, we are proposing procedures.2 $1 million were, and continue to be, excluded from
several other amendments that would Casinos are cash-intensive businesses Bank Secrecy Act requirements otherwise
that offer a broad array of financial applicable to casinos and card clubs.
update or clarify the ‘‘cash in’’ and 4 See 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2)(Y) and (Z).
‘‘cash out’’ examples of transactions that services. These services include 5 See section 409 of the Money Laundering
are set forth in our currency transaction customer deposit or credit accounts, Suppression Act of 1994, Title IV of the Riegle
reporting regulations. facilities for transmitting and receiving Community Development and Regulatory
DATES: Written comments on all aspects funds transfers directly from other Improvement Act of 1994, Public Law 103–325. The
financial institutions, and check cashing current statutory specification reads:
of the proposal are welcome and may be (2) Financial institution means—
submitted on or before May 22, 2006. and currency exchange services.
* * * * *
Consequently, these services offered by
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (X) A casino, gambling casino, or gaming
casinos are similar to and may serve as establishment with an annual gaming revenue of
identified by Regulatory Information
substitutes for services ordinarily more than $1,000,000 which—
Number (RIN) 1506–AA84, by any of the
provided by depository institutions and (i) Is licensed as a casino, gambling casino, or
following methods: gaming establishment under the laws of any State
• Federal E-rulemaking Portal: http:// 1 The statute generally referred to as the ‘‘Bank or any political subdivision of any State; or
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Secrecy Act,’’ Titles I and II of Public Law 91–508, (ii) Is an Indian gaming operation conducted
instructions for submitting comments. as amended, is codified at 12 U.S.C. 1829b, 12 under or pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory
Include 1506–AA84 in the submission. U.S.C. 1951–1959, and 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314, 5316– Act other than an operation which is limited to
class I gaming (as defined in section 4(6) of such
• E-mail: regcomments@fincen. 5332.
2 Language expanding the scope of the Bank Act); * * * 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2)(X).
treas.gov. Include 1506–AA84 in the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

6 See 61 FR 7054 (February 23, 1996).


Secrecy Act to intelligence or counter-intelligence
subject line of the message. activities to protect against international terrorism 7 See 63 FR 1919 (January 13, 1998). Card clubs

• Mail: Financial Crimes Enforcement was added by section 358 of the Uniting and generally are subject to the same rules as casinos,
Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate unless a different treatment for card clubs is
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism explicitly stated in 31 CFR Part 103. Therefore, for
22183. Include 1506–AA84 in the body purposes of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
(‘‘USA PATRIOT’’) Act of 2001, Public Law 107–
of the text. 56 (October 26, 2001). In pertinent part, regulations and unless the context indicates otherwise, the term
Instructions: Electronic comments are implementing Title II of the Bank Secrecy Act ‘‘casino’’ refers to both casinos and to card clubs.
preferred because paper mail in the appear at 31 CFR part 103. 8 See 31 CFR 103.11(ii)(2).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:06 Mar 20, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM 21MRP1