Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I. INTRODUCTION
902
TABLE II
THE PH, SUMS OF ANION AND CATION CONCENTRATIONS OF PRECIPITATION
AND ACID RAIN GRADE OF THE WORLD [2]
1990~1992
No of
sites
1
5.13
Total
anion
16.2
1992~1994
4.82
19.0
35.2
5.63
41.6
47.9
Bhubaneswar (India)
44.4
55.2
1996
4.30
54.1
85.3
California (USA)
1972~1973
5.10
57.2
60.6
1982~1986
4.54
58.0
122.0
79.1
location
Malaysia (Whole)
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.8
5.7
5.3
4.9
5
4.8
4.7
5
4.8
4.5
4.4
4.7
4.8
4.8
5.0
Pusan
5.2
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
4.7
4.8
4.9
5
6.2
4.9
5
4.8
5.7
5.5
5.1
5.2
Daegu
5.6
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.6
5.8
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
5.6
4.8
5.3
5.3
5.5
5.6
5.5
5.5
Incheon
6.2
5.8
6
5.9
5.9
5
4.4
4.6
5
4.7
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.5
5.4
4.8
4.8
5.1
Kwang
-ju
Daejeon
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.2
5.9
5.9
4.8
5.2
5.2
5
5.1
5
5.2
4.8
5.2
4.7
4.5
5.3
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.2
5.9
5.9
4.8
5.2
5.2
5
5.1
5
5.2
4.8
5.2
4.7
4.5
5.3
average
5.6
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.7
5.5
4.8
5.1
5.2
5.1
5.3
4.9
5.0
4.8
5.3
5.0
4.9
pH
Total
cation
22.8
Florida (USA)
1978~1987
4.59
64.9
1986~1989
66.4
74.0
Narayangani (Bangladesh)
1994~1995
6.35
71.5
111.7
Sogndal (Norway)
1984~1987
4.80
71.6
82.0
Sonbhadra (India)
1999
6.95
80.9
129.5
Haliburton-Muskoka(Canada)
1976~1978
83.4
166.8
Pune (India)
1992~1994
6.28
84.7
154.2
N.E. Vietnam
1997~2000
5.80
87.8
77.8
1963~1974
4.14
97.3
102.9
Singapore
1997~1998
4.50
97.6
127.5
Korea (Whole)
2000~2003
31
4.90
101.3
124.0
Pallanza (Italy)
1984~1986
4.40
120.0
129.0
Japan (Whole)
1989~1993
29
4.80
122.0
117.4
1978
4.06
128.0
129.0
Tokyo (Japan)
1990~1999
4.56
131.2
147.3
1996~1999
147.2
152.8
Guongyang (China)
1982~1986
186.0
399.4
Gwangneung (Korea)
1991~1993
5.65
199.2
93.8
Guangzhou (China)
1998~1999
4.39
241.3
261.4
period
Taipai (Taiwan)
1991~1995
4.37
269.8
275.7
Kwanaksan (Korea)
1992~1993
341.5
587.9
Neijang (China)
1982~1986
344.0
625.0
Guiyang (China)
1982~1986
379.0
422.0
Amman (Jordan)
1996~1997
6.20
424.6
578.8
Beijing (China)
1995~1998
6.76
503.8
672.4
Chongquing (China)
1987~1989
1,351
4.29
541.7
704.1
903
600000
400000
200000
Fig. 2 Emission of sulfur oxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOX)
[ton/year] in South Korea. Data between 1992 and 1996 were from Ref
[1] and other data were from the Yearbook of Environmental Statistics,
South Korea (2006 and 2009)
TABLE III
PARTICULATE MATTER (PM10) CONCENTRATIONS IN MAJOR CITIES
IN 2009, SOUTH KOREA
month
Seoul
ave max
Pusan
ave max
Daegu
ave max
Incheon
ave max
Jan
57
143
44
116
49
117
57
161
Feb
81
240
63
157
64
178
78
227
Mar
60
276
50
247
50
246
64
273
Apr
66
177
62
141
54
127
76
195
May
57
116
57
159
49
121
62
149
June
50
131
54
154
46
116
55
136
July
41
88
42
114
38
86
46
104
Aug
31
92
37
102
31
95
39
113
Sep
39
94
39
83
37
87
52
148
Oct
51
155
55
145
51
128
62
204
Nov
46
153
39
119
45
161
53
153
Dec
71
359
52
180
62
211
76
437
Data were from the 2010 Yearbook of Environmental Statistics, South
Korea
Fig. 3 Monthly pH values of rain in Seoul in2008. Data were from the
Yearbook of Environmental Statistics, South Korea (2009).
904
Gosanli
Yeondong
Useung
-seang
1996
N/A
N/A
5.1
5.1
1997
N/A
N/A
5.4
5.3
1998
5.9
5.9
4.9
4.8
1999
5.6
5.4
5.2
5.2
2000
5.4
5.5
5.3
5.2
2001
4.8
4.4
5.2
5.1
2002
N/A
N/A
5.1
There are other places than Jeju Island in South Korea that
were free from pollutions. We had a similar observation for
those places. Anmyeondo in Yellow Sea and Uljin at the coast
of East Sea showed very high acidity in rain [6]. In Table V,
rain in Anmyeondo had an average of pH 4.8 and rain in Uljin
had a pH of 4.87. These two places are free from industrial
complex. There is little traffic in Anmyeondo which is an island.
Very strong acid rain seen in pollution-free areas supports the
theory that acid rain is not generated only by pollutions
produced at the local area.
TABLE V
PH OF PRECIPITATION IN ANMYEONDO AND ULJIN
Anmyeon
-do
Uljin
2001
4.72
4.98
5.08
2002
4.76
4.96
5.04
4.86
2003
4.43
4.88
4.56
4.96
2004
4.74
4.72
Anmyeon
-do
Uljin
1997
4.76
N/A
1998
5.00
1999
2000
905
acid rain in South Korea can be summarized into two. First, the
acidity in rain was an important issue in 1980's and the public
attention has been somewhat diminished in 1990's. Strong acid
rain has been still monitored not only in major cities but also in
the coastal area and in the clean zones such as Jeju Island. The
acidity is quite strong showing pH values between 4.4 and 5.0.
This acidity can cause damages on fish eggs of salmon or trout
[7]. Therefore we should be concerned with this environmental
issue. Secondly, our acid rain is not only due to pollutants that
we produce in the country. Pollutants produced from the
neighboring countries travel in the air flow and reach the
Korean peninsula. The opposite is also true.
We suggest some policies to cope with acid rain. First, we
should be more aware of acid rain as serious environmental
problem. In order to promote public awareness, we propose the
obligatory installation of acid rain meter at the public sites.
They include schools (elementary, secondary and high school),
government offices, the cross roads and apartment complex, etc.
Frequently and periodically, the acid rain meter takes rain
sample and measures pH. It is recommended that pH values
along with warning statements of potential hazards.
Secondly, we should double an effort to reduce or minimize
the emission of pollutants responsible for acid rain. Promoting
the public transportation and use of hybrid cars will reduce air
pollution caused by the combustion of fossil fuel. As many
researches stated, it is necessary to develop further and to use
alternative energy sources. The regulations and provision of
incentives by the governmental organizations are encouraged.
Thirdly, we want to emphasize international collaborations.
There can be two levels. One is the civilian program and the
other is the official program. As civilian program, schools or
organizations that have already on-going collaboration
programs may initiate a joint project to share the importance of
acid rain issue as environmental problem and to discuss about
various aspects on acid rain. Above all, students even in the
early stage of education system have interests in this issue and
try to come up with more solid collaboration and potential
solutions.
There have been governmental collaborations. In 1979, the
UN European economy committee played a pivotal role in
establishing international policies to cope with the damage of
acid rain and made a contract on Convention on Long-range
Trans-boundary Air Pollution (CLTAP). In 1994, 30 countries
reached an agreement of Oslo Protocol on SOX [8]. Through
CLTAP, the European Monitoring Evaluation Program was
established and monitored SOX emission among the member
countries. Oslo Protocol was the agreement that the member
countries decided to abide by their cutback goals. The cutback
goal of each country was set of one's own accord. This was a
good example of the international collaboration through an
agreement among the nations was made and carried out. They
made a monitoring system, imposed the goal of reduction rates
or set the goals of individual nations within a certain time frame.
South Korea is also aware of trans-boundary characteristic of
the origin in acid rain and makes an effort of some agreements in
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
906