Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
This is a reprint of a Cochrane protocol, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane
Library 2009, Issue 2
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HEADER . . . . . . . . .
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . .
BACKGROUND . . . . . .
OBJECTIVES . . . . . . .
METHODS . . . . . . . .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
. .
WHATS NEW . . . . . . .
HISTORY . . . . . . . . .
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
SOURCES OF SUPPORT . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
5
[Intervention Protocol]
of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2 Research, James P. Swyers Enterprises, Baltimore, Maryland,
USA. 3 Complementary Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Contact address: Marc C Hochberg, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 10 S Pine St MSTF 8-34, Baltimore, MD, 21201,
USA. mhochber@umaryland.edu. (Editorial group: Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, 2009 (Status in this issue: Unchanged)
Copyright 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001977
This version first published online: 26 October 1998 in Issue 4, 1998. (Help document - Dates and Statuses explained)
This record should be cited as: Ezzo J, Hadhazy VA, Berman BM, Hochberg MC. Acupuncture for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001977. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001977.
ABSTRACT
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:
To review all randomized or quasi-randomized (not strictly randomized methods of allocation e.g., by date of birth, hospital record
number or alternation) controlled trials pertaining to the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of OA of the knee, hip or hand. The
three specific objectives of this systematic review are:
1) To assess the efficacy of acupuncture compared to standard medical treatment for osteoarthritis.
2) To assess the efficacy of true acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee.
3) To assess the efficacy of acupuncture plus standard medical treatment compared to standard medical care alone for osteoarthritis of
the knee.
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, and is a
major cause of morbidity, physical limitation, and increased health
care utilization, including total joint arthroplasty, especially in the
elderly (Scott and Hochberg 1993; Hochberg 1997; Lawrence
1998).
Recent years have seen advances in our understanding of this condition. For example, it is now believed that OA may not be a single disorder but rather a group of overlapping distinct diseases.
Presently there is no cure for OA (Creamer and Hochberg 1997;
Creamer 1998). Therefore, the treatment of OA is primarily focused managing the condition by minimizing morbidity. Current
recommendations for the management of OA, including guidelines published by the American College of Rheumatology, focus
on the relief of pain and stiffness and maintenance or improvement in functional status as important goals of therapy (Hochberg
1995).
Many pharmacological therapies for OA can be associated with
significant adverse effects (Blackshear 1985; Herman 1986; Brandt
1993, Schlegal 1986). Therefore, the need for effective, nontoxic
therapies for OA, has become evident. Non pharmacologic physical modalities include patient education, physical and occupational therapy, aerobic and resistive exercises and weight loss (Puett
and Griffin 1994).
Acupuncture, one non pharmacologic modality, is gaining popularity among OA patients, especially those who have failed to respond to standard therapy. Approximately one million consumers
utilize acupuncture annually in the United States (Paramore 1997)
and that a large percentage of these users are patients with musculoskeletal disorders such as OA (Diehl 1996). Although the safety
of acupuncture has been well demonstrated (Lytle 1993) and the
utilization of acupuncture is increasing, the efficacy of acupuncture for OA, either as a stand alone treatment or an adjunct to
standard medical care, remains in question.
Several models explaining the possible mechanisms of action for
acupuncture analgesia have been proposed. The most widely researched and documented hypothesis, known as the neurohumoral
model of acupuncture analgesia (Han 1997; Huang 1987; Sims
1997) will be briefly described here. This model proposes that
the acupuncture needle stimulates the A delta afferents (types II
and III) of a peripheral neuron. This neuron, terminating in the
dorsal horn of the spinal cord, transfers the impulse to a second
neuron within the same spinal segment. This second neuron then
activates three levels of the nervous system. In ascending order,
these levels are: 1) the spinal cord itself, within the same segment,
2) the midbrain, where two of the three anatomical structures of
the bodys internal analgesia mechanism reside: the periaqueductal
gray matter (PAGM) and raphe magnus nucleus (RMN), and 3)
the pituitary-hypothalamus complex.
OBJECTIVES
To review all randomized or quasi-randomized (not strictly randomized methods of allocation e.g., by date of birth, hospital
record number or alternation) controlled trials pertaining to the
efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of OA of the knee, hip or
hand. The three specific objectives of this systematic review are:
1) To assess the efficacy of acupuncture compared to standard
medical treatment for osteoarthritis.
2) To assess the efficacy of true acupuncture compared to sham
acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee.
3) To assess the efficacy of acupuncture plus standard medical treatment compared to standard medical care alone for osteoarthritis
of the knee.
METHODS
analyses may include length of follow up time, type of needle manipulation of acupuncture procedure (various manipulations are
known to stimulate different endorphin/monoamine cascades),
the total number of treatments received, and/or the overall adequacy of the acupuncture treatment (discussed in the next section).
All trials included in the systematic review will be entered into Review Manager 4.0.4 (RevMan 4.0.4). For pain measures, standardized effects sizes will be estimated (change divided by the baseline
standard deviation of the sample). The results for each intervention group will be weighted by the sample size of the group. Dichotomous results will include dropouts and withdrawals as non
responders (intention-to-treat analysis) and will be summarized as
odds ratios (ORs). The summary OR will be obtained by weighting each individual OR by the inverse of the variance of the estimate for each trial. Because overall effects will only be estimated
for groups of trials using the same type of reference group (e.g.,
sham acupuncture, NSAIDS, steroid injection), it is likely that
more than one meta-analysis will be performed.
A sensitivity analysis will be conducted to evaluate the robustness of the meta-analysis. This analysis will examine the effects of
methodological quality on study outcomes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to express appreciation to William Mac Beckner,
Ginny Stone and Don Frese, the information specialists who assisted in identifying relevant trials. We further acknowledge the
NIH Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM) for providing funding to the Complementary Medicine Field through NIH.
WHATS NEW
22 May 2008
Amended
HISTORY
Protocol first published: Issue 4, 1998
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
None known
SOURCES OF SUPPORT
Internal sources
University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
External sources
No sources of support supplied