Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Introduction
Thermoelectric generators are one of the promising ways to produce the environmentally clean energy. Due to their relatively small efficiency are particularly
considered their applications in the field of thermal energy harvesting recovery
of the small amounts of waste heat to the useful electric energy [1]. The main
advantages for the use of TEGs in mechatronic applications are no movable parts
which represent low demands on maintenance.
Promising area is the use of small amounts of locally harvested energy for
powering the wireless applications, telemetry units, sensors, etc. This approach is
particularly advantageous in the places where is difficult to trace wiring or where
the battery replacement is challenging due to disassemble difficulties. Typical
cases of this kind of application are the diagnostic systems in aerospace field [2,
3], portable medical devices [4], or autonomous measurement units in process
control systems [5].
T. B ezina and R. Jabloski (eds.), Mechatronics 2013,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02294-9_34, Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
265
266
Wider commercial use of the MEMS thermoelectric generators is in its infancy [6]. There are only a few existing commercial solutions in the field of
MEMS TEGs and even fewer amount could be bought as a standalone solution.
Standalone MEMS solutions have been developed by Micropelt GmbH [7], Nextreme Thermal Solutions, Inc. [8], Thermo Life Energy Corp., Inc. [9], Hi-Z
Technology, Inc. [10] and Perpetua Power Source Technologies, Inc. [11]. Modules from the first two above-mentioned manufacturers Nextreme and Micropelt
which are currently easily achievable through worldwide electronics components retailers are shown in Fig. 1.
b)
a)
Physical nature of thermal energy harvesting - the Seebeck effect is based on the
diffusion of electrons through the interface between two different materials conductors or semiconductors. This diffusion is achieved by applying a heating at the
junction of two materials which make a thermocouple. Heating causes the net
changes in the materials and allows electrons to move from material where they
have lower energy into material where the energy of electrons is higher. Because
the electrical current is exactly a flow of electrons, this effect of passing electrons
from one material to another makes an electromotive force (voltage) on the
terminals of thermoelectric module [1, 13, 14]. Generated open circuit voltage is
linearly dependant on the temperature difference between hot and cold sides of
thermoelectric module:
U oc = N . . TH TC
(1)
267
In practical applications is TEG operated with electric load RL (Fig. 2). TEG is,
in fact, the temperature-controlled constant voltage source with internal resistance
Ri. Thus the voltage UL on load is:
UL =
RL
R L + Ri
.U oc
(2)
Current IL in the TEG circuit can be easily calculated using Ohms law. The
maximum power point (MPP) is achieved when Ri = RL. This mode of operation is
called operation with matched load. Operation in the MPP mode with maximum
electrical power on load PL is desired in the most of applications [13].
Fig. 2 Principle of operation of TEG into the load resistance RL (current IL, voltage UL)
TEG is, in fact, a type of heat engine operating between two temperatures TH
and TC. Thus a theoretical efficiency of the thermoelectric energy conversion is
limited by the Carnots Theorem [1]. The efficiency of real TEG is exactly around
2 5 %. This reduction is caused by the materials- or design-related problems.
Enhancement of efficiency and higher integration with surrounding systems are
the tasks for MEMS and NEMS TEGs. [14]
268
Cwafer, Rtcs, Ctcs). Thermal materials properties are not directly offered by manufacturer and their estimation based on information from [12, 14] is necessary. Temperature dependences of the materials were neglected and their fixed values
were estimated at the room temperature. Ideal heat flow sources Qjoule, QpelC and
QpelH represent phenomena of the Peltier cooling and Joule heating which occur in
TEG.
Heat fluxes generated by heat flow sources are dependant on the current passing through the electrical part of TEG model. Thus the thermal and electrical parts
are interacting together. Equations describing the implementation of multi-domain
phenomena of Peltier cooling and Joule heating are shown in Fig. 4.
269
Finally, the electrical part of TEG is built as the constant voltage source with
internal resistance as described in the chapter 2. Output voltage is controlled by
the real temperature difference on the thermocouples. Implementation of electrical
part is shown in the Fig. 5.
3.1
Comprehension of Results
Transient behaviour of MEMS TEG module was examined by applying the step
function of hot-side temperature TH. Input simulation parameters are set to the
temperature difference of 50 C and matched resistive load. Resulting step response of voltage UL is shown in Fig. 6. As could be seen in Fig. 6, the occurring
time constant is in the millisecond range. This rapidity is caused by the very small
thermal masses appearing in the MEMS TEG module.
Fig. 6 Step response of dynamic Simscape model (MEMS eTEG HV56, conditions:
Tout = 50 C, TC = 25 C, TH = 75 C, TH applied at t = 0)
270
The steady-state value reached by the dynamic model was compared with results of other simulation modelling approaches. Steady-state values are listed and
compared below in the Table 1. In the comparison are included results given by
the simple modelling approach using (2) and Ohms law, Analytic Model with
Constant Resistances [14, 17] and FEM analyses [15]. Obtained output values are
also compared with the datasheet values provided by manufacturer in [12].
Table 1 Comprehension of results (conditions: T = 50 C, TC = 25 C, TH = 75 C,
matched load)
Type of Model
Voltage on the
Passing current
matched load UL [V] IL [mA]
Produced electric
power PL [mW]
Simscape dynamic
0,651
41,552
63,784
0,688
67,412
46,379
62,393
39,318
FEM (ANSYS)
0,688
Datasheet value
0,6
60
36
Conclusions
The above-described dynamic model of MEMS TEG was successfully implemented in Simscape and verified by application of the trivial input conditions
constant temperature difference and matched load. Very small time constant in the
millisecond range was observed. The maximal observed difference between datasheet value and simulation was 15,4 % (PL). In the comprehension with other
simulation modelling approaches was observed the maximum difference of 15 %
in the case of voltage UL and analytic model with contact resistances. These inaccuracies could be reduced by identification of input parameters based on measurement. Better identification of input parameters and verification of models based
on MEMS TEG module measurements are the tasks for future development.
The biggest challenges for the further work in energy harvesting area are the
co-simulations with surrounding systems [18]. The Simscape model will be
chiefly used for the co-simulations of MEMS TEG with surrounding power conditioning electronics.
Acknowledgments. This work has been funded by the European Commission within the
FP7 project "Efficient Systems and Propulsion for Small Aircraft | ESPOSA", grant agreement No. ACP1-GA-2011-284859-ESPOSA. And this work has been additionally supported by the project "Complex Affordable Aircraft Engine Electronic Control (CAAEEC)"
TA02010259 under The Technology Agency of the Czech Republic.
271
References
[1] Priya, S., Inman, D.J.: Energy Harvesting Technologies, pp. 325336. Springer
(2009)
[2] Featherston, C.A., Holford, K.M., Pullin, R., Lees, J., Eaton, M., Pearson, M.: An autonomous structural health monitoring solution. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 8763, p. 876302
(2013)
[3] Becker, T., Kluge, M., Schalk, J., Tiplady, K., Paget, C., Hilleringmann, U., Otterpohl, T.: Autonomous Sensor Nodes for Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring. IEEE
Sensors Journal 9(11), 15891595 (2009)
[4] Settaluri, K.T., Lo, H., Ram, R.J.: Thin Thermoelectric Generator System for Body
Energy Harvesting. Journal of Electronic Materials 41(6), 984988 (2012)
[5] Carstens, T.A., Corradini, M.L., Blanchard, J.P., Zhenqiang, M.: Thermoelectric Powered Wireless Sensors for Spent Fuel Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear
Science 59(4), 14081413 (2012)
[6] Natrop, P., Das, R.: Energy Harvesting and Storage for Electronic Devices 20102020. IDTechEx Ltd. (2010)
[7] Micropelt Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Home,
http://www.micropelt.com
[8] Nextreme Thermal Solutions Microscale Thermal and Power Management,
http://www.nextreme.com
[9] Powered by Thermo Life, http://www.poweredbythermolife.com
[10] Hi-Z Technology, Inc., http://www.hi-z.com
[11] Energy harvesting solutions for wireless sensors,
http://www.perpetuapower.com
[12] eTEG HV56 Power Generator data sheet, http://www.nextreme.com/
media/pdf/techspecs/Nextreme_eTEG_HV56_Data_Sheet.pdf
[13] Goldsmid, H.J.: Introduction to Thermoelectricity, pp. 115. Springer (2010)
[14] Rowe, D.M., et al.: Thermoelectrics handbook: macro to nano. Taylor & Francis
Group (2006)
[15] Ancik, Z., Vlach, R., Janak, L., Kopecek, P., Hadas, Z.: Modeling, simulation and experimental testing of the MEMS thermoelectric generators in wide range of operational conditions. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 8763, p. 87631 (2013)
[16] Dziurdzia, P.: Simulation Tool for Virtual Estimation of Harvested Thermoelectric
Energy Supplying Wireless Sensor Nodes. In: 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE), pp. 414418 (2010)
[17] Rowe, D.M., Min, G.: Design theory of thermoelectric modules for electrical power
Generation. IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol. 143(6), 351356 (1996)
[18] Hadas, Z., Singule, V.: Energy harvesting opportunity for future remote applications. In: 17th International Conference on Engineering Mechanics, Svratka, Czech
Republic, pp. 167170 (2011)