Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ARTICLE IN PRESS
JVAC 15111 17
Vaccine
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vaccine
Q1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Q2
Q3
Merck Research Laboratories, Vaccine Basic Research, West Point, PA, United States
Merck Research Laboratories, Laboratory Animal Resources, West Point, PA, United States
c
Merck Research Laboratories, Vaccine Drug Product Development, West Point, PA, United States
d
Eurons Laboratories, Lancaster, PA, United States
e
Agile 1, Torrance, CA, United States
b
12
13
23
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
14
15
16
Article history:
Available online xxx
17
22
Keywords:
Clostridium difcile
Recombinant vaccine
TcdA
TcdB
24
1. Introduction
18
19
20
21
25
26
Clostridium difcile infection (CDI) is the major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis, a disease associated with signicant morbidity and mortality. The disease is mostly of
nosocomial origin, with elderly patients undergoing anti-microbial therapy being particularly at risk. C.
difcile produces two large toxins: Toxin A (TcdA) and Toxin B (TcdB). The two toxins act synergistically to
damage and impair the colonic epithelium, and are primarily responsible for the pathogenesis associated
with CDI. The feasibility of toxin-based vaccination against C. difcile is being vigorously investigated. A
vaccine based on formaldehyde-inactivated Toxin A and Toxin B (toxoids) was reported to be safe and
immunogenic in healthy volunteers and is now undergoing evaluation in clinical efcacy trials. In order
to eliminate cytotoxic effects, a chemical inactivation step must be included in the manufacturing process of this toxin-based vaccine. In addition, the large-scale production of highly toxic antigens could be
a challenging and costly process.
Vaccines base on non-toxic fragments of genetically engineered versions of the toxins alleviate most
of these limitations. We have evaluated a vaccine assembled from two recombinant fragments of TcdB
and explored their potential as components of a novel experimental vaccine against CDI. Golden Syrian
hamsters vaccinated with recombinant fragments of TcdB combined with full length TcdA (Toxoid A)
developed high titer IgG responses and potent neutralizing antibody titers. We also show here that the
recombinant vaccine protected animals against lethal challenge with C. difcile spores, with efcacy
equivalent to the toxoid vaccine. The development of a two-segment recombinant vaccine could provide
several advantages over toxoid TcdA/TcdB such as improvements in manufacturability.
2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
0264-410X/ 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
2
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
ARTICLE IN PRESS
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Karczewski et al. / Vaccine xxx (2014) xxxxxx
161
174
TcdA and TcdB (puried from C. difcile strain VPI10463, List Biologicals, Campbell, CA) and selected recombinant fragments (B-ED
and B-TC) were reconstituted in 20 mM HEPES-buffered saline (pH
7.4) at 0.30.4 mg/mL. Formaldehyde was added to a nal concentration of 0.43% (v/v) and l-lysine was added to a nal concentration
of 4.2 mg/mL. Inactivation proceeded for 18 days 4 C and then the
protein solutions were dialyzed against 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH
7.4), containing 100 mM sodium chloride and sterilized by passage
through a 0.22 lter.
Protein antigens were co-formulated with aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate adjuvant (AHPS, Merck & Co, Inc.) and
ISCOMATRIXTM adjuvant (CSL Limited, Parkville, Australia) in saline
to prepare each component of the vaccine.
175
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
194
195
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
2.6.1. ELISA
Thermo Reacti-Bind (Thermo Lab systems, Waltham, MA) 96well plates were coated with either TcdA or TcdB at 50 ng/well or
25 ng/well, respectively in PBS overnight at 4 C. Wells were washed
with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and blocked in PBS
containing 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Serial
dilutions (1:2) of hamster sera were incubated at room temperature
for 1.5 h. Plates were then washed with PBS-T and incubated with
goat anti-hamster IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
(Abcam, Cambridge, MA) for 1 h at room temperature. Following
an additional wash, 50 L of 3,3 ,5,5 -tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)
substrate (Thermo Labsystems, Rockford, IL) was added and after
15 min, the reaction was stopped with 50 L 0.4 N sulfuric acid and
the absorbance measured at 450 nm (Powerwave X Select, Bio-Tek
Instruments, Winooski, VT). Antibodytiters were calculated using
four parameter regression tting of the titration curve using Prism
5 for Windows software (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA).
2.6.2. Neutralization and cytotoxicity assay
Native TcdA or TcdB was pre-incubated with test sera for 1.5 h
at 4 C, applied to Vero cells grown in 384 well plates and incubated
in humidied CO2 incubators at 37 C for 48 h. The cells were xed,
permeabilized, and stained with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin and an
image of the cell monolayer was acquired using the ImageXpress
Velos Scanning Cytometer (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA).
The total cell surface area in each well was plotted against the
Table 1
Recombinant toxin fragments selected for in vivo evaluation, their molecular
weigths and purication yields.
.
Fragment
Amino acids
Mw (kDa)
Yield (mg/L)
B-ED
B-TC
B-C0
B-C1
B-C2
B-C3
B-C4
A-C1
1543
5452367
17862367
18362367
18362101
19492275
21022367
18322710
62.2
207
68
62.4
31.6
39.1
32
99.5
505
39
822
582
1836
686
800
20
dilution of sera (for neutralization titers) or against the toxin concentration (for cytotoxicity assessment) and titers were calculated
using four parameter regression tting using Prism 5 for Windows
software (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA).
3. Results
3.1. Design, preparation and formulation of recombinant Toxin B
fragments
We designed a vaccine composed of two recombinant fragments
covering an entire sequence of TcdB (Table 1). The rst fragment,
B-ED comprised the N-terminal region (amino acids 1543) and
contained the entire enzymatic domain of TcdB. To minimize the
possibility of cytotoxicity resulting from cellular uptake of this
fragment, four residues were mutated: W102A, D288A, E515Q
and S518A, which have been shown to be critical for the catalytic activity of the enzyme [2931]. The second component of
the vaccine (B-TC) encompassed the translocation domain through
the C-terminus (residues 5452367); therefore, when combined
together, fragments B-ED and B-TC contained the entire amino acid
sequence from full-length TcdB. The CROPS regions were identied
as being immunodominant and shown to induce potent neutralizing antibodies [32], we therefore prepared and evaluated several
shorter CROPS-derived fragments of TcdB (B-C0B-C4) and one Cterminal fragment of TcdA (Table 1).
TcdB fragments were expressed in E. coli and puried from soluble extracts in a two-step process including IMAC followed by
anion exchange chromatography. A similar strategy was initially
attempted to produce recombinant fragments of TcdA, including
the larger fragment A-TC and the shorter CROPS-derived fragment
A-C1; however, expression yields as well as solution stability did
not allow for production of sufcient quantities of proteins necessary to support in vivo studies. Expression of the A-C1 fragment
in S. cerevisiae followed by sequential chromatography on cation
exchange and hydroxyapatite chromatography allowed the desired
product to be puried to homogeneity (>95%). The overall purication yields from E. coli extracts ranged from 39 to 1836 mg/L of E. coli
culture, as shown in Table 1. The puried TcdA and TcdB fragments
migrated on SDS-PAGE at a molecular weight corresponding to the
monomeric form of each protein, as calculated from the amino acid
sequence (Fig. 1A). The purity of all antigens was greater than 90%
with very little evidence of degradation, as conrmed by Western
blot analysis (data not shown).
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
4
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Karczewski et al. / Vaccine xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Table 2
Combinations of TcdA TcdB antigens selected for in vivo evaluation in clindamycininduced enterocolitis model.
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
Group 8
Group 9
TcdA antigen
TcdB antigen
TcdA
TcdA
TcdA
TcdA
TcdA
TcdA
A-C1
A-C1
AAHS/IMX
TcdB
B-ED+B-TC(+F)
B-ED+B-TC
B-ED+B-C0
B-ED+B-C1
B-TC
B-ED+B-TC(-F)
TcdB
/IMX
Fig. 1. (A) Analysis of recombinant toxin fragments by SDS/PAGE. 5 g of each protein was separated on NuPage 412% gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. (B)
Cytotoxic activity of native and recombinant toxin fragments. The potency of fragments or unmodied combinations was measured in a cell-based cytotoxicity assay.
The values for all recombinant fragments are plotted as the highest concentrations
tested (no cytotoxicity was observed at these concentrations).
Secondary structure estimation and solution-based size of puried fragment B-TC (207 kDa) was determined by circular dichroism
263
and analytical ultracentrifugation, respectively. CD indicated 22%
264
-helix, 29% -sheet, 21% turns, and 29% unordered compo265
nents suggesting that the recombinant antigen adopted a complex
266
secondary structure not dominated by any single structural com267
ponent. In comparison, previously published results have reported
268
that full length native TcdB is composed of 36% -helix, 21%
269
-sheet, 18% turns and 25% unordered components [33]. Sedimen270
tation equilibrium analysis of B-TC yielded a molecular weight of
271
726,745 Da, consistent with the formation of trimers in solution.
272
Recombinant fragments and combinations thereof were evalu273
Q5 ated in a cellular-based cytotoxicity assay. Studies by Genisyuerek
274
262
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Karczewski et al. / Vaccine xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Fig. 2. Systemic antibody response in the individual sera samples collected at day 77. (A and B) ELISA titers were measured against TcdA (Panel A) and TcdB (Panel B). (C and
D) Neutralizing titers for TcdA (Panel C) and TcdB (Panel D) were measured. The average titers (n = 9) SEM are shown.
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
6
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Karczewski et al. / Vaccine xxx (2014) xxxxxx
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
hamsters with a formaldehyde treated two-segment TcdB component combined with a full-length, formaldehyde inactivated TcdA
component provided long-lasting (>3 months) immunity with100%
survival against lethal challenge with C. difcile. Moreover this
vaccine was as efcacious as a full-length toxoid vaccine. To our
knowledge this is the rst report to demonstrate equivalent efcacy
of a recombinant TcdB and toxoid antigen, where both molecules
were evaluated within the same experiment, at the same antigen
dose and formulation and using the same C. difcile challenge strain.
In contrast, we observed only partial efcacy in all other groups
(groups 38), immunized with one of several shorter fragments of
TcdB and/or one fragment of TcdA in combination with full-length
TcdB toxoid.
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
G Model
JVAC 15111 17
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J. Karczewski et al. / Vaccine xxx (2014) xxxxxx
486
Acknowledgements
489
490
References
487
488
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
[1] Lo Vecchio A, Zacur GM. Clostridium difcile infection: an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and therapeutic options. Curr Opin Gastroenterol
2012;28(January (1)):19.
[2] Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, et al. Clinical
practice guidelines for Clostridium difcile infection in adults: 2010 update by
the ociety for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious
diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(May
(5)):43155.
[3] Loo VG, Bourgault AM, Poirier L, Lamothe F, Michaud S, Turgeon N, et al. Host
and pathogen factors for Clostridium difcile infection and colonization. N Engl
J Med 2006;365(November (18)):1693703.
[4] McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens Jr RC, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP,
et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difcile. N Engl J Med
2005;353(December (23)):243341.
[5] Muto CA. Why are antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections spiraling out of
control? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26(January (1)):102.
[6] Pepin J, Valiquette L, Alary ME, Villemure P, Pelletier A, Forget K, et al. Clostridium difcile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a
changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ 2004;171(August (5)):46672.
[7] Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin
and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difcile-associated diarrhea,
stratied by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45(August (3)):3027.
[8] Pituch H, Bakker D, Kuijper E, Obuch-Woszczatynski P, Wultanska D, Nurzynska
G, et al. First isolation of Clostridium difcile PCR-ribotype 027/toxinotype III in
Poland. Pol J Microbiol 2008;57(3):2678.
[9] Hookman P, Barkin JS. Clostridium difcile associated infection, diarrhea and
colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15(April (13)):155480.
[10] Venugopal AA, Johnson S. Fidaxomicin: a novel macrocyclic antibiotic approved
for treatment of Clostridium difcile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;54(February
(4)):56874.
[11] Lowy I, Molrine DC, Leav BA, Blair BM, Baxter R, Gerding DN, et al. Treatment
with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difcile toxins. N Engl J Med
2010;362(3):197205.
[12] Kotloff KL, Wasserman SS, Losonsky GA, Thomas Jr W, Nichols R, Edelman R,
et al. Safety and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a Clostridium difcile
toxoid vaccine administered to healthy adults. Infect Immun 2001;69(February
(2)):98895.
[13] Lyerly DM, Krivan HC, Wilkins TD. Clostridium difcile: its disease and toxins.
Clin Microbiol Rev 1988;1(January (1)):118.
[14] Hamm EE, Voth DE, Ballard JD. Identication of Clostridium difcile toxin B cardiotoxicity using a zebrash embryo model of intoxication. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 2006;103(September (38)):1417681.
[15] Cohen SH, Tang YJ, Silva Jr J. Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium
difcile strains. J Infect Dis 2000;181(February (2)):65963.
Please cite this article in press as: Karczewski J, et al. Development of a recombinant toxin fragment vaccine for Clostridium difcile
infection. Vaccine (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.026
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620