Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices 7517
non–market economy producer
purchases an input from market
economy suppliers and pays for that
input in a market economy currency,
the Department normally uses the actual
price paid for these inputs, where
possible. See 19 CFR 351.408(c)(1).
Because Shanghai Fortune provided
sufficient documentation on the record
of this review demonstrating that the
phthalic anhydride used was sourced
from a market economy and paid for in
a market economy currency, we are
using the actual average price paid by
Shanghai Fortune for this input for the
final results. For further details, see
Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 3, and Memorandum to the
File From Jennifer Moats Through
Wendy Frankel ‘‘Analysis for the Final
Results of the Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on
Saccharin from the People’s Republic of
China: Shanghai Fortune Chemical Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Fortune Final Analysis
Memo’’),’’ dated February 6, 2006,
which is available in the CRU in Room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
Since our issuance of the Preliminary
Results, we have reviewed our
calculations of surrogate values and
found some to contain clerical errors,
which we have corrected for the Final
Results. These values are for the
products sulphuric acid, hydrochloric
acid, sodium bicarbonate, sodium
hypochlorite, cardboard drums and
cartons, inner plastic bags, plastic film,
and pallets. For further details, see
‘‘Factors Valuations for the Final Results
of the Administrative Review,’’ dated
February 6, 2006.
For further information detailing all of
the changes to Shanghai Fortune’s
calculations in the final results, see
Shanghai Fortune Final Analysis Memo.
Final Results of the Review
The Department has determined that
the following final dumping margins
exist for the period December 27, 2002,
through June 30, 2004:
SACCHARIN FROM THE PRC
Producer/Manufacturer/ Weighted–Average
Exporter Margin (Percent)
Shanghai Fortune
Chemical Co., Ltd. .... 17.05%
PRC–Wide Entity 2 ........ 329.33%
2 The PRC-wide entity includes: Suzhou
Fine Chemicals Group Co., Kaifeng Xinghua
Fine Chemical Factory, Tianjin North Food,
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Tianjin Changjie Chemical Co., Ltd., and Beta
Udyog Ltd.
The Department will disclose
calculations performed for these final
results to the parties within five days of
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:38 Feb 10, 2006 Jkt 208001
the date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Duty Assessment and Cash–Deposit
Requirements
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. The
Department will issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
within 15 days of publication of the
final results of this review. For
assessment purposes, we calculated
exporter/importer (or customer)-specific
assessment rates or values for
merchandise subject to this review.
Because Shanghai Fortune reported
entered values, for these final results,
we divided the total dumping margins
for the reviewed sales by the total
entered value for the reviewed sales for
each applicable importer. For duty–
assessment rates calculated on this
basis, we will direct CBP to assess the
resulting percentage margin against the
entered customs values for the subject
merchandise on each of the applicable
importer’s/customer’s entries during the
review period.
Further, the following cash–deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of the
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
subject merchandise exported by
Shanghai Fortune, the cash–deposit rate
will be 17.05 percent; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above that have separate rates, the
cash–deposit rate will continue to be the
company–specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all other PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash–deposit rate will
be the PRC–wide rate of 329.33 percent;
(4) for all non–PRC exporters of subject
merchandise, the cash–deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that exporter.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
review.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the review period. Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply
PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
with this requirement could result in
the Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the administrative protective order
itself. See 19 CFR 351.306. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. See 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative
review and notice are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: February 6, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix 1
Decision Memorandum
1. Bona Fides
2. By–Product Offset
3. Valuation of Phtalic Anhydride
4. Valuation of Brokerage and Handling
5. Valuation of Ammonia Water
6. Valuation of Liquid Chlorine
7. Valuation of Sulfur Dioxide
8. Valuation of Ocean Freight
9. Valuation of Steam Coal
10. Valuation of Activated Carbon
[FR Doc. E6–1985 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–806]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Silicon
Metal from Brazil
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 8, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the order on
silicon metal from Brazil. See Silicon
Metal from Brazil: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 45665 (August 8, 2005)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). This review
covers one manufacturer/exporter of the
13FEN1
 7518 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
subject merchandise, Camargo Correa
Metais (CCM). The merchandise covered
by this order is silicon metal from Brazil
as described in the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’
section of this notice. The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is July 1, 2003, through
June 30, 2004. We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the preliminary results. Based upon our
analysis of the comments received, we
made changes to the margin calculation.
Therefore, the final results have
changed from the preliminary results of
this review. The final weight–averaged
dumping margin is listed below in the
section titled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department’s preliminary results
of review were published on August 8,
2005. See Preliminary Results. As
provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), we
verified sales and cost information
provided by CCM, from September 12,
2005, through September 23, 2005,
using standard verification procedures
such as the examination of relevant
sales and financial records. Our
verification results are outlined in the
public and proprietary versions of our
verification reports, which are on file in
the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’) in
room B–099 of the main Commerce
building. We invited parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results and our
verification findings. We received
written comments on November 14,
2005, from Globe Metallurgical (the
petitioner). On December 9, 2005, we
received rebuttal comments from CCM,
the respondent. On January 26, 2006,
the Department held a public hearing
concerning these final results. The
Department is conducting this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Act.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is silicon metal from Brazil
containing at least 96.00 percent but less
than 99.99 percent silicon by weight.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Also covered by this order is silicon
metal from Brazil containing between
89.00 and 96.00 percent silicon by
weight but which contains more
aluminum than the silicon metal
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:38 Feb 10, 2006 Jkt 208001
containing at least 96.00 percent but less
than 99.99 percent silicon by weight.
Silicon metal is currently provided for
under subheadings 2804.69.10 and
2804.69.50 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) as a chemical product, but
is commonly referred to as a metal.
Semiconductor grade silicon (silicon
metal containing by weight not less than
99.99 percent silicon and provided for
in subheading 2804.61.00 of the
HTSUS) is not subject to the order.
Although the HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and for
customs purposes, the written
description remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs, as well as the
Department’s findings, in this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
for the Administrative Review of Silicon
Metal from Brazil (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’), dated February 6,
2006, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. A list of the issues raised, all of
which we have responded to in the
Decision Memorandum, is appended to
this notice. The Decision Memorandum
is on file in the CRU in room B–099 of
the main Commerce building, and can
also be accessed directly on the Web at
http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
changes in the calculations for the final
dumping margin. The changes are
discussed in detail in the Decision
Memorandum. Additional detail
regarding these changes is provided in
the Memorandum from Maisha Cryor,
Senior International Trade Compliance
Analyst, to Thomas F. Futtner, Acting
Office Director, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Silicon Metal
from Brazil; Calculation Memorandum
for the Final Results,’’ dated February 6,
2006, and the Memorandum from
Michael P. Harrison, Senior Accountant,
to Neal M. Halper, Director, Office of
Accounting, ‘‘Cost of Production and
Constructed Value Calculation
Adjustments for the Final Results,’’
dated February 6, 2005.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that the following weighted–
average margin exists for the period July
1, 2003, through June 30, 2004:
PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
Weighted- Average
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (Percentage)
Camargo Correa
Metais ...................... 0.00 percent
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries,
pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The
Department calculated importer–
specific duty assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales for each importer to the
total entered value of the examined
sales for that importer. Where the
importer–specific assessment rate is
above de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping duties on that
importer’s entries of subject
merchandise produced by CCM. The
Department will issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
within 15 days of publication of these
final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of silicon metal from Brazil entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, as provided
by section 751(a) of the Act: (1) for CCM
we will instruct CBP not to collect cash
deposits; (2) for merchandise exported
by producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in the
investigation, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
rate from the most recently completed
review; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the investigation, but the producer is,
the cash deposit rate will be that
established for the most recent period
for the producer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will be 91.06
percent, the ‘‘All Others’’ rate
established in the less–than-fair–value
investigation. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
13FEN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2006 / Notices
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred, and in the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also is the only reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: February 3, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX – Issues in Decision
Memorandum
I. Programa de Integracao Social and
Contribuicao do Financiamento Social
Taxes
II. Per–Unit Cost Calculation
III. General & Administrative Expense/
Ratio
IV. Financial Expenses
V. Depreciation of Deferred Charges for
Restarting Idled Furnaces
VI. Depreciation of Idled Assets
VII. Taxes Included in Constructed
Value
[FR Doc. E6–1987 Filed 2–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–831]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
From Taiwan; Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 9, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Department) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results and
partial rescission of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:38 Feb 10, 2006 Jkt 208001
from Taiwan. This review covers 16
manufacturers/exporters. The period of
review (POR) is July 1, 2003, through
June 30, 2004.
We provided interested parties with
an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results of review. After
analyzing the comments received, we
made changes to the margin calculations
for two respondents, Chia Far Industrial
Factory Co., Ltd. (Chia Far) and Yieh
United Steel Corporation (YUSCO).
Therefore, the final results of review
differ from the preliminary results of
review. The final weighted–average
dumping margins for the reviewed firms
are listed below in the section entitled
‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Blackledge or Karine Gziryan,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3518 or (202) 482–
4081, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The following events occurred after
the Department published the
preliminary results of the instant
administrative review in the Federal
Register. See Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip in Coils from Taiwan: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 46137 (August 9, 2005)
(Preliminary Results). In response to the
Department’s invitation to comment on
the Preliminary Results, the petitioners1
filed case briefs on September 8, 2005,
and September 12, 2005. Chia Far filed
case brief on September 12, 2005.
YUSCO filed rebuttal brief on
September 13, 2005, while the
petitioners and Chia Far filed rebuttal
brief on September 19, 2005. On
November 16, 2005, the Department
extended the time limit for completing
the final results of review until February
5, 2006. See Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip in Coils From Taiwan: Extension
of Time Limit for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 69514 (November 16,
2005).
Period of Review
The POR is July 1, 2003, through June
30, 2004.
1 The petitioners are Allegheny Ludlum, AK Steel
Corporation, Butler Armco Independent Union, J&L
Specialty Steel, Inc., United Steelworks of America,
AFL-CIO/CLC, and Zanesville Armco Independent
Organization (collectively, ‘‘petitioners’’).
PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
7519
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
certain stainless steel sheet and strip in
coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or
less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more
of chromium, with or without other
elements. The subject sheet and strip is
a flat–rolled product in coils that is
greater than 9.5 mm in width and less
than 4.75 mm in thickness, and that is
annealed or otherwise heat treated and
pickled or otherwise descaled. The
subject sheet and strip may also be
further processed (e.g., cold–rolled,
polished, aluminized, coated, etc.)
provided that it maintains the specific
dimensions of sheet and strip following
such processing.
The merchandise subject to the order
is classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTS) at
subheadings: 7219.13.0031,
7219.13.0051, 7219.13.0071,
7219.1300.812, 7219.14.0030,
7219.14.0065, 7219.14.0090,
7219.32.0005, 7219.32.0020,
7219.32.0025, 7219.32.0035,
7219.32.0036, 7219.32.0038,
7219.32.0042, 7219.32.0044,
7219.33.0005, 7219.33.0020,
7219.33.0025, 7219.33.0035,
7219.33.0036, 7219.33.0038,
7219.33.0042, 7219.33.0044,
7219.34.0005, 7219.34.0020,
7219.34.0025, 7219.34.0030,
7219.34.0035, 7219.35.0005,
7219.35.0015, 7219.35.0030,
7219.35.0035, 7219.90.0010,
7219.90.0020, 7219.90.0025,
7219.90.0060, 7219.90.0080,
7220.12.1000, 7220.12.5000,
7220.20.1010, 7220.20.1015,
7220.20.1060, 7220.20.1080,
7220.20.6005, 7220.20.6010,
7220.20.6015, 7220.20.6060,
7220.20.6080, 7220.20.7005,
7220.20.7010, 7220.20.7015,
7220.20.7060, 7220.20.7080,
7220.20.8000, 7220.20.9030,
7220.20.9060, 7220.90.0010,
7220.90.0015, 7220.90.0060, and
7220.90.0080. Although the HTS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise under the order is
dispositive.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are the following: (1) sheet and strip that
is not annealed or otherwise heat treated
and pickled or otherwise descaled, (2)
sheet and strip that is cut to length, (3)
plate (i.e., flat–rolled stainless steel
2 Due to changes to the HTS numbers in 2001,
7219.13.0030, 7219.13.0050, 7219.13.0070, and
7219.13.0080 are now 7219.13.0031, 7219.13.0051,
7219.13.0071, and 7219.13.0081, respectively.
13FEN1