Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract
This study will attempt to focus on improving targets set following the OFSTED inspection to
my school. The report stresses on raising the quality of teaching and learning, particularly in
science and ICT, by ensuring that expectations are high and that learning activities are
appropriately challenging in all lessons
I was employed to teach ICT two years after the OFSTED report. I reflected on ways I can
impart on the quality of learning within my subject. However, this study provides me with an
opportunity.
The study will explore different learning styles in relation to its influence in my practise as a
teacher and also attempt to use findings to answer questions and challenges I have reflected
upon in my teaching. These questions are:
would the use of different learning styles improve behaviour during a learning activity?
The study will carry out a survey of a year 9 set, with practical activities on understanding the
meaning of learning, its methodology, learning cycles and will then attempt to use findings to
answer the above questions.
Introduction
Although not everybody will agree with me that there is not an effective use of learning styles
to inform planning within a classroom setting.
Teachers are more concerned about teaching strategies that conforms to their learning
styles rather than the learners themselves.
It is also surprising that lesson templates in most schools do not accommodate learning
preferences for learners.
Teachers do not really understand the concept of differentiation. I until now understand the
concept to mean teacher being aware of “Some will.....less able will... the more able will.....”
whereas in actual fact, it is to understand that pupils learn differently, and it is just as
important to provide teaching resources to address this.
Too much concern on assessment for learning and paying less emphasis on training
teachers on the use of learning styles, helping and supporting teachers to implement
findings in classroom
1
As this is my tenth year of teaching in the UK, until my undertaking of this module, I have
always focused on developing a teaching style of adherence to lesson formats given to me
in different schools I worked at. On reflection, upon taken this module, I started to focus on
learners; I began to ask questions of how to develop learners as well as my teaching? I
began to wonder how well “assessment in learning” and “assessment for learning” will give a
good understanding of how children learn or understand in my lessons. I see a learning
activity as an opportunity for learners to make connection of what is being learnt to other
things relevant to them. To this end, I believe that the measure of understanding is not
evidenced in the use of formative and summative assessment. It is more effective in
recognising the natural way of children’s learning. Agreeing with john Holt (1982a)
Children have a style of learning that fits their condition and which they use naturally...he
believes that schools setting does not encourage this natural and powerful way of thinking
instead it makes children feels that where words or symbols or abstract thought are
concerned they can’t think at all. They think of themselves as “stupid” and incapable of
learning or understanding anything that is complicated, or hard or simply new.
In a learning situation, learning directors should create an atmosphere where children can
create a connection with their learning, so that not only few will become good at learning in
the way we try to make them learn, those that get frightened, humiliated and discouraged will
also see the essence of the activity to participate and become more involved in the learning
activity. Children as John Holts (1983b) puts it will no longer use their minds not to learn or
get out of doing the things we tell them to do. When we teachers better understand the
ways, conditions and spirit in which children do their best in learning, and are able to make
school into a place where they can use and improve the style of thinking and learning natural
to them, school may then become a place in which all children grow, not just in size, not
even in knowledge, but in curiosity, courage, confidence, independence, resourcefulness,
resilience, patience, competence and understanding.
The mystery behind why one pupil perform better under one teacher versus another in the
same subject lies in the way the teacher presents the information and the type of learning
style that best meets the needs of the pupils. The fact that everyone has a different learning
style and learns better through different means shows that an understanding of different
learning styles by teachers will help improve the learning of pupils.
As the DfES (2004) will suggest, successful learning takes place when teachers play to
pupils’ strengths and build their capacity to learn in a range of styles. For this to happen,
teachers need to:
techniques.
2
• remain on-task and focused during group or practical activities
Understanding these learning styles and how best to meet the needs of these learning
styles by teachers is necessary in helping pupil learn better. However, Alan Pritchard (1983
believes that it is difficult understanding how each child learns, given that there are different
theories of learning, and he argued, that teachers in the secondary schools will find it a huge
task trying to understand ways every child learns. I think it is important to explore different
theories of learning, Keira Sewell (2008) provides a good guide to different proponents of
learning
Learning designed jointly by teacher and Enabling student learn more naturally, more
student through negotiation effective and faster Alister smith advocated
a four stage learning circle connect, activate,
demonstrate n consolidate
Learning that are tailored to individuals Features in the national strategies{black and
needs, ability etc William from kings college} giving students
regular, diagnostic, precise, actionable,
written or verbal feedback to improve
performance, However, i am of the opinion
that this can discourage creativity, too much
help sheets and elements of challenge is
weak!
Logical ( use of number and critical thinking) Activist: as those who prefer to learn by
1
Spatial (use of pictures, diagram, graphs) doing rather than by reading or listening
Intrapersonal (Personal Learning time and Reflection : stand back and observe, collect
choice) as much information before making a
decision
Interpersonal (Group work)
Theorist :try to connect understanding to
Kinaesthetic ( Movement) existing frame work
Musical ( Sound) Pragmatist : try to seek out and make use of
new ideas and seek practical implications
Verbal Linguistic ( Reading, Writing,
Speaking)
As will be shown in this study, I have adapted the four learning styles and made a learning
circle out of it. However, the understanding of many researchers that learners have
characteristic from all the four learning styles indicates that for effective learning to be
achieved, efforts be made at improving pupils in all the four styles, hence the introduction of
the Visual, Audio, kinaesthetic which is theoretically practised in many schools but know
measures in place to test its effectiveness. I believe this to be the case because teachers
are not confident in integrating learning styles into classroom that will support learning
activities, and more so, school management have not made real effort at supporting
teachers or giving training on how to apply VAK. There are big talks about assessment for
learning, assessment in learning but I will argue that identifying learning preferences and
using that to plan and teach lessons should be given the same attention in our education.
This study will explore VAK as a follow up to the understanding of different theories of
learning. Using Ldpride (2007) as a guide to exploring VAK, it explains VAK as learners in
each channels exhibiting certain traits
Visual Learners
Are people who learn through seeing, these learners need to see the teacher’s body
language and facial expression and to fully understand what is being taught. Visual learners
prefers sitting in front in avoidance of visual obstructions. They think more in pictures and
learn better from visual displays including diagrams, illustrated text books, over head
transparencies, videos, flipcharts, and hand outs. Visual learner prefers the taking of notes
during either classroom activities or group discussions.
Auditory Learners
Are people whose learning is more effective through verbal lectures, discussions, talking
things through and listening to what others have to say. Written information may have very
little meaning until it is heard. These learners often benefit from reading text a loud. Auditory
learners interpret the underlying meaning of speeches through listening to tone of voice,
pitch, speed
Kinaesthetic learners
1
Are learners that learn through moving, doing and touching, learning becomes more
effective through a more active hands-on approach. These set of learners may find it hard to
sit still for long periods and may become distracted by their need for activity and exploration.
The big question is how do we know more about learning?, according to john holt many think
the best way is by doing research on the brain itself in order to understand the right-brain
left-brain theory which holds that for some kinds of thinking we use one side of our brain,
while for other kinds we use the other. I wanted to use this theory to balance the
understanding of the learning circle, although I have my reservations just as john holt
(1983c) also stresses in his book about Omni magazine in an article called
“brainstorms”....”the new right-left brain theory has already been disproved and that different
kinds of mental activities cannot be precisely located in either one side or the order”
Still, I thought it was important to test my year 9 set to find out how this theory will be
applicable towards helping out in understanding how they learn and how I can use it to raise
level of my teaching. It became particularly useful using the DCS training handout (2008)
Pupils are to put a tick where applicable in opposite each statement, count up the ticks within
each style section and put the total in the appropriate box
(Left Brain)
I like to understand how things work and how ideas have been developed
I like to make lists, work out timetables and have clear action plans
1
I learn best by studying things for myself
Total
I enjoy making connections between different topics, and enjoy finding out how ideas
link together
I can spend a lot of time thinking about work without actually getting down to it
I like to find new and original ways of completing and presenting work
I would rather work from, and produce, creative diagrams than straightforward lists
Total
I like clear purpose and direction I get bored easily and enjoy
moving on to new things
1
I like to know exactly what is I am not interested in detail
required or expected before starting
a project
I like to get on with a task and not be When I’m interested I get totally
sidetracked by new approaches and involved; when I’m not I shy away
alternatives from topics
I use lists, charts and graphs that I like asking lots of questions to
give data rather than attempt to be find out all I need to know
works of art
I read instructions carefully and work I like to take life as it comes and
methodically like timetables and be spontaneous
Total Total
The essence of this exercise was to build an awareness of the learning circle, help pupils
understand their learning preference, and based on scores, effort will be made to build on
strength and perhaps help area of weaknesses. The exercise is also to reinforce the
understanding that a combination of these learning styles will help make pupils better
learners
How did I develop the learning circle with the year 9 set?
The introductory exercise I gave examines how different types of learning are carried out by
different sides of the brain; the exercise was to explore pupil’s perceptions of learning and
how they learn, and to give pupils the opportunity to use the continuous cycle of learning. To
this end, I developed an activity to test how practicable this assumption is.
I started by explaining that the left and right sides of the brain are used for different sorts of
learning, and that we usually have preferences for using one side or the other. We learn
effectively when the two sides work together. For example, when we meet someone new,
1
the left side of the brain is used to remember the name and the right side to remember the
face.
What is learning?
How do we learn?
How do we learn?
Pupils’ responses led me to introducing the learning circle using the Fenman training
example: carrying out an action, reflection on what happened, adding concepts and theory to
make sense, applying it next time.
I explained further that learning a new skills requires a conscious effort to get it to completion
and that there is a dreaded disease on the way which is known as the action trap: many of
us carry out an action, but do not move to the next stage of The Learning Cycle. We just
continue to the next action, so we fail to complete our learning. To avoid the action trap we
must strive to complete the learning process.
I applied the concept constructively using a classroom teaching structure and plotted the
below graph as illustration
To represent graphically:
2
help pupils round the circles
participation is encouraged
success is achieved
with others
1
there is a chance to try it out in safety.
Is it practicable?
The exercise looked good on paper, I could not measure the full effectiveness because it
was a one off lesson. I had the feeling from my observation that students were engaged with
very little or no disruption. Pupil completed the task. As it was an exercise I practised on my
own, I suspected a possible mismatch between the learning opportunities I presented to
pupils, maybe because of not having enough time to conduct a thorough understanding of
the range of learning preference within the classroom, I had the temptation of steering more
into my preferred style rather than the learners, the concern about behaviour management
when applying the kinaesthetic activities and more importantly the time constraints.
• students can take ownership of learning and make them better learners.
• Student will have an understanding of the bigger picture and know the purpose of the
lesson and how it fits in with what has gone on before.
• Raises self esteem, recognising the social and emotional needs of student
However, Alan Pritchard (2005) added that applying VAK will encourages learners to find
things out themselves, from experience , I found out that pupils are more likely to access the
activities presented to them, and display enthusiasm and commitment to the subject they are
studying, remain on task and focused during group or practical activities.
The human mind is a mystery, getting far in education is a delusion if we think we can
measure, know, and control what goes on in children’s mind. To this extent I agree with John
Holt (1983d) who believes we cannot do much but to guide and support
In my mind’s ear I can hear the anxious voices of hundred of teacher asking me,
“How can you tell, how can you be sure what the children are learning? Or even that the
children are learning anything?” the answer is simple. We can’t tell. We can’t be sure. We do
not need to “motivate” children into learning, by wheedling, bribing, or bullying. We do not
need to keep picking away at their minds to make sure they are learning. What we need to
do and all we need to do, is bring as much of the world as much into school and classroom;
give children as much help and guidance as they need and ask for; listen respectively when
they feel like talking; and then get out of the way. We can trust them to do the rest. However,
sharing the same understanding with Holt, the use of VAK will empower the children to take
control, and If students feel they are in control over their learning and can attribute success
or failure to factors they have control over, then they will be motivated to work to improve
their learning and achievements. If, however, they attribute success or failure to factors
beyond their control they will lose the sense of power to influence this. Applying the learning
circle, I found out that pupils showed more willingness to participate in the learning process,
the probing questions I prepared and shared with the pupils served as guide. Pupils showed
a lot of enthusiasm all through the circle. The time constraint did not allow me enough time
to measure impact, however, it was a method worth trying.
1
Would it improve behaviour?
Using the VAK to plan and teach lessons, I discovered that it brought me closer to
understanding the needs of pupils; it encouraged a connection with pupils who initially were
unconnected with the work. The fact that I moved around, and the proximity to pupils helped
their emotional attachment with the activity, and during the learning circle, I constantly
reinforced the behaviours that I considered acceptable and rewarded those who did well with
praise and attention. In this way, the suggestion of behavioural Theorist John B Watson,
that rewards inform of written comments in books, stamps, stickers, formal commendation,
can add value to children, improve their behaviour and add value to the activity being done
in class, Alan Pritchard (2005c), reinforces the same view by suggesting that learning is
about changing behaviour, schools should encourage a reward system that will add value to
children and effect a change in their behaviours. Although I believe that this may not have a
direct impact in a learning activity as it does to establishing a pattern of behaviour within a
classroom. It is more to make children behave well rather than have a direct impact to
learning.
Alan Pritchard (2005d) also acknowledged that researchers also believe that it may also
have a negative effect. However, it proved motivating to the pupils in my lessons, everyone
wanted to participate, behave well, and contribute to the learning process.
Having explored the theories and styles of learning, the challenge was to put into practice
my findings in a classroom. In order to do that, I introduced a lesson about learning, and
from observation I found out the percentage of pupils in relation to learning styles. Visuals
and Auditory had more number of pupils, with kinaesthetic having a fewer number. The
challenge for me was to put this finding into planning, so as to adjust teaching strategies to
meet the needs of pupils.
I reflected on my teaching, listened to my recorded lesson to find out how balanced and
flexible I was. The essence was to ascertain the level of my awareness and response to
pupils exhibiting traits of VAK
How I moved in class? I checked on how expressive I was, as a lot of gestures will appeal to
visual learners, and whilst I moved amongst students giving assistance with, appealed more
to kinaesthetic as those learners appreciated proximity and the hands on help
Giving out new information what form do I prefer? I tell them (A ) but the V and the K will
benefit if I gave them to read on paper and or give a task for them to discover the
information (k), How I wonder if time constraints will allow me do this every lesson.
1
I paid attention to the challenging and the quieter ones. Seeking how they sit and which
remain upright and still listening to me (V) which students move about(K) who takes the front
row without an uninterrupted view of the teacher (V) which pupils talk a lot (A) who looks up
a lot(V) who looks down a lot?(K) which pupils fidget, fiddle, wriggle or tap?(K)
Task 4 Materials
I examined the type of activities students do to ascertain whether the learning channels were
well represented, as I only teach functional ICT skills in year 9, some activities and units
have videos and some interactive. I could not vary much of the materials, because it will
slow the pace of my classes in comparison with the pace of other classes from my
colleagues. Moreover, it will be more effective if the exercise was a whole departmental
approach in support from the school management.
Task 5
I took out my lesson plan, annotated each stage according to which channel the pupils will
be using, and also inserted activities that helps in balancing up the learning channel. Below
is the example of the lesson plan
Welcome students
Explain this is the first lesson on the health and safety associated with 3 mins
using computers (A)
10 mins
Load presentation and explain the basics (V) (A)
Send out work sheets and handouts around the class and Take
register. (K) (A) 2 mins
10 mins
1
Ask students to work on the computers start on Task 2 on the
worksheet handout. Inform students they are to look at hand out to
identify health hazards. (K)
Go around the room assisted any students who require help (K)
35 mins
approx
25 mins
Conclusion: (15
mins)
Set home work – See Continuity Task “”Thoroughly explain that these
tasks, whilst optional, will greatly assist them in their work for Task B“”
6 mins
Dismiss class.
Conclusion
1
The learning style and learning circles should be combined together as element that can be
used to improved the teaching and learning in a classroom.
The learning circle will involve the use of VAK and other constructive methods as highlighted
by pupils. It is important that every teacher recognises different learning styles of pupils and
apply strategies to implement them. Pupils will learn more effectively and be able to connect
their understanding of task to other areas of their lives.
Teachers will need to be trained to apply VAK in the planning of lessons, and identifying
learning styles of people should be a whole school priority rather than departments or
teachers.
In reflection, if I am to plan the integration of the learning styles and learning circle again
Undertake an audit of the learning styles of the pupils either in a year group, or even key
stage,
review the schemes of work in the light of that audit to determine how well to accommodate
the range of learning styles that has identified (maybe audit the schemes of work from the
perspective of a chosen theory, either VAK, multiple intelligences or Gregorc’s four styles of
thinking)
work collaboratively to modify those schemes of work to take account of findings, providing
both range and choice in learning opportunities and outcomes.
With another teacher, create an observation schedule which focuses on the way in which the
lesson accommodates different learning preferences and the impact of this upon the pupils’
learning. Use this schedule with one or more of each other’s lessons and give feedback.
However, time constraints and who will assume responsibility for implementation, and
whether management will give support, are challenges that needs to be worked out.
1
References
Alan Pritchard Learning (2005a) Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom, Great
Britain: David Fulton Publishers.
Alan Pritchard Learning (2005b) Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom, Great
Britain: David Fulton Publishers
Alan Pritchard Learning (2005c) Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom, Great
Britain: David Fulton Publishers
2
John Holt (1983a), How Children Learn, USA: Da Capo Press.
John Nisbet and JanetShucksmith (1986)’ Learning Strategies, London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Jon Nixon, Jane martin, Penny Mckeown, Stewart Ranson, (1996), ‘Encouraging Learning’,
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Keira Sewell (2008) Doing your PGCE at Masters Level, a Guide for Student being
Professional as a Teacher, Great Britain: David Fulton
Michael Shayer and Philip Adey, (2002), Learning Intelligence: Cognitive Acceleration
across the Curriculum from 5 to 15 years’, Buckingham: Open University Press
Richard Riding (2000) Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour, Great
Britain : David Fulton Publishers.
Richard Riding (2002) ‘School Learning and Cognitive style, Great Britain: David Fulton