928 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices
and acceptability status of chemicals in
inert mixtures;
4. Maintain existing files of all inert
ingredient mixture compositional data
submitted to the Agency;
5. Receive new compositional
information from suppliers;
6. Scan an image pesticide inert
ingredient master file submission
documents into an image database.
This contract involves no
subcontractors.
The OPP has determined that the
contracts described in this document
involve work that is being conducted in
connection with FIFRA, in that
pesticide chemicals will be the subject
of certain evaluations to be made under
this contract. These evaluations may be
used in subsequent regulatory decisions
under FIFRA.
Some of this information may be
entitled to confidential treatment. The
information has been submitted to EPA
under sections 3, 4, 6, and 7 of FIFRA
and under sections 408 and 409 of
FFDCA.
In accordance with the requirements
of 40 CFR 2.307(h)(3), the contracts with
Lockheed Martin, prohibits use of the
information for any purpose not
specified in these contracts; prohibits
disclosure of the information to a third
party without prior written approval
from the Agency; and requires that each
official and employee of the contractor
sign an agreement to protect the
information from unauthorized release
and to handle it in accordance with the
FIFRA Information Security Manual. In
addition, Lockheed Martin is required to
submit for EPA approval a security plan
under which any CBI will be secured
and protected against unauthorized
release or compromise. No information
will be provided to Lockheed Martin
until the requirements in this document
have been fully satisfied. Records of
information provided to Lockheed
Martin will be maintained by EPA
Project Officers for these contracts. All
information supplied to Lockheed
Martin by EPA for use in connection
with these contracts will be returned to
EPA when Lockheed Martin has
completed its work.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Business
and industry, Government contracts,
Government property, Security
measures.
Dated: December 29, 2005.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Brenda Despanza,
Acting Director, Information Technology and
Resources Management Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–27 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 208001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6671–1]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20050389, ERP No. D–FHW–
J40171–CO, US Highway 160,
Transportation Improvements from
Junction U.S. 160/550 Durango—East
to Bayfield, US Army COE Section
404 Permit, La Plata County, CO.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns with the proposed project
regarding impacts to wetlands and
cumulative impacts to air quality.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050433, ERP No. D–FHW–
F40433–WI, US Highway 12,
Improvement from US12/WI–26
North Fort Atkinson Interchange to
Whitewater Bypass, Funding, Rock
and Jefferson Counties, WI.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns with the proposed project
regarding impacts to wetlands and water
quality as well as secondary and
cumulative impacts. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20050461, ERP No. F–AFS–
J65416–WY, Bighorn National Forest
Revised Land and Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Big Horn Mountain Range, Bighorn
National Forest, Johnson, Sheridan,
Bighorn, and Washakie Counties, WY.
Summary: While the Final EIS and
selected alternative improve monitoring
for grazing activities, EPA continues to
have environmental concerns with
potential adverse environmental
impacts, including cumulative impacts
to water quality, fisheries and wildlife
habitat from new road construction,
timber harvest and an 85% reduction of
roadless areas.
EIS No. 20050486, ERP No. F–AFS–
L65479–0R, Timberline Express
Project, To Improve the Winter
Recreational Opportunities,
Implementation, Zigzag Ranger
PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
District, Mt. Hood National Forest,
Clackamas County, OR.
Summary: The final EIS addressed
EPA’s environmental concerns about
water resources, habitat fragmentation,
and infrastructure constraints.
Dated: January 3, 2006.
Clifford Rader,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6–25 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6670–9]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 12/27/2005 through 12/30/2005
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20050548, Draft EIS, NPS, NC,
North Shore Road, Great Smoky
Mountains National Park, General
Management Plan, Implementation,
Fontana Dam, Swain County, NC,
Comment Period Ends: 02/21/2006,
Contact: Imelda Wegwerth 865–436–
1302.
EIS No. 20050549, Draft EIS, BLM, AZ,
Aqua Fria National Monument and
Bradshaw-Harquahala, Proposed
Resource Management Plan,
Implementation, Yavapai County, AZ,
Comment Period Ends: 04/07/2006,
Contact: Chris Horyza 623–580–5628.
EIS No. 20050550, Final EIS, AFS, CA,
North Fork Eel Grazing Allotment
Management Project, Proposing to
Authorize Cattle Grazing on Four
Allotment, Six Rivers National Forest,
Mad River Ranger District, North Fork
Eel River and Upper Mad River,
Trinity County, CA, Wait Period Ends:
02/06/2006, Contact: Julie Ranieri
707–441–3673.
EIS No. 20050551, Draft EIS, NAS, 00,
Programmatic—Development of
Advanced Radioisotope Power
Systems, Two New Advanced RPS’s:
Multi-Mission Radioisotope
Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG)
and Stirling Radioisotope Generator
(SRG), Comment Period Ends: 02/21/
2006, Contact: Dr. Ajay Misra 202–
358–1588.
EIS No. 20050552, Draft EIS, FRC, FL,
Cypress Pipeline Project and Phase
VII Expansion Project, Construction
and Operation, U.S. Army COE
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1