76764 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
superimposed layers) and of a width of
0.5 inch or greater, or in straight lengths
which, if of a thickness less than 4.75
millimeters, are of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater and which measures at least
10 times the thickness or if of a
thickness of 4.75 millimeters or more
are of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness, as currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item
numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060,
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030,
7210.49.0090, 7210.61.0000,
7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030,
7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090,
7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000,
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000,
7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000,
7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000,
7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500,
7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560,
7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030,
7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090. Included in
these orders are flat–rolled products of
non–rectangular cross-section where
such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process (i.e.,
products which have been ‘‘worked
after rolling’’) for example, products
which have been beveled or rounded at
the edges. Excluded from these orders
are flat–rolled steel products either
plated or coated with tin, lead,
chromium, chromium oxides, both tin
and lead (‘‘terne plate’’), or both
chromium and chromium oxides (‘‘tin–
free steel’’), whether or not painted,
varnished or coated with plastics or
other nonmetallic substances in
addition to the metallic coating. Also
excluded from these orders are clad
products in straight lengths of 0.1875
inch or more in composite thickness
and of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness. Also excluded from these
orders are certain clad stainless flat–
rolled products, which are three–
layered corrosion–resistant carbon steel
flat–rolled products less than 4.75
millimeters in composite thickness that
consist of a carbon steel flat–rolled
product clad on both sides with
stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20% ratio.
On September 22, 1999, the
Department issued the final results of a
changed circumstances review partially
revoking the order with respect to
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
certain corrosion–resistant steel from
Germany.2 This partial revocation
2 See
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Reviews and Revocation of Orders in Part: Certain
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:37 Dec 27, 2005 Jkt 208001
applies to certain corrosion–resistant
deep–drawing carbon steel strip, roll–
clad on both sides with aluminum
(AlSi) foils in accordance with St3 LG
as to EN 10139/10140. The
merchandise’s chemical composition
encompasses a core material of U St 23
(continuous casting) in which carbon is
less than 0.08; manganese is less than
0.30; phosphorous is less than 0.20;
sulfur is less than 0.015; aluminum is
less than 0.01; and the cladding material
is a minimum of 99% aluminum with
silicon/copper/iron of less than 1%. The
products are in strips with thicknesses
of 0.07mm to 4.0mm (inclusive) and
widths of 5mm to 800mm (inclusive).
The thickness ratio of aluminum on
either side of steel may range from 3%/
94%/3% to 10%/80%/10%.
The HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and Customs
purposes. The written description
remains dispositive.
Initiation of Changed Circumstances
Reviews
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, the Department will conduct a
changed circumstances review upon
receipt of information concerning, or a
request from an interested party for a
review of, an AD duty order which
shows changed circumstances sufficient
to warrant a review of the order. As
noted above, on November 7, 2005,
Eutectic requested a ruling from the
Department in accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(b) to exclude the ‘‘wear plate’’
product described above from these AD
orders. Therefore, pursuant to section
751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216(b), we are initiating changed
circumstances reviews. Although
petitioners and domestic interested
parties have expressed a lack of interest
in the orders with respect to the ‘‘wear
plate’’ product in question, they did not
claim that they represent substantially
all of the production of the domestic
like product, nor has the Department
made such a determination. Therefore,
the Department is not, at this time,
preliminarily revoking the AD orders
with respect to the product in question
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i).
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this initiation, or to
demonstrate that the petitioners and
domestic interested parties account for
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product.
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Germany, 64 FR 51292 (September 22, 1999). The
Department noted that the affirmative statement of
no interest by petitioners, combined with the lack
of comments from interested parties, is sufficient to
warrant partial revocation.
PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit
comments which the Department will
take into account in the preliminary
results of these reviews. The due date
for filing any such comments is no later
than 15 days after publication of this
notice. Responses to those comments
may be submitted not later than 7 days
following submission of the comments.
All written comments must be
submitted in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of preliminary
results of changed circumstances
reviews in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4) and 351.221(c)(3)(i),
which will set forth the Department’s
preliminary factual and legal
conclusions. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will
have an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. The Department
will issue its final results of review in
accordance with the time limits set forth
in 19 CFR 351.216(e).
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and section
351.221(b) of the Department’s
regulations.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–7983 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–485–803]
Notice of Extension of Final Results of
the 2003–2004 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Cut–
to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from
Romania
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Edwards, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 7, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–8029.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 8, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
28DEN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of this administrative review of
certain cut–to-length carbon steel plate
(‘‘cut–to-length plate’’) from Romania.
See Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate from Romania: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission, 70 FR 53333 (September 8,
2005) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In the
Preliminary Results we stated that we
would make our final determination for
the antidumping duty review no later
than 120 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results
(i.e., January 6, 2006).
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results
The Department is extending the time
limit for the final results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on cut–to-
length plate from Romania. This review
covers the period August 1, 2003,
through July 31, 2004.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), states
that if it is not practicable to complete
the review within the time specified, the
administering authority may extend the
120-day period, following the date of
publication of the preliminary results, to
issue its final results by an additional 60
days. Due to the complexity of issues
raised in this review segment, including
the respondent’s notification of
unreported sales following the
Department’s preliminary results, and
the respondent’s withdrawal of its
business proprietary versions of all
information submitted on the record of
this review, the completion of the final
results within the 120-day period is not
practicable.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for issuing
the final results of review by an
additional 31 days until no later than
February 6, 2006.
Dated: December 21, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–7985 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:37 Dec 27, 2005 Jkt 208001
76765
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Qingdao Xintianfeng, XuZhou Simple,
and Longtai certified that they grew and
International Trade Administration exported the garlic on which they based
their requests for a new shipper review.
A–570–831 Qingdao Camel certified that Jinxiang
County Lufeng Agricultural Production
Fresh Garlic From the People’s Material Co., Ltd. (‘‘Lufeng’’) grew the
Republic of China; Initiation of New subject merchandise it exported.
Shipper Reviews Qingdao Saturn certified that
Changshan County Taifeng Agricultural
AGENCY: Import Administration,
By–Products Processing Co., Ltd.
International Trade Administration,
(‘‘Taifeng’’) grew the subject
Department of Commerce.
merchandise that it exported.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 28, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Initiation of New Shipper Reviews
(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
requests for new shipper reviews of the the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2),
from the People’s Republic of China Qingdao Camel, Qingdao Saturn,
(‘‘PRC’’), received in September and Qingdao Xiantianfeng, Longtai, and
November 2005, meet the statutory and XuZhou Simple certified that they did
regulatory requirements for initiation. not export fresh garlic to the United
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) of these States during the period of investigation
new shipper reviews is November 1, (‘‘POI’’). In addition, Lufang and
2004, through October 31, 2005. Taifeng, producers of the subject
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: merchandise, exported by Qingdao
Ryan A. Douglas or Jim Nunno, AD/CVD Camel and Qingdao Saturn,
respectively, provided certifications that
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade they did not export the subject
Administration, U.S. Department of merchandise to the United States during
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution the POI, pursuant to section
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR
telephone: (202) 482–1277 and (202) 351.214(b)(2)(ii)(B). Pursuant to section
482–0783, respectively. 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) and 19 CFR
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), all companies
discussed above certified that, since the
Background initiation of the investigation, they have
The notice announcing the never been affiliated with any exporter
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic or grower who exported fresh garlic to
from the PRC was published on the United States during the POI,
November 16, 1994. See Antidumping including those not individually
Duty Order: Fresh Garlic From the examined during the investigation. As
People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B),
(November 16, 1994). The Department these companies also certified that their
received five timely requests for a new export activities are not controlled by
shipper review in accordance with 19 the central government of the PRC.
In addition to the certifications
CFR 351.214(d)(1), dated as follows:
described above, each exporter
Date Requester submitted documentation establishing
the following: (1) the date on which it
September 30, first shipped fresh garlic for export to
2005 ................ Qingdao Camel Trading the United States and the date on which
Co., Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao the fresh garlic was first entered, or
Camel’’) withdrawn from warehouse, for
November 2,
consumption; (2) the volume of its first
2005 ................ Qingdao Xintianfeng
Foods Co., Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao shipment and the volume of subsequent
shipments; and (3) the date of its first
Xintianfeng’’)
November 15, sale to an unaffiliated customer in the
2005 ................ XuZhou Simple Garlic United States.
Industry Co., Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
Ltd.(‘‘XuZhou Simple’’) Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are
November 29, initiating five new shipper reviews for
2005 ................ Qingdao Saturn shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC:
International Trade Co., (1) grown by Lufeng and exported by
Ltd.(‘‘Qingdao Saturn’’) Qingdao Camel,
November 30, (2) grown by Taifeng and exported by
2005 ................ Shandong Longtai Fruits
and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
Qingdao Saturn,
(‘‘Longtai’’)
(3) grown and exported by Qingdao
Xiantianfeng,
PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1