Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
published in the Federal Register on
January 9, 2002 (66 FR 1191). A public
scoping meeting was held in Pendleton,
Oregon, on January 23, 2003, to solicit
comments and ideas. On November 6,
2003, an open house was held in
Pendleton, Oregon, to update the public
on the National Environmental Policy
Act compliance process for the
proposed project. All comments
presented throughout the process have
been considered.
Public Comment Availability
Comments, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
mailing address shown in the
ADDRESSES section during regular
business hours, 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Individual respondents may
request confidentiality. If you wish us to
withhold your name and/or address
from public review or from disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your written comment.
Such requests will be honored to the
extent allowed by law. We will not,
however, consider anonymous
comments. All submissions from
organizations or businesses and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
Authority
This notice is published in
accordance with section 1503.1 of the
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through
1508) implementing the procedural
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and
the Department of Interior Manual (516
DM 1–6), and is in the exercise of
authority delegated to the Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs by 209 DM 8.1.
Dated: December 8, 2005.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E5–7413 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001
74845
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–079–06–1010–PH]
Notice of Public Meeting, Western
Montana Resource Advisory Council
Meeting
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), the Western
Montana Resource Advisory Council
will meet as indicated below.
DATES: The next two regular meetings of
the Western Montana RAC will be held
February 22, 2006 at the Butte Field
Office, 106 N. Parkmont, Butte, Montana
and May 11, 2006 at the Missoula Field
Office, 3255 Fort Missoula Road,
Missoula, Montana beginning at 9 a.m.
The public comment period for both
meetings will begin at 11:30 a.m. and
the meetings are expected to adjourn at
approximately 3 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
the Western Montana RAC, contact
Marilyn Krause, Resource Advisory
Council Coordinator, at the Butte Field
Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte,
Montana 59701, telephone 406–533–
7617.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-
member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior, through the Bureau of
Land Management, on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in western Montana. At the
February 22 meeting, topics we plan to
discuss include: a Montana Challenge
presentation by Montana Fish, Wildlife,
and Parks, election of officers, an update
on the Recreation RACs, a briefing on
the White House Conservation
Conference and impacts related to the
Pombo Mining Bill (if passed). Topics
for the May 11 meeting will be
determined at the February meeting.
All meetings are open to the public.
The public may present written
comments to the Council. Each formal
Council meeting will also have time
allocated for hearing public comments.
Depending on the number of persons
wishing to comment and time available,
the time for individual oral comments
may be limited. Individuals who plan to
attend and need special assistance, such
as sign language interpretation, or other
PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
reasonable accommodations, should
contact the BLM as provided below.
Dated: December 12, 2005.
Steven Hartmann,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E5–7459 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1098
(Preliminary)]
Liquid Sulfur Dioxide From Canada
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines,2 pursuant to
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there
is no reasonable indication that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured or threatened with
material injury, or that the
establishment of an industry in the
United States is materially retarded, by
reason of imports from Canada of liquid
sulfur dioxide, provided for in
subheading 2811.23.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that are alleged to be sold
in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV).
Background
On September 30, 2005, a petition
was filed with the Commission and the
U.S. Department of Commerce
(Commerce) by Calabrian Corp.,
Kingwood, TX, alleging that an industry
in the United States is materially
injured by reason of LTFV imports of
liquid sulfur dioxide from Canada.
Accordingly, effective September 30,
2005, the Commission instituted
antidumping duty investigation No.
731–TA–1098 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigation and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of October 7, 2005 (70
FR 58747). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on October 20, 2005,
and all persons who requested the
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Chairman Stephen Koplan dissenting.
16DEN1
 74846 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on December
12, 2005. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3826 (December 2005), entitled Liquid
Sulfur Dioxide from Canada:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1098
(Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 12, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7449 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–340–E and H
(Second Review)]
Solid Urea From Russia And Ukraine
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,2
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on solid urea from Russia
and Ukraine would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on October 1, 2004 (69 FR
58957) and determined on January 4,
2005 that it would conduct full reviews
(70 FR 2882, January 18, 2005). Notice
of the scheduling of the Commission’s
reviews and of a public hearing to be
held in connection therewith was given
by posting copies of the notice in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register on April
13, 2005 (70 FR 19502). The hearing was
held in Washington, DC, on September
22, 2005, and all persons who requested
the opportunity were permitted to
appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR § 207.2(f)).
2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun,
Commissioner Jennifer A. Hillman, and
Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff dissenting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001
Secretary of Commerce on December 13,
2005. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3821
(December 2005), entitled Solid Urea
from Russia and Ukraine: Investigations
Nos. 731–TA–340–E & H (Second
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E5–7445 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to OMB and solicitation of
public comment.
SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a
submittal to OMB for review of
continued approval of information
collections under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: Billing Instructions for NRC
Cost Type Contracts.
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0109.
3. How often the collection is
required: Monthly and on occasion.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
NRC Contractors.
5. The number of annual respondents:
55.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: The total annual contractor
burden for the Billing Instructions and
License Fee Recovery Cost Summary for
NRC cost type contracts is estimated to
be 1,070 hours. Billing burden is 754
hours plus 316 hours for License Fee
Recovery Cost burden.
7. Abstract: In administering its
contracts, the NRC Division of Contracts
provides Billing Instructions for its
contractors to follow in preparing
invoices. These instructions stipulate
the level of detail for supporting data
that must be submitted for NRC review.
The review of this information ensures
that all payments made by the NRC are
for valid and reasonable costs in
accordance with the contract terms and
conditions.
PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
Submit, by February 14, 2006,
comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
1. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
2. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site (http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/index.html. The
document will be available on the NRC
homepage site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the
information collection requirements
may be directed to the NRC Clearance
Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton (T–5 F53),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, by
telephone at 301–415–7233, or by
Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of December 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E5–7451 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. PROJ0734, PROJ0735,
PROJ0736, POOM–32]
Draft Interim Concentration Averaging
Guidance for Waste Determinations
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Draft Interim
Guidance.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing draft
interim guidance on concentration
averaging for public comment. The NRC
is currently in the process of preparing
a Standard Review Plan (SRP) to
provide guidance to NRC staff regarding
reviews of waste determinations
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1