Main Site

Home

All Posts

All Posts
Home All Posts Conservation in the News The Movie Art and Craft: A Conservators Perspective

The Movie Art and Craft: A

Conservators Perspective

Search..

Posted in: Conservation in the News, Ethics and Standards, Outreach and Advocacy | October 14, 2014
3 Comments
Conservators have an uneasy relationship with forgery. Often knee-jerk reactions arise: outrage,
indignation, feelings of being duped, and sometimes a closet admiration of a particular craft skill. While
certainly valid, and generally true, they can be somewhat of a conversation stopper. Deep down, I find
myself a bit envious that forgers get so much media attention, and that this attention is generally
overwhelmingly sympathetic. Conservation is just as interesting, right?
Some examinations of philosophic aspects forgery within the field of conservation include AICs 2007
Annual Meeting, Fakes, Forgeries and Fabrications and tangential papers like conservation rock star
Salvador Munoz Vinass 2011 The Frankenstein Syndrome in Ethics and Critical Thinking in Conservation.
Once, I discovered a forged portion of a Gutenberg Bible I was working on, thankfully it belonged to an
institutional client, rather than a private one. Since we spend a lot of time looking at very small things,
maybe it is difficult to change perspective, take the optivisor off, and look at this issue a bit more broadly.

Search

Search by Category
Select Category

Tags

AIC's 38th Annual

Meeting AIC's 39th
AIC

Annual Meeting
AIC's 40th Annual
Meeting AIC's 41st
Annual Meeting

AIC's 42nd Annual

Meeting
AIC wiki
AIC-CERT

The movie Art and Craft tells the story of Mark Landis, a contemporary forger. It is an entirely enjoyable
film, the directors allow Landis to show and tell his story with little interference. The film clearly articulates
his reasons and motivations for forgery while not becoming overly romantic. Landis, a diagnosed
schizophrenic, is shown visiting his therapists and at home, generally watching tv and copying pictures
from art books at the same time. He is quite likely more a victim of the system more than someone taking
advantage of it. A couple of times he is shown engaging in quotidian activities; eating a dinner of melba
toast dipped into a container of margarine, for example.

analytical techniques

archaeological

conservation archaeology art

conservation ASG awards

papers

CIPP

call for

collection care

Collection Care Network

conference reviews

conservation conservation

education conservation fiction Cuba

documentation ECPN ecpn forum

Emerging Conservation Professionals

Network health and safety HVAC ICOM-CC
IMLS

outreach

Group Philadelphia

Painting Specialty

preventive conservation

preservation

San

Francisco sustainability

Sustainability Committee Textile

Conservation training treatments
WAG Workshop workshops

Blogroll
American Museum of Natural History In

Their True Colors

Antarctic Conservation
Artful Science
At The Bench
Behind The Scenes at the National Libraries
of Australia
Beth Heller Conservation
Branches of the Same Tree
Brooklyn Museum Art Conservation
Department
Caryatid Conservation Services, Inc.
Chedworth Excavations
Conversations on conservation of cultural
heritage
Cracking The Collections
Cross-Sections
Cultural Heritage Science Open Source
e-Conservation Magazine blog
Ellen Carrlee Conservation
Emerging Conservators Professional
Network Blog
Gordion Objects Conservation
Mark Landis. Source: <http://i.imgur.com/XzrQz4K.jpg>

Heritage Without Borders

Early on, the film reveals his primary motivation for creating forgeries: he wants to be a philanthropist. But

Historic Jamestown

he realizes quite quickly it is hard to be a philanthropist without money or art to give away; he had to

IFACC Conservation Class of 2016

create the art in order to distribute it. Also, he liked being treated like a philanthropist, and he
admits becoming addicted to it. Who wouldnt? So he keeps making more forgeries. The film delves into his
personality, much of which seems to be strongly influenced by a tv that always seemed to be on. He is selfaware of these influences, and tells others of their source. For example, he started smoking because he saw
characters in 1940s movies smoking to calm down, so he thought it would help calm his nerves, and curb
his compulsion to pace.
The film emphasizes the naturalness, almost an innocence, of his desire to copy works of art. The
motivations behind many forgers (which are generally not pecuniary by the way) are often egotistically
motivated: proving oneself equal to the great artists or getting even with the art experts by exposing their
ignorance. In addition to his philanthropic desires, Landis also simply likes to copy things, again because it
calms him down. Repetitive hand motions and using hand-eye coordination is comforting to him. Sound
familiar?
The antagonist in this film is a Matthew Leininger, a museum registrar, who originally noticed a number of
identical paintings in numerous museums, and over the years slowly closed in on Landis. When seeing

IIC News Blog

In the Artifact Lab: Conserving Egyptian
Mummies
Indianapolis Museum of Art Blog
Inside the Conservator's Studio
Iraqi Institute
Jeff Peachey
Kelsey Museum of Archaeology Dig Diaries
Museum 2.0
Museum Musings

some of the paintings, the audience wonders how they could have fooled anyone. Many are not of Eric

Museum Textile Services blog

Hebborn or Elmyr de Hory caliber, though Landis is certainly capable of finely crafted work. Many of his

National Museum of American History

forgeries are a color photocopy of a work with acrylic medium smeared on the surface, to resemble
brushstrokes. The materials he uses are all standard off the shelf art supplies from Michaels, and the
frames from Home Depot, though he slightly antiques them. He often photocopies a certificate of sale from
a major auction house or defunct gallery to aid in establishing provenance and adheres this to the back.

Once In a Whale
Parks Library Preservation
Preservation & Conservation Administration
News
Preservation Services at Dartmouth College

Preservation Underground Duke

University
Pulp and Circumstance
Pulp Fixin'
Repair the Tear
RISD Museum Notes
Save Your Stuff Blog
Smithsonian Collections Blog
Texas State Library & Archives Commission
The Still Room
UCLA Library Preservation
UCLA/Getty Conservation Program
University Products blog
USS Monitor Center
Voices of the Past
When Super Glue Won't Do

The Mona Lisa, Mark Landis, 2014. On view at Think Coffee, NYC. Photo by Jeff Peachey.
In Think Coffee, a coffee shop near the Angelica Film Center in NYC where I saw the film, an original Mark
Landis painting hangs. In this case, he has signed his own name, and the price tag is $25,000. When I saw
it, there was no red dot on the label. The painting is hanging in an ordinary wall space above a seat. I
hesitate to call it a forgery, since it would be impossible, I think, for anyone to confuse this with the real
thing. It looks like a color photocopy with acrylic medium and some painted additions, though the light is
pretty low. Is it a forgery of a forgery? Or a copy of a copy? Or just a photocopy with some paint on it?
Landis is quite cavalier concerning his lack of interest in technical details. In an online reddit interview he
dismissively leaves it to others. And as far as artists that use brushstrokes, its something I never really
gave much thought to. Experts supposedly can tell things like that, an expert is just someone who knows a
great deal about something and sometimes hes right. And what does it say about our culture that many
museum professionals dont bother to look closely enough to tell a photocopy from a painting? Is it the
result of looking at most things reproduced through a computer screen? To be fair, the film does show
other examples of his work, drawing and paintings, that are very skillfully executed.
Typical of Landis, he spins a variety conflicting press reports about his work, even the copy of Mona Lisa on
display. Was it was painted in 90 minutes as is generally reported or did it take an entire weekend? If sold,
will the proceeds benefit the museum in his hometown, the Lauren Rogers Museum? The museums
marketing director denies this is true. Again, according to the reddit interview, the most one of his
paintings has sold for is $800.
Here we enter an interesting terrain: Landis, who by copying so earnestly, and seemingly created by his
media environment, may convolute some of the Benjaminian notions of the aura of authenticity and the
copy. He compulsively recreates copies of copies, over and over, quite likely unable to stop despite
protests and essentially being caught. Landis himself admits he has not seen most of the works he copies,
only reproductions. There seems to be no authentic work to be copied in his world. He becomes a
Warholian performance artist, quite possibly the value of his work in is the transactions, and the changes in
perception of the value of his work: genuine, forgery, doesnt matter?

Landis does not confine himself to assume the persona of a wealthy philanthropist, there are references to
at least three other characters he portrays. In one hilarious scene (shown in the trailer below), he is
dressed as a catholic priest, and shown blessing a unknowing recipient.
A question that comes up in the movie that is often asked of forgersin fact, sometimes restorers and
conservators is why dont you create your own work? Landis is charasticly straightforward when he
replies that he doesnt have anything he wants to paint, he just likes copying others work. It is hard for the
viewer to resent him. Indeed, he wants come clean, and earn a living based on his skills, as his website
selling copies of photographs indicates. A charcoal or pencil drawing starts at $250, and a painting in
acrylic or oil is $650. There is an interesting caveat you must click: I certify that the photos provided are
owned by me and do not represent an attempt to commit a forgery of copyrighted work. Good idea, an
invitation for more forgery, or a bit of bravado?
I left the movie feeling his forgeries were not only harmless, but in fact a positive thing: he really was
making people happy by giving them gifts, and he seemed to get pleasure from it. What more could we ask
from a transaction? Leininger, the registrar, is presented as the killjoy. And even though Landis has
tentatively agreed not to gift forgeries to institutions, the movie ends with him headed in a new direction,
with similar ethical questions and even less accountability.
Forgers and magicians are experts at misdirection. Landis even compares himself to a magician at one
point, when someone asked how he painted his Mona Lisa. Well, its like a magic trick you know. If I told
people, it wouldnt be worth anything anymore. Has Landis manipulating the director to miss the essential
elements of his ethical, if not legal crimes? Could this entire film be considered a meta-forgery, where the
viewer is the one duped? The thought even crossed my mind that he might produce obvious forgeries in
order to continue producing more sophisticated ones.

Art and Craft provides an entertaining and engaging conversation starter for a number of issues
surrounding forgery.
.

_________________
OTHER RESOURCES
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction in Illuminations, New York:
Schocken Books, 2007. This extremely important essay comes up in virtually every discussion of forgery.

F is for Fake Movie. Dir. Orson Wells. 1974. A tangled web involving Elymr de Hory and Clifford Irving.
Hebborn, Eric. Confessions of a Master Forger: The Updated Autobiography. London: Cassell, 1997.
Regardless how you feel about him, he is a skilled and entertaining writer with a fascinating history.
Hebborn, Eric. The Art Forgers Handbook. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press, 1997. This is a how-to
book.

Irving, Clifford. Fake!: The Story of Elmyr de Hory the Greatest Art Forger of Our Time. New York: McGrawHill, 1969. Irvings interest in forgery became more than academic; he later faked an autobiography of
Howard Hughes. Is forgery a contagious disease?
Meyers, Robin and Michael Harris, eds. Fakes & Frauds: Varieties of Deception in Print and Manuscript. New
Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 1996. A collection of essays dealing with forged books and documents.
Schwartz, Hillel. The Culture of the Copy: Striking Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles. New York: Zone
Books, 1996. A lengthy examination of twins, doppelgngers, self-portraits, seeing double, ditto,
reenactment, replication and more in 565 pages.
Radnoti, Sandor. Fake: Forgery and Its Place in Art, trans. Ervin Dunai. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999. An important philosophical take on forgery.
Any other favorites?

About the author

JeffPeachey
Jeffrey S. Peachey is the owner of a New York City-based studio for the conservation
of books. Currently he is preoccupied with making tools out of Delrin.

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Statement of ISIS Destruction of

Proposal for the creation of an AIC

Cultural Heritage from AIC Board

Collections Care Network

President, Pamela Hatchfield

September 19, 2011

March 9, 2015
Job Posting: Sculpture Conservator

41st Annual Meeting Paintings

Nasher Sculpture Center (Dallas, TX)

Session, Friday May 31, Panel

March 6, 2015

Discussion: Current Challenges and

ECPN Officer Vacancies

March 5, 2015

Opportunities in Paintings
Conservation by Levenson, Phenix,
Hill Stoner, Proctor
June 2, 2013
ECPN Webinar on Self-Advocacy and
Fundraising for Personal Research
featuring Debra Hess Norris on July
26th: Call for Questions
June 28, 2012

3 Responses to The Movie Art and Craft: A

Conservators Perspective
Registrar Trek: The Next Generation FAUX Real: News from Art and
October 20, 2014
Craft
[] also wanted to share this blog from the American Institute for Conservation
(http://www.conservators-converse.org/2014/10/the-movie-art-and-craft-a-conservatorsperspective/). A very well thought out piece from the []
Reply

Registrar Trek: Die Nchste Generation Richtig geflscht:

October 20, 2014
Neuigkeiten von Art and Craft
[] mchte Sie auch auf diesen Blog des American Institute for Conservation aufmerksam machen
(http://www.conservators-converse.org/2014/10/the-movie-art-and-craft-a-conservatorsperspective/). Der Blogger hat da einen wohlberlegten Beitrag []
Reply

Registrador Trek: La Nueva Generacin Falso Real: Noticias de Art

October 30, 2014
and Craft
[] quera compartir este blog del Instituto Americano para la Conservacin (http://www.conservatorsconverse.org/2014/10/the-movie-art-and-craft-a-conservators-perspective/). Un post muy bien
pensado por parte del []
Reply

Leave a Reply
Name *

Email *

Website

Post Comment

About
Conservators Converse is the blog of the

Archives
Select Month

American Institute for Conservation of Historic

and Artistic Works (AIC). We encourage AIC
members and interested parties to join in on the
conservation about what conservators do, how

Popular Posts

they do it and where they work. AIC does not

Proposal for the creation of an AIC

necessarily endorse the opinions expressed in the

Collections Care Network

independent posts; nor does AIC vet position

September 19, 2011

announcement postings. We encourage job

seekers to conduct their own research to
determine if the advertised position is right for
them. Have something to contribute? Please
contact our e-Editor using the email contact form
to the right.

41st Annual Meeting Paintings

Session, Friday May 31, Panel
Discussion: Current Challenges and
Opportunities in Paintings
Conservation by Levenson, Phenix,

Manage Your Login

Log in
Entries R SS
Comments R SS
WordPress.org

Email AICs e-Editor

Name *
Email *

Contact Us
202-452-9545
info@conservation-us.org
www.conservation-us.org
1156 15th Street NW, Suite 320
Washington DC 20005-1714

Hill Stoner, Proctor

June 2, 2013
ECPN Webinar on Self-Advocacy and
Fundraising for Personal Research
featuring Debra Hess Norris on July
26th: Call for Questions
June 28, 2012

Copyright 2012 American Institute for Conservation. All Rights Reserved

Submit