Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2 types of Debate:
Developing a proposition
The
proposition
must
involve
a
debatable topic
The proposition should entail only one
statement for the affirmative to prove
The proposition should have enough
arguments on both sides so that the
debate is fair
The topic should hold interest of the
debaters over the course of the debate
period
Propositions fall into 3 categories:
Proposition of fact: is a statement
that can be proved using some kind of a
measurement (e.g. increasing taxes on
cigarettes will reduce smoking)
Proposition of value: requires the
affirmative to persuade the judges and
audience to accept an opinion or value
(e.g. active euthanasia is immoral)
Proposition
of
policy:
recommends
taking a certain kind of action (e.g.
there should be a ban on advertising of
all tobacco products)
Qualities of propositions:
It must be debatable or controversial
It must be in the form of assertion
It involves only one central idea
It must be susceptible to only
interpretation
It places the burden of proof in
affirmative
It must not be very broad
It
must
avoid
abstractions
generalizations
It should be unprejudiced, simple,
clear
It should be interesting
one
the
and
and
Public Forum
Known as the Tad Turner debate or CNN
Crossfire
The debaters argue a topic of national
importance
Conducted by teams of two people
alternating speeches for their side
Crossfire: the two debaters directly
ask each other questions and answer
questions of their opponent; may be
used to ask revealing questions in an
attempt to expose a weakness in the
opponents' arguments, but it is often
used as a way to further develop and
attack arguments through discourse.
Grand Crossfire is similar to crossfire
except that all four debaters can ask
and answer questions of each other
Final Focus: a two-minute speech that
is also referred to as "The Last Shot";
the speaker is given one last chance to
explain exactly why his or her team has
won the round; no new arguments are
allowed in the Final Focus but new
evidence to support previous arguments
is allowed; this speech is often the
determining factor for a judge's
decision in a closely contested round
as it allows the judge to hear which
arguments/evidence each team views as
the most important to his or her case,
and summarizes the entire debate
Karl Popper Debate
Two teams consisting the total of three
speakers each