Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Perreault &/VlcCarthy
Basic Marketing: A Global Managerial
Approach
F(/?eenth Edition
Perreanlt & McCarthy
Essentials of Marketing: A Global
Managerial Approach
Tenth Edition
Peter & Donnelly
A Preface to Marketing Management
Tenth Edition
Peter & Donnelly
Marketing Management: Knmvledge
and Skills
Seventh Edition
Peter & Olson
Consumer Behavior
Seventh Edition
Pnrvis & Burton
Whicb Ad Pulled Best?
Ninth Edition
Quelch, Rangan & Lal
Marketing Management Text and Cases
First Edition
Rayport & Jaworski
Introduction to e-Commerce
Second Edition
Rayport & Jaworski
e-Commerce
First Edition
Rayport & Jaworski
Cases in e-Commerce
First Edition
Richardson
Internet Marketing
First Edition
Roberts
Internet Marketing: Integrating Online
and Offline Strategies
First Edition
Spiro, Stanton & Rich
Management of a Sales Force
Eleventh Edition
Stock & Lambert
Strategic Logistics Management
Fourth Edition
Ulrich & Eppinger
Product Design and Development
Third Edition
Walker, Mullins, Boyd & Larr~ch~
Marketing Strategy: A Decision-Focused
Approach
Ffth Edition
Weitz, Castleberry & Tanner
Selling: Building Partnerships
F!fth Edition
Zeithaml & Bitner
Services Marketing
Fourth Edition
Marketing Strategy
A Decision-Focused Approach
Fifth Edition
John W. Mullins
Associate Professor of Management Practice
London Business School
Jean-Claude Larr~ch~
Alfred H. Heineken Professor of Marketing
European Institute of Business Administration
INSEAD
McGraw-Hill
Irwin
Boston Burr Ridge, IL Dubuque, IA Madison, Wl New York San Francisco St, Louis
Bangkok Bogotg~ Caracas Kuala Lumpur Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City
Milan Montreal New Delhi Santiago Seoul Singapore Sydney Taipei Toronto
McGraw-Hill
Irwin
MARKETING STRATEGY: A DECISION-FOCUSED APPROACH
Published by McGraw-Hill/frwin, a business unit of The McGraxv-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, NY, 10020. Copyright 2006, 2003, 1999, 1996, 1992 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced o1" distributed in any form or by any
means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior writteu consent of The McGraw-Hill Colnpanies, Inc., inclnding, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the
United States.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
34567890DOW/DOW0987
ISBN- 13:978-0-07-111674-9
ISBN-10:0-07-111674-5
wwxv.mhhe.com
John W. Mullins
John M,llins is Associate Professor of Management Practice at London Business School,
where he heads the entrepreneurship group. He earned his MBA at the Stanford Graduate
School of Business and, considerably later in life, his PhD in marketing from the University of Minnesota. An award-winning teacher, Jotm brings to his teaching and research 20
years of executive experience in high-growth firms, including two ventures he founded,
one of which he took public. Since becoming a business school professor in 1992, John
has published more than 30 articles in a variety of outlets, including Ha~a,ard Business
Review, the Journal of Product hmovation Management, and the Journal of Business Venturing. His research has won national and international awards fiom the Marketing Science
Institute, the American Marketing Association, and the Richard D. Irwin Foundation. He
is also co-author of Marketing Management: A Strategic Decision-Making Approach, 5th
edition. His recent trade book, The New Business Road Test: What Entrepreneurs and
Executives Should Do Before Writing a Business Plan, is the definitive work on the assessment and shaping of market opportunities.
Jean-Claude Larr6ch6
Jean-Claude Larr~ch~ is Alfred H. Heineken Professor of Marketing and Director of the
Competitiveness Fitness of Global Firms Initiative at the European Institute of Business
Administration, INSEAD, in Fontainebleau, France. He holds an MBA from 1NSEAD
and a PhD in marketing from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. A
consultant to several major international firms, Jean-Claude has worked with top management teams in Europe, North America, and Asia. He is chairman and founder of StratX, a
publisher of marketing simulations and other tools for strategic marketing. An awardwinning teacher, Jean-Claude is also a two-time winner of the overall case competition of
the European Case Clearing House. He is co-author of Marketing Management: A SOategic Decision-Making Approach, 5th edition.
Brie( Contents
Preface xiii
SECTION THREE
Formulating Marketing Strategies 173
8 Marketing Strategies for New Market
Entries 175
9 Strategies for Growth Markets 203
10 Strategies for Mature and Declining
Markets 227
11 Marketing Strategies for the New
Economy 257
SECTION ONE
of
Introduction to Strategy 1
1 Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie
Successful Corporate, Business, and
Marketing Strategies 1
2 Corporate Strategy Decisions and Their
Marketing Implications 31
Business Strategies and Their Marketing
Implications 57
SECTION FOUR
Implementation and Control 285
SECTION TWO
12 Organizing and Planning for Effective
Opportunity Analysis 83
Implementation 287
4 Understanding Market Opportunities85
13 Marketing Metrics for Marketing
5 Measuring Market Opportunities:
Performance 313
Forecasting and Market Knowledge 111
Name Index 337
6 Targeting Attractive Market
Subject Index 341
Segments 133
7 Differentiation and Positioning 153
vii
Preface xiii
Chapter 2
SECTION ONE
INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGY 1
Chapter 1
Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie
Successful Corporate, Business, and
Marketing Strategies 3
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 1 6
Three Levels of Strategy: Similar Components but
Different Issues 7
1. What Is a Strategy? 7
2. The Components qf Strategy 8
3. The Hierarchy of Strategies 8
4. Corporate Strategy 8
5. Business-Level Strategy 11
6. Marketing Strategy 11
What Is Marketings Role in Formulating and
Implementing Strategies? 11
1. Market-Oriented Management 12
2. Do Customers Always Know What They ~l{mt? 13
3. Does Being Market-Oriented Pay? 14
4. Factors That Mediate Marketings Strategic
Role 16
5. Recent Developments Affecting the Strategic Role
of Marketing 18
6. The Future Role qf Marketing 21
Formulating and Implementing Marketing Strategy-An Overview of the Process 21
1. A Decision-Making Focus 21
2. Analysis Comes First 21
3. hltegrating Marketing Strategy with the Firms Other
Strategies and Resotoces 22
4. Market OpportuniO~ Analysis 23
5. Formulati,g Marketing Strategies for Spec!fic
Situations 24
6. hnplementation and Control qf the Marketing
Strategy 24
7. The Marketing Plan--A Blueprint
for Action 25
viii
Sources of Synergy 51
1. Knowledge-Based Synergies 51
2. Corporate IdentiO, and the Corporate Brand as a
Source of Synergy 51
3. Corporate Branding Strategy--When Does a Strong
Corporate Brand Make Sense? 52
4. Synergyfiom Shared Resources 53
Chapter 3
Business Strategies and Their Marketing
Implications 57
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 3 58
Strategic Decisions at the Business-Unit Level 59
Contents ix
1. How Should Strategic Business Units Be
Designed? 60
2. Business-Unit Objectives 61
3. Allocating Resources within the Business Unit 61
How Do Businesses Compete? 62
1. Generic Business-Level Competitive Strategies 63
2. Do the Same Competitive Strategies Work for SingleBusiness Firms and Start-ups? 64
3. Do the Same Competitive Strategies Work for Service
Busi,esses? 65
4. Do the Same Competitive Strategies Work for Global
Competitors? 66
5. Will the htternet Change Evem.,thing? 67
How Do Competitive Strategies Differ from One
Another? 68
1. Differences in Scope 68
2. Diffbrences in Goals and Objectives 69
3. D!fferences in Resource Deployment 70
4. D!fferences in Sources qf Synergy 70
Deciding When a Strategy Is Appropriate:
The Fit between Business Strategies and the
Environment 71
1. Appropriate Conditions.for a Prospector Strategy 71
2. Appropriate Comtitions for an Analyzer Strategy 71
3. Appropriate Conditions.for a Dgfender
Strateg~ 73
How Different Business Strategies Influence
Marketing Decisions 74
1. Prodact Policies 75
2. Pricing Policies 76
3. Distribution Policies 76
4. Promotion Policies 77
What If the Best Marketing Program for a
Product Does Not Fit the Businesss Competitive
Strategy? 77
SECTION TWO
OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS 83
Chapter 4
Understanding Market Opportunities 85
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 4 86
Markets and Industries: Whats the Difference? 87
Assessing Market and Industry Attractiveness 88
Macro Trend Analysis: A Framework for Assessing
Market Attractiveness, Macro Level 88
1. The Demographic Em,iromnent 88
2. The Sociocultural Em,iromnent 91
Chapter 5
Measuring Market Opportunities:
Forecasting and Market Knowledge 111
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 5 113
Every Forecast Is Wrong! 113
A Forecasters Toolkit: A Tool for Every Forecasting
Setting 113
1. Statistical and Other Qaantitative Methods 114
2. Obsem,ation 115
3. Smweys or Focus Groups 116
4. Analogy 116
5. Judgment l l 7
6. Market Tests 118
7. Mathematics Entailed in Forecasting 118
x Contents
Chapter 6
Targeting Attractive Market Segments 133
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 6 134
Why Do Market Segmentation and Target Marketing
Make Sense? 135
1. Most Markets Are Heterogeneous 135
2. Today "s Market Realities Qften Make
Segmentation hnperative 136
How Are Market Segments Best
Defined? 137
1. Who They Are." Demographic Descriptors 137
2. Where The), Are. Geographic Descriptors 138
3. Geodemographic Descriptors 139
4. How They Behave: Behavioral Descriptors 140
5. hmovative Segmentation: A Key to Marketing
Breakthroagks 142
Choosing Attractive Market Segments:
A Five-Step Process 143
1. Step 1." Select Market-Attractiveness
and Competitive-Position Factors 144
2. Step 2. Weight Each Factor 146
3. Step 3: Rate Segments on Eack Factor; Plot Results
on Matrices 146
4. Step 4: Project Futare Position for Each
Segment 147
5. Step 5. Choose Segments to Target, Allocate
Resources 148
Different Targeting Strategies Suit Different
Opportunities 148
1. Niche-Market Strategy 149
2. Mass-Market Strategy 149
3. Growth-Market Strategy 150
Global Market Segmentation 150
Chapter 7
Differentiation and Positioning 153
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 7 154
Differentiation: One Key to Customer Preference
and Competitive Advantage 154
1. D(fferentiation in Business Strategies 155
2. Diffbrentiation among Goods" and Se~a,ices 155
Physical Positioning 156
1. Limitations qf Ph),sical Positioning 156
Perceptual Positioning 157
Levers Marketers Can Use to Establish
Positioning 157
Preparing the Foundation for Marketing Strategies:
The Positioning Process 158
1. Step 1: Ident(]j, a Relevant Set qf Competitive
Products 159
2. Step 2: ldent([j, Determinant Attributes 160
3. Step 3: Collect Data about Customers Perceptions
for Products in the Competitive Set 161
4. Step 4: Analyze the Current Positions qf Products
in the Competitive Set 161
5. Step 5: Determine Customers Most Preferred
Combination of Attributes 164
6. Step 6. Consider Fit of Possible Positions
witk Custonwr Needs and Segment Attractiveness 165
Z Step 7." Write Positioning Statement of Valae
Proposition to Guide Development of Marketing
Strategy 166
169
SECTION THREE
FORMULATING MARKETING
STRATEGIES 173
Chapter 8
Marketing Strategies for New Market
Entries 175
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 8 176
Sustaining Competitive Advantage over the Product
Life Cycle 177
1. Market and Competitive hnplications of Product Life
Cycle Stages 178
2. Strategic Implications of the Product Life Cycle 182
3. Limitations of the Product Life Cycle
Framework 183
New Market Entries--How New Is New? 183
Contents xi
Objectives of New Product and Market
Development 184
Market Entry Strategies: Is It Better to Be a Pioneer
Chapter 10
or a Follower? 186
1. Pioneer Strategy 186
2. Not All Pioneers Capitalize on Their Potential
Advantages 188
3. Follower Strategy 189
4. Determinants of Success for Pioneers and
Followers 190
192
Strategic Marketing Programs for Pioneers
1. Mass-Market Penetration 192
2. Niche Penetration 192
3. Ski"mining and Early Withdrawal 194
4. Marketing Program Components.for a Mass-Market
Penetration Strategy 194
5. Marketing Program Components for a Niche
Penetration Strategy 199
6. Marketing Program Conlponents for a Skinuning
Strategy 199
Chapter 9
Strategies for Growth Markets 203
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 9 204
Opportunities and Risks in Growth Markets 205
1. Gaining Sllare Is Easier 205
2. Share Gains Are Worth More 207
3. Price Competition Is Likely to Be
Less Intense 207
4. Early Ento, Is Necessaiy to Maintain
Technical Expertise 208
Chapter 11
Marketing Strategies for the New
Economy 257
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 11
Does Every Company Need a New-Economy
Strategy? 258
258
xii Contents
SECTION FOUR
IMPLEMENTATION AND CONTROL 285
Chapter 12
Organizing and Planning for Effective
Implementation 287
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 12 289
Designing Appropriate Administrative Relationships
for the Implementation of Different Competitive
Strategies 290
1. Business- Unit Autonomy 291
Chapter 13
Marketing Metrics for Marketing
Performance 313
Strategic Challenges Addressed in Chapter 13 314
Designing Marketing Metrics Step by Step 315
1. Setting Standards of Performance 316
2. Speci~4ng and Obtaining Feedback Data
3. Evaluating Feedback Data 321
4. Taking Corrective Action 322
320
xiv Preface
provides. Stockbrokers must attract new customers. Acconnting and consulting firms must
find ways to differentiate their services from other providers so their customers have reasons to give them their business. Software engineers developing the next great Internet or
other technology must understand how their technology can benefit the intended customer,
for without such benefits, customers will not buy. Thus, we have written this book to meet
the marketing needs of readers ~vho hope to make a difference in the long-term strategic
success of their organizations--whether their principal roles are in marketing or otherwise.
In this brief preface, we want to say a bit more about each of the four distinctive benefits--bulleted above--that this book offers its readers. We also point out the key changes
in this edition compared to previous ones; and we thank our many students, colleagues, and
others from whom we have learned so much, without whom this book would not have been
possible.
WEB-SAVVY INSIGHTS
Because this book has been written by authors who teach at Web-savvy institutions and
~vork with Web-savvy companies, it brings a realistic, informed, and Web-savvy perspective to an important question many students are asking: "Has the advent of the Internet
changed all the rules?" Our ans~ver is, "Well, yes and no." On one hand, the Internet has
Preface xv
made available a host of new marketing tools--from banner ads to e-mail marketing to
delivery of digital goods and services over the Internet--many of which are available to
companies in the so-called old and new economies alike. On the other hand, time-tested
marketing fundamentals--such as understanding ones customers and competitors and meeting customer needs in ways that are differentiated from the offerings of those competitors
have become even more important in the fast-moving, dot-corn world, as the many dot-com
failures a few years ago attest.
Thus, throughout the book, we integrate examples of new-economy companies--both
successful and otherwise--to show how both yesterdays and todays marketing tools and
decision frameworks can most effectively be applied. Because the advent of the Internet,
mobile telephony, and other new-economy technologies is so important in its own right,
however, we also devote Chapter 11 to new-economy strategies, in order to provide for
marketers in all kinds of companies a roadmap for decisions about where, when, and how
to deploy new-economy tools.
xvi Preface
Weve moved our overview of the product life cycle and its strategic implications to
the begilming of Section Three, where it serves as the foundation for Chapters 8, 9,
and 10, which discuss marketing strategies for product-markets in different stages of
development.
Weve added several Discussion Questions at the end of each chapter to facilitate your
review of the material and provide a possible focus for class discussion. However, the
books interactive Web site at www.mhhe.eom/walker06 continues to provide additional self-diagnostic questions for students--as well as answers for the discussion
questions~o enable you to test your understanding of the tools and decision frameworks covered in each chapter. For instructors, the Web site offers suggested activities
and assignments for each chapter, in order to aid instructors who seek to build interactive classroom environments. The Web site also suggests the "best of the best" decisionfocused cases including international ones, dot-corns, and companies in services and
manufacturing industries--and other supplemental readings to help instructors find
the best teaching materials to train graduates for the local economies in which they are
likely to work and to most effectively nail down the learning in each chapter.
In reality, though, no chapter has escaped untouched. All have been updated, although the
basic flow, sequence, and strategic focus of the book have remained unchanged.
THANKS!
Simply put, this book is not solely our work--far from it. Many of our students, colleagues,
and those with whom we work in industry have made contributions that have significantly
shaped our perspectives on marketing decision making. We are grateful to all of them.
We wish to give special thanks, though, to Barbara Jamieson of Edinburgh Business
School in Scotland and to Abi Murthy. Barbaras instructional expertise is reflected in the
Instructors Manual and the other teaching materials, which together comprise a standout
package of instructor support. Abis research skills, together with her extensive business
experience on three continents, have been instrumental in identifying many of the global
examples that bring the books real-world perspective to life.
We also thank a small army of talented people at McGraw-Hill/Irwin for their work that
has turned our rough manuscript into an attractive and readable book. In particular, our
editors, Barrett Koger and Jill OMalley, have been instrumental in giving birth to this edition. Without them, wed probably still be writing!
Finally, we thank Harper Boyd, without whom this book would not exist, and our parents, ~vithout whom, of course, none of us would be here. To all of you we extend our love,
our respect, and our gratitude for passing on to us your curiosity and your passion for
learning. We therefore dedicate this book to Harper Boyd, to Jeannette and Orville Walker
Sr., to Jack and Alice Mullins, and to Odette and Pierre Larrdch&
01a,ille C. Walker J~:
Jean-Claude Larr6ch6
Minneapolis, London, and Fontainebleau."
Spring 2005
Case Vignette
Strategic Issues
Highlight critical information and crucial
questions throughout each chapter.
xviii
Strategic Issue
The marketing objectives and st,ategy for a
particular productmarket entry nlust be
achievable with the
colnpanys available resources and capabilities
and consistent with the
direction and allocation
of resources inherent in
the firms corporate and
business-level slaategies.
stead, the
achievabl
dhection
strategies
elements
ponents ~
managee
Marke
A major
egy elem
Expansion by Increasin,
Product-Markets
One way for a company to expm
ically requires actions such as m
prices, or outspending competit(
combination of all these actions
Latin America.:
While developing nations ret
infrastructure goods and service:
making them attractive potential
Even developed nations can repr
on newly elnerging teclmologies
of e-retailers such as Amazon.cc
Marketing Plan
Exercises
End-of-chapter exercises put
important concepts from each
chapter into action.
Marketing
Identil-y an appropriate marketing strategy consistent with the products stage in its 1)roduct life cycle
and the market and competitive conditions it laces, drawing on Chapters 8, 9, and/or 10 as appropriate. Identify the strategies key eolnpetitors are using, and develop a rationale for the strategy you
have chosen.
xix
Online Learning
Center
Favorite cases and supplementary
readings selected by the authors can be
found at www.mhhe.corrdwalker06.
Instructors Resource
CD-ROM
The instructor package provides everything a
new or experienced marketing strategy
instructor needs to hit the ground running.
Instructors Manual
Contents include PowerPoint slides and Web-based instructor support and materials.
Market-Oriented Perspectives
Underlie Successful Corporate,
Business, and Marketing
Strategies
IBM Switches Strategies
For decades International Business Machines focused most of its efforts on the hardware side of
the computer industry: first on large mainframe
computers, then on personal computers (PCs), and
then, as the Internet began to take off in the mid1990s, on servers and related equipment. Its target
customers for that hardware were typically organizations rather than individual consumers and usually large organizations that needed lots of dataprocessing capacity and had the financial resources
to afford it. The firm did not ignore consumers or
small businesses, but it relied on independent retailers, such as Circuit City, and value-added resellers to reach those segments while focusing
much of its own marketing and sales effort on
large organizations.
IBMs competitive strategy was also quite consistent over the years. Given that the firm was never
the lowest-cost producer in the industry, it did not
try to compete with low prices. Instead, the firm
pursued a quality differentiation strategy by offering superior products backed up by excellent technical service and selling them at premium prices.
To implement its strategy, the company tried to
ensure a steady stream of cutting-edge products by
allocating vast resources to R&D and product development. IBM also generally followed an "open
Technology Changes
and Competitor Actions
Require a Shift in Strategy
For decades IBMs corporate, business, and marketing strategies were all very successful. By the
mid-1990s, however, several of IBMs traditional
businesses were in trouble. The companys share of
from its small and medium business segment increased 14 percent in 2003.
New Business
and Marketing Strategies
IBMs new corporate emphasis on e-business services as its primary path toward future growth also
has forced some changes in the firms competitive
and marketing strategies. At the business level, the
firm still seeks to differentiate itself from competitors on the basis of superior quality and to charge
premium prices for that quality. But in its new service businesses, competitive superiority depends
on the knowledge, experience, and expertise of its
consultants--and their familiarity with a customers operations that comes from continuing
interaction--rather than the technical quality of its
products. Therefore, to implement its new servicebased differentiation strategy effectively, the company reorganized and reallocated many of its internal resources.
For example, the firm created a stand-alone
software division with its own salesforce organized
to focus on making and selling products tailored to
the most common business problems of companies in 12 different industry segments, such as financial services, life sciences, and consumer packaged goods. Similarly, about half of the companys
$5 billion R&D budget is now focused on solving
business problems rather than improving the technical performance of its hardware. And the company found that in order to understand and tailor
services and software to a customers specific business problems, a team approach was required.
Consequently, customer relationships are typically
managed by teams involving the sales executive in
charge of the account, a representative from the
services division, a person in the software unit, and
often someone from the research labs. As Samuel J.
Palmisano--the man who took over as CEO from
Mr. Gerstner in 2002--points out, "For us to deliver the value of e-business on demand, we had
to reintegrate IBM."
Given that the success of IBMs competitive
strategy depends heavily on the knowledge and
expertise of its personnel and their ability to forge
beneficial relationships with customers, the firms
salesforce is even more crucial than ever. Many
Changes in IBMs
Revenue from
Various Sources Due
to Its New Corporate
Strategy
Source: Steve Lohr, "Big Blues
Big Bet: Less Tech, More
Touch," Money & Business
Section, New }brk Times, Sunday, January 25, 2004, p. 10.
Used by permission.
Revenue as a
percentage of total
BM revenue
~20 billion
EXHIBIT 1.1
lOO%
Software,
__
70
60
60
Global
services
50
80
40
- 40
30
20
- 20
10
0
of the task force appointed by CEO Gerstner to analyze the firms strengths and
weaknesses and develop new directions for growth and profitability. Gerstner himself was
recruited, in part, because of his experience working for customer-oriented package goods
and financial services firms, and his successor Mr. Palmisano rose through the sales and
marketing ranks.
Some firms systematically incorporate such market and competitive analyses into their
planning processes. They also coordinate their activities around the primary goal of satisfying unmet customer needs. Such firms are market-oriented and follow a business philosophy commonly called the marketing concept. Market-oriented firms have been shown
to be among the more profitable and successful at maintaining strong competitive positions in their industries over time. As we shall see later in this chapter, however, companies
do not always embrace a market orientation--nor rely as heavily on inputs from their
marketing and sales perso~mel--in developing their strategies. Some firms strategies are
driven more by technology, production, or cost concerns.
Regardless of their participation or influence in formulating corporate and businesslevel strategies, marketing managers freedom of action is ultimately constrained by those
higher-level strategies. The objectives, strategies, and action plans for a specific productStrategic Issue
market are but one part of a hierarchy of strategies within the firm. Each level of strategy
Each level of strategy
must be consistent with--and therefore influenced and constrained by--higher levels
must be consistent
within the hierarchy. For example, not only the new services developed by IBM, but also
with and therefore influenced and constrained their advertising appeals, prices, and other aspects of the marketing plans, were shaped by
the shift in corporate strategy toward emphasizing e-business services as the primary avby--higher levels
within the hierarchy.
enue for future growth.
These interrelationships among the various levels of strategy raise several questions of
importance to marketing managers as well as managers in other functional areas and top executives. What do strategies consist of, and do they have similar or different components at
the corporate, business, and functional levels? While marketing managers clearly
bear the primary responsibility for developing strategic marketing plans for individual product offerings, what role do they play in formulating strategies at the corporate and divisional
or business unit level? Why do some organizations pay much more attention to customers
and competitors when formulating their strategies (i.e., why are some firms more marketoriented) than others, and does it make any difference in their performance? What specific
decisions and analytical processes underlie the formulation and implementation of effective
marketing strategies? These are the questions tackled in the rest of this chapter.
Section One
Introduction to Strategy
Chapter One
Market-Oriented Perspectives
Corporate
mission
Corporate
strategy
Corporate
goals and
objectives
I
Corporate
development
strategy
Deployment
of
resources
I
SBU 2
SBU n
f
Strategic
business
unit 1
I
Business
strategy
Business
units
objectives
Competitive
strategy
Deployment of
resources across
product-markets
and functions
I
Marketing
strategy
for product
market entry X
R&D
strategy
and plans
Human
resources
strategy
and plans
Operations
strategy
and plans
Functional
strategy
Tactical
marketing plan
for product
market entry X
are the primary focus of corporate strategy. The essential questions at this level include,
What business(es) are we in? What business(es) should we be in? and What portion of
our total resources should we devote to each of these businesses to achieve the organizations overall goals and objectives? Thus, top-level managers at IBM decided to pursue future growth primarily through the development of Web-based services and software rather
than computer hardware. They shifted substantial corporate resources--including R&D
expenditures, marketing and advertising budgets, and vast numbers of salespeople--into
the corporations service and software businesses to support the new strategic
direction.
Attempts to develop and maintain distinctive competencies at the corporate level focus
on generating superior human, financial, and technological resources; designing effective
organizational structures and processes; and seeking synergy among the firms various
businesses. Synergy can provide a major competitive advantage for firms where related
businesses share R&D investments, product or production technologies, distribution channels, a common salesforce, and/or promotional themes--as in the case of IBM.3
10
Allocation of resources
Sources of competitive
advantage
Sources of synergy
Corporate Strategy
Corporate domain-"Which businesses
should we be in?"
Corporate development
strategy
Conglomerate
diversification
(expansion into
unrelated
businesses)
Vertical integration
Acquisition and
divestiture policies
Overall corporate
objectives aggregated
across businesses
Revenue growth
Profitability
ROI (return on
investment)
Earnings per share
Contributions to
other stakeholders
Allocation among
businesses in the
corporate portfolio
Allocation across
functions shared by
multiple businesses
(corporate R&D, MIS)
Primarily through
superior corporate
financial or human
resources; more
corporate R&D; better
organizational processes
or synergies relative to
competitors across all
industries in which the
firm operates
Shared resources,
technologies, or
functional competencies
across businesses within
the firm
Marketing Strategies
Business Strategy
Business domain-"Which productmarkets should we be
in within this business
or industry?
Business development
strategy
Concentric
diversification (new
products for
existing customers
or new customers
for existing
products)
Constrained by
corporate goals
Objectives aggregated
across product-market
entries in the business
unit
Sales growth
New product or
market growth
Profitability
ROI
Cash flow
Strengthening bases
of competitive
advantage
Allocation among
product-market entries
in the business unit
Allocation across
functional departments
within the business unit
Primarily through
competitive strategy;
business units
competencies relative to
competitors in its
industry
Shared resources
(including favorable
customer image) or
functional competencies
across product-markets
within an industry
Marketing Strategy
Target market
definition
Product-line depth and
breadth
Branding policies
Product-market
development plan
Line extension and
product elimination
plans
Constrained by
corporate and business
goals
Objectives for a specific
product-market entry
Sales
Market share
Contribution margin
Customer
satisfaction
Allocation across
components of the
marketing plan
(elements of the
marketing mix) for a
specific product-market
entry
Primarily through
effective product
positioning; superiority
on one or more
components of the
marketing mix relative
to competitors within a
specific product-market
Shared marketing
resources,
competencies, or
activities across productmarket entries
Business-Level Strategy
How a business unit competes ~vithin its industry is the critical focus of business-level
strategy. A major issue in a business strategy is that of sustainable competitive advantage.
What distinctive competencies can give the business unit a competitive advantage? Aa3d
which of those competencies best match the needs and wants of the customers in the businesss target segment(s)? For example, a business with low-cost sources of supply and efficient, modern plants might adopt a low-cost competitive strategy. One with a strong marketing department and a competent salesforce may compete by offering superior customer
service.4
Another important issue a business-level strategy must address is appropriate scope:
how many and which market segments to compete in, and the overall breadth of product
offerings and marketing programs to appeal to these segments. Finally, synergy should be
sought across product-markets and across functional departments within the business.
Marketing Strategy
The primary focus of marketing strategy is to effectively allocate and coordinate marketing resources and activities to accomplish the firms objectives within a specific productmarket. Therefore, the critical issue concerning the scope of a marketing strategy is specifying the target market(s) for a particular product or product line. Next, firms seek
competitive advantage and synergy through a well-integrated program of marketing mix
elements (primarily the 4 Ps of product, price, place, promotion) tailored to the needs and
wants of potential customers in that target market.
12
Sales
R&D
Ope~Oo~
Finance
38
39
33
32
13
29**
45**
38*
23**
11"*
11 **
3**
7**
29**
13
9**
3**
9**
9**
29**
14"*
10"*
12"*
65
48
40
34
31
30
29**
35**
37*
52**
47**
41"*
3**
5**
7**
1"*
5**
4**
1"*
8**
10"*
6**
10"*
9**
2**
4**
6**
6**
7**
16"*
Ded~ons
7**
35**
The numb~ ~ ea~ c~ is the mean of~e amoum ofpNms g~ ~ ~&ng m~e~ to each Nn~om ~g a c~stant-suln ~ale ~ 100. A ~e~ was ~rfo~ m
compa~ cMumn 2 (nr~n ~ive ~ ~m~g) w~h ~u 3 ~mugh 6 (~l~Ne ~ ~ R&~ ~e~i~ ~d financeh StatisticN~ fignificant ~
~n~s win maNet~g a~ inN~md by a~eri~ wh~e: * p < .05; **p < .01.
~urce: Cl~stian Homburg, John R Workm~ ~ and Harl~ Krohmer. ~\,larketin~s influence Within the Firm." Journal Q3~keting 63 (April 1999L p. 9. Reprinted by
~r~ ~ the American Marketing Associ~on.
More surprisingly, m~kN~g managers also were p~ceNed m wield figNficam~ mo~
~fluence ~an managers ~om ~her fun~nN areas on cros~functional, bu~nessqevd
str~e~c decisions. While ~e views of finance and oper~ns executNes carry more
weight ~ appro~ng m~or capRal expenNm~s, mark~ing and sa~s manages exert more
~fluence on deNfions concerNng the ~r~eNc Nm~n of the business unR, expan~on
~to new geograpNc m~k~s, the se~ction of s~e~c business p~tn~s, and new produ~
deve~pment.
Might the relative ~fluence of the Nffe~nt functions become more ~m~ar as firms
adopt more integratNe orgaNz~nN forms, such as ~oss-fun~nN work ~ams? The
~udyN resuRs sugge~ nm. M~ketingN influence was not significant~ reduced ~ comp~
Nes th~ had ~itumd cross-functional ~mcmms and processes.
But marking manages may not play as pervasNe a ~m~c role in o~er c~mms as
they do ~ the Unimd States. The ~udy found th~ mark~ers ~fluence on bo~ mcticM and
~r~e~c issues was ~gnificantly lower in German firms. As one of the smdy~ a~hors
poi~s out, "Germany has ~ad~ionaHy ~ressed mclmo~gy and operat~ns more ~an the
so~eg cu~ome~oriented aspects cemml to m~keting. So even when the env~onment
changes, a signal to topqevel German managers th~ marking should be play~g a greater
ro~, they are ~cm~ to ~ve it that role?~
Market-Oriented Management
Even w~n the U~d St~es, howeve~ marketing manages do not play an equM~ ex~nsNe str~eg~ role in every firm because not all firms are equal~ m~ket-oriemed. Not
surpri~n~ m~kem~ tend to have a gre~ influence on all levels of ~m~gy in o~aNzations ~ embrace a marke~orien~d philosophy of bu~ness. More critically, manages
in other fu~mtional areas of m~ke~oriemed firms ~corpor~e more cu~om~ and comp~Ror ~rm~n into Nek deNfiommaNng processes as well.
M~k~rie~ed organ~ns tend to opem~ accor~ng to the business pNlosophy
known as ~e marketing concept. As ofig~al~ ~amd by GenerN E~ctric five decades ago,
the marketing concept holds ~ ~e ~am~g and coord~n of N1 company a~N~s
around the primly goal of satis~ing cu~om~ needs is ~e mo~ effe~ive means to attain
and su~Nn a comp~RNe advamage and acNeve company oNectives over time.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Somve: Frederick ~ \Ve~ter ~, "Executing the New Marketing Concept," Marketing Management 3, no. I ( 1994L p. I 0. ReprinWd by p~mission of ~e American M~keb
ing A~od~n.
Othe~ have pNmed out that some very successN1 new produc~, such as the Chrys~r
minNan and CompaqS pioneering PC network serves were developed ~vith 1Rile or no
mark~ research. On the other han some ~mous duds, like Ford~ Eds~, New Coke, and
McDonNd~ McLean lo~v-fat hamburger, were developed ~vith a gre~ deal of cu~omer
~p~.9
The laws ofprobaNfi~ Nctate that some new pmduc~ will succeed and more will Nil
mg~Ness of how much is spem on marking research. But the critics ofa ~rong cugomer
14
Section One
~troducdon to St~tegy
focus argue that paying too much a~ention to cu~omer needs and wants can stifle innovation and lead firms to produce nothing but marginN imwovements or line exten~ons of
produ~s and services that akeady exisL How do marlce~rs respond to this charge?
While many consumers may lack the mchnical sophistication necessary to articulate
thek needs or wants for cutting-edge mchn~M innovations, the same is not true for industrial purchasers. About half of aB manufactured goods in most count6es are sold to other
organizations rather than individuN consumers. Many high-tech industrial products are
initiated at the urging of one or more mNor cu~omers, developed with thek cooperation
(perhaps in the form of an a~iance or partnership), and refined at cu~omer b~a sRes.
As for consumer markets, one way to resolve the conflict beaveen the views of technologies and mark~els is to consider the two components of R&D. Fkst there is basic
research and then there is development the conversion of ~chn~N concepts into actual
sNable produ~s or services. Most consumers have 1Rile lcnowledge of scientific advancements and emerging mchnologies. Therefore, they usuNly dont--and probably shouldnt-play a role in influencing how firms allocate thek ba~c research do~ars.
However, a cu~omer focus is crit~N to development. Someone wRhin the organiz~ion
must have either the in~ght and market experience or the sub~anfiN cu~omer input necessary to deNde what produ~ to develop ~om a new technolog~ what benefits R wi~ offer
to cu~omers, and whether cu~omers will value those benefits snffiNently to make the
product a commercial success. Iomega~ experiences in developing the Zip drive into a
cormnerNally successful product--as described in ExhibR 1.6--~lustrate this point.
O~en, as was the case with the Zip drive, a new technology must be developed into a
concrete product concept before consumers can react to ~ and Rs commerNN potentiN can
be assessed. In other cases, consumers can express the~ needs or wants for specific benefits even though they do not know what is technicNly feasible. They can mB you wh~ problems they are having with current products and services and what additional benefits they
would like ~om new ones. For in~ance, before Sony introduced the Walkman, few consumers would have asked for such a product because they were unfam~r with the poss~
bilities of miniaturization in the ~ectronics indu~rL But if they had been asked whether
they would buy a battery-driven produ~ small enough to hook on thNr beR th~ could produce sound nearly as good as the full-~zed stereo sys~m in their home, many probably
would have sai& "Sure!"
A s~ong cu~omer focus is not inconN~ent w~h the development of ~chn~Nly
innovative produc~, nor does R condemn a fnm to concentrate on satisfying only
cu~ent, a~icul~ed cu~omer wants. More impo~ant, while titans can som~imes succeed in
the sho~ mn even though they ignore customer deske~ a s~ong customer focus
usuNly pays big dividends in terms of market share and profit over the long haul. As Iomega~
CEO points out, ~ don~ know how else you can sell in a consumer marketpNce wRhout understanding produ~ design and usage. You have to know wh~ the end user wants?,
Does Being Market-OHented Pay?
Since an organ~ation~ success over time hinges on ~s ab~ky to provide benefits of value
to Rs customers--and to do th~ better than its competitors--it seems likely that marke~
oriented firms should perform be~er than others. By paying careful a~ention to cu~omer
needs and competitive threats--and by focusing activit~s across all fun~ional departments on meeting those needs and thie~s effectively~rganizations should be able to enhance, acce~r~e, and reduce the vol~Ry and vulnerability of the~ cash flows.1 And that
should enhance their econom~ performance and shareholder valne. Indee& Wofitab~ity is
the thkd leg, together ~vith a cu~omer focus and cros~functionN coordination, of the
three-legged stool known as the mark~ing concept.
Strategic Issue
A market orientation
has a significant positive effect on various
dimenMons of performance, including
return on assets, sales
growth, and new product success.
of mdMdual and business users, they designed throe diffeint models with different ~o~ge capad~es and diffeint prices. All thee were given bright colo~ to make
them stand out from their en~ronment and to signal
that they were different from the "gray" competition.
The most basic model--the Zip drive--held 100
megabytes and was NNaI~ priced at $200 per unit and
$20 per disk (prices that fell substantiN~ late~ to appeal
to ~dMdual PC owne~ for their pe~onal use. Finallg a
promotional campaign was ~afled around the theme
that Zip could help people organize their "~uff" to
make it more acces~ble and poRab~.
Within thee yea~ of its introduction, mo~ than thee
mill~n Np drives were sold. Consequentlg bmega; sha~
price soa~d, and the firm made it into the top 50 of Fo~
tune~ list of fastest-growing companies.
Unfo~unate~ the Zip drive also pro~des an exc~nt
Hlus~a~on of how advandng techn~ogy can sho~en
the lifecyde of even the hottest product. W~hin five
yeam of its introduG~n a vadety of read/write CD--and
eventual~ DVD--NayeG were being offered either as external add-ons or bui~-in components by the PC makeB.
Given that CDs offend more functionNity and much
greater storage capacity at a substantiN~ lower price,
the market for Zip ddves quickly dried up.
Source: "The Nght ~uff," Journg of Bus~ess and Desert 2 (Fall
199N, pp. 6-11; "America~ Fa~est Growing Companies," Fo~
tun~ OGober 14, 1996, pp. 90-104; and Paul Eng, "What to Do
When You Need Mo~ Space," BusinessWeek, November ~ 1996,
p. 126.
Section One
~oduc~on to Strategy
Marketing Odentation
Production Odentation
Product offering
Product line
Narrow.
Broad.
Pdcing
Research
Packaging
Cred~
Promotion
As indus~ies grow, they become more competitive. New entrants are attracted and existing producers a~empt to Nfferentiam themselves through improved products and moreefficient produ~n processes. As a resuk, indus~y capacky o~en grows faster than demand and the enviromnent shi~s ~om a seller~ mark~ to a buyer~ mark~. Firms o~en
respond to such changes with aggressNe promotionN activities--such as hiring more
sa~speople, increasing adve~N~g budgets, or offering ~equent price promotions--to
maintain mark~ share and hold down unit costs.
Unfortunately, this Nnd of sNes-oHen~d response to increasing comp~ition still focuses on selling what the firm wants to make r~her than on customer needs. Worse, competitors can easi~ match such aggressNe sa~s tactics. Simp~ spending more on selling
efforts usually does not create a su~a~able comp~itive advantage.
As indu~ries mature, sales vNume levels off and ~chnNo~c~ ~fferences among
brands tend to Nsappear as manufacture~ copy the be~ features of each other~ produc~.
ConsequentlL a firm must seek new mark~ segments or steal share ~om competitors by
offering lower price~ superior service~ or intanNNe benefi~ other firms cannot m~ch. At
this stage, managers can most reaNly appreciate the benefits of a mark~ orientat~m and
marke~ are o~en Nven a bigger ro~ in dev~oping competitive s~egies.~ It is not surpriNng, then, th~ many of America~ most mark~-ofiented fums and those working
hardest to become marke~orienmd--are wellmstablished competito~ in relative~ mature
industries. Of cou~ a gNen indu~ryN characmrisfics may make some components of a
mark~ orientation more crit~N for good performance than others. For example, in an indusWy dominated by large, dynamic competitors--as in mass merchan~se reviling ~ the
United States (Wa~Ma~ Target, Sears, etc.) bNng responsNe to comp~kor actions may
be even more impo~ant than a sWong cu~omer focus?~ But the bosom l~e is that an orientation reward the m~ket--competitors, cu~omers, and po~ntN1 cu~omersN usually
crucial for continued success in global mark,s.
The Influence of Different Stages of Development across Industries
and Global Markets
The previous discussion suggests that the degree of adoption of a market orientation varies
not only across firms but also across entire indu~fies. Industries that are in earl~r ~ages
of the~ life cycles, or that benefit ~om barriers to entry or other factors reducing the intens~y of competition, are likely to have relatively fewer market-oriented firms. For instance, in pa~ because of governmental regulations that re,riced competition, many service industries--including banks, ~rlines, phy~dans, lawyers, accountants, and insurance
companies--were slow to adopt the marketing concep~ But w~h the trend toward deregulation and the increasingly intense glob~ competition in such indu~ries, many service organ~ations are working much harder to under~and and satisfy the~ cu~omers.
Given that entire economies are in different s~ges of development around the worl< the
popularity--and even the appropriateness---of different business philosophies also may
vary across countries. A production ofentation was the dominant business philosophy in
the Uni~d St~es, for in~ance, during the indu~riafizafion that occurred ~om the mid1800s through World War I. Similarl~ a primary focus on devdoping product and production technology may still be appropriate in developing nations that are in the midst of
industri~izafion.
Intern~ion~ differences in business philosophies can cause some problems for the
globalization ofa firm~ strategic marketing programs, but it can create some opportunit~s
as wall, especially for alliances or joint ventures. Conside~ for example, General Ele~fic~
joint venture with the Mexican appl~nce manufacturer Organization Mabe. The arrangement benefi~ GE by providing direct access to Mexico~ rapidly growing market for household apphances and ~s low-co~ supply of labo~ But it also benefits Mabe--and the
Section One
~tmduction ~ ~gy
Mexican economy--by g~Ng the firm access to cutting-edge R&D and produ~n technology and the capitol necessary to rake advantage of hs newfound know-how?7
In some cases, a firm that acNeved success by beNg N tune w~h i~ envkonment loses
touch wi~ ~s mark~ because manages become ~ant to romper wi~ ~r~eNes and
m~kefing progrmns that worked N ~e pa~. They begin to b~ieve ~e is one be~ way to
s~isfy their cusmm~s. Such s~a~c inertia is dangerous because cu~om~s needs and
compe~Ne offerings change over time. IBM~ ~a~tionN ~cus on la~e organ~ationN
cu~om~s, ~r in~anc~ caused file company to devon too l~le effo~ ~ the much N~e~
growing seNnent of small technology start-ups. And ~s emph~N on comp~ ~chnNogy
and h~dwa~ made it s~w m respond ~ ~e exNosNe growth N demand ~r Web-based
applications and ~r~ces. Thus, in environments where such changes happen frequently,
e ~r~eNc ~anning process needs to be ongoing and adaptive. AH ~e partic~ants,
wh~h~ ~om m~kefing or ~h~ ~n~ionN d~pa~ments, need m p~y constant a~ent~n m
wh~ is happenNg wRh ~eir cu~om~s and competitors.
Recent Developments Affec~ng the Strategic Role
of Marketing
In the furore, str~e~c Nertia wi~ be even more dangerous N many indu~ries because they
are ~cNg Ncreasing magNmdes and rates of change N thek environments. These changes
are mpid~ aRefing the con~xt N wNch marking ~m~es are p~nned and carried out
and the Nform~ion and tools th~ m~kem~ have ~ thNr NsposM. These dev~opments inc~de (1) the in,eased ~obN~n of m~k~s and competition, (2) the growth of the
s~v~e sector of the economy and the importance of ser~ce N maintaNNg customer s~~N~n and ~yalty, (3) the rapid development of new Nform~ion and cormnunications
mchnNoNes, and (4) the growNg impo~ance of ~lationships for improved coor~n~ion
and Ncreased effiNency of m~k~Ng programs and for capturing a larger portion of customers fi~time va~e. Some recent impa~s of these four dev~opments on marketing
management are briefly summarized below and will be continuing themes tfiroughout this
book. We will also specnl~e ~om time to time about how these ongoNg ~ends may reshape the tasks, tools, and mchniques of marketing N the future. It is impossiNe to
pm~ exacHy how these ~ends will play out. Consequently, new busNess school graduates who bo~ undergand the m~kNNg management process and are savvy with respect
to one or more of these ongoNg developments can play an important role--and gaN a potential comp~itive advantage--within even the Nrge~ firms. Such new~ minted manages
can bring ~esh perspectives and va~aNe N~ghts concemNg how lhese emerging ~ends
~e like~ to impa~ ~eir organ~ations cu~omers, competim~, and m~keting Nr~eNes.
GNba6za#on
International m~k~s account ~r a la~e and glowNg p~fion of ~e sales of many orgaNzations. Bm wt~e global malke~ mpm~nt pmm~Ng oppwmnities ~r adNfionN sales
growth and profits, ~ffemnces N m~k~ and comp~itive conditions across country
boundaries can ~quire firms m adept ~ek comp~Nve s~a~es and m~k~Ng pm~ams
m be sn~sful. Even when simH~ maN~Ng ~r~eNes ~e appropriate ~r mult~ countries, Nmrn~nM Nffe~nces in N~as~uctu~, cultu~, legal sy~ems, and ~e l~e o~en
mean ~at one w morn ~ements of ~e m~k~Ng program--such as product ~atums,
pmmotionN appeals, w ~ribution channeN--must be mHomd m local condit~ns ~r ~e
~r~egy to be effe~Ne.
Business
Bu~ness-to-Bu~ness (B2~
Business
Consumer
Exam~es:
Pu~hasing s~es of Ford, Oracl~ Cisco
Supply chain networ~ linking produce~
and d~tHbu~on channel member, such as
3M and WaI-Ma~
Exam~e~
~tailers, such as E*~ad~ Amazon,
RedEnvelope
Producer~ direct sales site~ such as Dell,
American Alines
Web s~es of ~ad~on~ retailers, such as
Sears, Land~ End
Co~ume~B~s ~2B)
Consume~to-Consumer (C2C)
Exam~e~
Sites that enable consume~ to bid on
unsold aiHMe ~cke~ and other goods and
servke~ such as PHce~ne
wodu~ and schedule delNefies dke~ to each of the retN~r~ ~ores. Such papefless exchanges reduce mi~akes and bil~acks, minimize inventory levels, imwove cash flow, and
~crease customer satisfaction and loyalty.
In contrast, Internet sNes from buMnesses to consumers (the uppe~fight quadrant in
Exhib~ 1.8) accounted for ~ than $55 billion m the U.S. mark~ in 2003. Howeveg sales
vo~mes of firms such as AmazoK Dell Computeg and RedEnvebpe are expanOng rapidly, and many ~adRionN mmile~ a~ expand~g their marketing effo~s on the Web as
well. Inform~n avaiNNe over the Internet is affe~g consumer purchase pa~erns even
when the purchases are made in ~aditionN retail outlets. For in~ance, while only a small
percentage of new car purchases in the UNted States are made over the Intern~, a m~o~
ity of buyers now go onhne to compare prices or g~her ~formafion about brands.
C~a~L the Web is wesent~g markem~ with new ~r~egic options as well as new
competitive threes and opportunities--regardless of what or to whom they are seH~g.
Therefore, we will devom all of Chapter 11 lo markNing ~mmNes for ~commerce. Howeveg the changes being wrought by these new mclmo~Nes are so extensNe and profound
we will Nscu~ specific examples and thek implications in every chap~
Relationships aovss Ftmctions and Firms
New infomaation techno~gies and the ongo~g search for gre~er marketing effidency and
customer value in the face of ~crea~ng comp~ifion are changing the nature of exchange
between companies. Insmad of engag~g in a discrNe series of arms-~ngth, adversafial exchanges with cu~omers, channel members, and suppl~ on the open markN, more firms
are ~ying to develop and nurture brig-term mNtionships and allNnces, such as the one between 3M and WagMart. Such cooper~Ne rel~nships are thought to improve each partner~ abifity m adapt quic~y m environmentN changes or tbxe~s, to gain gre~er benefits ~
lower co~s from i~ exchange~ and to increase ~e lifetime vane of Rs cu~omers.~
Similar ~nds of cooperative relationsh~s are emerNng inside compaNes as firms seek
mechaNsms for more effemNe~ and effident~ coordinating across functionN deparb
ments the various actMties necessary to identify, a~rac~ service, and satisfy cu~omers. In
many fums, the pNnning and execution th~ used to be the responsibility of a product or
marketing manager are now coor~n~ed and carried out by cro~-fun~nN mares.
22 Section One
EXHIBIT 1.9
~oduc~on to Strategy
The Process of Formulating and Implementing Marketing Stra~gy
lmp~mentingco~rollingImp~ment~n andm~ketingbUSineSs(Cha~er(Chap~r~rategiesandl 3)
~r~egies; (2) the envffonmentM context such as broad social, economic, and ~chnology
trends--in which the firm ~vi~ comp~e; (3) the relative ~rengths and weaknesses of competit~ and ~ends in the compline env~onlnent; and (4) the needs, wants, and characteristics of current and potenthl ct~mm~ Markem~ rear to these dements as the 4Cs.
They are the focus ofa m~ oppo~7~miO, anaO~ and are ~scu~ed in more devil below.
Strategk Issue
The marketing oNectNes and ~rategy for a
particular produc~
mark~ entry must be
achievable with the
company~ avMhble resources and capabilities
and consi~ent w~h the
dffecfion and a~ocafion
of resources inherent in
the firm~ corpor~e and
business4evd s~egies.
Marketing managers also bear the primary ~spons~il~y for formul~ing and imp~menting s~a~Nc marketing plans for indivMual produ~-mark~ entries or product l~es.
But as we have seen, such stramNc marking programs are not crewed in a vacuum. Insma& the marking o~ecfives and s~egy for a pagicular woduct-mark~ entry mu~ be
achievable w~h the company~ avMhble resources and capabilities and conM~ent with the
dffection and a~oc~Mn of resources inherent in the firm~ corporam and business-~vel
s~eNes. In other words, there should be a good fit--or in~rnM con~stency--among the
dements of all three levels of ~r~egg Chapm~ 2 and 3 describe in more detail the components of corporate and bushaess s~egies and the roles mark~ers and other funcfionM
managers phy in shaping the s~e~c direction of thdr organiz~Mns and business un~s.
24
Section One
While some firms~articularly smaller ones--do not bother to write thek marketing
plans, most organizations believe that Mnless all the key eMments of a plan are wfi~en
down.., there wfil always be loopholes for ambiguity or misunde~tanding of s~amgies
and objective~ or of assigned responsibilities for raking action?~ This sugge~s that even
small organizations with hm~ed resources can benefit from preparing a written pNn, however brie Written plans also provide a concrete hi~ory of a product~ str~eg~s and pe~
formance over time, which aids institutional memory and helps educate new managers assigned to the product. Wfi~en plans are necessary in most larger organiz~ions because a
marketing manager~ Woposals usuNly must be reviewed and approved at higher levels of
management and because the approved plan provides the benchmark against Milch the
manager~ performance will be judged. Finally, the discipline involved in producing a formal plan helps ensure that the proposed objective~ s~egL and marketing a~ions are
based on rigorous analysis of the 4Cs and sound reasoning.
Because a wri~en marketing plan is such an important tool for conmmnicating and coordinating expectations and responsibilities throughout the firm, we will say more about ~
in Chapter 12 when we discuss the implementation of marketing programs in detaO. But
because the written plan a~empts to summarize and communicam an overview of the may
keting management process we have been examining, it is wo~hwhiM to briefly examine
the contents of such pNns here.
Marketing plans vary in timing, content, and organization across companies. In general,
marketing plans are developed ammally, though planning periods for some big-t~ket
indu~riM products such as commercN1 Mrcraff may be longeL and in some highly volat~e
indu~ries such as ~lecommunications or e-commerce they can be sho~e~ Plans typica~y
follow a format similar to that outhned in Exhibff 1.10.
There are three m6or pa~s to the plan. Fkst, the mark~ing manager detNls his or her
assessment of the current situation. This is the homework portion of the plan where the
manager summarizes the results of his or her analy~s of cu~ent and potentiM cumomers,
the company~ relative s~engths and weaknesses, the competitive s~u~ion, the m6or
trends in the broader envkonment that may affect the product an~ for existing product&
past performance outcomes. This section typicMly also includes foreca~ e~imates of
sales point,l, and other assumptions underlying the pNn, which are especiMly important
for proposed new produc~ or services. Based on these analyses, the manager also may call
aRention to several key issues m~or opportunities or threats that should be dealt w~h
during the pNnning period.
The second pa~ of the pNn details the s~a~gy for the coming period. This pa~ usually
starts by d~Mling the objectives (e.g., sales volume, market share, profits, customer satisfa~ion levels, era.) to be achieved by the product or service during the planning period. It
then outlines the overall marketing s~eg~ the actions asso~ated with each of the 4 Ps
Ohe product, price, promotion, and ~Nc~ or distribution) necessary to implement the
s~eg~ and the timing and locus of responsib~Ry for each action.
Finally, the plan detNls the financial and resource implications of the s~ategy and the
controls to be employed to monRor the plan~ impMmentation and progress over the
Content
I, Execu~ve summary
Presen~ a sho~ ove~iew of the ~sue~ o~e~Ne~ ~rateg~ and ac~ons incorpo~ted
in the plan and their expe~ed ou~omes for quick management review.
Examines the past performance of the product and the ~ements of i~ marke~ng
program (e.g., dNtribu~on, promotion~ etc.).
~ O~e~Nes
~en~fies the main opportunities and threats to the product that the plan mu~ deal
with in the coming yea and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the product
and business unit that must be taken into account in facing those issues.
Specifies the goals to be accompl~hed in terms of sales volum~ market share, and
prof,.
Summarizes the overall strategk approach that will be used to meet the plan~
o~ec~ve
This is the mo~ ~cal section of the annual plan for helping to ensure effe~Ne
implementa~on and coordina~on of a~M~es across func~onal depa~ments. It
specifies
The target market to be pursued.
What spec~c a~ions are to be taken with respe~ to each of the 4 Ps.
Who is responsible for each action.
When the a~ion will be engaged in.
How much will be budgeted for each ac~on.
IX. Controls
D~cu~es how the plan~ progre~ will be mon~ore~ may present con~ngency plans
to be used if performance falls be~w expectat~ns or the ~tuaUon changes.
X. Con~ngency plans
period. Some plans also ~ify ~me contingencies: how ~e plan will be moOfied if c~rain changes occur ~ the mmket, competitive, or em~nM envkonmen~.
Marke~ng
Plan Exercise
"But, xve~e on~ at Chapmr 1!" you migN sag "How do I go abom dNng wlr~ necessary so
at, by ~he end of the course, I can ddN~ a compmem~ pmpaed market~g plal~?" or some similar as~gnmem.
We briefly ~u~ed ~e co~eNs of a ~p~N mark~ing plan ~r an existing produ~ or produm
line ~ ~e end of Chap~r 1. Here, we look ~ markN~g ~ans for new pmdu~s, wh~e ~e ~e some
ex~a chal~nges due to the lack of any N~ory and the need to make lms of ded~ons from square
one.
Thus, wh~ fol~ws is a mrre demi~d s~ of g~dd~es for wh~ each ~n of a good m~keting plan entNls. As youH see, much of what youH find here ap~s m marketing ~ans for existing
bu~nesses or product lines as well. You migN ~ink of this m~N1 as a road map for ~e proje~
wink youll do ~ ~e course, ffyour course ~vN~es preparing a m~km~g plan or some~ing similar. The ~ct ~ this ouO~e looks ~htl> kut not fundamentNly, Nffemm from ~e one in Exh~
1.10 should be a clue to you th~ ~ere~ no single "rigN answeF m how a m~keting plan should be
a~emNed. Given ~e setting in which your project is to be carried ore, we sugge~ you develop your
own outline that best serves your context.
As you proceed through the book, youH find at ~e end of every chapt~ an exemise th~ identb
ties how that chap~rN ~ning comributes to the devdopment of your marketing plan. If you do
these exercises as you go a~ng, youH find ~a much of ~e work your marketing Nan entNN w~l
gN done as a msulk
Outline: New Product Marketing Plan
1. Exec~Ne Summary
Summa6ze the pmdum idea, Rs target m~k~, and the resN~ you ~mca~ (sales, gross
m~Nn, and profit contribut~N, in nm m~e ~an two pages.
2. The Pmdu~ (Good or S~!cO or Bus~s Idea
Identi~ ~e mi~n and SMART o~fiv~ (~ec~ me~u~Ne, a~naNe, m~vam m
your missio~ and time~oun~ of the bu~nes~
Briefly de~ribe ~e pmdum or service and hs targ~ maN~.
St~e your vane proposNon or a posNon~g ~emem ~ omhn~ ~e benefits your pro&
uct, ~r~ce, or bus~s will provide to ~e target customer, in order to ~ffemntiate your
offering from cu~e~ avNNNe ones.
3. M~ket Ana~s
~Oc~e who constimt~ your ov~all mark~ and ~e ~gme~ you will ~Nal~ t~get (defined according m one or mwe of~e ~l~w~g Mnds of N~o~: demograpNc, geogmpNc,
and/or behavioral variant).
Fw ~is m~k~ ov~a~, and ~r your target ~gme~:
--~d~ate their size and current and am~ed grow~ rate (measured if po~ibl< ~
um~, doll,s, and nmnb~ of p~emiN cu~om~O.
Nenti~ any unmet or poorly served needs ~at your new produ~ or ~r!ce will
address.
Identify m~va~ ~ends in any of ~e six macro ~end c~egories that suppo~ or de,act from ~e demand ~r your new wodum or s~!ce.
Nenti~ ~e wants and needs your woduct serves. Wh~ benefits wi~ you o~}g and wh*
woduct ~a~ms ~viH ddN~ ~em?
4. Competitw Assessment
Define the indus~y m wNch you wi~ compem.
A~e~ ~e ~dustly~ fi~e comp~RNe ~es.
~enti~ its cfific~ success ~s.
What dke~ and indirect comp~s c~mntly ~tis~ the needs of your propo~d m~N~
What comp~RNe advamag~ and ~dva~ages w~l specNc competitors have? WiR you
have?
What competitive responds ~ your emW am 1Ne~?
28 Section One
5. M~k~ing Swamgy
Wh~ are your marketing objectives (SMART)?
Wh~ is your overM1 m~k~ing str~egy?
How will your offering be pos~ioned?
Product decisions: ~, augmemed product, brand
PrYing dedMons: pric~g s~eg~ pfic~g ~cs
Di~rib~inn dedMons: channd s~ucmm, push or pNl s~egy
PmmmionM s~egy: inte~ated m~km~g commuNcations oNectives and plan, copy
N~rm, meNa ~an, ~ade and con~m~ pmm~n plan, pe~onN ~Hing pN~ punic relations plan
6. Foreca~ and Budg~
Pmv~e ore w mwe @ma&he~s ~ de~H yo~ ~s and gross m~gin ~m~ and ma~
ket~g budget and ~e ~tNNes ~at will comprise R ~r 3-5 ye~s, mo~h~ ~r ~e fi~t
yea~ ~Ncam, by c~egory of ~tiviV, all planned maNeting &enNng ~r the execution of
yo~ maNefing s~eg~ ~oken down imo as many of~e ~lMw~g ~mg~s as app,:
Advert~ing ~m~ive and media expens~
--Dim~ maNeting (direct mail an~or ~kmaNefing expense)
--Intem~ maNeting (Web site, banners, ~c.,)
--Con~m~ pmmm~n (~oums, ~mNes, ccupcns, mb~, co~, era.)
--Trade promotion (alMwan~s/discounts m your ~stribution channeN)
~ales~rce expenses (salary and fringes, sal~ m~erials, commission, travel)
--Publ~ ml~ns (nonpaid me~a)
Customer servke (inbound order mMng, cu~om~ suppo~, era.)
--O~ (~onso~h~s, evems, ~c.)
~c~ using apwowi~e m~ms, ~e level of effectiveness and effic~ncy you expect
~om each ~ti!W ~each, ~equenc~ CPM, response ram, numb~ of sal~ calls p~ week
close ~m, d~n of s~es cy~ ~c.,). Pin,de appmwi~e ev~ce in a ~u~n ~
suppo~s yo~ comemMn ~ yo~ planned m~kNing budget is ~ffic~ m drive ~e sa~s
you ~ca~.
7. Imp~memm~n and Comml Plan
Prov~e an o~aNzm~nM ~aa~ ~r m~kNing people and Nncfions.
Provide mm~ams of s~am~c an~or operationN comml "dashboard2 ~r key m~k~ing
manageme~ ~nctions.
8. Contingency Plan
Identi~ what is Hkely m change ~ go wmn~ and what shoNd be done ffand when it does.
1. How are ~e basic bus~s pN~pN~ or orientations of a mNor co~mn~ pmdu~s firm such
as General Mills and a smN1 ent~pmneuriN s~rt-up in a fast-~o~ving, bigh-tech industry 1Ne~
~ ~ffe~ What are the implications of~ phil~ophicM ~ffemnc~ for the role ofmarkem~ ~
e str~ pNnning pm~s~s of ~e two finns?
2. As ~e small entrepmneuriN firm de~ribed in que~on 1 ~ows l~ge~ its ma~ matures, and
its ~dustry b~om~ mo~ comp~N~, how ~ould ~s busin~s philo~phy ~ oriem~n
change? Why?
3. WNch m~ should m~kefing manages pl~ in helping to ~rm~me buMn~vd (SBU) strate~es in a la~e d~fied ~m ~ch as Gene~l M~ W~t ~n~ of in~rmation ~e m~ketels
be~ aNe to provide as a basis ~r plamfing? Which issues ~ demems of busin~vel swmegy
can such ~rmation hdp to m~Ne?
Sel~Nagno~ que~inns to m~ your aNh~ m apNy fl~ ~ncepts in this chapmr can be ~und ~ tiffs
book~ Web site ~ ww~mhhe.com/wNke~
1.TNs opeinng examp~ is based on m~eriM found in Stove Lohr, "Big B~e~ B~ Bet: Le~ Tech,
More Touch," New 1~ Time& Money & Bush~ss Section, Sunday, January 25, 2004, pp. 1,10;
Spencer E. Ame, "The New Blue? Business[l~ek, March 17, 2003, pp. 80 88; Spencer E. Ante,
"For Big Blue, The Big EncNNda," Businessll~ek, O~ob~ 2~ 2002, pp. 58-59; ka SageL ~nside IBM: In~rnet Business Mach~es? Businessl, I~ek, E-BIZ section, December 13, 1999,
pp. EB20 38; m~d ~e compaw~ Web s~e at www.ibm.com.
2.For a summ~y of ~e definitions offered by a nmnb~ of mher autlm~, see Roger Kerin, VOay
Mah~an, and R R~an Vamd~an, Contemporary Perspectives ~ Stmteg~ Mark~ Plannh~g
(Boron: Alan and Bacon, 1990), pp. 8-9. Our definit~n diffe~ from some o~ers, howeve~ ~
at we ~ew ~e setting of oNecfives as an iutegral pa~ of stramgy form~ation, whereas they see
o~e~Ne seRing as a sep~e proce~. Because a firm~ oNectives are influenced and con~rNned
by many of flae same envkonme~N and competitive N~o~ as ~e otb~ ~mnents of m~mg~
howeve~ it seems ~NcN m ~eat bmh the de~rm~ion of oNectNes and the resource allocations
aimed at macNng ~ose oNectives as two parts of the same s~ateg~ planning process.
3.Hmveve~ wN~ such corpor~vel synergies o~en are used m justify m~gers, acquisitions, and
forays into new businesses, ~ey som~imes prove elusive. For examp~, see Laura Landro, "Giants Talk Synergy but Fexv Make H Work~ The fl~tH Street JomT~al, Sepmmber 25, 1995, p. B1.
4.C.K. PrahNad and G~y Ham~, "The Core Compe~nce of ~e Corporat~n] Ha~v~ff Bt~htess
Revimv 68 (May-June 1990), pp. 79-91; and George S. Day and Prakash Nedungadi~Managerim Repmsentafious of C~np~RNe Advantage~ JomTml qfl Marke~tg 58 (April 1994),
pp. 31-44.
5. Chri~n Hombur~ Jotm R Wor~nan J~, and Harley Kxohmet; "MarketingN Influence within the
Nnn] JomTtal ofMarke~N 63 (April 1999), pp. 1-17.
6.Quo~d ~ Ka~erine Z. Andrews, "Still a M~or Player: M~keting~ Ro~ in Today~ Firm~ h~sigh~fivm MSI. W~mr 1999, p. 2.
7.Frederick E. Websmr J~, "Exec~g ~e New Marketing Concept," MarketNg Mcmagem~tt 3
(1994), pp. 9-16; and George S. Day, "CreWing a Superior Custome~R~ating CapaNli~," Repo~7 # 03-101 (Cambridge, MA: M~keting Science lnstitut~ 2003).
8. Qumed in G~y Hamel and C. K. PmhaN~ Compe~gJbr Ne F~mo~ (Cambridge, MA: H~vard
Busiuess School Press, 1994).
9.Just~ Martin, ~gnore Your Cusmmeff Fo~Ttm~ May 1, 1995, pp. 121 26.
10."The Right Smff,"JomT~al qfBt~Ness andDesign 2 (Fall 1996), p. 11.
11.R~endm K. Sriva~ava, Ta~dduq A. Sheavani, and Liam Fahe~ "Malketin~ Business Processes,
and Sh~ehoNer Va~e: An OrgaNzationM~ Embedded View of M~keting Acfi~fies and the
DNc~line of M~ket~g," Jotmml of Marketing 63 (SpeNN Issue 1999), pp. 168~9; and Thomas
S. Gruca and Lopo L. Rego, Cusmm~ SatisNction, Cash Floxv, and Shareholder Va~e7 Repo~
#03-106 (Cambridge, MA: M~kN~g Sconce In~imm, 2003).
12.For examp~, see John C. N~v~ and Stanley E SlamL "The Effect of a Market OrieN~n
on Business Profitab~i~," Jomwal of Marketing 54 (April 1990), pp. 1 18; Bernard J. Jaworski
and Ajay KoNi, "M~ket Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences] JomTtal qfMarke~tg
57 (July 1993); Stoney E Sl~er and Jolm C. Narvec "M~ket Orie~afiom Performance, and
the ModeratNg Influence of C~np~R~e Env~onmem~ Jowwal qf Marke~g 58 Oanuary
1994), pp. 46 55; and Subin Im and JoN~ E Workma~ "Market Orientation, C~atM~, and New
Product Perfo~nance in High-Technology Firms7 Jotmml of Marketing 68 (April 2004),
pp. 114-32.
13. RohR Deshpande, EI~ O~ and Sang-Hoon Kim, "P~empting Competitive Risk Via Cu~omer
Focus: EntrepmnenriN Finns in Japan and the U.SY Repm7 #03-114 (Cambridg~ MA: MarkNing Science Institut~ 2003).
14. S~n~y E Sl~er and Jolm C. Narver, "Mark~ Orientation, P~formance, and ~e Moderating Influence of Comp~itive Euviromnent2 JomTud of Marketing 58 Oanuary 1994), pp. 46 55; and
Jolm E Workman Jr., "When Marketing Shoed FN~w ~smad of Lea~" MarketitN Management
2 (1993), pp. 8-19.
15.Charles H. Nob~, R~ K. Sinha, and Aji~ Kuma~ "Mark~ Orientation and ARern~Ne