Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
HYPOTHESIS
This study sought to prove the following hypotheses:
1. There is no difference between the self-efficacy scores of respondents
when grouped by:
a. sex,
b. civil status, and
c. educational attainment.
2. There is norelationship between the self-efficacy scores and:
a. health condition,
b. health condition and motivation level,
c. health condition, motivation level, and monthly income, and
d. health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and expectation in
life.
Frequency
Percent
121
240
361
33.5
66.5
100.0
147
211
3
361
40.7
58.4
0.8
100.0
282
78.1
71
19.7
2.2
361
100.0
Table 1 shows the respondents profile. (Add content of the table here.)
Table 2
Self-efficacy of the respondents
Beliefs
I am not afraid to voice my opinions,
even when they are in opposition to
the opinions of most people.
In general, I feel I am in charge of the
situation in which I live.
I am not interested in activities that
will expand my horizons.
Most people see me as loving and
affectionate.
Mean
Description
4.623
Agree
4.537
Agree
2.186
Disagree
4.557
Agree
2.339
Disagree
4.681
Agree
4.108
2.645
Disagree
5.191
Strongly Agree
2.474
Disagree
5.500
Strongly Agree
5.194
Strongly Agree
3.139
2.028
Disagree
2.244
Disagree
1.994
Disagree
2.094
Disagree
2.569
Disagree
3.565
4.759
Agree
4.958
Agree
5.330
Strongly Agree
2.089
Disagree
5.097
Agree
4.319
4.202
2.781
4.903
Agree
5.094
Agree
2.083
Disagree
2.571
Disagree
2.507
Disagree
5.468
Strongly Agree
2.393
Disagree
4.239
3.189
4.316
4.464
Agree
2.302
Disagree
5.180
Strongly Agree
3.729
4.612
Agree
Weighted Mean
3.72
Table 3
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and sex
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
.648
1
.648
.002
.966
124282.82
350
355.094
Within Groups
6
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by sex.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 3 revealed that the F-ratio is .002 with
a p-value of .966 at df = 1/350, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
scoreof male and female respondents. Based on the group means, males
with a mean of 207.14 and SD of 19.60 do not differ from females (207.23,
18.46) as regards self-efficacy scores.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Tamayao (2014)(Add something here.)
Table 4
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and civil status
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
940.120
2
470.060
1.330
.266
123343.35
349
353.419
Within Groups
5
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by civil status.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 4 revealed that the F-ratio is
1.330with a p-value of .266at df = 2/349, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is
accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
score of single, married and individuals of other relationships. Based on the
group means, singleindividuals with a mean of 205.85 and SD of 19.56 do
not differ from married individuals (207.92, 18.29) and individuals of other
relationships (221.00, 15.52) as regards self-efficacy scores.
Table 5
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and educational attainment
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
1708.893
2
854.447
2.433
.089
122574.58
349
351.217
Within Groups
1
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by educational attainment.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 5 revealed that the F-ratio is
2.433with a p-value of .089at df = 2/349, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is
accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
score of bachelors, masters, and doctorate degree graduates. Based on the
Table 6
Multiple linear regressionshowing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
208.67
3.885
53.707
.000
(Constant)
3
Health Conditionb
-7.722
1.687
-.248
-4.579
.000
a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score
The study hypothesized that there is no relationship betweenselfefficacy score and health condition.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship
betweenself-efficacy score and health condition.The independent variable
statistically significantly predicted self-efficacy score with an F-ratio of
20.964 with a p-value of .000 at df = 1/320, 0.05. Table 6 shows that the
unstandardized coefficient for health condition is -7.722. Thus, the null
hypothesis is rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to a
7.722 decrease in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Calonia (1898)(Add something here.)
Table 7
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition and motivation level
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
(Constant)
Health Conditionb
Motivation Levelb
180.95
3
-7.989
10.707
7.961
1.650
2.702
-.257
.210
22.729
.000
-4.841
3.962
.000
.000
Table 8
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition, motivation level, and monthly income
Coefficientsa
Model
(Constant)
Health Conditionb
Motivation Levelb
Monthly Incomeb
Table 9
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and
educational attainment
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
169.73
8.787
19.316
.000
(Constant)
6
Health Conditionb
-8.063
1.625
-.259
-4.961
.000
Motivation Levelb
7.362
2.959
.144
2.488
.013
Monthly Incomeb
.000
.000
.142
2.715
.007
Expectation in Lifeb
5.896
2.778
.123
2.122
.035
a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score
The study hypothesized that there is no relationship between selfefficacy score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and
expectation in life.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship between
self-efficacy score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income,
and expectation in life. The independent variable statistically significantly
predicted self-efficacy score with an F-ratio of 12.735with a p-value of .000 at
df = 4/317, 0.05. Table 9 shows that the unstandardized coefficient for health
condition, motivation level, monthly income, and expectation in life is -8.063,
7.362,.000, and 5.896, respectively. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to an
8.079 decrease in self-efficacy score, but an increase in motivation level
leads to a 7.362increase in self-efficacy score and an increase in expectation
in life yields to a 5.896 increase in self-efficacy score. However, monthly
income does not lead to any increase and decrease in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Iringan (1945)(Add something here.)