Você está na página 1de 12

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study sought to answer the following questions:


1. What is the profile of the respondents according to:
a. sex,
b. civil status, and
c. educational attainment?
2. How do the respondents perceive their own self-efficacy?
3. Is there a difference between the self-efficacy scores of respondents when
grouped by:
a. sex,
b. civil status, and
c. educational attainment?
4. To what extent can the variables explain singly or in combination
differences in self-efficacy of the respondents?

HYPOTHESIS
This study sought to prove the following hypotheses:
1. There is no difference between the self-efficacy scores of respondents
when grouped by:
a. sex,
b. civil status, and
c. educational attainment.
2. There is norelationship between the self-efficacy scores and:
a. health condition,
b. health condition and motivation level,
c. health condition, motivation level, and monthly income, and
d. health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and expectation in
life.

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS


The analysis and interpretation of findings are hereby presented in this
chapter.
Table 1
Profile of the respondents
Categories
Sex
Male
Female
Total
Civil Status
Single
Married
Other Relationships
Total
Educational
Attainment
Bachelors Degree
Graduate
Masters Degree
Graduate
Doctorate Degree
Graduate
Total

Frequency

Percent

121
240
361

33.5
66.5
100.0

147
211
3
361

40.7
58.4
0.8
100.0

282

78.1

71

19.7

2.2

361

100.0

Table 1 shows the respondents profile. (Add content of the table here.)
Table 2
Self-efficacy of the respondents
Beliefs
I am not afraid to voice my opinions,
even when they are in opposition to
the opinions of most people.
In general, I feel I am in charge of the
situation in which I live.
I am not interested in activities that
will expand my horizons.
Most people see me as loving and
affectionate.

Mean

Description

4.623

Agree

4.537

Agree

2.186

Disagree

4.557

Agree

I live life one day at a time and don't


really think about the future.
When I look at the story of my life, I
am pleased with how things have
turned out.
My decisions are not usually influenced
by what everyone else is doing.
The demands of everyday life often
get me down.
I think it is important to have new
experiences that challenge how you
think about yourself and the world.
Maintaining close relationships has
been difficult and frustrating for me.
I have sense of direction and purpose
in life.
In general, I feel confident and positive
about myself.
I tend to worry about what other
people think of me.
I do not fit well with the people and the
community around me.
When I think about it, I haven't really
improved much as a person over the
years.
I often feel lonely because I have few
close friends with whom to share my
concerns.
My daily activities often seem trivial
and unimportant to me.
I feel like many of the people I know
have gotten more out of life than I
have.
I tend to be influenced by people with
strong opinions.
I am quite good at managing the many
responsibilities of my daily life.
I have the sense that I have developed
a lot as a person over time.
I
enjoy
personal
and
mutual
conversations with family members or
friends.
I don't have a sense of what it is I'm
trying to accomplish in life.
I like most aspects of my personality.

2.339

Disagree

4.681

Agree

4.108

More Agree Than


Disagree

2.645

Disagree

5.191

Strongly Agree

2.474

Disagree

5.500

Strongly Agree

5.194

Strongly Agree

3.139

More Disagree Than


Agree

2.028

Disagree

2.244

Disagree

1.994

Disagree

2.094

Disagree

2.569

Disagree

3.565

More Agree Than


Disagree

4.759

Agree

4.958

Agree

5.330

Strongly Agree

2.089

Disagree

5.097

Agree

I have confidence in my opinions, even


if they are contrary to the general
consensus.
I often feel overwhelmed by my
responsibilities.
I do not enjoy being in new situations
that require me to change my old
familiar ways of doing things.
People would describe me as a giving
person, willing to share my time with
others.
I enjoy making plans for the future and
working to make them a reality.
In many ways, I feel disappointed
about my achievements in life.
It's difficult for me to voice my own
opinions on controversial matters.
I have difficulty arranging my life in a
way that is satisfying to me.
For me, life has been a continuous
process of learning, changing and
growth.
I have not experienced many warm
and trusting relationships with others.
Some
people
wander
aimlessly
through life, but I am not one of them.
My attitude about myself is probably
not as positive as most people feel
about themselves.
I judge myself by what I think is
important, not by the values of what
others think is important.
I have been able to build a home and a
lifestyle for myself that is much to my
liking.
I gave up trying to make big
improvements or changes in my life a
long time ago.
I know that I can trust my friends, and
they know that they can trust me.
I sometimes feel as if I've done all
there is to do in life.
When I compare myself to my friends
and acquaintances, it makes me feel
good about who I am.

4.319

More Agree Than


Disagree

4.202

More Agree Than


Disagree

2.781

More Disagree Than


Agree

4.903

Agree

5.094

Agree

2.083

Disagree

2.571

Disagree

2.507

Disagree

5.468

Strongly Agree

2.393

Disagree

4.239

More Agree Than


Disagree

3.189

More Disagree Than


Agree

4.316

More Agree Than


Disagree

4.464

Agree

2.302

Disagree

5.180

Strongly Agree

3.729

More Agree Than


Disagree

4.612

Agree

Weighted Mean

3.72

More Agree Than


Disagree

Table 2 shows the weighted mean of the respondents efficacy score.


With a weighted mean of 3.72, the respondents perceived that they agree
more than disagree that they have positive self-efficacy.(Add something
here.)

Table 3
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and sex
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
.648
1
.648
.002
.966
124282.82
350
355.094
Within Groups
6
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by sex.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 3 revealed that the F-ratio is .002 with
a p-value of .966 at df = 1/350, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
scoreof male and female respondents. Based on the group means, males
with a mean of 207.14 and SD of 19.60 do not differ from females (207.23,
18.46) as regards self-efficacy scores.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Tamayao (2014)(Add something here.)

Table 4
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and civil status
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
940.120
2
470.060
1.330
.266
123343.35
349
353.419
Within Groups
5
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by civil status.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 4 revealed that the F-ratio is
1.330with a p-value of .266at df = 2/349, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is
accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
score of single, married and individuals of other relationships. Based on the
group means, singleindividuals with a mean of 205.85 and SD of 19.56 do
not differ from married individuals (207.92, 18.29) and individuals of other
relationships (221.00, 15.52) as regards self-efficacy scores.

The findings suggest that(Add something here.)


This supports/contradicts Reyes (2013)(Add something here.)

Table 5
Analysis of variance between self-efficacy score and educational attainment
Sum of
df
Mean
F-ratio p-value
Squares
Square
Between Groups
1708.893
2
854.447
2.433
.089
122574.58
349
351.217
Within Groups
1
124283.47
351
Total
4
The study hypothesized that there is no difference between the selfefficacy scores of respondents when grouped by educational attainment.
The Analysis of Variance in Table 5 revealed that the F-ratio is
2.433with a p-value of .089at df = 2/349, 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is
accepted.
The finding means that there is no significant difference in self-efficacy
score of bachelors, masters, and doctorate degree graduates. Based on the

group means, bachelors degree graduates with a mean of 206.92 and SD of


18.78 do not differ from masters degree (206.63, 19.03) and doctorate
degree holders (221.63, 13.82) as regards self-efficacy scores.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Lingan (1521)(Add something here.)

Table 6
Multiple linear regressionshowing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
208.67
3.885
53.707
.000
(Constant)
3
Health Conditionb
-7.722
1.687
-.248
-4.579
.000
a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score

b. Independent Variables: Health Condition

The study hypothesized that there is no relationship betweenselfefficacy score and health condition.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship
betweenself-efficacy score and health condition.The independent variable
statistically significantly predicted self-efficacy score with an F-ratio of
20.964 with a p-value of .000 at df = 1/320, 0.05. Table 6 shows that the
unstandardized coefficient for health condition is -7.722. Thus, the null
hypothesis is rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to a
7.722 decrease in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Calonia (1898)(Add something here.)

Table 7
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition and motivation level
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error

(Constant)
Health Conditionb
Motivation Levelb

180.95
3
-7.989
10.707

7.961
1.650
2.702

-.257
.210

22.729

.000

-4.841
3.962

.000
.000

a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score

b. Independent Variables: Health Condition and Motivation Level


The study hypothesized that there is no relationship between selfefficacy score and health condition and motivation level.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship between
self-efficacy score and health condition and motivation level. The
independent variable statistically significantly predicted self-efficacy score
with an F-ratio of 18.812 with a p-value of .000 at df = 2/319, 0.05. Table 7
shows that the unstandardized coefficient for health condition and
motivation level is-7.989and 10.707, respectively. Thus, the null hypothesis is
rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to a
7.989decrease in self-efficacy score, but an increase in motivation level leads
to a 10.707 increase in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Pangan (1941)(Add something here.)

Table 8
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition, motivation level, and monthly income
Coefficientsa

Model

(Constant)
Health Conditionb
Motivation Levelb
Monthly Incomeb

Unstandardized Standardiz t-value


pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
177.81
7.964
22.328
.000
5
-8.079
1.634
-.259
-4.944
.000
10.066
2.685
.197
3.748
.000
.000
.000
.144
2.745
.006

a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score

b. Independent Variables: Health Condition, Motivation Level, and Monthly Income


The study hypothesized that there is no relationship between selfefficacy score and health condition, motivation level, and monthly income.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship between
self-efficacy score and health condition, motivation level, and monthly
income. The independent variable statistically significantly predicted selfefficacy score with an F-ratio of 15.310with a p-value of .000 at df = 3/318,
0.05. Table 8 shows that the unstandardized coefficient for health condition,
motivation level, and monthly income is -8.079, 10.066, and .000,
respectively. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to
an8.079 decrease in self-efficacy score, but an increase in motivation level
leads to a 10.066increase in self-efficacy score. However, monthly income
does not lead to any increase and decrease in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Raquepo (1972)(Add something here.)

Table 9
Multiple linear regression showing the relationship between self-efficacy
score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and
educational attainment
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Standardiz t-value
pCoefficients
ed
value
Coefficient
s
B
Std.
Beta
Error
169.73
8.787
19.316
.000
(Constant)
6
Health Conditionb
-8.063
1.625
-.259
-4.961
.000
Motivation Levelb
7.362
2.959
.144
2.488
.013
Monthly Incomeb
.000
.000
.142
2.715
.007
Expectation in Lifeb
5.896
2.778
.123
2.122
.035
a. Dependent Variable: Efficacy Score

b. Independent Variables: Health Condition, Motivation Level, Monthly Income, and


Expectation in Life

The study hypothesized that there is no relationship between selfefficacy score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income, and
expectation in life.
Multiple linear regression was used to predict the relationship between
self-efficacy score and health condition, motivation level, monthly income,
and expectation in life. The independent variable statistically significantly
predicted self-efficacy score with an F-ratio of 12.735with a p-value of .000 at
df = 4/317, 0.05. Table 9 shows that the unstandardized coefficient for health
condition, motivation level, monthly income, and expectation in life is -8.063,
7.362,.000, and 5.896, respectively. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.
The finding means that a decrease in health condition results to an
8.079 decrease in self-efficacy score, but an increase in motivation level
leads to a 7.362increase in self-efficacy score and an increase in expectation
in life yields to a 5.896 increase in self-efficacy score. However, monthly
income does not lead to any increase and decrease in self-efficacy score.
The findings suggest that(Add something here.)
This supports/contradicts Iringan (1945)(Add something here.)

Você também pode gostar