Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In order to conserve natural resources and economize energies, weight reduction has been
the main focus of automobile manufactures as a recent trend. Weight reduction can be achieved by
introducing a better material to the existing one, design optimization and better manufacturing
process. The Suspension leaf spring is one of the potential parts for weight reduction in automobile
as it accounts for 10% to 20% of un-sprung weight, which is considered to be the mass not
supported by the leaf spring.
Advantage of composite leaf spring is it makes the vehicle achieve with more fuel
efficiency and improved riding quality. The introduction of composites materials has made possible
to reduce weight of leaf spring without any reduction of load carrying capacity and stiffness and
also composite materials have more strain energy storage capacity and high strength to weight
ratio. So now a days composites materials are being used in auto mobile industries to replaced the
metal components or parts.
Composite materials offers oppournity for substantial weight saving. Springs are designed
to absorb and store the energy, then release it hence strain energy of the material an shape become
major factor in designing the spring.
Over a few years plastics based composites materials are being used in automobile to
reduce the weight and conserve the natural resources. However, ecological concern has resulted in
a renewed interest in natural materials for their recyclability, light weight, non-abrasive and non
polluting properties. Important issues such as recyclability and environmental safety need to be
addresses when the new materials and products are introduced. Lignocelluloses natural fibers such
as flax, hemp, jute and sisal are interesting, environmental friendly alternatives to the use of glass
as reinforcement in engineering composites.
The benefits that these fibers provide over conventional reinforcement materials, and the
development of natural fibers composites has been a subject of interest for past few years.
1.1 Background
Semi elliptical leaf spring is almost universally used for suspension system in light and
heavy commercial vehicles. For cars also, these are widely used for rear suspension.
Springs are placed between the road wheels and the body. When the wheels come across
the bumps on the road body rises and deflects the spring, thereby energy is stored in it or released.
1
Due to the elasticity of the spring material, it rebounds thereby expending the stored
energy. In this way the spring starts vibrating, of course, with amplitude decreasing gradually on
the account of internal friction of the spring material of the suspension joints till vibration cease.
Objective of suspension
Multi leaf springs are widely used for automobile and rail road suspension .It consists of
series of flat plates, usually semi elliptical as shown in fig.
The leaves are held together by means of two U-bolts and a center clip .Rebound clips are
provided to keep the leaves in alignment and prevent lateral shifting of the plates during the
operation. The longest leaf called as master leaf is bent at both the ends to form spring eye. At the
center, the spring is fixed to the axle of the car. Multi leaf spring is provided with one or more extra
full length graduated leaves in addition to the master leaf. The extra full length leaves are stacked
between the master leaf and the graduated length leaves. The extra full length is provided to
support the transverse shear force.
For the purpose of analysis the leafs are divided in to two groups namely master leaf along
with graduated length leaves forming one group and extra full length leaves forming the other. The
following notations are used in analysis.
nf = number of extra full length leaves
ng = number of graduated length leaves including master leaf
n = total number of leaves
b = width of each leaf (mm)
t = thickness of each leaf (mm)
L = length of cantilever or half the length of semi elliptic spring (mm)
F = force applied at the end of spring (N)
Ff = portion of F taken by extra full length leaves (N)
Fg = portion of F taken by graduated length leaves (N)
The group of graduated length leaves along with master leaf can be treated as triangular
plate.
In this case it is assumed that the individual leaves are separated and master leaf placed at
the centre. The second leaf is cut longitudinally in to two halves, each of width b/2 and placed on
each side of the master leaf. A similar procedure is repeated for other leaves. The resultant shape is
approximately a triangular plate of thickness (t) and maximum width at the support as (n g b). The
bending stress in the plate which is uniform throughout is given by
(b)g = Mb/I *Y
(b)g = 6FgL/ nbbt2
(I)
It can be proved that the defection g at the load point of the triangular plate is given by
g = FgL3/2EImax = 6FgL3/Engbt3
(II)
Similarly the extra full length leaves can be treated as rectangular plate of thickness (t) and
uniform width (n f b) as shown in the figure. The bending stress at the support is given by
(b)f = Mb/I *Y =6FfL/ nfbt2
(III)
(IV)
g = f
6FgL3/Engbt3 = 4FfL3/Enfbt3
Fg/Ff = 2ng / 3nf
Also,
Fg + Ff = F
Ff = 3nf F/ (3nf + 2ng)
Ff = 2ng F/ (3nf + 2ng)
(b)f = Mb/I *Y =12 F L/ (3nf + 2ng)bt2
(b)f = Mb/I *Y =18 F L/ (3nf + 2ng)bt2
It is seen from the above equation that the bending stress in full length leaves is more than
those in graduated length leaves. The defection at the end of the spring is given by
4
The standard dimensions for the width and thickness of the leaf section m are as follows:
Nominal thickness : 3.2,4.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,9,10,11,12,14,and 16
Nominal width( mm) : 32,40,45,,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,90,1000and 125. [9]
1.2 Aim and Objective
A vehicle carries sprung and un-sprung weights during transportation .The un-sprung weighted part
provides a suspension and ride comfort to the drive, this un-sprung weight unnecessarily increases the weight
of the vehicle and it affects the fuel consumption. Some automobile industries are trying to reduce the unsprung weight of the vehicle by providing the nearly same ride comfort so that fuel will reduce and it will
help to saving the national wastage.
1.2.1 Problem Identification
The weight of the conventional multi leaf spring is very heavy, i.e. 10 to 20% un-sprung weight of
vehicle.
Multi leaf structure creates problems such as producing squeaking sound, fretting corrosion thereby
decreasing the fatigue life.
High cost
The strength to weight ratio of the composite material is high i.e. 3 to 5 times lighter than the
comparable steel leaf spring.
As single leaf eliminates the problems arising due to multi leaf structure.
Sudden spring failure does not occur due to laminated structure
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
Composites materials are now extensively used in the automobile industry instead of metal parts.
Several papers were published on this topic; some of these papers are reviewed here for the further study of
composites materials leaf spring application for automobile.
A single leaf with variable thickness and width for constant cross sectional area of unidirectional
glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) with similar mechanical and geometrical properties to the multi leaf
spring, was designed, fabricated (hand lay- up technique) and tested. The computer algorithm for design for
variable with and variable thickness mono composite leaf spring is explained. Three-dimensional finite
element analysis is used for verification of result obtained from experiment. In which the solid 45 element is
used for steel leaf spring and solid layered 46 element is used for composite leaf spring .For the fabrication of
mono composite leaf spring of E-glass/epoxy hand lay- up technique is used. The experimental test are
carried on both steel and composite leaf spring and compared the result .It is observed that composite leaf
spring is more superior than steel with a large weight reduction [1].
Composite leaf spring is design on basis of fatigue failure .Theoretical equation for prediction
fatigue life is formulated using fatigue modulus and its degrading rate. The dimensions and number of leaves
for both steel leaf spring and composite leaf spring are considered to be same. The stress analysis is
performed using finite element method .The element selected for analysis is solid 45 which behave like a
spring. For the fabrication of each leave the filament winding machine is used and assembled this leaves
together with the help of center bolt and four side clamps. The testing of steel multi leaf spring and composite
multi leaf spring are carried out with the help of an electro-hydraulic leaf spring test rig. Design and
experimental fatigue analysis of composite multi leaf spring are carried out using data analysis. It is found
that composite leaf spring has 67.35%lesser stress, 64.95% higher stiffness and 126.98% higher natural
frequency and also 68.15% weight reduction is achieved [2].
In this paper a four-leaf steel spring used in the rear suspension system of light vehicles is analyzed
using ANSYS V5.4 software. The finite element results showing stresses and deflections verified the existing
analytical and experimental solutions. Using the results of the steel leaf spring, a composite one made from
fiberglass with epoxy resin is designed and optimized using ANSYS. Main consideration is given to the
optimization of the spring geometry. The objective was to obtain a spring with minimum weight that is
capable of carrying given static external forces without failure. The design constraints were stresses (Tsai
Wu failure criterion) and displacements. The results showed that an optimum spring width decreases
hyperbolically and the thickness increases linearly from the spring eyes towards the axle seat. Compared to
the steel spring, the optimized composite spring has stresses that are much lower, the natural frequency is
higher and the spring weight without eye units is nearly 80% lower [3].
This paper presents the design evolution process of a composite leaf spring for freight rail
applications. Three designs of eye-end attachment for composite leaf springs are described. The material used
is glass fiber reinforced polyester. Static testing and finite element analysis have been carried out to obtain
the characteristics of the spring. Loaddeflection curves and strain measurement as a function of load for the
three designs tested have been plotted for comparison with FEA predicted values. The main concern
associated with the first design is the delamination failure at the interface of the fibers that have passed
around the eye and the spring body, even though the design can withstand 150 KN static proof load and one
million cycles fatigue load. FEA results confirmed that there is a high inter-laminar shear stress concentration
in that region. The second design feature is an additional transverse bandage around the region prone to
delamination. Delamination was contained but not completely prevented. The third design overcomes the
problem by ending the fibers at the end of the eye section [4].
A single leaf spring with variable thickness of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) with similar
mechanical and geometrical properties to the multi leaf steel spring was designed, fabricated and tested.
Glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) presents advantages over graphite/epoxy such as lower sensitivity to
cracks, impact and wear damage. The leaf spring model was considered to be a parabolic ally tapered,
constant width beam carrying a concentrated load and assumed to be symmetrical with different cord lengths
for the two limbs of the spring. A finite element program is used to model the behavior of leaf spring. In
addition analytical analysis can be used to develop an expression which is a function of thickness and
position along the spring. In present work the hand lay-up vacuum bag process was initially employed and
mandrels (male and female) were made from plywood according to the desired profile and the glass fiber
fabric was cut to the desired lengths, so that when deposited on the mandrel, would give the calculated
thickness. The operation was simply performed by depositing impregnated glass fiber with epoxy resin over
the rotating mandrel in a hoop pattern. The spring was subjected to a series of laboratory static loading tests.
This study demonstrated that composite can be used for leaf spring for light trucks (jeeps) and meet the
requirement, together with substantial weight saving [5].
In this paper, the influence of ellipticity ratio on performance of woven roving wrapped composite
elliptical springs has been investigated both experimentally and numerically. A series of experiments was
conducted for composite elliptical springs with ellipticity ratios (a/b) ranging from one to two. Mechanical
performance and failure modes of composite elliptic spring elements under static load conditions are
reported. Key design parameters, such as spring rate and failure load, are measured as a function of spring
thickness. Parallel with the experimental work, numerical simulation for fatigue calculations was performed.
The simulation was designed to calculate numerically spring constants of elliptic subjected to the
compressive load along a major axis of the tubes and to calculate the cycle life of the elliptical composite
spring. The simulation was performed using a commercial available finite element package (LUSAS). Eight
noded QTS8 was used since they are expected to give an accurate stress and strain results. Composite elliptic
spring with ellipticity ratios of a/b 2.0 displayed the highest spring rate. The present investigation verified
that composites can be utilized for vehicle suspension and meet the requirements, together with substantial
weight saving. It is also believed that hybrid composite elliptical springs have better fatigue behavior than the
conventional and composite leaf and coil spring [6].
In this Paper hand lay-up technique for fabrication of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) laminated
plates, using glass fibers in the form of continuous roving, is presented. Fabricating the glass fiber roving
reinforced epoxy (GFRRE) laminated plates, three sub-methods have been implemented in the present
investigation: (a) resin flow method, (b) resin transfer method, and (c) impregnation method. Among the
three techniques discussed here, the impregnation method is the most effective, while the resin transfer
method is quite satisfactory. In this study, a new hand lay-up method has been developed by which any plate
having arbitrary number of layers with arbitrary fiber orientation angles, can be fabricated. The impregnation
method has the potential to fabricate FRP laminates, which will compare favorably with most structural
materials and, especially, with other types of FRP laminates as far as the strength-to-weight and modulus-toweight ratios are concerned [7].
2.1 Conclusion drawn from literature survey.
The leaf spring is design by considering as it is behave like a cantilever beam. For the analysis
purpose ANSYS software is selected as it gives good result. For the analysis of composite leaf spring the
SOLID46 element is selected and mapped meshing is done. The fabrication of constant width constant
thickness composite leaf spring is done by with the help of hand lay-up method. The specimen is tested
experimentally by conducting a single point bending test. In almost all the paper it is concluded that by using
composite material heavy reduction in the weight is obtain with many other advantages such as reduction in
noise, increasing in comfort ride. The suggestion is that in forthcoming efforts, analysis of FRP leaf spring could
be best possible with Finite Element Method with ANSYS. The work is to design the FRP leaf spring, for
fabrication of FRP leaf spring the hand lay -up technique is used as it is more economical than the other method of
fabrication. A stress analysis is performed using finite element method (FEM) and ANSYS Software. Considering
the environmental issues the use of natural fibers in composite can also be recommended. The natural fibers such
as Jute, Flax , Hemp, Sisal Coir etc can also be used The experimental test has to be carried on both Glass Fiber
Reinforced Composite (GFRC) and Natural Fiber Reinforced Composite (NFRC) leaf spring and compared the
result. Fatigue analysis is required to find the life of GFRC leaf spring.
Reinforcement
Matrix
Composit
es
3. SELECTION OF MATERIAL
Where,
U=Strain Energy
= Stress
= Density of Material
E=Young s Modulus of the Material
The stored elastic strain energy in a leaf spring varies directly proportional with the square of
maximum allowable stress and inversely proportional with the modulus of elasticity both in the longitudinal
and transverse direction.
The composite material have more elastic strain energy storage capacity and high strength to
weight ratio as compared to those of steel thus composite materials have been selected for leaf spring.
Glass The most widely used fiber in polymer composites , the term fiber glass is applied to
denote glass fiber-reinforced plastic(GRPF)
A .E-Glass A strong and low cost, but modulus is less than other (500000psi)
B .S-Glass A stiffer and its tensile strength is one highest of all fibers materials
(650000psi). Has about five times the tensile strength of steel and has density of about one third
tensile strength three to five times stronger than steel and has density that is one fourth of steel.
Boron It is having very high elastic modulus, but its high cost limits its application to aerospace
components.
Ceramics Silicon carbide (SiC) and aluminum oxide (Al 2O3) are the main fiber materials among
ceramics. Both have high elastic moduli and can be used to strengthen low- density, low modulus
10
Types of fiber
Properties
E- Glass
S-Glass
Carbon fiber
Ceramic
11
12
Although S2 fibers have better mechanical properties than E - fibers, but the cost associated with EGlass is much lower to that of S2 .So in present work the E-Glass/Epoxy is selected as the material for
manufacturing of spring.
3.3.1 Glass fiber
Glass is the most common fiber used in polymer matrix composites. Its advantages include its
strength, low cost, highly chemical resistant. The main types are E-Glass and S-Glass.The alphabet E-stands
for electrical, as it was designed for electrical applications. However, it is being used for many other
purposes now, such as decoration and structural applications. The alphabet S stands for high content of
silica, it retains its strength and elevated temperatures and also has higher fatigue strength.
13
Graph 3.5 Effect increasing the length of E-Glass fiber in an epoxy matrix increasing the strength of
composite.
Fibers may be short , long or even continuous . Their dimensions are often characterized by aspect ratio l/d,
where l is the length of the fiber and d is the diameter of the fiber. Typical fiber have diameter varying from
10m (10 x 104cm ) to 150 m (150 x 104 cm )
3.4.2 Amount of fibers
A great volume fraction of fiber increases the strength and stiffness of the composite, as we would
expect from the rule of matrix. However, the maximum volume fraction is about 80%, beyond which the
fiber can no longer be surrounded by the matrix.
14
Graph 3.6 Effect of fiber orientation on the tensile strength of E-Glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite
The orientation of the fiber indicates the strength of the composite and the strength is greatest along
longitudinal direction of the fiber. This does not means the longitudinal fibers can take same load
irrespective of the direction in which it is applied. Optimum performance from longitudinal fibers can be
obtained if the load is applied in all the directions. The slight shift in the angle of loading reduces the
strength of the composite. Unidirectional loading is found in few structures and hence it is prudent to give a
mix of orientation for fibers in composites particularly where the load is expected to be the heaviest.
3.4.4 Fiber properties
In most fiber reinforced composite, the fiber is strong, stiff and light weight. If the composite is to
be used at elevated temperatures, the fiber should have high melting temperature. Thus specific strength and
specific modulus of the fibers are important characteristic.
Specific strength= TS/
Specific modulus = E/
Where, TS= tensile strength
= the density of material
E = Modulus of elasticity
% Weight
Silicon oxide
54
Aluminum oxide
15
Calcium oxide
17
Magnesium oxide
4.5
15
Boron oxide
Other
1.5
Property
Units(SI)
Glass
2.5
Youngs Modulus
Gpa
85
Mpa
1550
m/m/C
Specific gravity
Property
Units(SI)
Value
Specific gravity
1.28
Youngs Modulus
Gpa
3.792
Mpa
82.74
16
Property
Units
Glass
Axial Modulus
Gpa
85
Transverse modulus
Gpa
85
.20
.20
Gpa
35.42
m/m/C
Transverse
m/m/C
Mpa
1550
coefficient
of
thermal
expansion
Axial tensile strength
17
Mpa
1550
Mpa
1550
Mpa
1550
Shear strength
Mpa
35
Specific gravity
Mpa
2.5
Units
Glass
Axial Modulus
Gpa
3.4
Transverse modulus
Gpa
3.4
-----
.30
-----
.30
Gpa
1.308
m/m/C
63
m/m/kg/kg
.33
Mpa
72
Mpa
102
Mpa
72
Mpa
102
18
Shear strength
Mpa
34
Specific gravity
Mpa
1.2
From the table 3.5, the density volume fractions is calculated as,
c= fV f+ mV m
Using the above equation the density of the composite is
c = (2500) (0.7)+ (1200) (0.3)
c = 2110 kg/m3
19
v c = 4/2110
v c = 1.896 x 10 -3m3
The volume of the fiber is,
v f = Vf vc
v f = 0.7 x 1.896 x 10 -3
v f = 1.327 x 10 -3m3
The volume of the matrix is,
v m = Vm vc
v m = 0.3 x 1.896 x 10 -3
v m = 0.5688 x 10 -3m3
The mass of the fiber is,
Wf = c vf
Wf = 2500 x 1.327 x 10 -3
Wf = 3.318 kg
The mass of the matrix is,
Wm = m vm
Wm = 1200 x 0.5688 x 10 -3
Wm = 0.6826 kg
Calculations for elastic modulus of a unidirectional Glass- Epoxy lamina with a 70% fiber volume
fraction,
1.
2.
3.
4.
20
Ef = 85Gpa
From the table 3.5 the youngs modulus of the matrix is,
Em = 3.4Gpa
Longitudinal Elastic Modulus of a unidirectional lamina is given by,
E1= Ef Vf + EmVm
E1 = (85 x 0.7) + (3.4 x 0.3)
E1 = 60.52Gpa
Ratio of the load taken by the fibers to that of the composite is given as,
Ff/Fc = (Ef/E1) x Vf
Ff/Fc = (85/60.52) x 0.7
Ff/Fc = 0.9831
3.5.2 Transverse Elastic Modulus, E2
Transverse Elastic Modulus of a unidirectional lamina is given by,
1/E2 = ( Vf / Ef) + (Vm / Em)
1/E2 = (0.7/ 85) + (0.3 / 3.4)
E2 = 11Gpa
3.5.3 Major Poissons Ratio, v12
Poissons Ratio of the fiber is
vf = 0.2
Poissons Ratio of the matrix is
vm = 0.3
Therefore the total Poissons Ratio of the composite is
v12 = vf Vf + v mVm
v12 = (0.2)(0.7) +(0.3)(0.3)
21
v12 = 0.230
Minor Poissons Ratio, v21
v21 = v12 x (E 2/ E1)
v21 = .23 x (10.37/60.52)
v21 = 0.03941
Units
Gpa
E-Glass/Epoxy
60.52
E2
Gpa
11
v12
---
0.230
v21
---
.03941
G12
Gpa
4.014
22
Jute is a long, soft, shinny vegetable fiber that can be spun into coarse, strong threads. It is produced
from the plants in the genus Corchorus, family Tiliceae. Jute is one of the cheapest natural fibers and is
second only to cotton in the amount produced and the variety of uses. Jute fibers are composed primarily of
the plant material cellulose (major component of plant fiber) and lignin (major component of the wood fiber.
It is thus a Lignocelluloses fiber that is partially a textile fiber and partially a wood fiber. It also fall into bast
fiber category (fiber collected from the skin of the plant) along with kenaf, industrial hemp, flax(linen),
ramie, etc.The industrial term used for jute fiber is raw jute. The fibers are off- white to brown, and 1-4
meters (3-12 feet) long. The table shows chemical and physical properties of some bio fibers as we compared
all the properties it was found that least diameter the jute fiber ranges from 0.01- 0.025 and moisture content
is approximately 12.6% of the weight. Therefore the jute fiber shows better characteristics for the application
of leaf spring.
For higher ductility and toughness, and better transfer of loads from the matrix to fiber, composites
require large surface area of the fiber-matrix interface.
Sr.no
Fiber
Density
% elongation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Cotton
Jute
Flax
Hemp
Ramie
Sisal
Coir
Viscose
Soft wood
(g/cm )
1.5-1.6
1.3
1.5
1.48
1.51
1.5
1.2
---1.5
7-8
1.5-1.8
2.7-3.2
1.6
3.6-3.8
2.0-2.5
30
11.4
-----
Tensile strength
(Mpa)
287-597
393-773
345-1035
690
400-938
5.11-635
175
593
1000
Youngs
Modulus
(Gpa)
5.5-12.6
26.5
27.6
-----61.4-128
9.4-22
4-6
11
40
craft
23
24
25
26
27
Property
Units
Jute E Glass
Gpa
Epoxy
37.52
Gpa
9.12
----
.3284
----
.0798
Gpa
3.45
Hardener
Hardener 758
Proportion
100:55
Properties
High
viscosity,
Uses
General
purpose
520F
Hardener EH 411
100:10
adhesive
adhesive strength,
electronic circuits,
Good
chemical resistance
insulation
electrical
&
chemical resistance
binder
general
Fast
for
for
FRP
purpose,
curing
adhesive
Netpol is the brand name for unsaturated polyester resins manufactured at Networks private limited,
these resins are specially wdesigned to cater almost entire spectrum of glass reinforced plastic molding
industry.
Netpol resins are formulated to have increased production efficiency & improve field performance of
finished products.
28
Netpol 1011 is a versatile general purpose orthopthalic resin of medium reactivity designed to give
fast wetout of glass fiber reinforcement with higher glass to resin ratio & higher loading of inorganic filler.
Rapid cures & fast molding cycles with smooth & tack free glossy surface are typical characteristics of
Netpol 1011.
Fiber glass reinforced Netpol 1011 laminates display excellent physical, mechanical & electrical
properties beside thermal & acoustic insulation properties. Articles molded out of Netpol 1011 are light in
weight, dimensionally stable & resistant to heat & water
1012
Viscosity at 25C
450
Acid value
0.01
50
25 3
Volatile content
35 2
15-20
155-160
Netpol 1011 has a flash point 34C & classified as flammable. Containers should be kept in a cool, dry
and ventilated place away from sunlight & source of ignition. Under this condition, the shelf life is 3 months.
The storage stability could be further improved by aerating the resin stored in barrels at an interval of about
fortnight.
No smoking rules should be strictly enforced. In case of fire, suitable extinguishers are dry chemical,
foam carbon dioxide or water spray .Containers close to fire should be kept cool by spraying water. Spillages
may be absorbed on to sand or earth & shoveled off for disposal according to local regulation.
Caution
29
Store accelerator and catalyst separately. Do not allow them to come in contact with each other as they
form violently explosive mixture. It is recommended that the accelerator be blended in to resin first and then
catalyst be added immediately before use.
while molding.Skin contact and vapor inhalation must be avoided during molding because of the presence of
styrene monomers. In case of irritation in the eye or skin, it is recommended to wash with copious amount of
water. In extreme case, seek immediate medical advice.
Uses
Netpol 1011 is suitable for variety of contact molding FRP articles such as,
Furniture
Building panels
Automotive hoods
Modular housings
Boats
Sanitary wear
Machine covers & guards
Cooling towers
30
Parameters
Value
55Si2Mn90
1962
1470
2.1x105
653
1010
eye(mm)
Arc height at the axle seat (mm)
Spring rate (N/mm)
Normal static loading (N)
Available space for spring width (mm)
Spring weight (Kg)
( b) =
F = 1471 N
No. of full length leaves = 2
31
580
120
31.98
2943
45
13.4
By considering the property variation in the tapered system improper bonding and improper curing etc.
some constant of property value are reduced from calculated values using equations
VALUE
10370
6030
1530
800
450
32
2433
1600
2433
40000
1000
0.23
0.03941
In this work mono composite leaf spring is designed by considering constant thickness and constant
width for the design of composite leaf spring.
Given data :
Weight(W) = 2943 N
Length (L) = 505 mm
max
= 120mm
max
= 2000 N/mm2
K.required = 25N/mm
33
step 1:
a =
800 N/mm2
step 2:
= 495.505 N/mm2
a
Step 3:
30000
34
= 382.8 mm
Thus values for b,t fails it does not satisfied 2nd condition.
2) Let, b = 25 mm, t =25 mm.
step 1:
a =
= 800 N/mm2
step 2:
= 317. 05 N/mm2
a
35
Step 3 :
58593.75
= 196.0 mm
Thus value for b,t fails it does not satisfied 2nd condition.
3) Let b=45 mm, t= 28 mm
step 1:
a =
= 800 N/mm2
step 2:
36
= 252.75 N\mm2
a
82320
= 113.5 mm
37
step 1:
a =
= 800 N/mm2
step 2 :
220.18 N/mm2
a
step 3:
= 101250 mm4
38
= 113.5 mm
K =
K=
K = 26 N/mm
Value
505 mm
45mm
30 mm
Introduction of ANSYS
Ansys software is commercially available software which is capable of analyzing the given part by
means of structural, thermal, fluid, harmonic analysis.
5.1 Structural Static Analysis
Static structural analysis is a analysis in which the load condition does not vary with time & is
assumed that the load conditions are gradually applied. The most common application of FEA is the solution
of stress related design problems. As a result, all commercial available packages have extensive range of
stress capabilities.
The behavior of the system could be linear or non linear.
From formal point of view, three conditions have to be met in any stress analysis, equilibrium of forces
or stresses, compatibility of displacements & satisfaction of the state of stress at continuum boundaries. The
kind of loads that a system could experience here are:
40
element stiffness matrix for the problem and calls the mathematical engine which will calculate the
primary unknown results (displacement, temperature).The results are returned to the solver and post
solver is used to calculate derived results (stress, strain, heat-fluxes, velocity )for each node
within the component. All these results are written to a file which may be read by post processor.
POSTPROCESSOR
As discussed above the process of reviewing the result with the help of CAE tool is called post
processing .In this stage, the result of the analysis are read and interpreted .They can be represented
in the form of the table, a contour plot, deformed shape of the component or the mode shapes and
natural frequencies if frequency analysis is involved. Other results are available for fluid, thermal
and electrical analysis types. Most post processors provide an animation service, which produces an
animation.
5.3 Analysis of composite material
The model made up of composites materials are not directly developed for the composites materials
we feed data in matrix form or layered form.
Selecting the proper element type.
The following element types are available to model layered composite materials:
The type of element to be chosen depends upon the application, the type of results
to be calculated.
From above element SHELL99, SOLID 46 are best suited for the modeling of
composite material.
SHELL99
SHELL99 is an 8 node, 3D shell element with six degrees of freedom
at each node. It is designed to model thin to moderate thick plate and
shell structures with side- to thickness ratio of roughly 10 or greater.
SOLID 46
SOLID 46 is a layered version of 8 s- node, 3D element, SOLID 45 with
three degrees of freedom per node (UX, UY, UZ).It is designed to model
thick layered shells or layered solids and allows up to 125 layers with
thickness that may vary bilinear over the area of the layer. An advantage
with this element type is that you can stack several elements to model
more than 250 layers to allow through-the thickness deformation slope
discontinuities. The user input constitutive matrix option is also
available.SOLID46 adjusts the material properties in the transverse
direction permitting constant stress in the transverse direction. In
comparison to the 8 node shells, SOLID46 is a lower order element and
finer meshes may be required for shell applications to provide the same
accuracy as SHELL91 or SHELL99.
From the above elements we have selected SOLID46 for the Analysis of
the leaf spring.
41
Build a Model
Mesh the Model
Apply the loads
Solve the Analysis
Review the Results.
5.4.1 Build a Model
42
5.4.4
Stress Results
43
44
6. FATIGUE ANALYSIS
6.1 Introduction
Fatigue is a phenomenon associated with variable loading or more precisely to cyclic stressing or
straining of a material. Just as human beings get fatigue when a specific task is repeatedly performed, in
similar manner metallic components subjected to variable loading get fatigue, which also leads to premature
failure under specific conditions.
Fatigue failure is a predominant mode of in service failure of many automobile components. This is
due to the fact that the automobile components are subjected to variety of fatigue loads like shocks caused
due to road irregularities traced by the road wheels, the sudden loads due to the wheel travelling over the
bumps etc. The leaf springs are more affected due to fatigue loads, as they are a part of the un- sprung mass
of the automobile.
45
Fatigue is a phenomenon in which a repetitively loaded structure fractures at a load level less than
its ultimate static strength. For instance, a steel bar might successfully resist a single static application of a
300KN tensile load, but might fail after 1,000,000 repetitions of a 200KN load.
Failure occurring under conditions of dynamic loading is called fatigue failure.
Fatigue failure is characterized by three stages.
Crack initiation
Crack propagation
Final fracture
6.1.1 What are the criteria for transition from crack initiation to crack growth life?
Life till crack of the size 2 mm detected is crack initiation life and remaining life after detection is
crack propagation or crack growth life.
Life (abscissa) is always plotted on log scale while alternating stress on either linear or long.
46
stress. Bending fatigue strength is higher than tension/compression and torsional fatigue strength is the
lowest.
6.2 Factors affecting fatigue -life
Cyclic stress state : Depending on the complexity of the geometry and the load , one or more
properties of the stress state need to be considered, such as stress amplitude, mean stress,
biaxiality,in phase or out-phase shear stress, and load sequence.
Geometry: Notches and variation in the cross section throughout a part to concentrations where
fatigue cracks initiate.
Surface quality: Surface roughness cause microscopic stress concentration that lower the fatigue
strength. Compressive residual stresses can be introduced in the surface by e.g. Shot Peening to
increase fatigue life. Such techniques for producing surface stress are often referred to as peening,
whatever the mechanism used to produce the stress. Low plasticity Burnishing, Laser Peening, and
Ultrasonic impact treatment can also produce this surface.
Compressive stress and can increase the fatigue life of the component. This improvement is
normally observed only for high cycle fatigue.
Material Type: Fatigue life, as well as the behavior during cyclic loading, varies widely for
different materials, e.g. composites and polymers differ markedly from metals.
Residual stresses: Welding, cutting, casting and other manufacturing processes involving heat or
deformation can produce high levels of the tensile residual stress, which decreases the fatigue
strength.
Size and distribution of internal defects: Casting defects such as gas porosity, non-metallic
principal stress.
Grain size: For most metals, smaller grains yield longer fatigue lives, however, the presence of the
surface defects or scratches will have a greater influence than in a coarse grained alloy.
Environment: Environment conditions can cause erosion, corrosion, or gas phase embrittlement,
which all affect fatigue life. Corrosion fatigue is a problem encountered in many aggressive
environments.
Temperature: Extreme high or low temperature can decrease fatigue strength.
47
48
Property Table
S-N Table
(Click N1)10(Click S1)62.1e3
(Click N2)1000(Click S1)62.1e3
(Click N1)10000(Click S1)52.1e3
(Click N1)100000(Click S1)42.1e3
(Go to Menu)
General Postprocessor
Fatigue
Calculate Fatigue
Specify Location Node Number
The result were obtained by using Ansys 11.0 by considering nodes 65,54 & 32 are as follows.
49
50
Winding
Technique
Advantages
Excellent
mechanical
properties
due to use of
continuous
fibers.
High degree of design flexibility due to controlled fiber orientation and lower cost of large number
of composites.
This is a very fast and economic method of laying down material
Resin content can be controlled by metering the resin on to each fiber tow through nips or dies.
Disadvantages
Difficulty to wind complex shapes, which may require complex equipments.
Poor external finish
The process is limited to convex shaped components.
52
an increase use of nip roller type impregnators for forcing resin into fabrics by means of rotating rollers and
a bath of resin. Laminates are left to cure under standard atmospheric conditions.
Advantages
Design flexibility
Large and complex items can be produced.
Tooling cost is low.
Design changes are easily affected
Sandwich constructions are possible
Semi- skilled workers are needed
Higher fiber content and longer fibers than with spray lay- up.
Disadvantages
Only one molded surface is obtained
Quality is related to the skill of the operator
Low volume process
Longer cure times required
Resins need to be low in viscosity to be workable by hand. This generally compromises their
mechanical/thermal properties.
The waste factor is high.
A part from selection of material and design procedure, selection of manufacturing process also
determines the quality and cost of the product.
We can use filament winding machine as well as hand layup technique for manufacture of composite leaf
spring.
Requirements of manufacturing process
53
A filament winding machine is used for large scale production. It requires a design and fabrication of
filament winding machine and it is very time consuming and complicated and this method is not as
economical as hand layup .Hand lay up technique. Hand layup technique is used for small scale production
(2 to 3 specimen) and it is economical thus the hand layup technique is selected as manufacturing process.
7.3 FABRICATION PROCEDURE
7.3.1 Pre-procedure for fabrication
Preparation of mould
Material used Plywood
Value (mm)
1160
1010
45
130
Cut the glass fiber (stand chopped mat & woven roving) in to pieces according to the dimensions of
54
Add 100ml acceleration in to the resin of 6 lit for increase the speed of reaction.
Prepare the solution of resin & hardener by adding 10-12% of hardener of required resin.
Place the piece of glass fiber chopped mat on mould
Apply the epoxy with the help of brush on glass fiber mat. The care should be taken that air is not
trapped.
Wait for 5-10min.
Again prepare the solution of resin & hardener.
Place layer of glass fiber woven roving on it.
Apply the epoxy with the help of brush. The care should be taken that air is not trapped between the
two layers.
Repeat the procedure up to attaining the desired thickness.
Cure the leaf spring for 24 hours.
Cut the extra fiber coming out of mould with the help of hacksaw
Remove the leaf spring from mould.
55
8. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
8.1 Universal Testing Machine (UTM)
Testing of composite & steel leaf spring has been carried on UTM. Various specifications of
UTM are as follows.
56
Move the plunger up to the desired height so that we can fix the fixture and leaf spring for
the test.
Fix the position of the fixture.
On the fixture place the specimen
Set the universal testing machine
Apply the loads in steps of 50kg gradually
Note down the deflection readings
The results obtained during the experiment on the Glass Reinforced leaf spring are listed in the following
table
Sr.no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Applied load(kg)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Move the plunger up to the desired height so that we can fix the fixture and leaf spring for
the test.
Fix the position of the fixture.
On the fixture place the specimen
Set the universal testing machine
Apply the loads in steps of 50kg gradually
Note down the deflection reading.
The results obtained during the experiment on the Jute Glass- Reinforced-Composite leaf spring
are listed in the following table
57
Sr.no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Applied load(kg)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Table 8.2 Deflections at different load on natural fiber composite leaf spring
58
Applied
Deflection of E glass
loads
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Table 9.1 Comparison of Deflection of glass fiber reinforced and jute fiber reinforced composite leaf spring
(Experimental)
59
Graph 9.1 Comparison of Deflection of Glass and Jute Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite Leaf Spring.
9.2 Comparison of stiffness of glass fiber and jute fiber reinforced composite leaf spring
Sr.no
Applied load
Stiffness(N/mm) of E-glass
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Table 9.2 Comparison of stiffness for Glass epoxy composite and Jute glass epoxy composite leaf spring
of
epoxy
leaf spring
leaf spring
3.85kg
2.730kg
60
Table 9.3 Comparison of Weight glass fiber composite leaf spring and jute fiber based composite leaf spring
9.4 Comparison of stress of GFRP and NFRC (Jute based) in Mpa
Leaf spring
COMPOSITE
JUTE E-GLASS-COMPOSITE
Analytical
220.18
220.18
Numerical (FEA)
234.38
288.99
10. CONCLUSION
Experimental results from testing the leaf spring under static loading condition the stresses and
deflections are calculated. These results are compared with FEA. Testing has been done for unidirectional EGlass Epoxy composite leaf spring and jute E Glass epoxy composite leaf spring. Since the composite leaf
springs are able to withstand the static load, it is concluded that there is no objection from strength point of
view in the process of replacing the conventional leaf spring by GFRP and Jute glass epoxy leaf spring.
61
Since, the FRP leaf springs designed for same stiffness as that of steel leaf spring. GFRP and Jute glass epoxy
composite are considered to be almost equal in vehicle stability and both are manufactured with same
dimensions. The major disadvantage of GFRP and Jute Glass Epoxy composite leaf spring are chipping
resistance. The matrix material is likely to chip of when it is subjected to poor road condition(that is ,if some
stone hit the composite leaf spring then it may produce chipping)which may break some fibers in lower
portion of the spring. This may result in a loss of capability to share flexural stiffness. But this depends on the
condition of road. In normal road condition, this type of problem will not exist. GFRP leaf and Jute glass
epoxy composite leaf spring made of polymer matrix composite have high strength retention on aging at
severe environments.
The objective was to fabricate and analyze the springs with minimum weight which is capable of
carrying given static external forces by constraints limiting stresses and displacement. The weight of the leaf
spring is reduced considerably about 75% by replacing steel and GFRP and Jute-E-Glass-Epoxy composite
leaf spring thus, the objective of reducing the un-sprung mass is achieved to a larger extent. The stresses in
the composite leaf spring are much lower than that of the steel.
FUTURE SCOPE
In future we can use some other bio-materials such as cotton, wheat straw, coconut,
coir etc, as a reinforcement material along with E-Glass/Carbon/S-Glass fiber:
As in our project work Jute-E-Glass-Epoxy fiber is used as a reinforcement material
instead of jute fiber other bio- materials such as cotton/flax/coconut coir etc.and instead of
E-Glass some Carbon, S-Glass fiber can be used as a reinforcing material. So in future we
62
can use such a material for the comparison performance of the steel leaf spring and biocomposite leaf spring.
Study of effects of different resins on the performance of leaf spring:
In our project General Purpose resin is used for manufacturing the leaf spring instead of
GPR polyester, vinyl ester etc. can be used to study effects of different resin on the
performance of composite leaf spring.
Study of effects of temperature on the stress and strain of the leaf spring material:
As environment temperature increases, the stresses of E-Glass fiber get reduced hence the
effect of temperature on the performance of the spring material is an important part of
study.
Study of prevention for the maintenance is a very important concept of composite
material leaf spring:
The preventive maintenance is a very important concept for application work so in future
we can study preventions for composite leaf spring.
REFERENCES
1.
Shiva Shankar, Vijayarangan, Mono Composite Leaf Spring for Light Weight Vehicle Design, End
2.
Joint Analysis and Testing Materials Science Vol. 12, No. 3. 2006 ISSN 1392-1320
X.Y.Liu, G.C.Dai Surface modification and micromechanical properties of jute fiber mat
3.
reinforced polypropylene composites express polymer letter vol.1,no 5(2007) p.n.- 299-307
I. Rajendran, S. Vijayarangan Optimum design of a composite leaf spring using genetic
4.
63
5.
H.M.M.A. Rashid, M.A.Islam, F.B.Rizivi Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of jute
fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
6.
June 2006
Saira Taj, Munawar Ali, hafiullah Khan Natural fiber reinforced polymer composite Proc.
7.
8.
9.
1392 1320.
10. S.V.Joshi,L.T.Drzal,A..Mohanty, S.Arora Are Natural fiber composites environmentally superior
to glass fiber reinforced composites?
11. Kamal Sethi Investigation of damaged glass fiber reinforced composite in three point bending Mtech thesis Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala.
12. James Holbery and Dan Houstan Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in automotive
application JOM Nov.2006 p.p. 80-86
13. Yu WJ, Kim HC Double tapered FRP beam for automotive suspension leaf spring Composite
Structures 1988; 9(4):279-300.
14. A.Al-Qureshi, Automobile leaf spring from composite materials Journal of Material Processing
Technology 118 (2001)pp 58-61.
15. T.Kevin OBrein, Arun D.Chawan , Ronald Krueger, Isabelle L.Paris Transverse tension fatigue
life characterization through flexture testing of composite materials International Journal of
Fatigue 24(2002)127-145
16. Mahmood M.Shokreih, Davood Rezaei Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf spring
Composite Structures 60 (2003)pp 317-325
17. M.Senthil Kumar, S.Vijayarangan Static analysis and fatigue life prediction of steel and composite
leaf spring for light passenger vehicle Journal of Scientific &Industrial Research Vol .66 Feb.2007
pp128-134.
18. Carlo Santulli Impact properties of glass/plant fiber hybrid composite Journal of Material Science
(2007) 42 pp 3699-3707
19. Dr.Kirpal Singh, Automobile Engineering, Standard Publishers, Volume-1.pp 204-208
20. R.S.Khurmi &J.K.Gupta Machine Design S Chand Publishers Multi Colored Addition First pp
822-884.
21. Navin Chand & Mohammed Fahim Tribology of Natural Fiber Polymer CompositesWoodhead
Publishing and Maney Publishing on behalf of The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining.
64
65