Você está na página 1de 53

Workshop

Ergonomic Work Design and Prevention


of Work-Related Musculoskeletal
Disorders (MSDs)
Prevention of MSDs in Practice
Dr. Rolf Ellegast

XIX. World Congress on Saftety and Health at Work


September 11-15, 2011, Istanbul

Prevention of Work-Related MSDs


Reduction of work load/exposure by
ergonomic design of work equipment and work places,
e.g. by using lifting aids
health-oriented organisation of working processes
Improvement of individual pre-conditions, e.g. by
individual training to build muscle, behavioural training,
e.g. back exercises

Ellegast_2011

Examples
Ergonomic Design of Equipment/Tools

Grinding in a shipyard

Ellegast_2011

Examples
Ergonomic Design of Equipment/Tools
Classes of risk - 4 OWAS* risk categories
(as percentage of working time):
1,4%

4,7%

9,1%

84,8%

Class 1: No intervention required


Class 2: Corrective action should be taken during next regular review
Class 3: Corrective action should be taken as soon as possible
Class 4: Corrective action should be taken immediately
*

Ellegast_2011

OVAKO-Working-Posture-Analysing-System

Examples
Ergonomic Design of Equipment/Tools

Ergonomic Redesign of the grinding tool

Ellegast_2011

Examples
Ergonomic Design of Equipment/Tools

before:

1,4%

4,7%

0%

after:

84,8%

Ellegast_2011

6,2%

9,1%

93,8%

Examples
Ergonomic Design of Equipment/Tools

Lower extremeties

Grinding in a shipyard: Quantification of work load reduction


Gehen
walking

after
erg.
Schleifer
before
konv.
Schleifer

0,9

Knien
kneeling

90,3

Hocken
squatting

6,1
2,1

Stehen
standing

4,2

gebeugt und tordiert

5,1

Bent forward & twisted

36,7

1,9
2,3

tordiert
twisted

Trunk

56,4

3,5

gebeugt
bent forward

84,8

gerade
neutral

Ellegast_2011

98,1

7,9

20

40
60
80
Anteil anofArbeitszeit
(%)
Percentage
working time

100

Use of supporting tools

Ellegast_2011

Use of supporting tools


Brick laying machine

Source: Rehme, Bau BG


Ellegast_2011

Use of supporting tools

Ellegast_2011

Use of supporting tools


Example: Removal men (BG Verkehr)
Use of a shoulder strap for big material

Ellegast_2011

Use of supporting tools


Example: Cleaning of sewage ducts
before:
Manual lifting of the duct cover

Ellegast_2011

after:
Use of a lifting aid
(magnetic pick-up tool)

Use of supporting tools


Example: Wheel changing (busses)
before:
manual assembling

Ellegast_2011

after:
Use of a hydraulic jack

Use of handling aids

Ellegast_2011

Luggage service at the airport


Use of lifting aids

Ellegast_2011

Results luggage service


Impact on the work organisation handled luggage

Number of
handled
luggage per
Anzahl
Gepckstcke
\ hhour

Abgefertigtes
Gepck
handled luggage
500

abgefertigt
ohne Vaculex
Without lifting
aid

450

abgefertigt
mit Vaculex
With lifting
aid

400

With lifting aid,


manually handled

davon manuell gehoben

350
300
250
200
150

292

100

230 => -22%

50
0
P01

P02

P03

P04

P05

Versuchsperson

Subjects

Ellegast_2011

P06

P09

P10

Bellyloader

Ellegast_2011

Results Bellyloader
Average duration of luggage handling (bellyloader)
Unloading: -45%
Mittlere Handhabungsdauer pro Gepckstck in Sekunden
Loading: -53%
Average duration of luggage handling [s]
duration
of luggage handling
[s]
Handhabungsdauer
[s]

2,00
1,80

ohne
PowerStow
without
PowerStow

1,60

with
PowerStow
mit
PowerStow

1,40
1,20

1,52
1,27

1,00
0,80
0,60
0,40
0,20

n = 475

n = 373

n = 336

n = 383

0,00
Entladung
Unloading

Ellegast_2011

0,72

0,70

Beladung
Loading

Results Bellyloader
Proportion of knee-straining postures (bellyloader)
100,0

percentage
time
Zeitanteilof
[%]

90,0
80,0
70,0
loading (with
PowerStow)
Beladung
mit PowerStow

60,0

loading (without
PowerStow)
Beladung
ohne PowerStow

50,0

unloadingmit
(with
PowerStow)
Entladung
PowerStow

40,0

unloadingohne
(without
PowerStow)
Entladung
PowerStow

30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
Kriechen
crawling

Hocken
squatting

Knien
sitting
Fersensitz
on

heels

kneeling
Knien mit
Absttzung
(supported)

Haltung
Postures

Ellegast_2011

Knien
kneeling
ohne
Summe:
total
Absttzung
Kniebelastende
(unsupported)
Haltungen

Experimental Technologies
in Luggage Handling

Ellegast_2011

Workplace Design

Ellegast_2011

Warehouse Working

before:
unfavourable working heights leading to awkward postures when taking
and scanning goods
Ellegast_2011

Warehouse Working

after:
Modification of working heights leading to better (upright) postures when taking
and scanning goods
Ellegast_2011

Warehouse Working
Trunk inclination
after

percentage of time

before

angular categories []

Ellegast_2011

Examples of Prevention
Ergonomic Workplace Design

Sewing Workplace

Ellegast_2011

Ergonomic Archetyp
of a Sewing Workplace

Ellegast_2011

Features

Ellegast_2011

Quick change between sitting


and standing

Individually adjustable arm


rests

Variety of adjustment
possibilities

Features

Ellegast_2011

Extension of leg and foot space

Chooseable position of pedals

Comparison: Before and After

Ellegast_2011

Comparison: Before and After

Angle of trunk bending []

Trunk bending

after
(sitting)

before
(sitting)

Number of measurement
Ellegast_2011

after
(standing)

Comparison: Before and After

Angle of forearm rotation []

Rotation of forearm (pronation/supination)


after
(sitting)

after
(standing)

left arm
right arm
before
(sitting)

Number of measurement
Ellegast_2011

Instruction for Action: BGI 804-2


Practical hints for designing
Workplaces,
Working environment,
Work organisation
and
Best practice-examples of ergonomic
workplace-design

Ellegast_2011

Implementation and transferability since 2004

The redesigned sewing workplace was installed in more than 30


German enterprises .
Redesigning of 2 up to 160 workplaces per enterprise.
Deployment in
Automobile industry,
Toys industry,
Textile industry,
Furniture industry and
sheltered workshops.
This approach can principally be transfered to other workplaces or
industries (e.g. assembly workplaces).

Ellegast_2011

Humanitarian and Economic Advantages


Example Fa. MEWA: Mending of working clothes
Before:

After:

Ergonomic redesign of 40 work places


Costs: 1.500 per work place (total: appr. 60.000 )
Decrease of sick leaves by 16 %
Increase of productivity by appr. 15 %
The project will pay for itself within a few months!

Ellegast_2011

Pushing and pulling trolleys aboard aircrafts*


Starting point:
Service tasks are increasingly

necessary on short flights during


ascent and descent phases.
Flight attendants complain of high
physical workload from manoeuvring
trolleys in these phases of flight and
MSD in general.
High interest in analysing pushing

and pulling tasks aboard aircrafts.


Project partners:

*U. Glitsch, HJ Ottersbach, R. Ellegast, M. Jger, K. Schaub et al., Untersuchung der


Belastungen von Flugbegleiterinnen und Flugbegleitern beim Ziehen und Schieben von
Trolleys in Flugeugen, BIA-Report 5/2004, HVBG, Sankt Augustin, 2004
http://www.hvbg.de/d/bia/pub/rep/rep04/bia0504.html

Ellegast_2011

Example: Stewardesses

Ellegast_2011

Laboratory study (flight attendants)


setup:

adjustable ramp (12 m)

CUELA motion analysis in


combination with 3D force
measurements (handles on trolley and
GRF at start)

study protocol:

Ellegast_2011

25 subjects (flight attendants)

trolley types: full-size, half-size,


with variable masses:
Full-size (FS)

: 90, 65, 40 kg

Half-size (HS)

: 60, 45, 30 kg

handling: pushing, pulling

floor gradient:

No. of trials incl. 3 repetitions: 144

8, 5, 2, 0

Laboratory study (flight attendants): results


compression forces L5/S1, calculated with
biomechanical model The Dortmunder, (Jger et al. 1992)
Pulling

4000

4000

3000

3000

Compression force [N]

Compression force [N]

Pushing

2000

1000

2000

Gradient
0

1000

2
5

0
30

40

45

60

Mass [kg]

65

90

8
30

40

45

60

65

90

Mass [kg]
Half-size

Ellegast_2011

Research project: Flight attendants

Recommendations for

Work organisation

Trolley design

Manual handling of the trolley, training

http://www.hvbg.de/d/bia/pub/rep/rep04/bia0504.html
Ellegast_2011

Examples of Prevention
Ergonomic Workplace Design
Example: Crane operator in a waste incineration plant
Initial point:

Ellegast_2011

Crane operators in a waste-to-energy-plant


reported about complaints in the neck and
shoulders.

Obiously identical crane operatorworkplaces in two plants (P1 and P2)


regarding seat, equipment, work
organisation and duration of shift,

but only complaints in P1

Crane Operator Workplace


Waste-to-Energy-Plant

Waste

Ellegast_2011

Crane Operator Workplace

Ellegast_2011

Ellegast_2011
0
-

-3
0

-2 -20
0
--1 10
0
0
0
1
10 0
2
20 0
3
30 0
4
40 0
5
50 0
6
60 0
7
70 0
8
80 0
90 90
10 100
0

-1
10
>
11
0

-3

<

Anteil an Arbeitszeit
Percentage
of working(%)
time

Crane Operator Workplace


Measurements: Bending of cervical spine in P1 and P2
35%

30%

MHKW
P1 1

P2 2
MHKW

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

Winkelbereich []
()
angular categories

Position of crane operator cabine


P 1:

Mll-Anlieferung

Preventive Measure:

Ellegast_2011

P 2:

Mll-Anlieferung

Installation of a new seat

Before
Ellegast_2011

after

Features of the new memory seat

Ellegast_2011

Comparison: before - after intervention

Cervical spine flexion angle []

Seat new

Ellegast_2011

Seat old

Comparison: before - after intervention

Trunk inclination angle []

Seat new

Ellegast_2011

Seat old

Individual Behaviour

Ellegast_2011

Individual Behaviour

Ellegast_2011

Maintenance of electricity wires

Ellegast_2011

Improvement of individual pre-conditions


Example: Project RehaBau
Ergonomic Training
Aims:

Ergonomic design at construction


sites

Manuell material handling


techniques

Working with handling aids

motivation and ergonomic


techniques

Senes of self of ergonomic


techniques

Ellegast_2011

Improvement of individual pre-conditions


Example: Project RehaBau
Medical Training

Ellegast_2011

Intensive medical care


Muscle/muscle strength training
Sports/gymnastics, stress relaxation
Training in health care, nutrition,
physiology

Você também pode gostar