Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights
Department of Technology Assessment and Substance Cycles, Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Bornim (ATB), 14469 Potsdam, Germany
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Jember (UNEJ), East Java, Indonesia
Department of Technology Assessment and Substance Cycles, Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering, Potsdam-Bornim (ATB), 14469 Potsdam,
Germany
d
Research Development PT. Asam Jawa, North Sumatra, Indonesia
b
c
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 17 April 2013
Received in revised form
12 July 2013
Accepted 29 July 2013
Available online 6 August 2013
The efuents from palm oil mills for biodiesel production are generally treated in open ponds, causing
large amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study assesses the use of palm oil mill efuents
(POME) as feedstock to produce biogas via anaerobic digestion. Biogas from POME can be converted into
electricity and heat to eventually reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of biodiesel production
from palm oil. This study is using two system boundaries, rstly, system a gate-to-gate concerning the
POME treatments, and secondly a cradle-to-gate/total combustion when we assess the impact of
varying POME treatments within the biodiesel chain.
The research draws on eld and experimental data from palm oil and biogas production in Sumatra,
Indonesia. The ndings show that the energy output from the conversion of POME to methane via
anaerobic digestion and the subsequent combustion of the methane in a combined heat-power plant exceeds the energy consumption of the palm oil milling process. Treating POME in an anaerobic digester and
using the biogas to generate electricity and heat has the potential to signicantly reduce the GHG emissions
of biodiesel production from palm oil. In the studied case, the energy output from the conversion of POME
to electricity and heat is 0.44 MJ kg1 biodiesel and the net energy yield is 0.42 MJ kg1 biodiesel. The ratio
of energy output to energy input of the conversion process is about 23.1. The potential reduction of GHG
emissions is 658 g CO2-eq kg1 biodiesel or 15.96 g CO2-eq MJ1. This is equivalent to about 33% of the total
GHG emissions of biodiesel production from palm oil. Against this background we recommend to further
develop and implement the treatment of POME in anaerobic digestion combined with the purposeful use of
the methane, electricity and heat produced from the POME. This can make a signicant contribution toward
meeting international targets of emissions reduction for biodiesel production.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Palm oil mill efuent
Anaerobic digestion
Biodiesel
Net energy yield
Greenhouse gas emissions
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
Abbreviations: CH4, methane; CHP, combined heat and power; CO2-eq, carbon
dioxide equivalents; COD, Chemical Oxygen Demand; CPO, crude palm oil; d, day;
EFB, empty fruit bunches; FFB, fresh fruit bunches; g, gram; GHG, greenhouse
gases; GWP, Global Warming Potential; ha, hectare; hr, hour; IOPRI, Indonesian Oil
Palm Research Institute; LUC, land use change; POME, palm oil mill efuent; yr,
year.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 49 3315699919; fax: 49 3315699849.
E-mail addresses: s_harsono@yahoo.com, sharsono@atb-potsdam.de (S.S. Harsono).
0959-6526/$ e see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.056
620
the total area cultivated with palm oil increased from 3.9 million ha
to more than 7.9 million ha (Rianto, 2009).
Nevertheless, Laurance et al. (2010) and Yule (2010) stated that
sustainability of palm oil production as always been questioned by
some countries and the non-governmental organization (NGOs).
They claimed that further expansion of palm oil plantation cause
more negative impact for environmental such deforestation and
increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to over utilization
of peat land for palm oil plantation.
The criticism not only in the palm oil plantation expansion, but
also include in the palm oil mills. Poh and Chong (2009) argued that
the most signicant pollutant from the palm oil mills is palm oil mill
efuent (POME). The increasing production of CPO is accompanied
by an increasing output of efuent from palm oil mills. Yacob et al.
(2005) and Singh et al. (2010) reported that palm oil mills treat in
average 60% of the wastewater in open ponds before it is disposed to
the natural waters, while untreated wastewater is mainly used as
liquid fraction in the composting process of empty fruit bunches.
However, there are large quantities of water based wastes that
are not able to burn by themselves. These wastes have to be processed or digested in the waste treatment plant on order to comply
with Department of Environment the Republic of Indonesia regulation before they can be allowed to be discharged into the water
course. During the fermentation process, biogas is the unavoidable
but valuable gaseous product of such a process.
North Sumatra province of Indonesia has a signicant number of
large agricultural operations. These agricultural operations produce a
considerable amount of organic waste in the form of palm oil mill
efuent (POME). Handling such large amounts of organic wastes,
especially POME, in a environmentally friendly manner a highly
challenging.
Given this huge amount of palm oil production, therefore the
quantity of waste produced is expected to be large. These wastes, if not
disposed properly, will have great negative impacts on the surrounding
environment, i.e.: water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Fig. 1. Simplied process ow diagram of the production of crude palm oil including
palm oil mill efuents (POME) (Lam and Lee, 2010).
621
until up to 5e7.4 kg CO2-eq t1 FFB due to reduced methane emissions and nutrient recycling.
2. Methodology
Fig. 2. System boundary (denoted by the dash line) of POME treatment with aerobic
digestion in open ponds and anaerobic POME treatment in a digestion plant including
the combustion of methane to heat and electricity.
622
Table 1
Operational data of the palm oil mill PT. Asam Jawa, North Sumatra, Indonesia.
Parameter
Unit
Value
Source
hr yr1
d yr1
ha
t yr1
m3 POME yr1
m3 POME t1 FFB
m
GJ yr1
GJ yr1
6240
312
13,000
384,480
234,936
0.610
5
6.543
4.559
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
data
data
data
data
data
data
data
data
data
Remark.
d yr1: day per year.
m3 POME yr1: meter cubic of POME per year.
m3 POME t1 FFB: meter cubic POME per ton Fruit Fresh Bunch.
m: Meter.
GJ yr1: Giga Joule per year.
Table 2
Energy content and GHG emission factors of materials and energy sources. Operational data of the experimental anaerobic digestion plant at IOPRI, North Sumatra,
Indonesia.
Factor
Energy content
GHG emission
Diesel fuel
41.33 MJ kg1
(Fritsche and Schmidt, 2001)
e
Electricity
Biochar
Syngas
Bio-oil
28.61 MJ kg1
(Khor et al. 2009)
9.8 MJ kg1
(Khor et al. 2009)
36.30 MJ kg1
(Imam and Capareda, 2011)
Parameter
Unit
Value
Source
Biogas capturing
efciency of digester
Electricity generation
efciency
Heat production
efciency
Electricity consumption
Diesel fuel consumption
for pumping and
stirring the POME
Energy diesel fuel for
additional fuel for the
combined heat
and power (CHP)
Conversion factor
90
Field data
30%
UNFCC, 2005
30%
UNFCC, 2005
GJ yr1
GJ yr1
336.96
269.57
Field data
Field data
GJ yr1
167.88
Field data
MJ MWh1
3,599
(1)
where:
CoDsl_fuel: diesel fuel consumption for starting the CHP plant (in
l yr1)
CoElec: electricity consumption for POME treatment (in MJ yr1)
CoHeat: heat consumption for POME treatment (in MJ yr1)
E_Input: energy input (in MJ yr1)
ECDsl_fuel: energy content of diesel (caloric value) (in MJ l1)
(2)
623
Table 3
Data used in the calculations for estimating the energy balances and GHG emissions of POME treatment strategies.
Parameter
Description
Unit
Value
AD
Bio_Prod
BiogasCH4
BiogasProd
Biogasyield
Bo
CH4HV
CH4Loss
CH4Prod
CH4Dens
CODPOME
CODDis
CoDsl_fuel
CoElec
CoHeat
DGPOME
ECBio_fuel
ECDsl_fuel
BioDensity
E_Input
E_Output
EFDsl_fuel
EFElect
EFHeat
GHGBgs
GHGBgs_ Elec
GHGBgs_Heat
GHGBL
GHGDigst
GHGDischr
GHGDsl_fuel
GHGPond
GHGPump_Str
GHGRED
GHGSlurry
GWP_CH4
MCFnal
MCFinitial
NEY
QDischr
QPOME
%
kg ha1
kg CH4 kg1 biogas
kg biogas yr1
kg biogas kg1 COD
kg CH4 kg1 COD
MJ m3 CH4
kg CH4 yr1
kg CH4 yr1
kg CH4 m3 CH4
kg COD m3 POME
kg COD m3 charge
MJ yr1
MJ yr1
MJ yr1
%
MJ kg1
MJ l1
kg l1
MJ yr1
MJ yr1
kg CO2-eq GJ1
kg CO2-eq GJ1
kg CO2-eq GJ1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq yr1
kg CO2-eq kg-1 CH4
%
%
GJ yr1
m3 Discharge yr1
m3 POME yr1
9.5a
4640h
61.97b
Chapter 3.1c
0.56b
0.21d
39.89g
8800 (2%)b
Chapter 3.1c
0.668
0.114b
0.006b
29b
37b
18b
50b
41.24j
33i
0.80
In chapter 3.1c
In chapter 3.1c
87.5f
134.2e
77.6g
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
2% of total CH4b
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2a
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
In chapter 3.2c
21d
10b
62b
In chapter 3.1c
128,018
234,936b
(4)
where:
(3)
where:
BiogasCH4 :
methane
content
in
the
biogas
(in
kg CH4 kg1 biogas)
BiogasProd: quantity of biogas produced (in kg biogas yr1)
CH4Loss : methane leakages from the anaerobic digestion plant
(in kg CH4 yr1)
Biogasyield: biogas yield from the COD (in kg biogas kg1 COD).
CODPOME: Chemical Oxygen Demand of POME (in kg COD m3
POME)
DGPOME: share of the POME treated in the digester (in %)
QPOME: volume of POME produced in a year (in m3 POME yr1)
The methane in the biogas produced from POME is converted in
a CHP plant into electricity and heat. The estimated efciency of
624
(5)
Ratiooutputinput
Energy output
Energy input
(6)
The MCFInitial factor expresses the proportion of POME anaerobically degraded in the ponds. This is appraised by the difference of
COD between the POME before and after the treatment.
The emissions from the POME discharged after the treatment
in open ponds (GHGDischr) were calculated according to the equa
tion (10).
(10)
where:
CODDis: Chemical Oxygen Demand of discharge (in kg COD
m3 POME discharged)
GHGDischr: emissions from the POME discharged after the
treatment (in kg CO2-eq yr1)
MCFnal: methane conversion factor of the POME discharged
(in %)
QDischr: volume of POME discharged per year (in m3 POME
discharged yr1)
The baseline GHG emissions of electricity for pumping
and stirring the POME (GHGPump_Str) were calculated using the Equa
tion (11).
(7)
GHGPump
where:
GHGBgs: emissions from treatment of POME in anaerobic
digester (in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGBL: emissions from the treatment of POME in open ponds (in
kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGRED: potential reduction of GHG emissions (in
kg CO2-eq yr1)
Str
(8)
(11)
Heat
GHGBgs
Str
Elec
GHGDsl
fuel
(12)
where:
Co*Elect EFElect
where:
where:
Str
(9)
where:
GHGBgs: emissions from anaerobic treatment of POME
(in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGBgs_Elec: emissions from electricity generated from biogas
(in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGBgs_Heat: emissions from heat needed for temperature
regulation (in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGDigst: emissions (leakages) from the anaerobic digestion
plant (in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGDischr: emissions from the POME discharged from the ponds
(in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGDsl_fuel: emissions from fuel used to start-up the CHP plant
(in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGPond: emissions from POME treated in open ponds
(in kg CO2-eq yr1)
GHGBgs
Heat
CoHeat *EFHeat
(13)
where:
CoHeat: heat consumed in a year to regulate the temperature in
the digester (in GJ yr1)
EFHeat: emission factor for heat generated from biogas
(in kg CO2-eq GJ1)
The GHG emissions from diesel fuel for starting the CHP plant
(GHGDsl_fuel) were calculated according to Equation (14).
GHGDsl
fuel
TotDsl
(14)
where:
ECDsl_fuel: energy content of biodiesel by volume (lower caloric
value) (in GJ l1)
EFDsl_fuel: emission factor of diesel fuel (in kg CO2-eq GJ1)
TotDsl_fuel: total diesel fuel consumed to start the CHP plant in a
year (in l yr1)
Table 4
Energy input, energy output, net energy yield and energy output to energy input
ratio of covered ponds of POME treatment in a digestion plant in Sumatra, Indonesia
(in MJ ha1 yr1).
Parameter
Unit
Energy input
Electricity for pumping and stirring POME
Diesel fuel to start-up the CHP plant
Diesel fuel for temperature regulation
Total energy input (a)
Total energy output (electricity and heat) (b)
Net energy yield (b a)
Energy output to energy input ratio (b/a)*
MJ
MJ
MJ
MJ
MJ
MJ
ha1
ha1
ha1
ha1
ha1
ha1
Value
yr1
yr-1
yr-1
yr1
yr1
yr1
37
29
18
84
2021
1937
23.1
625
Table 5
Total baseline emissions for aerobic treatment of POME in open ponds (GHGBL) (in
kg CO2-eq ha1 yr1).
Emission source
Unit
Value
6956.78
621.64
1
1
4.97
7583.39
kg CO2-eq ha
yr
Unit
Value
3478.39
389.81
310.82
1
yr
1
310.82
yr
1
13.19
11.56
10.08
kg CO2-eq ha
1
kg CO2-eq ha
1
1
4.97
4529.64
kg CO2-eq ha
yr
626
Table 7
GHG emissions from biodiesel production with aerobic POME treatment in open
ponds compared to biodiesel production with anaerobic POME treatment in an
anaerobic digester.
Parameter
Unit
Open ponds
Covered ponds
Emissions from
biodiesel production
Emissions from
POME treatment
Total emissions
from biodiesel
production including
POME treatment
Difference of GHG
emissions (GHGRED)
Reduction of GHG
emissions
Reduction of GHG
emissionsd
Reduction of GHG
emissionse
1566.00a
1566.00a
7583.39b
4529.64c
9149.39
6095.64
3053.75
33.38
658.14
15.96
Remarks.
a
Harsono et al. (2011:12).
b
See Table 5.
c
See Table 6.
d
1 ha of land yields 4640 kg of biodiesel.
e
Energy content of palm oil biodiesel: 41.24 MJ kg1 (Sivaramakrishnan, 2011).
627
Khor, K.H., Lim, K.O., Zainal, Z.A., 2009. Characterization of bio-oil: a by product
from slow pyrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunches. American Journal of
Applied Sciences 6 (9), 1647e1652.
Lam, M.K., Lee, K.T., 2010. Renewable and sustainable bioenergies production from
palm oil mill efuent (POME): winewin strategies toward better environmental
protection. Biotechnology Advances 29, 124e141.
Laurance, W.F., Koh, L.P., Butler, R., Sodhi, N.S., 2010. Improving the performance of
round table on suitability palm oil for nature conservation. Conservation
Biology 24, 377e381.
Pleanjai, S., Gheewala, S.H., 2009. Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production
from palm oil in Thailand. Applied Energy 86, S209eS214.
Poh, P.E., Chong, M.F., 2009. Development of anaerobic digestion method for palm
oil mill efuent (POME) treatment. Bioresources Technology 100, 1e9.
Poku, K., 2002. Small-scale Palm Oil Processing in Africa. In: FAO Agriculture Service
Bulletin, p. 148.
Rianto, B., 2009. Overview Palm Oil Industry Landscape in Indonesia. In: Plantation
Indonesia. Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Indonesia, pp. 1e16. http://www.pwc.
com/id/en/publications/assets/Palm-Oil-Plantation.pdf.
Rupani, P.F., Singh, R.P., Ibrahim, M.H., Esa, N., 2010. Review of current palm oil mill
efuent (POME) treatment methods: vermicomposting as a sustainable practice. World Applied Sciences Journal 11, 70e81.
Schuchardt, F., Wulfret, K., Herawan, T., 2008. Protect the Environment and Make
Prot from the Waste in Palm Oil Industry assessed on July 2012. Available in:
http://www.utec-bremen.com/userles/le/pdf/Paper_POSE_2008.pdf.
Singh, R.P., Hakimi, M., Esa, I., 2010. Composting of waste from palm oil mill: a
sustainable waste management practice. Review in Environmental Science and
Biotechnology 9, 331e344.
Sivaramakrishnan, K., 2011. Determination of higher heating value of biodiesels.
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3 (1), 7981e7987.
Souza de, S.P., Pacca, S., vila, M.T., Borges, J.L., 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions and
energy balance of palm oil biofuel. Renewable Energy 35, 2552e2561.
Stichnothe, H., Schuchardt, F., 2010. Comparison of different treatment options for
palm oil production waste on a life cycle basis. International Journal of Life
Cycle Assessment 15, 907e915.
Sumanthi, S., Chai, S.P., Mohamed, A.R., 2008. Utilization of oil palm as a source of
renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Review 12,
2404e2421.
Turnbull, J., Kamthunzi, W., 2008. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Associated
with Livestock Waste Management Systems: a Case Study for the Langerwerf
Dairy Waste Management System. Peninsula Energy Partners, Los Altos, CA, USA.
http://www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/projects/task38casestudies/usa-fullreport.
pdf, (assessed on February 2012).
UNFCC (United Nation Framework for Climate Change), 2005. Clean Development
Mechanism Proposed New Methodology: Baseline (CDM-NMB). www.cdm.
unfcc.int.
USDA, 2012. Indonesia Oilseeds and Products. It was assessed in May 11th 2012
http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Oilseeds%20and%
20Products%20Annual_Jakarta_Indonesia_4-12-2012.pdf.
Waldheim, L., Nilsson, T., 2001. Steam Value of Gases from Biomass Gasication.
Report prepared for: IEA Bioenergy Agreement, Task 20-Steam Gasication of
Biomass. This is can be downloaded in: http://www.ieatask33.org/app/
webroot/les/le/publications/SteamValue.pdf.
Wu, T.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim, J.W., Anuar, N., 2009. A holistic approach to
managing palm oil mill efuent (POME): biotechnological advances in the
sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnology Advances 27, 40e52.
Yacob, S., Hassan, M.A., Shirai, Y., Wakisaka, M., Subash, S., 2005. Baseline study of
methane emission from anaerobic ponds of palm oil mill efuent treatment.
Science of the Total Environment 366, 187e196.
Yee, K.F., Tan, K.T., Abdullah, A.Z., Lee, K.T., 2009. Life cycle assessment of palm
biodiesel: revealing facts and benets for sustainability. Applied Energy 86,
189e196.
Yule, C.M., 2010. Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function in Indo-Malayan peat
swamp forest. Biodiversity Conservation 19, 393e409.
Yusoff, S., Hansen, S.B., 2007. Feasibility study of performing an life cycle assessment on crude palm oil production in Malaysia. International Journal of Life
Cycle Assessment 12, 50e58.