Homosexuality is a vital and controversial issue in political, philosophical, ethical and religious domains.

We are open to the debate of homosexuality in the media on a consistent basis and issues related to
homosexuality have been taken up by the law, politicians and religious bodies. It can be said, that the
debate surrounding homosexuality has covered the attention of almost all in society to some extent. Let
us talk how homosexual behavior can realize the same real things of love, happiness, and pleasure,
among everybody, that heterosexual behavior can realize. Specifically, if homosexual behavior can
produce the benefits, then there is no reason of treating homosexual behavior as morally inferior to
heterosexual behavior.
The sensible reason to discourage homosexual behavior is the thought that it leads to
unhappiness. Secondly, it is thought that homosexuals misuse sexual organ which is unnatural. Thirdly,
people believe that anything that differs from traditional process is unnatural and this unnatural thing
normally leads to unhappiness. Therefore homosexuality is discouraged. But are the above arguments
right to blame homosexuality. We need to understand the meaning of sex first. People normally believe
that the main aims of sexual activities are reproduction and love. This believes ends the analysis of sex.
If we take the sex as a physical desire for contact with anothers body, then we can conclude easily that
homosexuality is not immoral. Moreover people think homosexuality in the realm of marriage. But there
is difference between homosexual conduct and homosexual marriage because there are things that
people do in the privacy of their bedrooms that are unrelated to marriage. Specifically, people can ask
whether such sexual bedroom activities are wrong or sinful, whether or not they relate to marriage. The
issue of homosexual marriage is clearly a distinct issue because there may be people who think that
homosexual conduct is wrong, but who believe that as a matter of legal right, homosexual marriage
should be legal because it is required by equal protection of all citizens. To illustrate, there are people in
America who think that it is immoral to get divorced and then re-marry. However, such people do not
believe that such re-marriages or marriages in general should be illegal. In other words, they make a
moral judgment about behavior but do not simultaneously label the institution in which the behavior
takes place as immoral or illegal. One can then discuss homosexual conduct without implicating any
conclusions regarding homosexual marriage. Religion also takes a significant role in the debates
surrounding homosexuality. The above facts talk about the thought, which is their in the mind of the
people in our present society.
If we allow homosexuality in our society, instead of affecting negatively, it will give some positive
solution towards some well-known problems present in our society. We can analyze its effect at three
levels: individual, family & community.
Community level: Giving similar-sex couples with the same legal and social recognition of their
relationships in no way oversteps upon the rights of others. Allowing similar-sex marriage is about
extending the rights already enjoyed by the majority to an excluded minority who differ simply in terms
of the sex of the person with whom they are in a committed relationship. Further, and very importantly,
lifting the ban on similar-sex marriage is not only about speaking the rights of this minority group; it is
about protecting the rights of people in general. If we say exclusion to certain basic rights is okay for
some, then we are opening up the doors to introducing laws as we see fit to exclude others. In a
different space and time, it may be your rights or those of your loved ones that are affected. Equality,

respect, dignity, and a sense of belonging are ideals and values endorsed by our society. When these
values are not upheld for some, it has the potential to affect us all.
Family level: The absence of opportunity for the same-sex community to legally and socially
authenticate their committed relationships not only affects the couples involved but also their
families. Same-sex attracted individuals do not exist on the peripheral of society or in isolation. They
are someones son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, grandparent,
or grandchild. Having a family member treated differently by the community at large can negatively
result the family as a whole. Those who argue against same-sex marriage in the name of the family
seem to overlook the many heterosexual family members that are adversely affected by the social
exclusion of one of their own
Individual level: The dearth of opportunity for same-sex couples to solemnize their relationships, as do
different-sex couples, sends the message that their relationships are not of equivalent standard and that
they are second class citizens. As same-sex sexuality is no more a choice than heterosexuality,
restricting marriage to hetero-sex couples will not stop committed relationships between members of
the same sex. What it will do is continue to promote bias and prejudice towards a select group of
individuals who nevertheless pay the same taxes, fight the same wars, and abide by all other citizenry
responsibilities
Homosexuality is not a new phenomenon; it is noted in the earliest human writings and is
depicted in petroglyphs. It is well recorded in the Greek and Roman civilizations, in the cuneiform
writings of the earlier societies along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, and in the later history of the
middle ages.(a) It is present and common in all races and cultures, including present day hunter-gather
societies.(b)However those with same sex orientation are not spread uniformly through Western society
communities; many tend to segregate in territories within all major cities and many cities such as San
Francisco have large audiences. Homosexuality has been present in humans long before there was ever
a deliberate record of our presence. Homosexual orientation demises the survival fitness of the
individual, but at an earlier time in our evolutionary history increased the inclusive fitness of the family
tribes of which that individual was a member. Homosexuality is still of inclusive advantage to civilized
man but in ways that are very different from when it evolved in tribal societies at least two hundred
millennia ago. In conclusion, the same homosexuality should be legalized. It is human civil rights, it will
encourage families value and will lead to a lot of financial profits to state and local. Two people of the
same sex who love each other should allowed to publicly celebrate their commitment and receive the
same advantages of marriage as opposite sex couples. All lovers should be granted the final gift of
marriage, because marriage is an unchallengeable right of humans. Joe Solmonese confirms that one
day in the near future, people will look back on todays same-sex couples and families and ask with
raised eyebrows, Why wouldnt two people, who have spent their lives committed to one another, be
granted the same human rights that most others take for granted? Marriage can provide families with
true equality, so please stand for the same sex marriages as marriage equality.