Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
UNIVERSE
OvidiuNedu
The realist ontology implicit in the mentality of ordinary common sense, brings man to a
frightening prospect who reports to its minor importance in a universe that is indifferent to its
values. Human beings seem a minor accident occurs in a universe that, ultimately, following
another sense of evolution as a human being than interested. Ultimately, after a short period of
"survival", man is crushed by that same universe that continues to evolve, indifferent to human
values.
Some religious systems, including Advaita Vedanta, the "official" philosophy of Hinduism, flip
this perspective, claiming the priority of man in relation to the Universe. One way or the other,
the purpose of the universe is linked to the purpose of man. This way of looking at things could
also be contextualized in a realistic ontological framework, as happens in Judaism and
Christianity (at least in their canonical forms), in which man is a part of the Universe, but the
reason being of man precedes the purpose of the universe.
The reversal of perspective is even more radical in the case of some idealistic currents, as is the
case of Advaita Vedanta. In the case of this philosophical current, man ceases to be a part of the
Universe, even the fundamental part, and becomes the very basis of the universe. In the case of
these systems, it is more correct to speak of the human experience of the Universe as the
Universe as a collection of objective entities, among which is the man too. The experience of the
Universe to man as a subject who experiments and that - it can not be found elsewhere. The
reasons for the universe is not only connected to the reason of man, but they depend exclusively
on them. There is nothing objective in the universe, nothing that depends on the condition of the
subject that experiences, nothing that can
6exister not reflect this condition. The Universe is opposed and, in addition, it is not indifferent to
the direction of evolution of the being who experiences, but there is just to give the possibility to
this being to evolve; the universe is simply a part of the evolutionary mechanism of the human
subject. Ultimately, the direction of evolution of the Universe is subject to human teleology.
This is the perspective that Advaita Vedanta adopted regarding the relationship between the
universe and the human being. Since, by its very name, Advaita Vedanta proclaims as a monistic
philosophy, has dvaita-meaning "non-duality" in this system of thought the subject is unique, is
the absolute consciousness (cit) which, being affected by ignorance (avidy, ajna) takes the
hypostasis of a variety of individual beings (j va). In essence, all these beings are the same with
absolute consciousness, called Brahman, but they represent demarcated hypostases of an illusory
way, the same consciousness. The Vedanta discuss any individual determination of any personal
characteristic in terms of "limitations" (updhi).
"III.3. The Self (tman) is like space (
"III.19. One who was not born (aja) is differentiated in an illusory way (
) and not
otherwise. "2
Once self-limited and have taken the hypostasis of beings, absolute consciousness experiences all
through this "window" which is the assumed limited individuality. The universe is nothing but a
projection, an experience of absolute consciousness hypostasized as diverse beings. The texts of
Vedanta have this screening trial to experience the universe as a repetitive coverage of the
absolute consciousness by a number of envelopes (ko a) becoming coarser and more and more
distant from nature .
will of the self, whether he This is the unconscious desire to live (in the
case of breaths) or deliberate desires, conscious (in the case of action
departments). Together, the five breaths and the five faculties of
action form the "envelope which consists of breath"
(pramayakoa), by which consciousness is planning experience
characterized by the active involvement of volitional participation .
"What -what is [envelope] which consists of breath?
The five vital airs , starting with Pra and the five
faculties of the share, starting with the
voice, [those - it] form the envelope consisting of breath
.25
Reducing the action to experience the breath of respiration, is a legacy
of the archaic period of Brahmanism - the end of the Vedic period and
the beginning of the writing of the Upanishads - when, while trying to
find the ultimate principle of life and the universe, the breath has
sometimes been identified as that - it. The major importance of the
breath, breathing, not only in the religious practices of India, but even
in Indian philosophy, is due precisely to the identification of the breath
as the essence of life and even the Cosmos especially in the archaic
period of Brahmanism.
The subtle body and the dream state (svapna avasth)
Being a purely noetic nature, subtle body is experienced by him - even
only in those situations in which the experience of sensory faculties
and action faculties are suspended, ie in the dream state ( svapna
avasth). The sensory faculties and those of action are responsible for
the manifestation of the coarse experience at the level of
consciousness and, in this way, their suspension leaves as active only
the breaths and the internal organ (antakaraa) at which originates
dream experience "The dream is design
of objects, [design] that arises
from the mental impressions [produced] in
waking when the faculties of knowledge and
action are removed . "26
In the literature of Vedanta, the three envelopes which together form
the subtle body (sthla arra) are generally presented in an order
that reflects some ontological hierarchy of those - one. The closer the
absolute is the envelope which consists of knowledge
(vijnamayakoa), at which the experiment takes the form of a
simple representation. The experience of the envelope which consists
of thought (manomayakoa) away over Brahman because at this