Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TITLE PAGE
AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF MANPOWER TRAINING
AND DEVELOPMENT IN SERVICE ORGANISATIONS.
(A CASE STUDY OF POWER HOLDING COMPANY OF NIGERIA
(PHCN) PLC ENUGU ZONE)
BY
AIDELOMON, ROSELINE .O.
BA/2006/080
A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
CARITAS UNIVERSITY, AMORJI-NIKE, EMENE,
ENUGU STATE
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned have read, certified and recommended to
Business Administration Department Caritas University for the
acceptance of this research work entitled An evaluation of the
effect of manpower training and development in service
organizations. A case study of power holding company of Nigeria
(PHCN) Enugu Zone carried out and submitted by AIDELOMON,
ROSELINE .O. as meeting the requirement for the Award of the
Degree of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc) in Business Administration,
Caritas University, Amorji Nike, Enugu state.
_____________________
Prof Nwanguma G.U.
__________________
Date
Project Supervisor
____________________
___________________
Date
Head of Department
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge the most powerful God for giving me the
strength, wisdom, courage and ability to complete this research
work.
uchukwu,Ijeoma,Ugomma,Chiamaka,Joan,Chigozie,Angela,Lizzy,Ka
chi,Jennifer,Chidimma but to mention a few.
I will be rather ungrateful if I fail to appreciate the contribution
and assistant given to me by the administrative and service
department of PHCN Enugu Zone and the entire staffs for their
cooperation throughout the period of my research work.
ABSTRACT
square. Among the major findings of the work was that training and
development programme improve productivity and better performance.
The research therefore recommended that there should be a free flow of
information to enable all the staff to be aware of the training and
development programme available to them both internally and externally.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page
Certification
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of content
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Research Questions
1.5
Statement of Hypothesis
1.6
1.7
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERTURE
2.1
2.2
Historical background
2.3
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN
3.1
Research Design
3.2
Sources of data
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.6
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1
4.2
Test of Hypothesis
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1
Summary of findings
5.2
Conclusion
5.3
Recommendation
Bibliography
Appendix
Questionnaire
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
invests in the workforce for greater return today and even in the
foreseeable future.
Organizational effectiveness rests on the efficient and effective
performance of workforce that makeup the organization. The
efficient and effective performance of the workforce inturn, rest on
the richness of the knowledge, skills and abilities possessed by the
workforce. Manpower training and development in most
organizations is a continuous act/exercise. The inexorable march of
time and the ceaseless glamour for social change combine to make
adaptability and continuing preparation of the workforce as
inevitable as the initial acquisition of knowledge and skills. This
cannot happen if employees training and development do not occur
in an enterprise. In other to maximize the productivity and
efficiency of the organization, every executive, manager or
supervisor in a public or private organization has the responsibility
and indeed the bounding duty to ensure the development of their
employees who have requisite knowledge and expertise.
Training is like sharpening an existing skill in order to reflect the
trends in technology and other social cultural environmental
changes of an organization. Productivity is the goal of todays
competitive business world and training can be a spring board to
enhance productivity. The aim is to enable them contribute their
full measure to the welfare, health and development of the
organization (onah 1993). The main objective of training and
development in service organization is to increase efficiency of
employees with the resulting increase in corporate productivity. This
accounts for why a large number of fund and time is expected by
organization at one period or the order in the improvement of the
skills of their employees at various levels.
1.2
1.3
ii)
iii)
particular
To increase the general knowledge and understanding of
individual member.
iv)
v)
1.5
STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
Here, Hi and Ho below represent the alternative hypothesis
and null hypothesis respectively.
HYPOTHESIS ONE
Hi: Training and development improve productivity
and better performance.
Ho: Training and development does not improve
productivity and better performance.
HYPOTHESIS TWO
Hi: Training and development improve skills and
knowledge of manpower in service organization.
Ho: Training and development do not improve skills
and knowledge of manpower in service
organization.
1.6
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1
x.
xi.
workers.
When there is noticed inability to take up challenges among
workers.
When there is noticed reduction in job involvement and
organizational commitment.
2.1.2
FORMAL TRAINING
It entails the deliberate and structured presentation of
2.1.3
2.1.4
PROGRAME
Tessin (1978) discussed extensively how benefits accrues to
organization, individual and inter-group relations through training
and development whereas, Dickey (1982) submission bothers on
individual benefit; bearing in mind that the workers are in the
organization While the organizations are in the workers. Discussing
the benefits separately under subheading as done by tessin(1978)
and dickey(1982) will amount to jamboree in simplicity. Therefore,
let them be merged under one heading.
Training and development leads to improved profitability.
Training and development leads to improved job knowledge
and skills at all levels of organization.
Training and development improve workers morale and job
satisfaction.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
2.2 ORIGIN OF POWER HOLDING COMPANY OF NIGERIA
(PHCN)
Around the world, electric industries are undergoing
extensive restructuring. The trend, which started in the United
Kingdom and Chile in the 1980, has rapidly spread to many
countries in Latin America, Asia, Europe and Africa. The main
motivation of driving forces for restructuring the electric industry in
different counties are not the same. In some countries, such as the
United Kingdom and the Latin America countries, privatization of
the electric has provided a means of attracting funds from the
private sector to relieve the burden of heavy burden of heavy
government subsidies. In the country formerly under centralized
control (central and eastern Europe), the process follows a general
trend away from centralized government control towards increased
privatization and decentralization. In the United States and several
other countries where the electric industry has for the most part
been owned by the private sector, the trend is toward increased
competition and regulation.
Power holding company of Nigeria (PHCN) formally known as
National electricity power authority (NEPA) is a public corporation
owned by the federal government of Nigeria to generate, transmit
and distributes electricity to the populace. The history of electricity
(power generation) in Nigeria dates back to 1898 when electricity
was first produced in Nigeria. Therefore, several other towns
established electricity supply by the installation of isolated
generation in each town.
In 1946, the Nigeria government electricity undertaking
was established within the then public works department to take
over the responsibility of electricity supply to Lagos area.
DEVELOPMENT METHOD
Executive development is a systematic process of growth and
training. This includes what Jones, George and Hills (2000) referred
to as;
i)
ii)
2)
3)
4)
2.2.5
TRAINING TECHNIQUES
point to the relevant areas for which the executive needs to undergo
some types of training and development.
2)Survey: Each executive would make a survey of what he likes or
what his subordinate managers lack and make appropriate
recommendations accordingly.
3)Job Analysis: Where movement or transfer into a higher position
is being contemplated, the requirement of that higher
responsibilities would enable management to determine the training
and development needs of subordinates that are being ear marked
for such higher positions.
2.2.8
It has been found from recent studies that before the recession
really set in (pre (1983) not much of training was witnessed. The
recession of 1983 and the structural adjustment program of 1986
were accompanied by a continuous and critical modification in the
frequency, method and focus of training courses. The main reason
for these changes is the substantial decline in the resources of older
generation firms, which seriously reduced the financial allocation of
training. In a few other cases, the cut on overseas training was
informed by caution on the part of older firms who felt that the
boom in new firms(e.g, banks) is at best artificial and not enduring.
In fact, casual observation reveals that overseas training have
practically ceased while the grants of study leave (training leave
with pay) have substantially reduced. A number of other reasons
explained the refocused interest of employers in training courses for
their staff. These may be;
rapid changes in technology(computerization);
rapid changes in public policy(branches, interest rates, interbank and other prudential guideline) suggesting that
managers and workers need to respond appropriately with
new skills, attitude and knowledge;
increase in the incidence of fraud and the role of employers to
prevent and control malpractice from all possible sources;
policy intervention strategies such as re-engineering and
adoption of total quality management, team working and other
specialized and specific goal-directed human resource
utilization approaches; and
Reduced demand for goods and services, high rates of interest
bringing about high incidence of bad debts, and requiring new
and modern marketing approaches to attract deposits and
minimize bad debt expected to persist in the millennium and
beyond.
Employers will continue to pay serious attention to training and
development since new corporate cultures are necessary in order to
imbibe new attitudes that are required for success in a new
operating environment.
Current training and development programmes are however
constrained by the following incidences or practices;
The failure to determine training needs reliably and relevantly;
Inadequate funding of training;
Burying or sacrificing the training function in organizational
policies;
Failure to systematically evaluate the effects of training;
Unwarranted dumping or muddling of the steps in the
standard training process (viz., design, implementation and
evaluation);
ii)
iii)
person.
From time to time, to consider the employment in industry
or commerce as appear to require a special consideration
iv)
v)
vi)
2)
3)
4)
situation.
Non evaluation of the outcome of training: The company
does not evaluate the outcome of the programme, there are in
many instance, no examinations either written or oral or
feedback from the employee.
REFERENCES
New York.
Isaiah Urhoma, K. (2009) : A textbook of Human Resource
Management Vol 1. University printing press Delta State
University Abraka, Delta State.
Michael Stahl, J.(1995): Management total quality in a global
environment. Black well publisher, Massachsetts.
Nwachukwu, C.C. (1988:) Management theory and practice.
African F.C.P publisher, Nigeria.
Onuchekwa, C.I.(1995): Personnel Management. Goshen
publisher, Awka.
Obikeze, S.O, Obi, E.A, Abonyi, N. (2005):Personnel
Management concepts, principles and application.
Bookpoint ltd, Onitsha.
Simbo Banjoko, A.(1989): Human Resource Management: an
expository approach. Pumark Nigeria ltd, Nigeria.
Sola Fajana (2002): Human Resource Management an
Introduction. Labofin and Company, Lagos.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1
RESEARCH DESIGN
SOURCES OF DATA
The data for this research work was collected from both
The primary data used for this research work was gotten from
oral interviews conducted by the researcher within the office and
premise of the Power holding company of Nigeria(PHCN) Enugu and
N
1+ N (e)2
N
1 + N(e)2
Where N=250
e = (0.05)2
n=
250
1
+ 250(0.0025)
250
1 + 0.625
= __250_
0.0025
1.625
= 153.846
n = 154
Using Bourleys proportion allocation formula
n1 = n1(n)
N
Where n1 = Element within the sample frame i.e Number
allocated to each class of employee(department)
n = Sample or the proportion of the universe used
for the study.(Total sample size)
N = Population of the study i.e overall employee.
Departments:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
62
80
35
40
33
250
=38.19
=38
250
= 12320
250
= 5390
250
Audit Dept
n1= 33 x 154
250
=5082
250
=49.28
=49
=21.56
=22
=24.64
= 25
=20.32
=20
To cross check:
38 + 49 + 22 + 25 + 20
=154 (sample size)
3.5
Df =Degree of freedom
n = Number of rows
k = Number of column
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1
chapter one of this write up. It deals with the presentation, analysis
and interpretation of the data collected. They were analyzed using
tables and chi-square (X2) statistical tool
4.1.1
Table 4.1.1
DEPARTMENT
NO OF
NO
PERCENTAGE
QUESTIONNAIR
RETURNED
E DISTRIBUTED
Admin and
(%)
38
30
25
Technical/Service
49
35
29
Customer service
22
17
14
Finance and
25
20
17
service
Account
Audit
20
18
15
Total
154
120
100
Table 4.1.2
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTIC
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Male
80
67
Female
40
33
Total
120
100
No of respondents
Percentage (%)
18-29
20
30-39
35
29
40
33
40-49
17
50& above
Total
25
21
120
100
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Single
35
29
Married
80
67
Divorced
Total
120
4
100
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
WAEC/GCE
14
12
OND/NCE
22
18
HND/BSC
58
48
Other Qualification
26
22
120
100
Total
Source: field survey 2010.
No of respondent
Percentage(%)
0-2
18
15
3-5
24
20
6-10
32
27
11 & above
46
38
120
100
Total
No of Respondent
Percentage (%)
On the job
25
21
40
33
Simulated
25
21
30
25
120
100
Total
Source: Field Survey 2010.
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Middle mgt
23
19
Supervisory
28
23
Junior staff
60
50
120
100
Total
Options
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Lack of tools
58
48
Lack of
45
38
17
14
120
100
training
Lack of
renumeration
Total
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Yes
120
100
No
120
100
Total
Source: field survey 2010.
No of respondent
Technical
Percentage (%)
44
37
22
18
54
45
courses
Administrative
courses
Both
Total
120
100
Options
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Yes
110
No
10
120
100
Total
92
No of respondent
Yes
No
Total
Percentage (%)
100
83
20
17
120
100
Table 4.1.14
WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES?
Options
High productivity increases
No of respondent
Percentage(%)
40
33
25
21
25
21
staff morale
Enhance career
development
High productivity reduce
staff turn over
No response
Total
30
25
120
100
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
28
23
20
17
42
35
30
25
120
100
Total
Source: field survey 2010.
Options
No of respondent
Percentage (%)
Machines
18
15
Workers
22
18
Both
80
67
Total
120
100
4.2
TEST OF HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis which were stated earlier in chapter one would
HYPOTHESIS ONE
HI: Training and development improves productivity and better
performance.
HO: Training and development does not improve productivity and
better performance.
Recall Table 4.1.13
Table 4.2.1
Options
No of Respondent
Yes
No
Total
Using X2
X2 = (o1 e 1)2
e1
= 120
2
=60
Percentage (%)
100
83
20
17
120
100
3200
60
= 53.33
Therefore, the calculated X2 = 53.33
Degree of freedom = (n-1) (k-1)
= (2-1) (2-1)
=1
DECISION
From the chi-square for 1 degree of freedom at 5% level of
significance, the tabulated X2 value is 3.84. This shows that the
computed value of 53.33 is greater than the tabulated value of 3.84
i.e 53.33 > 3.84.
CONCLUSION
Based on the above analysis, the researcher rejects null
hypothesis (HO) and accept the alternative hypothesis (HI). That
training and development improve productivity and better
performance.
HYPOTHESIS TWO
HI: Training and development improves skills and Knowledge of the
manpower in service organization.
HO: Training and development does not improve skills and
Knowledge of the manpower in service organization.
Recall Table 4.1.12
Table 4.2.2
Options
No of Respondent
Yes
110
92
10
120
100
No
Total
Using X2
X2 = (o1 e1)2
e1
X2 = (110 60)2 + (10 60)2
60
= 2500 + 2500
60
= 5000
60
=83.33
= (n - 1) (k - 1)
= (2 -1) (2 - 1)
=1
DECISION
Percentage (%)
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
5.1
CONCLUSION
The essence of training and development in service organization
BIBLOGRAGHY
Akpomuvire, M. (2007). Human Resource Training and Development
for the civil service Nigeria. U.S.A : CatawbaPublishing
Company Charlotte.
Bello-Imam, I.B, Oshiomebo, B.O, Ojeifo, S.A. (2007).
Fundementals of Human Resource Management in Nigeria.
Ibadan: college press and publishers ltd.
Chandramohan, A. (2008).Human Resource Management. New
Delhi: S.B. Nangia APH publishing corporation.
Cruz, E.M.D. (2002). Staff and Service Management.Kuala lumpur:
Golden books centre SDN Bhd.
APPENDIX
Faculty of
management and social science
Department of
Business Administration
Caritas University
Amorji Nike Emene
Enugu State
June 30 2010.
Dear Sir/Madam
I am a final year student of the above named university
conducting a research on An evaluation of the effect of
manpower training and development in service organization with
PHCN Enugu as my case study.
The research is in partial fulfillment for the award of B.sc
degree in Business Administration from the above school. Please
you are kindly requested to provide answers to the questions set
out in the attached questionnaire to the best of your knowledge.
Information supplied and views expressed are solely for academic
purpose.
Yours
faithfully
Aidelomon,
Roseline .o.
QUESTIONNAIRES
INSTRUCTION: please tick (
1) Name:
2)
3)
4)
5)
optional
Sex :
a) Male [ ]
b) Female [ ]
Age :
i)
18-29
[ ]
(ii) 30-39 [
]
(iii) 40-49 [ ]
iv)
50 and above [
]
Marital status:
a) Married [ ]
b) single [ ]
c) divorced [
]
c) Widowed [ ]
d) separated [ ]
Academic Qualification:
a)WAEC/GCE
[ ]
b)OND/NCE
[ ]
c)HND/B.SC
[ ]
d) Other Qualification [
]
6) Years of Experience:
a) 0-2
b) 3-5
c) 6-10
]
]
d) 11 and above [
SECTION TWO
6)
7)
8)
9)
a) Yes [ ]
b) No [
]
11)
What method of training and development does your
organization use?
a) On the- job training method
[
]
b) Off the job training method
[
]
c) Simulated
[
]
d) Both
[ ]
12)
How often do you conduct training and development in
your organization?
a) Every six (6) months
[
]
b) Every year
[
]
c) Every five years
[
]
d) Specify if otherwise ..
13)
Who do you send for the course?
a) Junior staff
[
]
b) Senior staff
[
]
c) Supervisor
[
]
d) Manager
[ ]
e) All of the above [ ]
14)
Does your organization have policy on employees
training?
a) Yes [ ]
b) No [ ]
15)
If your answer to the above is yes, please state the
policy
16)
What are the category of staff level in PHCN Enugu
a) Top management
[
]
b) Middle management [ ]
c) Supervisory
[
]
d) Junior staff
[ ]
17)
What are the major problems in the organization?
a) Lack of tools
[
]
b) Lack of training
[
]
c) Lack of renumeration
[
]
18)
development programme?
a) Technical courses [
]
b) Administrative courses [ ]
c) Both
[ ]
19) Does training and development improve skills and
knowledge of manpower in service organization?
a) Yes
20)
b)
No
better performance?
a) Yes
b) No [
Machines
b)
Workers
c)
Both
]
[
23)
..
c)