Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of
ABEGAIL H. LAQUIAO
Employee:

Name of Rater: LILIAN C. MOLINA

Position: Teacher I

Position:

Date of
Review:
Rating
Period:

MASTER TEACHER 1

Bureau/Center/Service
Deparment of Education-Division of Tabuk City
/Division:
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

TIME WEIGTH/
FRAME KRA

1. Prepared daily lesson June

plans or daily logs of 2015activities
March
(5%)
2016

Delivery of basic education services

TeachingLearning
Process

2. Utilized appropriate
IMs and teaching
strategies (10%)

3. Facilitated learning
through the use of varied
learning experiences
(10%)

June
2015March
2016

30%

June
2015March
2016

2016

25%

VERY SATSIFACTORY
4

SATISFACTORY
3

UNSATISFACTORY
2

1 to 2 times found with back

logs or no DLL/DLP in any
learning area during the
regular checking of DLL/DLP.

DLL/DLP were submitted on

time based on the agreed
regular checking of DLL/DLP

DLL/DLP were submitted one DLL/DLP were submitted two DLL/DLP are submitted three
day late based on the agreed days late based on the agreed days late based on the
regular checking of DLL/DLP regular checking of DLL/DLP agreed regular checking of
DLL/DLP

3 times found with back logs or 4 times found with back logs 5 times found with back logs
no DLL/DLP in any learning or no DLL/DLP in any learning or no DLL/DLP in any of the
area during the regular
area during the regular
learning area during the
checking of DLL/DLP
checking of DLL/DLP
regular checking of DLL/DLP

TIMELINESS

QUALITY

Utilized appropriate IMs and

Utilization of appropriate IMs
teaching strategies were evident and teaching strategies were
if 75% to 100% of the learners evident if 60% to 74% of the
got 75% or above of the given learners got 75% or above of
formative or summative test as the given formative or
reflected in the class record.
summative test.

Utilization of appropriate IMs

and teaching strategies were
evident if 45% to 59% of the
learners got 75% or above of
the given formative or
summative test.

All prepared IMs could be used All prepared IMs could be

for two or more years
used for one year

All prepared IMs could be used All prepared IMs could be

for six months
used for three months

EFFICIENCY
QUALITY

Utilized varied learning

Utilized varied learning
experiences/Activities that
experiences/Activities that
caters to 4 MIs as reflected in caters to 3 MIs as reflected in
the DLL/DLP
the DLL/DLP

QUALITY

Utilization of appropriate IMs

and teaching strategies were
evident if 35% to 44% of the
learners got 75% or above of
the given formative or
summative test.

DLL/DLP are submitted four

days late based on the
agreed regular checking of
DLL/DLP
Utilization of appropriate IMs
and teaching strategies were
evident if 34% and below of
the learners got 75% or
above of the given formative
or summative test.
prepared IMs could be used
for once only

Utilized varied learning

experiences/Activities that
caters to 2 MIs as reflected in
the DLL/DLP

Utilized varied learning

experiences/Activities that
caters to 1 MIs as reflected
in the DLL/DLP

2 of the following were

observed
1. Cleanliness and proper
waste disposal
2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to individual
and group task.
4. Compliance to school and
classroom policies.
5. Leadership

1 of the following were

observed
1. Cleanliness and proper
waste disposal
2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to individual
and group task.
4. Compliance to school and
classroom policies.
5. Leadership

5 of the following were observed 4 of the following were

1. Cleanliness and proper waste observed
disposal
1. Cleanliness and proper
2. Friendly environment.
waste disposal
3. Responsible to individual and 2. Friendly environment.
group task.
3. Responsible to individual
4. Compliance to school and
and group task.
classroom policies.
4. Compliance to school and
5. Leadership
classroom policies.
5. Leadership

3 of the following were

observed
1. Cleanliness and proper
waste disposal
2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to individual
and group task.
4. Compliance to school and
classroom policies.
5. Leadership

Conducted assessment on
learners performance thru
written and at least 4 authentic
assessment every rating period
supported by the following

QUALITY
Conducted assessment on
Conducted assessment on
learners performance thru
learners performance thru
written and 2 authentic
written and 1 authentic
assessment every rating period assessment every rating
supported by the following
period supported by the

. Conducted assessment on
learners performance thru
written and 3 authentic
assessment every rating
period supported by the

POOR
1

QUALITY

Complete DLL/DLP of all the

subjects taught

Utilized varied learning

experiences/Activities that
caters to 5 MIs as reflected in
the DLL/DLP

4. Set standards for

June
class discipline, rules, 2015and individual and group
March
task. (5%)

Pupil/Student 1. Monitored, evaluated June

maintained pupils 2015Outcomes and progress(10%)
March
2016

OUTSTANDING
5

Conducted assessment on
learners performance thru
written only every rating
period supported by the
following evidences:

ACTUAL
RESULTS
Q E T A

SCORE

OBJECTIVES

RATING

MFO

KRAs

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
( Q U A L I T Y, E F F I C I E N C Y, T I M E L I N E S S )

evidences:
1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different
performance task.
5. Class Record/eclass record

following evidences:
1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different
performance task.
5. Class Record/ eclass
record

evidences:
1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different
performance task.
5. Class Record/ eclass record

following evidences:
1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different
performance task.
5. Class Record/ eclass
record

1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Class Record/ eclass
record

TIMELINESS
Learners performances were Learners performances were Learners performances were Learners performances
evaluated 10 days after every evaluated 15 days after every evaluated 20 days after every were evaluated 1month after
rating period.
rating period.
rating period.
every rating period.
QUALITY
Conducted at least 4
Conducted 3
Conducted 2
Conducted 1
Conducted 1
remediation/enrichment
remediation/enrichment
remediation/enrichment
remediation/enrichment
remediation/enrichment
program supported by the
program supported by the
program supported by the
program supported by the program without support
following evidences
following evidences
following evidences
following evidences
documents
1. formative and summative test 1. formative and summative 1. formative and summative 1. formative and summative
analysis
test analysis
test analysis
test analysis
2. remediation/enrichment plan 2. remediation/enrichment
2. remediation/enrichment plan 2. remediation/enrichment
3. IMs, Activity sheets
plan
3. IMs, Activity sheets
plan
4. ICT aided instruction
3. IMs, Activity sheets
4. ICT aided instruction
3. IMs, Activity sheets
4. ICT aided instruction
4. ICT aided instruction
EFFICIENCY
IMs, activity sheets, ICT aided IMs, activity sheets, ICT aided IMs, activity sheets, ICT aided IMs, activity sheets, ICT
IMs, activity sheets, ICT
materials can be utilized for at materials can be utilized for 1 materials can be utilized for 1 aided materials can be
aided materials can be
least two years.
year
semester only
utilized for a month
utilized for 1 session only.
.
.
.
.
TIMELINESS
Conducted the appropriate
Conducted the appropriate Conducted the appropriate
Conducted the appropriate Conducted the appropriate
interventions 2 days after
interventions 3 days after
interventions 4 days after
interventions 5 days after
interventions 6 days after
determining learners needing determining learners needing determining learners needing determining learners
determining learners
intervention.
intervention
intervention
needing intervention
needing intervention
QUALITY
All of the following records were Found once any of the
Found twice any of the
Found thrice any of the
Found 4 times any of the
maintained and updated.
following records not updated following records not updated following records not
following records not
during regular checking of
during regular checking of
updated during regular
updated during regular
(1) Form 1(class adviser)
records.
records.
checking of records
checking of records.
(2) Form 2(class adviser)
(1) Form 1(class adviser)
(1) Form 1(class adviser)
(1) Form 1(class adviser)
(1) Form 1(class adviser)
(3) Form 3
(2) Form 2(class adviser)
(2) Form 2(class adviser)
(2) Form 2(class adviser)
(2) Form 2(class adviser)
(4) Form 5(class adviser)
(3) Form 3
(3) Form 3
(3) Form 3
(3) Form 3
(5) Class Record/e-class record (4) Form 5(class adviser)
(4) Form 5(class adviser)
(4) Form 5(class adviser)
(4) Form 5(class adviser)
(5) Class Record/e-class
(5) Class Record/e-class
(5) Class Record/e-class
(5) Class Record/e-class
record
record
record
record
TIMELINESS
Submitted updated records on Submitted updated records Submitted updated records 2 Submitted updated records 3 Submitted updated records
or before the set date for
one day late of the set date days late of the set date for
days late of the set date for 4 days late of the set date
submission/checking
for submission/ checking
submission / checking
submission /checking
for submission / checking
QUALITY
Conducted at least 4 teacher Conducted 3 teacher parent Conducted 2 teacher parent Conducted 1 teacher parent Conducted teacher parent
parent conferences and home conferences and home
conferences and home
conferences and home
conferences and home
visitation to students needing visitation to students needing visitation to students needing visitation to students needing visitation to students
monitoring supported with the monitoring supported with the monitoring supported with the monitoring supported with the needing monitoring without
following documents.
following documents.
following documents.
following documents.
support document.
1. Anecdotal record of students. 1. Anecdotal record of
1. Anecdotal record of
1. Anecdotal record of
2. Attendance during conference students.
students.
students.
3. Agreement
2. Attendance during
2. Attendance during
2. Attendance during
4. referral slip duly signed by the conference
conference
conference
guidance office or School head. 3. Agreement
3. Agreement
3. Agreement
4. referral slip duly signed by 4. referral slip duly signed by 4. referral slip duly signed by
the guidance office or School the guidance office or School the guidance office or School
head.
head.
head.
Learners performances were
evaluated 1 week after every
rating period.

2. Conducted
June
remediation/enrichment 2015programs to improve
learners performance March
2016
(5%)

3. Maintained updated
pupils school records
(5%)

June
2015March
2016

4. Conducted teacher
parent conference and
home visitation (5%)

June
2015March
2016

TIMELINESS
Teacher parent conferences and Teacher parent conferences Teacher parent conferences

Teacher parent conferences Teacher parent conferences

home visitation conducted 1

week after quarterly
examination.

1. Organize functional
Homeroom PTA
organization
(5%)

Organized functional Homeroom One of the evidences not

PTA association supported the satisfied
following evidences:
1. List of officers
.
2. minutes of meetings
3 Project completion report
(project)
4. Parent support (Services)
5. Report on Parent teacher
conference.

June
2015

Community
Involvement
(10%)

10%

2. Initiated or chaired a
committee of Community
Involvement/ projects/
events/
Activities
(5%)

1. Conducted Action
Research
(10%)

June
2015March
2016

and home visitation

conducted 25 days after
quarterly examination.

QUALITY
two of the evidences not
satisfied

three of the evidences not

satisfied

four of the evidences not

satisfied

Organized, conducted and

submitted reports three
weeks after the set target
date

Organized, conducted and

submitted reports one month
after the set target date

Organized, conducted and

submitted reports within the
target date

TIMELINESS
Organized, conducted and Organized, conducted and
submitted reports one week submitted reports two weeks
after the set target date
after the set target date

QUALITY
Chairman/Initiated of 2
project/event/
activity supported with
documpents like proposal,
terminal report, certificate of
recognition, request, invitation,
etc.

Mermber of a committee of 2
project/event/
activity supported with
documpents like proposal,
terminal report, certificate of
recognition, request,
invitation, etc.

QUALITY:
Conducted 1 Action Research
with complete documentation
(approved proposal and
approved terminal report)
EFFICIENCY:
The Action Research was
approved without revision

June
2015March
2016

June
2015-

and home visitation conducted and home visitation

15 days after quarterly
conducted 20 days after
examination.
quarterly examination.

Chairman/Initiated of 1
project/event/
activity supported with
documpents like proposal,
terminal report, certificate of
recognition, request, invitation,
etc.

Member of a committee of 1 Proposed an activity/ event/

project/event/
project.
activity supported with
documpents like proposal,
terminal report, certificate of
recognition, request,
invitation, etc.

EFFICIENCY
Submitted project proposal with Project proposal was returned Project proposal was returned Project
proposal
was Project proposal was
no revision (Complete parts/ once with revision based fromtwice with revision based from returned more than thrice returned for major revision
documentation)
DREC
suggestions, DREC suggestions, comments with revision based from (total revision/ disapproved)
*Request Letter to the
comments
andand recommendation
DREC
suggestions,
barangay/ Homeroom
recommendation
comments
and
PTA Officers
recommendation
*Approval from the
Concerned barangay
official
*Approval Sheet
(School/ district/
DREC ) and
*Write-up
TIMELINESS
Implemented/served project,
Implemented/served project,
Implemented/served project, Implemented/served project,
event activity within the target event activity one week after Implemented/served project, event activity two months
event activity three months
date.
the target date.
event activity one month after after the target date.
after the target date
the target date.

25%
2. Served as coach/
facilitator/Technical

and home visitation

conducted 10 days after
quarterly examination.

Conducted the action

Approved research proposal
research and terminal report and in the process of
not completed.
implementation.

Submitted research proposal Identified learning problems

for approval.
and in the process of writing
the proposal

The Action Research was

returned once for minor
corrections

The Action Research was

returned twice for minor
corrections

The Action Research was

The Action Research was
returned for revision of some returned for complete
parts
revision

Completed the Action

Research a month after the
planned time frame

Did not complete the Action Did not attempt to complete

Research within the rating the Action Research within
period
the rating period.

TIMELINESS:
Completed the Action Research Completed the Action
within the time frame
Research a week after the
planned time frame
QUALITY
Garnered an award at the
Garnered 1 award at the

Garnered I award at the district Participated in 2 co-curricular Participated in 1 co-

Officials in extra and cocurricular activities.

(5%)
3. Produced publication/
Professional creative work for school
paper/division
Growth and publication/Community
Devt
paper or compose any
literary pieces for contest
purposes.
(5%)
4. Attended Trainings/
Workshops/
Seminars
(5%)

regional level competition of any division level competition of

curricular activities or served as curricular activities or served
technical official in 1 coas technical official in cocurricular activities at the
curricular activities at the
regional level.
division level

March
2016

QUALITY
Produced 2 publications or
creative work published in a
community paper or composed
any literary pieces for contest
purposes.

March
2016

QUALITY
Attended at least 5
Attended at least 4
Trainings/workshops/seminars Trainings/workshops/seminar
conducted by the Department of s conducted by the
Education or any training
Department of Education or
endorsed by deped authorities any training endorsed by
deped authorities

June

QUALITY:
1 dropout

3. Masters Degree(4%)

June
2015March
2016
June
2015March
2016

curricular activities at district

level for elementary and
division level for secondary

Produced 1 publication or
creative work published in
a school paper

Unpublished work produced

Attended at least 3
Trainings/workshops/seminars
or any training endorsed by
deped authorities

Attended at least 2
Trainings/workshops/semin
ars conducted by the
Department of Education

Attended at least 1
Training/workshop/seminar
conducted by the
Department of Education

2 dropouts

3 dropouts

4 or more dropouts

Maintained 0 dropout rate

2016

2. Served as
facilitators
/working
Plus
committee/lecturer
Factor(10%)
during school/
community activities(3%)

Produced 1 publication or
Produced 1 publication or
creative work published in a creative work published in a
community paper or
Division Paper
composed any piece for
contest purposes.

June
2015March
2016

1. Maintained 0 drop out 2015rate(3%)

March

level competition of curricular activities

activities for elem and school At the division level
level for sec. or served as
technical official in 1 cocurricular activities at the
district or school level

10%

QUALITY:
Served as facilitators /working
committee/lecturer during
school/ community in at least 5
activities with the following
evidences:
a. certification
b. pictorials
c. programs/narrative report
Masters Degree holder

Served as facilitators /working

committee/lecturer during
school/ community in at least 5
activities

Completed academic
requirements

QUALITY:
Completed at least 21 to 32
units of MA

Served as facilitators
/working committee/lecturer
during school/ community in
at least 5 activities

Completed at least 15 to 18 Planning to enroll in MA

units of MA

OVERALLRATINGFOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

Ratee: ABEGAL H. LAQUIAO

Teacher I

Rater:

LILIAN C. MOLINA
Master Teacher I

Approved:

HERMINIA F. DAPEG
Principal I