Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
, combustion) for
emissions of the driving gases and aerosols. They are also connected because the atmospheric lifecycles of common
air pollutants such as CO, NOx and VOCs, and of the climatically important methane gas (CH4) and sulfate aerosols,
both involve the fast photochemistry of the hydroxyl free radical (OH). Thus policies designed to address air pollution
may impact climate and vice versaSolid waste management processes and climate change
operate at similar timescales, as such; there is a need to understand what the potential
climate change impacts may be on waste management. The scope of this study was
limited only to municipal and household waste
The Earths atmosphere contains many types
Climate change could result in
of gases, including those known as
changes in temperatures, cloud
greenhouse gases which hold in the suns
warmth. Scientists call this naturally occurring
cover, rainfall patterns, wind
the greenhouse effect.
speeds, and storms: all factors that phenomenon
Greenhouse gases help regulate global
could impact future waste
temperatures. Certain human activities such as
burning fossil fuels and dumping solid waste,
management facilities
however, produce additional greenhouse gases
development and operation. The and upset the natural balance by raising global
time scales for climate change and temperatures. Global temperature has risen by
about 0.60C over the last 100 years and 1998
waste management are similar.
was the single warmest year in the 142 year
For instance, landfill sites can be global instrumental record (Hulme et al,
2002). Climate change could have an impact
operational for decades and still on the waste management industry, and given
the operational time frame for many waste
remain active for decades
sites, there is a need to examine
following their closure. There is, management
whether the issues that arise are of such
significance that policy or op
therefore, a need to consider
How Solid Waste Impacts Climate Change
potential changes in waste
management over significant
Even before a material or product becomes a
solid waste, it goes through a long cycle that
timescales and respond
involves removing and processing raw
appropriately.
materials, manufacturing the product,
transporting the materials and products to
markets, and using energy to transform the product. Each of these activities has the potential to generate
greenhouse gas emissions through one or more of the following means:
a. Energy Consumption: Extracting and processing raw materials, manufacturing products, and transporting
materials and products to markets all generate greenhouse gas emissions by consuming energy from fossil
fuels.
b. Methane Emissions: When organic waste decomposes in landfills and dumps, it generates methane, a
greenhouse gas.
c. Carbon Storage: Trees absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, from the air and store it in wood through
carbon sequestration. Waste prevention and recycling of wood and paper products allow more trees to remain
standing in the forest, where they can continue to remove carbon dioxide from the air, which helps minimize
climate change impacts.
Different wastes and waste management activities have varying impacts on energy
consumption, methane emissions, and carbon storage. For example, recycling reduces
greenhouse gas emissions by preventing methane emissions from landfills or open
dumps and by preventing the consumption of energy for extracting impacts of
construction on climate change
The cement sector alone accounts for 5% of global man-made CO2 emissions.
Highest impact is the mining/manufacture of materials and chemicals.
Transport of heavy materials such as cement is energy-intensive, but most building
materials
tend to be sourced from close-by facilities.
The chemical processes and use of fuel/electricity account for the major portion of the
sectors CO2 emissions.
On-site construction of buildings is relatively low-impact, mainly energy use;
influenced by
choice of building materials, construction techniques, and modes/ distances of
transportation.
The maintenance of buildings is higher impact due to significant energy use (esp.
heating,
lighting); New building regulations impact on requirements for maintenance and demolitionnd processing
raChennai is not on this list, and that might be a very good thing. Here are some huge demerits
to high-rises.
| EMAIL | SHARE +
Analysis by CSE exposes steady and rapid increase in pollution levels, high
local impacts and high traces of toxics making its air dangerous to breathe
Over the last two decades, share of bus and train ridership has dropped
drastically. The share of personal vehicle trips has increased
Garbage
Introduction: The disposal and treatment of waste can produce
emissions of several greenhouse gases (GHGs), which contribute
to global climate change. Global temperature has risen by about
0.60C over the last 100 years. Each greenhouse gas differs in its
ability to trap heat in the atmosphere. Methane traps over 21
times more heat than carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide absorbs
310 times more than carbon dioxide. The higher the heat trapping
potential of the gas, the greater the impact on climate change.
Efforts to decrease emissions of these gases help reduce climate
change impacts.
The most significant GHG gas produced from waste is methane. It
is released during the breakdown of organic matter in landfills.
Other forms of waste disposal also produce GHGs but these are
mainly in the form of carbon dioxide (a less powerful GHG). Even
the recycling of waste produces some emissions (although these
are offset by the reduction in fossil fuels that would be required to
obtain new raw materials). Waste prevention and recycling help
address global climate change by decreasing the amount of
greenhouse gas emissions and saving energy (Environmental
Protection Agency.
The beauty of T.Nagar lies in the restoration to its past glory. The
stunning growth of this part of Chennai city is stunted only by the
ever increasing mounds of garbage menace. This threat is one
which needs the utmost attention before we compromise its illeffects and settle down to continue with no awareness to our bad
habits. It is the problem of the society and the attitude of the
present inhabitants. The broad objectives are to reduce the
amount of garbage in T.Nagar.
Objectives: To minimize the global warming due to methane emission from
solid waste by:
carry out composting in our own backyard. We can use the leaves,
grass, twigs and add vegetable and fruit peels and skins. We can
use khambha for composting. After a few days, you will see that
the matter has decomposed. We can use this compost, which is
rich in nutrients, to improve the soil in our garden.
3. Landfills
Waste management through the use of landfills involves the use
of a large area. This place is dug open and filled with the waste.
The area is then covered up with soil. Landfills are not safe
because they give off gases like methane, which are highly
hazardous. We should not carry out waste management through
landfills if we cannot ensure proper safety means. The landfill
should be properly lined and the waste should not come in
contact with the adjoining areas.
Hypothesis
As the cities are growing in size and problems seen as the
generation of plastic waste, various municipal waste treatment
and disposal methods are now being used to try resolving these
problems. Garbage generation in household can be recycled and
reused to prevent creation of waste at sources and reducing
amount of waste thrown into the community dustbins. So
Effective waste management reduces landfill implications.
Effective waste management saves money for councils.
Effective waste management creates a cleaner environment.
Effective waste management results in reduced global warming.
T.Nagar has lost its beauty as it can literally be seen in the above
picture. This picture is taken from the tremendous shopping area,
the Ranganathan Street. This is because of over-population and
over-exploitation of natural & artificial resources. People have
thrown their garbage on the street which not-at-all a human
activity.
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Year
No.Of Tons
Questionnaire to Residents
Name:
Age:
Designation:
1. What do you normally do with organic waste materials from your kitchen? For
example, vegetable peels, coffee grounds, eggshells etc.
Place in regular garbage without segregating / Backyard composter/ dont
know/Unsure
Other (specify): ____________________________________________________________________
2. If you have a backyard composter do you use it all year round?
Yes /No/ dont know/Unsure /Not applicable
3. What do you normally do with the grass clippings from your lawn?
Place in regular garbage /dig into garden Backyard composter
Leave on lawn / mulch/ dont know/unsure /Lawn service takes away
Other (specify): ____________________________________________________________________
4. And what about leaves? How do you normally dispose of leaves that fall on
your property?
Place in regular garbage/ Dig into garden Backyard composter
Leave on lawn / mulch Bring to Landfill compost area
Please Tick:Method
household
garbage
storage
of
Closed container
Open
container
Plastic
bags
6. How often the corporation people remove the garbage from the dust-bin?
i) Once-Daily
No.
Agree Disagre
e
No
opinion
Yes
No
Dont
Know
Analysis Report
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
94%
78%
94%
17%
No.of people
No.Of People
From the above analysis we infer that 17% of the residents are
segregating garbage, 94% are aware of composting, 78% are
willing to participate in Environmental Programs and 94% are
willing to use eco-friendly products. Even though 94% of the
residents are aware of composting, only 17% of the residents are
GREENHOUSE GASES:
Some greenhouse gasessuch as water vapor, carbon dioxide,
methane, nitrous oxide, and ozoneoccur naturally in the
atmosphere, while others result from human activities.
Carbon dioxide is released to the atmosphere when solid waste,
fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), and wood and wood
products are burned.
Methane is emitted during the production and transport of coal,
natural gas, and oil; the decomposition of organic wastes in
municipal solid waste landfills; and by livestock.
Nitrous oxide is emitted during agricultural and industrial
activities, as well as during the combustion of solid waste and
fossil fuels.
| EMAIL | SHARE +
Chennai (72) is one of the highest in cities studied in India third after Kolkata (150) and
Delhi (100).
Mobility crisis
Explosive numbers: Vehicle population increased from less than 5 lakh in 1991 to more
than 30 lakh today. Cars are 20 per cent and two-wheelers 55 per cent of the total vehicular
fleet. Two-wheelers and cars are 31 per cent of the total travel trips and approximately 75
per cent of the total vehicular fleet on road. Two-wheelers saw a phenomenal growth from 4
lakh in 1991 to 21.6 lakh in 2009..Average vehicles per household have increased from 0.25
to 1.26. It is said about Chennai that if we add two-wheelers, then personal motorization in
the city is higher than that of Mexico City. An average of more than 800 new two-wheelers is
registered every day in the city.
| EMAIL | SHARE +
Analysis by CSE exposes steady and rapid increase in pollution levels, high
local impacts and high traces of toxics making its air dangerous to breathe
Over the last two decades, share of bus and train ridership has dropped
drastically. The share of personal vehicle trips has increased
Chennai, August 6, 2013: According to this years Global Burden of Disease estimates,
one-fifth of deaths across the world occur from outdoor air pollution. Also, outdoor air
pollution is the fifth leading cause of deaths in India. These alarming pieces of information
have drawn everyones attention and forced experts to take stock of pollution trends in
Indias cities including Chennai.
A recent analysis of Chennais air quality, done by Centre for Science and Environment
(CSE), the New Delhi-based research and advocacy body, indicates that though Chennai
shows deceptively low to moderate pollution levels because of its location near the sea,
local impacts and exposure are high and the pollution levels are rising steadily, thereby
increasing public health risks.
CSE released the findings of its analysis here today at a stakeholder workshop conducted in
association with the Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board. Bhure Lal, chairperson of the
Supreme Courts Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority, and Anumita
Roychowdhury, executive director-research and advocacy, CSE addressed the participants.
Said Roychowdhury: Chennais case is different from the trends observed in other highgrowth mega cities where overall ambient air pollution is very high. But this must not breed
complacency as detailed scanning of available pollution data as well as research studies
point to steady and rapid increase over time, high local impacts and high traces of toxics
making Chennais air dangerous to breathe. This demands more rigorous scrutiny of air
pollution profile and aggressive action in this rapidly motorizing city.
CSE findings the key highlights
Annual average levels of particulates increasing rapidly: Though lower than other
mega cities of India, a rapid escalation in levels has been witnessed: PM10 levels have
increased from 32 microgramme per cu m in 2007 to 94 microgramme per cu m in 2011 (a
193 per cent jump) increasing at 29 per cent a year.
Annual average levels of nitrogen dioxide increasing at a more rapid rate than
PM10: Between 2007 and 2011, NO2 levels rose from 9 microgramme per cu m to 24
microgramme per cu m -- an increase of 166 per cent, at 60 per cent a year. An official
source apportionment study in Chennai carried out by IIT Madras under the aegis of the
environment ministry attributes 63 per cent of nitrogen oxides to vehicles.
Vehicles are a special problem
High exposure to vehicular fumes: Vehicles pose a special challenge. In terms of actual
exposure, people are more vulnerable to vehicular fumes while traveling and in close
proximity to roads. Pollution concentration in our breath is 3-4 times higher than the ambient
air concentration. In densely-populated cities, more than 50-60 per cent of the population
lives or works near the roadside where levels are much higher. This is very serious in low
income neighbourhoods located close to roads. Road users, public transport users, walkers
and cyclists are the most exposed groups they are also the urban majority.
Vehicles contribute hugely to air pollution: Source apportionment studies carried out in
Chennai by Madras IIT under the aegis of the Ministry of Environment and Forests show
vehicles contribute 14 per cent of particulate matter and 68 per cent of nitrogen oxides.
Some other studies show that 35 per cent of PM2.5 in Chennai comes from vehicles -- tinier
the particles higher the share of vehicles.
Chennai records very high exposure to vehicular pollution: A study carried out by
scientists of University of Berkeley published in Environmental Science and Technology in
2012 shows that the exposure to vehicular fumes (in terms of population-weighted intake
fraction, or the grams of vehicle pollution inhaled per grams of vehicle pollution emitted) in
Chennai (72) is one of the highest in cities studied in India third after Kolkata (150) and
Delhi (100).
Leapfrog technology to address diesel emission which is a class 1 carcinogen: India
is motorising at a level of technology and fuel quality that can compound health risks. There
are special concerns about growing use of poor quality diesel. The International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC), a wing of the WHO, has said that diesel engine exhaust can
certainly cause cancer, especially lung cancer in humans. This finding comes at a time
when India has failed to adopt a clean diesel road map, prevent use of under-taxed and
under-priced toxic diesel in cars.
Mobility crisis
Explosive numbers: Vehicle population increased from less than 5 lakh in 1991 to more
than 30 lakh today. Cars are 20 per cent and two-wheelers 55 per cent of the total vehicular
fleet. Two-wheelers and cars are 31 per cent of the total travel trips and approximately 75
per cent of the total vehicular fleet on road. Two-wheelers saw a phenomenal growth from 4
lakh in 1991 to 21.6 lakh in 2009..Average vehicles per household have increased from 0.25
to 1.26. It is said about Chennai that if we add two-wheelers, then personal motorization in
the city is higher than that of Mexico City. An average of more than 800 new two-wheelers is
registered every day in the city.
Learn from Delhis experience. Delhi has not been able to solve its problem of pollution and
congestion by building more roads and flyovers for cars. Delhi is most privileged to have
more than 21 per cent of its geographical area under road space. Delhi has built the
maximum roads and flyovers. Yet its roads are totally gridlocked. Peak hour traffic has even
slumped to below 15 km/hour. Cars and two-wheelers in Delhi occupy 90 per cent of the
road space but meet less than 20 per cent of the travel demand. More roads are not the
answer.
Sign of congestions: Level of congestion on arterials and other major roads has increased
eight-fold over the period 1984 to 2008. According to the estimates of the Chennai
Corporation there were 10 key arterial roads in 1993-94 with journey speed of 31-40
km/hour. Now only 3 roads have this kind of speed. Similarly, there were only 2 roads with
average peak hour journey speed of 11-20 km/hour then. Now the number of roads in the
class has increased to 20. Not only the vehicles taking over road but also the urban space
to meet the insatiable demand for parking.
Cars meet miniscule of travel demand yet car centric infrastructure getting priority: In
Chennai cars meet only 7 per cent of the daily travel demand and two-wheelers as much as
26 per cent. This means the majority are either using public transport or walking and
cycling. This will steadily undermine multi modal public transport which is a comparative
strength of Chennai. This requires immediate intervention to scale up, reinvent and redesign
the sustainable modes to protect the public transport, and walking share a rich legacy of
the city.
Erosion of public transport ridership: Over the last two decades share of bus, train and
bicycle ridership has dropped drastically in the city. The share of personal vehicles trips
have increased. Cycle rickshaws have totally vanished from the city, negatively impacting
the last mile connectivity. Significant increase noted in the share of two wheeler trips
followed by car trips.
CSE checked out the impact of car centric infrastructure on pollution and carbon emissions
in a few locations. This is diagnostic. Car centric infrastructure (signal free roads, flyovers
and foot over bridges etc) increases interferes with walking accessibility, increases travel
distances, encourage more motorized travel, and lead to more emissions. For example,
access to Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board is impeded due to signal free corridor
and a fly over. The detour increases the car distance from the study point from 600 meters
of walking access to close to 4km car ride. This makes one petrol car emit about 0.024
gram of extra PM and a diesel car about 0.24 gram of PM -- 10 times higher than petrol car.
At the same time the cars depending on the engine size emit heat trapping carbon dioxide
of about 504 to 592 grams of CO2 depending upon car engine capacity. Similar issues have
been noted in other locations including Alandur Road, Anna Salai to Guindy Metro station,
Travel distance- 4 Kms taken by car. The cumulative impact of the detour on the traffic
volume can be enormous. Such impacts must be assessed for traffic impact assessment of
any road engineering projects.
Make livable cities to cut toxic emissions
CSEs ongoing opinion survey in Chennai reveals that majority feels that air pollution is
worsening and vehicles are largely to be blamed for it. Action on air pollution has begun in
Chennai but needs to gather momentum. The first generation action includes successive
introduction of Bharat Stage I-II-III emissions standards, introduction of LPG in autos,
notification of lubricant standards for two-stroke engines, bypass heavy duty trucks during
day hours, strengthening of pollution control efforts in other sectors and so on.
The pollution challenge demands second generation action to keep ahead of the problem.
The city has the chance to plan its future growth differently and avoid the path of pollution,
congestion and energy guzzling. More road space is not the answer. It needs to make
maximum investment in redesigning the existing road space and travel pattern and achieve
compact urban form to provide the majority of the people affordable and efficient mode of
public transport that can be an alternative to personal vehicles. It is time to set new terms of
action. Soft options have all been exhausted.
Strengthen air quality, health monitoring and risk communication:Review the
monitoring network keeping in mind the growth in pollution, unique challenges of the city,
population exposed and newer challenges like ozone, PM2.5 and toxics. It should
strengthen its monitoring grid, deploy air quality forecasting modes, must regularly and
systematically monitor the health indicators. At the same time implement an air quality index
system and health advisory for informing people about ill effects of poor air quality.