Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
88 / Monday, May 9, 2005 / Notices
Shanxi Fengkun, Winhere, and ZLAP
will be the rates determined in the final
results of review (except that if a rate is
de minimis, i.e., less than 0.50 percent,
no cash deposit will be required); (2) the
cash deposit rate for PRC exporters who
received a separate rate in a prior
segment of the proceeding (which were
not reviewed in this segment of the
proceeding) will continue to be the rate
assigned in that segment of the
proceeding (i.e., Luqi, Shenyang
Yinghao, and Xumingyuan); (3) the cash
deposit rate for the PRC NME entity
(including Huanri General and Rotec)
will continue to be 43.32 percent; and
(4) the cash deposit rate for non–PRC
exporters of subject merchandise from
the PRC will be the rate applicable to
the PRC exporter that supplied that
exporter.
These requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next
administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
These administrative and new shipper
reviews and notice are in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213
and 351.214.
Dated: May 2, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–2229 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–588–824)
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From Japan: Notice
of Extension of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review.
AGENGY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 9, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003 17:20 May 06, 2005 Jkt 205001
24393
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett or James Terpstra,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4161 or (202) 482–
3965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published an
antidumping duty order on certain
corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat
products from Japan on August 19,
1993. See Antidumping Duty Order:
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from Japan, 58 FR
44163 (August 19, 1993). Nucor
Corporation (‘‘Nucor’’), the petitioner,
requested that the Department conduct
an administrative review of the order.
See Letter from Nucor Corporation,
August 31, 2004. On September 22,
2004, the Department published a notice
of initiation of administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat
products from Japan, covering the
period of August 1, 2003, to July 31,
2004. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation, In
Part, 69 FR 56745. The preliminary
results for this review are currently due
no later than May 3, 2005.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section
351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s
regulations allow the Department to
extend this deadline to a maximum of
365 days.
Both respondents, JFE and Nippon
Steel, have declined to participate in
this review. As such, the Department
will apply adverse facts available
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the
Act. The Department has continuing
concerns about what the appropriate
rate is to assign to JFE and Nippon Steel
as adverse facts available. Therefore, the
Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the original time period, and is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results by 30 days to
PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
no later than June 2, 2005. We intend to
issue the final results no later than 120
days after publication of the notice of
the preliminary results. This notice is
being issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Dated: May 3, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–2230 Filed 5–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–805, A–428–807, A–412–805)
Sodium Thiosulfate from the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, and the
United Kingdom: Final Results of
Sunset Reviews and Revocation of
Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 2, 2005, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) initiated the sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on sodium thiosulfate from the People’s
Republic of China, Germany and the
United Kingdom (70 FR 5415). Because
the domestic interested parties did not
participate in these sunset reviews, the
Department is revoking these
antidumping duty orders.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 2005
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hilary Sadler, Esq., Office of Policy,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4340.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 19, 1991, the Department
issued antidumping duty orders on
sodium thiosulfate from the People’s
Republic of China, Germany, and the
United Kingdom (56 FR 2904). On July
1, 1999, the Department initiated sunset
reviews on these orders and later
published its notice of continuation of
the antidumping duty orders. See
Continuation of Antidumping Duty
Orders: Sulfur Chemicals (Sodium
Thiosulfate) from the Untied Kingdom,
Germany and the People’s Republic of
China, 65 FR 11985 (March 7, 2000). On
February 2, 2005, the Department
initiated the second sunset reviews of
these orders.
09MYN1