Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Contemporary
Sociology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 77.105.21.162 on Wed, 20 May 2015 20:35:33 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
CONTEMPORARYSOCIOLOGY 299
The domestication of critique and the
been sacrificed.We have lost sightof "The
Degradation of Work in the Twentieth interpretiveturn coincide with the separaCentury."Braverman'spoint of departure tion of intellectuals from the working class.
who obtainsfulfillmentLabor and Monopoly Capital described the
was the craftworker
throughthe creationof objects firstcon- eclipse of the industrial craftworker,but it
ceived in the imagination.His point of could as well have been about the eclipse of
conclusionwas the vision of an alternative the intellectual craftworkerwho unites the
future,
a socialismthatwould notrestorethe academy with the working class, who resists
but would instead recombine the intense professionalizationof the univercraftworker
conceptionand executionat the collective sity, who refuses to package the lived
level to forgea classlesssocietybased on experience ofworkersforscholasticconsumpdemocraticplanning.This double critique tion. Once an artisan, now an organic
ofa vanishing
pastand a intellectual, Braverman strove to refute his
fromthestandpoint
utopianfutureeasilydisappearsin a welterof own thesis, to be an exception to his own
theeclipse laws. And here lies Braverman's crowning
Moreover,
"explanation."
scientific
of materialistcritique opens the door to and lastingachievement:As a product of the
dissolvedinto a linguis- unityof mental and manual work,Labor and
idealism-structure
tic construction,and historyreduced to Monopoly Capital proclaimed itself against
narrative.Experience becomes discourse, the very tendencies it so persuasively described.
oppressionbecomestalkabouttalk.
Universityof California,Berkeley
Originalreview, CS 4:6 (November 1975), by
Elizabeth Colson:
of Cultures:SelectedEsThe Interpretation
says, by CliffordGeertz. New York: Basic
Books [1973] 1993. $20.00 paper. ISBN:
0-465-09719-7.
This content downloaded from 77.105.21.162 on Wed, 20 May 2015 20:35:33 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
300
CONTEMPORARYSOCIOLOGY
This content downloaded from 77.105.21.162 on Wed, 20 May 2015 20:35:33 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
CONTEMPORARYSOCIOLOGY 301
understandingthe meanings that animate a
cultural system.
In history, first and foremost, Geertz's
work legitimated taking seriously popular
culture, the culture of subordinated groups,
and the symbolsand discourse even of major
political events. Historians were also freed
from focusing on events, or on such hard
realities as birth rates, marriagepatterns,or
material life.The abilityto focus on particular, even obscure texts,and then to ask what
they revealed about the larger complex of
meanings within a society, meant that historians could focus not only on popular rituals,
but also on little-known,unusual, or even
bizarre events,examiningthem forwhat they
reveal about deeper cultural patterns in a
society. The loosening of the strictureson
how central, how repeated, or how institutionalized a practice needs to be to serve as a
text allowed a historian like Natalie Zemon
Davis to move fromstudyingwell-institutionalized ritual practices like charivari to
studyingthe single episode of the disappearance and "return" of Martin Guerre. Robert
Darnton moved fromstudyingthe influence
of popular belief and practice on major social
transformations
(the influenceof mesmerism
on Enlightenmentthought,or the influence
of book censorship on French political
thought) to using particular engaging, but
often atypical,events or stories as texts that
reveal the whole structure of meanings
available in a historicalera.
Geertz's revolutionhas also met substantial
resistance. In anthropologythere is by now
an enormous critical literature (see Shankman 1984; Asad 1983; Biersack 1989; Parker
1985; Wikan 1991). Some argue thatinterpretation is insufficient,
that Geertz provides no
criteria for an adequate interpretation,and
thatinterpretationis substantivelyinferiorto
explanation. Geertz has also been attacked
for exoticizing the peoples he studies,
makingthem seem foreignand incomprehensible so that their texts require elaborate
"interpretation."And he has been taken to
task for neglecting or actively obscuring
power, domination,conflict,historicalchange,
and the colonial context of the societies he
studies. He has also had to face the increasing
resistance in anthropology by "natives" to
being "translated"at all, theirinsistence that
indigenous understandingsare privileged.
These are not, however, quite the issues
This content downloaded from 77.105.21.162 on Wed, 20 May 2015 20:35:33 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
302
CONTEMPORARYSOCIOLOGY
A DifferentPoststructuralism
CRAIG CALHOUN
This content downloaded from 77.105.21.162 on Wed, 20 May 2015 20:35:33 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions