Você está na página 1de 2

15872 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices

present boundaries of any Indian Description of respondents: Qualified FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
reservation on June 1, 1934; (c) you are Indians who are seeking preference in Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific
an Alaska Native; or (d) you possess employment with the BIA and IHS. Region Public Affairs Officer, Jeff
one-half degree Indian blood derived Approximately a total of 5,000 McCracken, at (916) 978–5100.
from tribes that are indigenous to the applications for preference in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prohibited
United States. The information is employment are received annually by Acts: The following acts are prohibited
submitted in order to obtain or retain a the BIA field offices. in the closure area.
benefit, namely, preference in Frequency: On occasion as needed. A. Operating a motorized vehicle of
employment with the BIA and the IHS. Estimated completion time: The any kind, including stopping, standing,
average burden of submitting an Indian or parking in the closure area.
II. Request for Comments Preference Form is 30 minutes General Exception: Operations,
The Department of the Interior invites including time for reviewing maintenance, and construction
comments on: instructions, searching data sources and personnel that have express written
(a) Whether the collection of assembling the information needed. authorization from the Mid-Pacific
information is necessary for the proper Total annual burden: 5,000 × 1⁄2 hour Regional Director, NCAO Area Manager
performance of the functions of the = 2500 hours. or his/her designee, law enforcement
agency, including whether the Estimated cost: There are no costs to
and fire department officials;
information will have practical utility; consider, except postage and the cost of
ambulances and others who have
(b) The accuracy of the agency’s duplicating the original verification
received express written authorization
estimate of the burden (including the form, because verification of the
to enter the closure area.
hours and cost) of the proposed information is already available for
B. Entering the closure area on foot,
collection of information, including the other reasons. The form will be used by
on bicycle, or by any other means.
validity of the methodology and an applicant to seek documentation of
General Exception: Reclamation
assumption used; Indian descent or membership from
employees acting within the scope of
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, either a tribal official or the BIA.
their employment; operations,
utility, and clarity of the information to Dated: February 11, 2005. maintenance, and construction
be collected; and David W. Anderson, personnel that have express
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. authorization from the Mid-Pacific
the collection of information on those [FR Doc. 05–6114 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am] Regional Director, NCAO Area Manager,
who are to respond, including through BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P or his/her designee, law enforcement
the use of appropriate automated, and fire department officials; and others
electronic, mechanical, or other who have received express written
collection techniques or other forms of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR authorization from the Mid-Pacific
information technology. Regional Director, NCAO Area Manager,
The Office of Management and Budget Bureau of Reclamation or his/her designee to enter the closure
has up to 60 days to approve or area.
disapprove the information collection Closure Order Establishing Limited Exception: Pedestrians and
but may respond after 30 days; Prohibitions at Trinity Lake, CA bicyclists may enter that portion of the
therefore, comments submitted in AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, closure area along the west side of the
response to this notice should be Interior. river for the purpose of fishing. All
submitted to OMB within 30 days in ACTION: Notice of closure. persons shall comply with all signs and
order to assure their maximum other directions as posted or disclosed.
consideration. Our practice is to make SUMMARY: Purpose of Closure Order: This limited exception to the closure
comments, including names and home This closure is issued to provide for the order may be revoked at any time to
addresses of respondents, available for protection of Federal property and to meet operational, security, or safety
public review during regular business ensure public safety at Reclamation concerns as determined by the area
hours. If you wish us to withhold any facilities. manager or his/her designee.
information, you must state this Closure Areas: Under the authority of C. Operating a vessel or watercraft of
prominently at the beginning of your 43 CFR 423.3(b) the following facilities, any kind, swimming, or scuba diving.
comment. We will honor your request to lands, and waters are closed to the General Exception: Reclamation
the extent allowable by law. Please note public: The crest of Trinity Dam and employees acting within the scope of
that an agency may not conduct or adjacent property, buildings, and their employment; operations,
sponsor, and a person is not required to facilities under the control of maintenance, and construction
respond to, a collection of information Reclamation. The closure area includes personnel that have express
unless a currently valid OMB control the area from the dam crest to the authorization from the Mid-Pacific
number is displayed. You may request upstream waterline and 700 feet Regional Director, NCAO Area Manager,
copies of the information collection downstream of Trinity Dam and 700 feet or his/her designee, law enforcement
forms and our submission to OMB from on either side of the entire width of the and fire department officials; and others
the person listed in FOR FURTHER dam downstream. who have received express written
INFORMATION CONTACT section. DATES: The entire closure area is to authorization from the Mid-Pacific
remain closed effective April 10, 2005, Regional Director, NCAO Area Manager,
III. Data and remain closed indefinitely except as or his/her designee to enter the closure
Title: Verification of Indian Preference permitted as described below. area.
for Employment in the BIA and the IHS, ADDRESSES: A map is available for D. Fires.
BIA Form 4432, 25 CFR 5. inspection at Reclamation’s Northern E. Vandalism or destroying, injuring,
OMB approval number: 1076–0160. California Area Office (NCAO), located defacing, or damaging real property that
Type of Request: Extension of a at 16349 Shasta Dam Boulevard, Shasta is not under one’s lawful control or
currently approved collection. Lake, California 96019. possession.

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:01 Mar 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Notices 15873

F. Tampering or attempting to tamper review of the Operating Criteria and 11. Irrigation & Electrical Districts
with property or real property, or inviting comments regarding whether Association of Arizona.
moving, manipulating, or setting in the Operating Criteria should be 12. Colorado Water Conservation
motion any of the parts thereof. modified, and if so, how they should be Board, State of Colorado.
Violation of the prohibition listed in modified (67 FR 1986). The January 15, 13. New Mexico Interstate Stream
43 CFR part 423 is punishable by fine 2002, notice provided for a comment Commission.
or imprisonment for not more than 6 period that ended on March 18, 2002. 14. Office of the Attorney General,
months, or both. On March 6, 2002, a second notice was Water & Natural Resources Division,
published in the Federal Register State of Wyoming.
Dated: March 2, 2005. 15. International Boundary and Water
Michael J. Ryan, extending the comment period to March
29, 2002, and inviting public feedback Commission, United States and Mexico.
Area Manager, Northern California Area 16. State of Utah, Department of
Office, Mid-Pacific Region. on whether or not Reclamation should
Natural Resources, Division of Water
conduct a public meeting to solicit
[FR Doc. 05–6112 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am] Resources.
comments as part of the sixth review of The comment letters were reviewed
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
the Operating Criteria (67 FR 10225). A for identification of and analysis of the
letter was then sent to all interested issues. Responses to the comment
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR parties, tribes, and stakeholders on letters, as well as the corresponding
March 7, 2002, that included copies of number of the party that made the
Bureau of Reclamation both Federal Register notices and the comment, are provided under the
Operating Criteria. Synopsis of Comments and Responses
Review of Existing Coordinated Long- On June 27, 2002, a Fact Sheet section of this notice.
Range Operating Criteria for Colorado providing information on the Operating As required by Federal law, formal
River Reservoirs (Operating Criteria) Criteria, scope of the review process, consultation with the seven Basin
public participation, timeline for the States, interested parties and
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation review process, and contact information
(Reclamation), Interior. stakeholders, as well as government-to-
was sent to all interested parties and government consultation with tribal
ACTION: Notice of final decision stakeholders. In addition to the Fact
regarding the operating criteria. representatives, was conducted during
Sheet, Reclamation set up a Web site this review of the Operating Criteria.
SUMMARY: The purpose of this action is
(http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/ The January 15, 2002, Federal Register
to provide public notice that the lroc) for the sixth review of the notice stated that open public meetings
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has Operating Criteria that contained further would be conducted as part of this
made a number of limited modifications information on the review, copies of all review, and in the March 6, 2002,
to the text of the Operating Criteria comment letters received, and links to Federal Register notice, Reclamation
developed pursuant to section 602 of technical documents Reclamation felt asked for comments on whether or not
the Colorado River Basin Project Act of would be useful during the review a public meeting should be held. At the
1968. The bases for the changes are: (1) process. end of the comment period (March 29,
Specific change in Federal law Detailed written comments were 2002), several of those who provided
applicable to the Operating Criteria, (2) received from 16 interested parties comments stated that a public meeting
language in the current text of the providing Reclamation with numerous to solicit comments on the need to
Operating Criteria that is outdated, and issues, comments, and concerns revise the Operating Criteria was not
(3) specific modifications to Article regarding possible changes to the needed. Accordingly, Reclamation did
IV(b) of the Operating Criteria that Operating Criteria. The names of the not conduct a public meeting at that
reflect actual operating experience. The parties that provided comments, as well point in the review process.
review of the Operating Criteria has as the corresponding number assigned On November 3, 2004, a Notice of
been conducted through a public review by Reclamation to the comment letter, Proposed Decision Regarding the
process, including consultation with the are as follows: Operating Criteria and Announcement
seven Colorado River Basin States, tribal 1. Western Area Power of Public Consultation Meeting was
representatives, and interested parties Administration, Phoenix, Arizona. published in the Federal Register (69
and stakeholders. 2. Quechan Indian Tribe. FR 64096). The Notice identified the
3. Metropolitan Water District of proposed changes to the Operating
DATES: Effective Date: March 21, 2005.
Southern California. Criteria as Reclamation’s response to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4. National Park Service. comments received and invited public
Jayne Harkins, Bureau of Reclamation, 5. Arizona Department of Water input on those changes. The notice
Lower Colorado Region, P.O. Box 61470, Resources. announced that a public consultation
Boulder City, Nevada 89006–1470; 6. Sierra Club, Southwest Rivers, meeting would be held in Henderson,
telephone (702) 293–8411; faxogram Defenders of Wildlife, Land and Water Nevada, on November 19, 2004, and
(702) 293–8614; e-mail: Fund of the Rockies, Environmental provided for a comment period that
jharkins@lc.usbr.gov; or Tom Ryan, Defense, Pacific Institute, Friends of ended on December 6, 2004. On
Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Arizona Rivers, Living Rivers, and November 4, 2004, a letter was sent to
Region, 125 South State Street, Room American Rivers. all interested parties, tribes, and
6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138–1147; 7. Interested Party (this entity stakeholders containing a copy of the
telephone (801) 524–3732; faxogram requested that their name be withheld November 3, 2004, Federal Register
(801) 524–5499; e-mail: from public disclosure). notice.
tryan@uc.usbr.gov. 8. Colorado River Board of California. On November 19, 2004, a public
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 9. Western Area Power consultation meeting was conducted to
public review process began with a Administration, Salt Lake City, Utah. (1) Discuss the proposed changes to the
Federal Register notice published on 10. Upper Colorado River Operating Criteria as Reclamation’s
January 15, 2002, announcing the sixth Commission. response to comments received, (2)

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:01 Mar 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1

Você também pode gostar